product
Use when the user wants a product strategy doc, PRD, pitch, vision, personas, or outcomes at docs/product/product.md. Drafts or re-authors the document. Triggers on "write the PRD", "draft a product pitch", "who are our personas". Re-authoring is also how an existing product.md gets critiqued or revised — docs-review checks writing quality and cross-document consistency, not strategic soundness. Do NOT use for phased delivery plan (roadmap), epics or backlog (tasks), architecture (solution), tasks or Gherkin (tasks), or implementation (implement).
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-20
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- product
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "owner": "product", "author": "Carinya Parc", "version": "1.1", "work_shape": "authoring", "output_class": "delivery-artefact" }
- description
- Use when the user wants a product strategy doc, PRD, pitch, vision, personas, or outcomes at docs/product/product.md. Drafts or re-authors the document. Triggers on "write the PRD", "draft a product pitch", "who are our personas". Re-authoring is also how an existing product.md gets critiqued or revised — docs-review checks writing quality and cross-document consistency, not strategic soundness. Do NOT use for phased delivery plan (roadmap), epics or backlog (tasks), architecture (solution), tasks or Gherkin (tasks), or implementation (implement).
- allowed-tools
- Read Write Glob Grep
- argument-hint
- [--stage pitch|product] [--context <notes>]
02 资源文件 2
- 资产文件assets/product.template.md880 B
- 参考文档examples/product.md1.5 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Product
You are a Product Manager writing a product document that defines the why, who, and what of the product.
Artefact
Default path: docs/product/product.md — strategy document (why, who, what).
Readable by a non-technical stakeholder without a glossary.
Path resolution
If the user names a different file path in their request, read and write that path instead of the default.
Arguments
--stage pitch|product (default: ask if unclear).
Context
<artifacts> [Pitch: problem statement, appetite, known constraints. Product stage: existing pitch product.md, user research, stakeholder map.] </artifacts>
Steps (pitch stage)
- Read all provided context
- §1 Problem — evidence-based bullets
- §2 Appetite — investment and phasing
- §3 Sketch — end-to-end outcome in plain language
- §4 Rabbit holes — deliberate exclusions
- §5 No-gos — out-of-scope with reasons
- Delete the
DRAFTING AIDEcomment block before saving
Steps (product stage)
- Read context and existing pitch product.md if present
- Carry forward §1–§5, updated if needed
- §6 Target users
- §7 Outcome metrics — reference
docs/architecture/solution.md §2.1for thresholds; do not restate numbers - §8 Product principles — commercial only
- §9 Stakeholders and RACI
- §10 Dependencies and sequencing
- Delete the
DRAFTING AIDEcomment block before saving
Quality rules
- Readable without a glossary; pitch ≤2 pages, product stage ≤5 pages
- §7 no raw numeric thresholds; §8 not technical
- Derive from context — do not invent requirements
- No file paths, APIs, or schemas — those belong in solution.md
- No epic tables — roadmap and backlog own sequencing and epics
Output
Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Use assets/product.template.md.
Supporting files
Related skills
roadmap,tasks,solution— sequencing, epics, and architecturedocs-review— review or critique an existing product.md
04 同仓库更多 Skills
skill-name
Replace with description of the skill and when the agent should use it.
validate
Use when the user wants final completion sign-off on any work item — epic, story, bug, or spike: every task in docs/work/{work-id}/tasks.md verified against Gherkin AC and, for an epic, roadmap phase exit criteria. Triggers on "validate CHK01", "validate JIRA-123", "is this story done", "sign off the epic". Builds an acceptance matrix with evidence, updates task and work-item status, and produces a validation report. Do NOT use for PR or branch code review (code-review), writing tasks (tasks), sprint retrospective (sprint-retro), or drafting the breakdown (tasks) or the technical design (tdd).
ux-design-review
Use when the user wants a UX or design review of implemented UI — components, pages, or flows — against its design source, covering accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA), interaction states, responsiveness, design fidelity, and design-system conformity. Triggers on "review the checkout page", "check this UI before I ship it", "is this accessible", "does this match the design". Live-environment-first: drives the rendered UI in a real browser where possible. Works with any framework or design tooling. Produces a structured verdict with a coverage statement; writes no source changes. Do NOT use to address or fix UX findings (ux-design-fix), for code correctness or security review (code-review), to review a tdd.md document (docs-review), or to implement features (implement).
ux-design-fix
Use when the user wants to change how existing UI looks or behaves — fix spacing, colour, layout, states, responsiveness, or accessibility on a component, page, or flow. Takes either a ux-design-review output (scoped by action tier) or a direct instruction. Triggers on "the summary card padding is off", "the modal breaks on mobile", "make the focus ring visible", "fix the UX review findings", "this button looks wrong". Fixes via design tokens and library components rather than local patches, re-renders to verify visually, and re-checks neighbours for shift. Do NOT use to build new UI, screens, or flows (implement), to review UI without changing it (ux-design-review), to fix code-review findings (code-review-fix), or to redesign a component or flow.
tdd
Use when the user wants a technical design document (TDD) for any work item — epic, story, bug, or spike — at docs/work/{work-id}/tdd.md, in skeleton or full mode. Pass a work item ID (CHK01, or a Linear/Jira/GitHub key like JIRA-123). Resolves the source system and writes at whatever level the ID names — a story gets its own tdd.md beside its parent epic's, not nested inside it. Cite solution.md — do not re-narrate architecture. Triggers on "tdd CHK01", "write the technical design for JIRA-123", "design the epic", "how should we build this story". For reviewing an existing tdd.md, use docs-review instead. Do NOT use for test-driven development — writing a failing test first, red/green/refactor, or any test-authoring task is implement. Do NOT use to write the breakdown itself — stories, tasks, or sub-tasks (tasks), task Gherkin (tasks), system-wide architecture (solution), ADR write (adr), or code implementation (implement).
tasks
Use to decompose anything into delivery work — a product strategy and roadmap into epics, an epic into stories and tasks with Gherkin acceptance criteria, a story into sub-tasks, or an external spec, RFC, or PRD into both in one pass. Resolves the work item's source system (Linear, Jira, GitHub/GitLab issues, or filesystem) and its type first. Writes docs/product/backlog.md and docs/work/{work-id}/tasks.md, or the tracker directly when one is resolved. Triggers on "break this spec into a backlog", "write the epics", "decompose checkout-foundation", "turn this RFC into tickets", "write tasks for CHK01", "write sub-tasks for JIRA-123", "what stories do we need". EARS with --ears. Do NOT use to groom an existing backlog or check sprint readiness (backlog-refine), write technical design at any level (tdd), write architecture (solution), phase the delivery (roadmap), implement code (implement), or sign off a work item (validate).