[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71T524E331PE04HC9QXEVCE":3,"skill-same:01M71T524E331PE04HC9QXEVCE":60},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":35,"linkOnly":36,"markdownContent":37,"markdownBody":38,"frontMatter":39,"refName":40,"commitSha":41,"skillDirectory":42,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":43,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":44,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":45,"install":46,"resources":59},"01M71T524E331PE04HC9QXEVCE","verification-before-completion",null,"Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always","fxcl\u002Fopencode-rs","fxcl","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F74125308?v=4","01M71T4Q1Y6VFEC8ZSS2DWCC7K","okk","01M71T4Q2RFFVTSJZZNS2ZV2DR",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.opencode\u002Fskills\u002Fverification-before-completion\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34],"verification","verification before completion","running","evidence","complete","prs","claim","use","assertions","when","committing","output","claims","work","about","commands","2026-11-10 13:02:02",false,"---\nname: verification-before-completion\ndescription: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always\n---\n\n# Verification Before Completion\n\n## Overview\n\nClaiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.\n\n**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.\n\n**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**\n\n## The Iron Law\n\n```\nNO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE\n```\n\nIf you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.\n\n## The Gate Function\n\n```\nBEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:\n\n1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?\n2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)\n3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures\n4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?\n   - If NO: State actual status with evidence\n   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence\n5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim\n\nSkip any step = lying, not verifying\n```\n\n## Common Failures\n\n| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |\n|-------|----------|----------------|\n| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, \"should pass\" |\n| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |\n| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |\n| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |\n| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |\n| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports \"success\" |\n| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |\n\n## Red Flags - STOP\n\n- Using \"should\", \"probably\", \"seems to\"\n- Expressing satisfaction before verification (\"Great!\", \"Perfect!\", \"Done!\", etc.)\n- About to commit\u002Fpush\u002FPR without verification\n- Trusting agent success reports\n- Relying on partial verification\n- Thinking \"just this once\"\n- Tired and wanting work over\n- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**\n\n## Rationalization Prevention\n\n| Excuse | Reality |\n|--------|---------|\n| \"Should work now\" | RUN the verification |\n| \"I'm confident\" | Confidence ≠ evidence |\n| \"Just this once\" | No exceptions |\n| \"Linter passed\" | Linter ≠ compiler |\n| \"Agent said success\" | Verify independently |\n| \"I'm tired\" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |\n| \"Partial check is enough\" | Partial proves nothing |\n| \"Different words so rule doesn't apply\" | Spirit over letter |\n\n## Key Patterns\n\n**Tests:**\n```\n✅ [Run test command] [See: 34\u002F34 pass] \"All tests pass\"\n❌ \"Should pass now\" \u002F \"Looks correct\"\n```\n\n**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**\n```\n✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)\n❌ \"I've written a regression test\" (without red-green verification)\n```\n\n**Build:**\n```\n✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] \"Build passes\"\n❌ \"Linter passed\" (linter doesn't check compilation)\n```\n\n**Requirements:**\n```\n✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion\n❌ \"Tests pass, phase complete\"\n```\n\n**Agent delegation:**\n```\n✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state\n❌ Trust agent report\n```\n\n## Why This Matters\n\nFrom 24 failure memories:\n- your human partner said \"I don't believe you\" - trust broken\n- Undefined functions shipped - would crash\n- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features\n- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework\n- Violates: \"Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced.\"\n\n## When To Apply\n\n**ALWAYS before:**\n- ANY variation of success\u002Fcompletion claims\n- ANY expression of satisfaction\n- ANY positive statement about work state\n- Committing, PR creation, task completion\n- Moving to next task\n- Delegating to agents\n\n**Rule applies to:**\n- Exact phrases\n- Paraphrases and synonyms\n- Implications of success\n- ANY communication suggesting completion\u002Fcorrectness\n\n## The Bottom Line\n\n**No shortcuts for verification.**\n\nRun the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.\n\nThis is non-negotiable.\n","# Verification Before Completion\n\n## Overview\n\nClaiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.\n\n**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.\n\n**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**\n\n## The Iron Law\n\n```\nNO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE\n```\n\nIf you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.\n\n## The Gate Function\n\n```\nBEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:\n\n1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?\n2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)\n3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures\n4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?\n   - If NO: State actual status with evidence\n   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence\n5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim\n\nSkip any step = lying, not verifying\n```\n\n## Common Failures\n\n| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |\n|-------|----------|----------------|\n| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, \"should pass\" |\n| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |\n| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |\n| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |\n| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |\n| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports \"success\" |\n| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |\n\n## Red Flags - STOP\n\n- Using \"should\", \"probably\", \"seems to\"\n- Expressing satisfaction before verification (\"Great!