AGENT SKILL

vibe

Router for the vibestack skills: name the task and it picks the right skill, also where there is no / picker.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 8
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
vibe
triggers
[ "which vibestack skill", "what vibestack skills are there", "list vibestack skills", "vibestack help", "vibe help" ]
description
Router for the vibestack skills: name the task and it picks the right skill, also where there is no / picker.
allowed-tools
[ "Bash", "Read", "Skill" ]

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

If this session was compacted, the copy of this skill in context may be cut off. Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/SKILL.md from disk and resume at the step you are on.

When to invoke

Use when the task clearly wants a vibestack workflow but the right one is not obvious, or when the host has no slash-command picker and the pack has to be found by name. In Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro and Copilot CLI, skills are /name. In Codex there is no / picker — reference a skill as $name inside an ordinary message (Use $office-hours to shape this idea).

/vibe — pick the right skill

The router is named vibe, not vibestack: the pack's own checkout is sometimes parked at ~/.claude/skills/vibestack, and a skill installing to that path would collide with it — the installer's own integration test asserts that checkout survives.

Route on intent. Process skills come first: brainstorm or plan before implementing, investigate before fixing, review before shipping.

When the task is… Use
Shape a rough idea into a design doc office-hours
Turn intent into a precise, executable spec spec
Plan a feature, refactor, or architecture change plan-eng-review, autoplan
Execute an approved multi-step plan an installed plan-execution skill if present; otherwise the plan-eng-review cold-start briefs lane by lane, then review and ship
Weigh product scope or the bigger problem plan-ceo-review
Plan a UI change, or review a design before it is built plan-design-review
Pressure-test the developer experience of a plan plan-devex-review
Audit the live developer experience of a shipped product devex-review
Debug an error, test failure, or odd behavior investigate (see Failures below)
Review a diff before merge review
Rewrite a PR description from its actual changes pr-summary
Get a second opinion from a different model codex or claude — by host, see below
Audit security cso
QA a running web app qa (fixes), qa-only (report)
Drive a browser, scrape a page, pair a remote agent browse, scrape, open-browser, pair-agent
Test logged-in pages with your real browser's cookies connect-chrome, setup-browser-cookies
Turn a browse or scrape flow that worked into a skill skillify
Read, transcribe or send Telegram messages as yourself telegram
Review a shipped UI, or explore design directions design-review, design-shotgun, design-consultation
Turn an approved mockup into production HTML/CSS design-html
Render a Mermaid diagram to HTML and PNG diagram
Render markdown or HTML to a polished PDF make-pdf
Ship: tests, version, changelog, PR ship
See which VERSION slots open PRs already claim landing-report
Address PR review threads and failing CI address-pr-review
Merge, deploy, and confirm production health land-and-deploy when the user explicitly asks to land a specific PR, then canary (setup-deploy configures it once)
Measure page performance against a baseline benchmark
Update docs after shipping document-release, document-generate
Strip machine-sounding prose unslop
Check code-quality health or find refactors health, improve-arch
Make the build, lint and tests pass without editing a test health as /health --fix
Review AWS spend, or price a change before it deploys aws-cost (--estimate <plan>)
Review a Terraform plan, cdk diff or EKS config before apply iac-review
Cap paid-inference spend ai-cost-guard
Audit Bedrock guardrails, region and tenant isolation bedrock-guardrails
Review a knowledge base or RAG pipeline kb-review
Review an Amazon Connect, Lex or voice solution connect-review
Evaluate an agent or prompt agent-eval
Review an MCP server mcp-review
Save or restore working context across sessions context-save, context-restore
Review, search or prune what the pack has learned learn
Run a retrospective from git history retro
Tune which questions the skills ask you plan-tune
Guard a risky session careful, freeze, guard (and unfreeze to release)
Update the pack itself type /vibe-upgrade (typed-only)
Find and retire unused skills, hooks, permissions and caches vibe-gc

Anything not listed here is in the full index — read it rather than guessing at a skill name:

_found=""
for _d in "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR:-}" "$HOME/.agents/skills/vibe" "$HOME/.claude/skills/vibe" \
          "$HOME/.cursor/skills/vibe" "$HOME/.kiro/skills/vibe" "${COPILOT_HOME:-$HOME/.copilot}/skills/vibe" \
          ".agents/skills/vibe" ".claude/skills/vibe" ".cursor/skills/vibe" ".kiro/skills/vibe" ".github/skills/vibe"; do
  if [ -n "$_d" ] && [ -r "$_d/skills-index.md" ]; then
    cat "$_d/skills-index.md"; _found=1; break
  fi
done
if [ -z "$_found" ]; then
  for _r in "$HOME/.agents/skills" "$HOME/.claude/skills" "$HOME/.cursor/skills" "$HOME/.kiro/skills" \
            "${COPILOT_HOME:-$HOME/.copilot}/skills"; do
    [ -d "$_r" ] && { echo "$_r:"; ls "$_r"; }
  done
fi

The index sits next to this file, so if none of those paths resolve, read skills-index.md from the directory this SKILL.md was loaded from.

Second opinion — route by host. The outside voice has to be a different model from the one already running:

if [ -n "${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}" ] || [ -n "${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}" ]; then echo "HOST: codex"
elif [ -n "${CLAUDECODE:-}" ]; then echo "HOST: claude"
else echo "HOST: other"; fi

HOST: claude → codex. HOST: codex → claude (codex refuses to run nested under Codex, and would be the same model anyway). HOST: other (Cursor, Kiro, Copilot CLI) → codex, unless the session's own model is GPT, then claude. Copilot CLI sets no documented session variable, so it always reports HOST: other.

Rules when routing:

  • Invoke it, don't describe it. Once a skill fits, hand off: invoke it through the Skill tool (Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro, Copilot CLI), or on Codex load that skill's SKILL.md and follow it (users invoke it there as Use $<name>). Do not answer with a list of options, and do not do the skill's work freehand when the skill exists. Except: never invoke a typed-only skill (a row that says "type /name") — tell the user to type it (on Codex, Use $name) and do not do its work yourself.
  • Failures. When the user names the cause and a narrow fix, make one read-only check of the file, test or log it rests on; if it holds, fix it and run the focused test, otherwise invoke investigate. When the cause is unknown, make one read-only triage pass, with no reproduction and no wider search, over the supplied evidence and the code it implicates; fix only if that pass alone proves the root cause, otherwise invoke investigate.
  • Answer directly instead when the request is a quick factual question (including "which skills are there?" — show the table), a small edit the user scoped themselves, or the user asked for a direct answer rather than a workflow.
  • Pick one. Don't stack skills; each carries its own full workflow, and a skill's own instructions take precedence once invoked.
  • Only route to a skill that is installed. Don't guess a name: if the table or the index has nothing that fits, or the skill is not present on this host, say so and proceed normally — these are workflows, not dependencies.

04 同仓库更多 Skills