chinese-reference-formatter-skill
Use when a user needs通用中文参考文献、GB/T 7714-style bibliography entries, Chinese academic reference formatting, or BibTeX completion from Chinese or English literature titles, including 根据文献名补全参考文献、生成中文论文参考文献格式、format Chinese academic references.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-09-18
- Stars
- ★ 234
- Forks
- 36
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- chinese-reference-formatter-skill
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "tags": "chinese-references, bibliography, bibtex, gb-t-7714, academic-writing", "author": "Zechang-Xiong", "version": "1.0.0", "repository": "https://github.com/Zechang-Xiong/chinese-reference-formatter-skill" }
- description
- Use when a user needs通用中文参考文献、GB/T 7714-style bibliography entries, Chinese academic reference formatting, or BibTeX completion from Chinese or English literature titles, including 根据文献名补全参考文献、生成中文论文参考文献格式、format Chinese academic references.
- compatibility
- Requires internet access for public metadata verification. Bundled formatter uses Python 3 standard library only.
02 资源文件 8
- 其他.gitignore38 B
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml252 B
- 许可证LICENSE1.0 KB
- 参考文档README.md9.5 KB
- 参考文档references/chinese-reference-rules.md3.9 KB
- 脚本scripts/format_reference.py15.0 KB
- 脚本scripts/test_format_reference.py3.5 KB
- 脚本scripts/test_skill_content.py1.2 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Chinese Reference Formatter
Overview
Convert one or more Chinese or English reference titles into通用中文论文参考文献条目 and BibTeX. Always verify bibliographic metadata from public sources before formatting; do not invent missing references.
Workflow
- Read
references/chinese-reference-rules.mdbefore formatting. - For each input title, search public metadata sources and compare title, authors, year, venue, DOI/ISBN/URL.
- Prefer DOI, publisher, university repository, official journal, official conference, official standards, or patent pages over aggregators.
- If no DOI or official page exists, require a strong title match plus matching author/year/venue from at least one credible source.
- If sources conflict and no source is clearly authoritative, return an ambiguity note instead of choosing.
- If no clear match exists, output
未找到与“<title>”明确对应的公开文献。 - Normalize confirmed metadata to JSON and run
scripts/format_reference.pyto produce the reference entry plus BibTeX.
Search Sources
Use sources appropriate to the document type:
- DOI and publisher metadata: Crossref, DataCite, official publisher pages.
- Broad scholarly metadata: OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar.
- Computer science papers: DBLP, arXiv, conference/open-review pages.
- Biomedical papers: PubMed/NCBI and official journal pages.
- Chinese references: DOI/publisher pages, university repositories, official journal pages; use CNKI/Wanfang metadata when reachable from web search.
- Standards, patents, books, theses: official standards bodies, patent offices, publishers, library catalogs, university repositories.
Formatting
The formatter accepts a JSON object, a JSON list, or { "items": [...] } through stdin or --input.
python scripts/format_reference.py --start 1 < metadata.json
Common normalized fields:
{
"type": "article",
"title": "Paper title",
"authors": ["Family, Given", "中文作者"],
"journal": "Journal name",
"booktitle": "Proceedings name",
"year": 2026,
"volume": "12",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "1-10",
"doi": "10.xxxx/example",
"url": "https://example.org",
"access_date": "2026-05-07",
"sources": ["https://source.example"]
}
Supported type values include article, inproceedings, book, chapter, thesis, report, standard, patent, newspaper, and online.
Default output for each resolved item:
标准参考文献:[1] ...
BibTeX:
```bibtex
...
```
核验来源:...
Preserve the user's input order. Start numbering at [1] unless the user gives a different starting number. Do not append to a project .bib file unless the user explicitly asks.
Conflict Rules
- DOI or official source metadata wins over aggregator metadata.
- Publisher version wins over preprint metadata when formatting the published version.
- Preprint metadata is valid only when the user asks for the preprint or no published version exists.
- If author order, year, venue, or page range conflicts, state the conflict and cite the competing sources.
- Use the actual current date for online access dates unless the source provides a citation access date or the user specifies one.
Common Mistakes
- Do not format from title guesses alone.