\", \"Perfect!\", \"Done!\", etc.)\n- About to commit\u002Fpush\u002FPR without verification\n- Trusting agent success reports\n- Relying on partial verification\n- Thinking \"just this once\"\n- Tired and wanting work over\n- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**\n\n## Rationalization Prevention\n\n| Excuse | Reality |\n|--------|---------|\n| \"Should work now\" | RUN the verification |\n| \"I'm confident\" | Confidence ≠ evidence |\n| \"Just this once\" | No exceptions |\n| \"Linter passed\" | Linter ≠ compiler |\n| \"Agent said success\" | Verify independently |\n| \"I'm tired\" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |\n| \"Partial check is enough\" | Partial proves nothing |\n| \"Different words so rule doesn't apply\" | Spirit over letter |\n\n## Key Patterns\n\n**Tests:**\n```\n✅ [Run test command] [See: 34\u002F34 pass] \"All tests pass\"\n❌ \"Should pass now\" \u002F \"Looks correct\"\n```\n\n**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**\n```\n✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)\n❌ \"I've written a regression test\" (without red-green verification)\n```\n\n**Build:**\n```\n✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] \"Build passes\"\n❌ \"Linter passed\" (linter doesn't check compilation)\n```\n\n**Requirements:**\n```\n✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion\n❌ \"Tests pass, phase complete\"\n```\n\n**Agent delegation:**\n```\n✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state\n❌ Trust agent report\n```\n\n## Why This Matters\n\nFrom 24 failure memories:\n- your human partner said \"I don't believe you\" - trust broken\n- Undefined functions shipped - would crash\n- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features\n- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework\n- Violates: \"Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced.\"\n\n## When To Apply\n\n**ALWAYS before:**\n- ANY variation of success\u002Fcompletion claims\n- ANY expression of satisfaction\n- ANY positive statement about work state\n- Committing, PR creation, task completion\n- Moving to next task\n- Delegating to agents\n\n**Rule applies to:**\n- Exact phrases\n- Paraphrases and synonyms\n- Implications of success\n- ANY communication suggesting completion\u002Fcorrectness\n\n## The Bottom Line\n\n**No shortcuts for verification.**\n\nRun the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.\n\nThis is non-negotiable.\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","e8d0b9937ed05c662835f4a456a9b722b145e86d",".opencode\u002Fskills\u002Fverification-before-completion","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl","2026-05-01 15:45:35",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":47,"prompt":57,"zipAvailable":58},[48,51,54],{"tool":49,"command":50},"npx","npx skills add fxcl\u002Fopencode-rs --skill verification-before-completion",{"tool":52,"command":53},"bunx","bunx skills add fxcl\u002Fopencode-rs --skill verification-before-completion",{"tool":55,"command":56},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add fxcl\u002Fopencode-rs --skill verification-before-completion","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.opencode\u002Fskills\u002Fverification-before-completion\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[61,82,94,106,117,133],{"skillNo":62,"name":63,"nameZh":6,"description":64,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":65,"categories":66,"keywords":72,"publishedAt":35},"01M71T5NE7XB5P94GAMM3HR0HA","test-writer","Write focused tests with strong coverage and TDD discipline","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fopencode-rust\u002Fcrates\u002Fcore\u002Fskills\u002Ftest-writer\u002FSKILL.md",[67],{"categoryNo":68,"categoryName":69,"taxonomyType":70,"taxonomyTypeDesc":71},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量","SCENARIO","使用场景",[73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81],"writer","test writer","test","coverage","with","tests","discipline","tdd","write",{"skillNo":83,"name":84,"nameZh":6,"description":85,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":86,"categories":87,"keywords":88,"publishedAt":35},"01M71T5MF6FXF62J5AH9WPEDXC","security-auditor","Assess security posture and identify exploitable risks","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fopencode-rust\u002Fcrates\u002Fcore\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity-auditor\u002FSKILL.md",[],[89,90,91,92,93],"security auditor","auditor","security","assess","security posture",{"skillNo":95,"name":96,"nameZh":6,"description":97,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":98,"categories":99,"keywords":100,"publishedAt":35},"01M71T5JG3W7G9E6P29CAVQNE4","refactorer","Improve code structure without changing behavior","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fopencode-rust\u002Fcrates\u002Fcore\u002Fskills\u002Frefactorer\u002FSKILL.md",[],[96,101,102,103,104,105],"structure","behavior","code","code structure","improve",{"skillNo":107,"name":108,"nameZh":6,"description":109,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":110,"categories":111,"keywords":112,"publishedAt":35},"01M71T5H8K9AV8APGA9JWEBCYR","performance","Optimize runtime, memory, and throughput bottlenecks","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fopencode-rust\u002Fcrates\u002Fcore\u002Fskills\u002Fperformance\u002FSKILL.md",[],[108,113,114,115,116],"runtime","optimize","memory","throughput",{"skillNo":118,"name":119,"nameZh":6,"description":120,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":121,"categories":122,"keywords":123,"publishedAt":35},"01M71T5G4WG6YKHXNJ0TJSS35K","doc-writer","Produce clear technical documentation and developer guides","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fopencode-rust\u002Fcrates\u002Fcore\u002Fskills\u002Fdoc-writer\u002FSKILL.md",[],[73,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132],"doc writer","doc","clear","documentation","produce","technical","developer","technical documentation","guides",{"skillNo":134,"name":135,"nameZh":6,"description":136,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":137,"categories":138,"keywords":139,"publishedAt":35},"01M71T5F3RKC41MTMKGNXB4SH9","devops","Improve CI\u002FCD, deployment, and operational reliability","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffxcl\u002Fopencode-rs\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fopencode-rust\u002Fcrates\u002Fcore\u002Fskills\u002Fdevops\u002FSKILL.md",[],[135,105,140,141,142,143,144,145],"reliability","operational","cd","deployment","CI\u002FCD","ci"]