karpathy-guidelines
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Invoke when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria. Derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-25
- Stars
- ★ 8
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- karpathy-guidelines
- description
- Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Invoke when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria. Derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
03 SKILL.md 正文
Karpathy Guidelines
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
kevin-review
Review a diff and emit concise, evidence-backed findings.
kevin-merit
Audit a diff for over-engineering and report it as a corporate merit cycle. Satire; the subject is the code, never a person.
kevin-help
Show Kevin modes, commands, and runtime controls.
kevin-enlighten
Explain a topic to someone with no background as a self-contained HTML picture explainer.
kevin-compress
Compress an answer without losing required information or safety warnings.
kevin-commit
Generate a terse Conventional Commits message from the staged diff.