meta-ads-playbook
Meta ads planning playbook: objectives, structure, audiences, creative, testing cadence, Pixel/CAPI measurement. Does not assume live Marketing API access.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-09-16
- Stars
- ★ 20
- Forks
- 2
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- meta-ads-playbook
- description
- Meta ads planning playbook: objectives, structure, audiences, creative, testing cadence, Pixel/CAPI measurement. Does not assume live Marketing API access.
03 SKILL.md 正文
When to Activate
Use this skill for Meta ads planning: objective selection, account structure, audiences, creative formats, copy, testing cadence, and measurement concepts (pixel, CAPI). Live Meta Marketing API access is not assumed unless the user has connected integrations—use llm_call (e.g. Perplexity) for policy and trend research and web_scrape for URLs the user provides.
First Questions
- Offer & conversion — Purchase, lead, app install, engagement? Value per conversion?
- Geo & placements — Countries; Feed, Stories, Reels, RHS; any placement exclusions?
- Budget & duration — Daily cap, flight dates, learning phase tolerance?
- Creative assets — Video UGC, static, catalog/DPAs, existing hooks?
- Data — Pixel/CAPI status, offline conversions, lists (customer file, engagement)?
- Brand constraints — Disclaimers, restricted categories, tone?
Objectives & Structure
- Match campaign objective to true outcome (Sales / Leads / Traffic / Awareness)—avoid optimizing for clicks when you need purchases.
- ASC / Advantage+ shopping vs manual: spell out tradeoffs (creative control vs automation).
- Consolidate when learning is fragmented; separate when budgets or offers truly differ.
Audiences
- Prospecting: Broad + creative feed, or interest/stacked signals when niche.
- Remarketing: Site, engagers, customer lists—frequency caps and creative refresh.
- Lookalikes (where available): Seed quality matters more than percentage size.
- Exclusions: Purchasers, low-intent site sections, employees.
Creative
- Formats: Single image, carousel, collection, Reels, short video—match platform norms (safe zones, thumb-stop in first 2s).
- Angles: Pain, outcome, social proof, objection handling, urgency (honest)—rotate 3–5 concepts.
- Copy: Primary text variants, headline, description; CTA button alignment with landing promise.
- Fatigue: Plan refresh cadence and naming for tests.
Testing
- Hypothesis: One clear variable (audience vs creative vs landing)—avoid multivariate soup.
- Duration & spend: Enough conversions per cell; don’t call winners on noise.
- Document: What was tested, result, next iteration.
Measurement & Privacy
- Pixel + CAPI: Redundancy for web events; server-side helps iOS/signal loss—conceptual checklist only unless user provides integration status.
- Attribution: Call out that Meta reporting ≠ last-click GA; compare definitions when user has both.
- Consent: Mention when ads touch EU/UK and consent mode matters.
Tools and data sources
llm_call: Current policy questions, format specs, competitor public positioning research—do not fabricate metrics.web_scrape: User-supplied landing pages, help articles, public policy pages.
If the user connects Meta via app integrations, Composio tools may apply—never guess tool slugs; follow integration search workflow when available.
Quality Gate (before final deliverable)
- [ ] Objective matches business outcome and conversion definition
- [ ] Campaign structure maps to prospecting vs retargeting (or catalog) clearly
- [ ] Audience strategy stated with exclusions
- [ ] Creative matrix: ≥3 angles × stated formats; hooks for video
- [ ] Primary text / headline variants provided or templated
- [ ] Test plan: hypothesis, budget split, minimum runtime guidance
- [ ] Measurement checklist (pixel/CAPI/offline) with gaps flagged
- [ ] Limitations stated: no live account data unless user provides exports or integrations
04 同仓库更多 Skills
technical-seo-ai-crawler-audit
Diagnose and prioritize the technical issues blocking a site from being crawled, indexed, ranked, and cited. Modern technical SEO has two audiences: Google's crawler/indexer and AI answer engines (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). Both need HTML-visible content and a clean crawl path.
seo-reporting-measurement
Build reports that stakeholders trust, rooted in data sources that are actually reliable. Modern SEO measurement has to reckon with a very specific constraint: **the primary data source (GSC) is ~75% incomplete**, and the AI visibility layer is **probabilistic**, not deterministic. Building reports that ignore these realities produces false confidence.
seo-max-kt
Long-form SEO and AEO methodology bundle; read SEO_AND_AEO_KT.md for the full corpus.
seo-keyword-research-intent-mapping
Build a keyword universe that reflects how both humans *and* AI answer engines search. Traditional keyword research looks at standalone terms; modern research also maps the **fan-out sub-queries** AI tools generate when breaking down a user prompt.
seo-aeo-content-strategy
Design content systems that earn both Google rankings *and* AI citations. The core insight: AI answer engines read content differently than humans — they extract the highest-information-gain sentences and treat H2 headings as prompts. The "ski ramp" structure optimizes for both.
prompt-picker
Build a prompt library that reveals how a brand shows up across the full buyer journey in AI search systems. The library is designed for actual LLM visibility tracking, not theoretical SEO keyword research.