AGENT SKILL

reflect

Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
reflect
description
Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.
disable-model-invocation
true

02 资源文件 4

03 SKILL.md 正文

Reflect

Mine the current conversation for durable learnings, then route them into skill edits.

When to invoke

Invoke when the user says "reflect" or "/reflect". Skip when the conversation is trivial, off-topic, or already covered by an existing skill the parent followed correctly. One-offs are not learnings.

Process

1. Locate the active transcript

The parent finds its own transcript file before fanning out. The system prompt names the active workspace's agent-transcripts/ directory. Use that path. Do not glob across ~/.cursor/projects/*/. That crosses workspace boundaries and reads private chats from unrelated projects.

ls -t <agent-transcripts>/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/subagents/*.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -10

Three transcript layouts: legacy flat (<id>.jsonl), current nested (<id>/<id>.jsonl), and subagent (<parent>/subagents/<child>.jsonl).

For each candidate, read the first JSONL line and check that message.content[0].text contains the conversation's opening user prompt. Take the matching path. If no path resolves, write a tight digest of the session and pass that instead.

2. Spawn three reviewers in parallel

One message, three Task calls, subagent_type: generalPurpose, explicit model: on each, agent mode (readonly: false). Reviewers need MCP access for context lookups (tickets, chat threads, observability traces referenced in the transcript). Readonly strips MCPs.

Lens model Prompt template
Judgment your configured reflect-judgment model (default claude-fable-5-1-thinking-max) references/judgment-reviewer.md
Tooling your configured reflect-tooling model (default gpt-5.6-sol-max) references/tooling-reviewer.md
Divergent your configured reflect-judgment model (default claude-fable-5-1-thinking-max) references/divergent-reviewer.md

Pass each template verbatim, substituting the transcript path or digest where marked. Reviewers return findings in the Task response body.

3. Synthesize

One Task call, subagent_type: generalPurpose, using your configured reflect-judgment model (default claude-fable-5-1-thinking-max), agent mode (readonly: false). The synthesizer's quality check includes spot-verifying citations, which can require MCP access. Readonly strips MCPs. Use references/synthesizer.md verbatim, with each reviewer's full output inlined where marked. The synthesizer returns a structured Accepted / Rejected / Backlog list.

4. Structural enforcement check

Sanity-check the synthesizer's Accepted list. For any item that would be enforced more reliably by a lint rule, script, metadata flag, or runtime check, move it from Accepted to Backlog. See the encode-lessons-in-structure principle skill.

5. Apply

Before applying any Accepted edit, present the synthesizer's full Accepted/Rejected/Backlog output to the user and wait for explicit approval. The user picks which subset to apply and may redirect routings. Skill changes affect every future agent in the org. Do not auto-apply.

Backlog items file to whatever devex / backlog tracker your team uses automatically. Only the Accepted list waits for approval.

For each approved Accepted item, follow the Routing field exactly:

  • Trivial existing-skill edit (a one-line bullet, a tightened sentence, a stale fact corrected): parent does directly.
  • Substantive existing-skill edit (a new section, a new pattern table, more than ~10 lines): hand to Cursor's built-in create-skill skill and run its draft / test / iterate loop.
  • tune description: <skill path> (the skill exists but didn't trigger when it should have): hand to create-skill and run its description-optimization loop.
  • new skill via create-skill: <kebab-name>: hand creation to create-skill. Do not invent the shape ad hoc.

If your environment ships a SKILL.md validator, run it on every touched skill before declaring done. Skip this step if it doesn't.

6. Summarize for the user

Short list, no preamble:

  • Edits applied: <skill path>. What changed, one line each.
  • New skills created: <skill path>. One line each (rare).
  • Backlog filed to the devex tracker: <issue title> (<tags>). One line each.
  • Dropped: one line per rejected finding + reason from the synthesizer.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

why

Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.

数据分析师
★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

unslop

Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.

★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

typescript-best-practices

TypeScript best practices. Use when reading or editing any .ts or .tsx file.

★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

technical-writing

Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.

开发工程师内容创作者写作与文案
★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

teach

Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

教师与教育
★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

tdd

Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

★ 0