- Do not silently translate titles or author names.
- Do not list more than three authors before
等oret al. - Do not force a school-specific thesis requirement unless the user explicitly provides that institution's rules.
- Do not count online resources or standards as ordinary journal/conference papers unless the user's style guide explicitly says to.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
thu-digitizer
Extract and validate numeric data from chart images, PDF figures, and official source-data files locally and reproducibly, with calibrated axes, compact-scatter recovery plus residual audits, grouped/stacked bars, visible-label pie/donut validation, original-pixel aligned lattice composites such as UpSet plots, PDF vector inspection, line tracing, histograms, boxplots, error bars, CSV/JSON evidence, source-data cross-validation, and regression evaluation. Use when a user asks to recover or recreate chart data, extract scatter points, bars, printed pie/donut labels, or aligned memberships, check a PDF chart, assess digitization accuracy, validate against source data, or improve a chart-digitization workflow from corrected examples.
scientific-visualization
Meta-skill for publication-ready figures. Use when creating journal submission figures requiring multi-panel layouts, significance annotations, error bars, colorblind-safe palettes, and specific journal formatting (Nature, Science, Cell). Orchestrates matplotlib/seaborn/plotly with publication styles. For quick exploration use seaborn or plotly directly.
theoretical-economics-claude-skill
Human-in-the-loop theoretical economics research pipeline: from economic intuition to manuscript skeleton in 10 structured stages with quality gates.
interview-guide-design
把一个研究题目、研究思路或研究问题,落成一份能用于学术研究、案例研究、学位论文、课题调研的质性访谈提纲时,使用此 skill。触发信号很宽:用户说"做/设计访谈提纲""访谈大纲怎么设计才规范""结构性访谈提纲""把研究问题/题目变成访谈问题""帮我弄份访谈提纲去问问他们""怎么访谈才能挖到深层的东西""interview guide / interview protocol / key informant / elite interview",无论措辞多口语、有没有提方法论,都应触发。典型情形:要去访谈领导 / 干部 / 管理者 / 专家 / 科室主任 / 一线员工或老师 / 关键知情人,了解某个现象、做法或机制;半结构化 / 结构化 / 关键知情人 / 精英访谈皆可;中英双语;社科 / 管理 / 教育 / 公共政策 / 医疗等领域;也常与案例研究、或与一份配套问卷的混合方法调研一起出现。它把研究问题按 Castillo-Montoya 的 IPR 框架与 Yin/Stake 的案例研究规范,拆成"主问题—追问—探测",保障与研究问题对齐、可信度(trustworthiness)与三角验证就绪,标注方法论依据与权威出处,产出研究者版 + 现场详版/简版。不要用于:量化问卷 / 量表设计(走 questionnaire-design)、求职面试、以传播或叙事为目的的人物访谈(媒体/播客/记者深度报道/纪录片/口述史,非以回答研究问题为目的)、访谈录音转写、焦点小组/座谈会提纲(群体互动动态与主持伦理不同,本 skill 不覆盖)、以及访谈完成后的编码与主题分析。
mixed-methods-instrument-design
基于同一项研究的研究目的、研究问题、理论框架与人群设计,协同产出彼此对齐的量化问卷/调查表和质性访谈提纲时使用;也可在用户明确要求时把经审核的问卷创建为问卷星未发布草稿并继续管理。触发信号包括“问卷和访谈一起设计”“根据研究思路同步出调查问卷与访谈提纲”“混合方法研究工具”“不同人群分别做问卷和访谈”“推送到问卷星”“创建在线问卷”“survey + interview guide”“convergent / explanatory sequential / exploratory sequential mixed methods instruments”。适用于社会科学、管理、教育、公共政策、医疗及其他经验研究;允许量化与质性部分使用相同或不同样本。产出研究设计判定、中央映射矩阵、问卷与变量字典、完整访谈三版、联合展示模板和预测试方案;默认用户成品仍是一份完整 Word。不要用于只设计单一访谈提纲(走 interview-guide-design)、只设计单一问卷、把现成工具做成网页、访谈转写、正式数据分析,或在没有研究问题的情况下机械拼接两套题目。
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.