AGENT SKILL

vuln-validate

Validate security findings by assessing reachability, exploitability, and existing mitigations. Use after a security scan when the user wants to separate real vulnerabilities from false positives.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-09-20
Stars
★ 4
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
vuln-validate
description
Validate security findings by assessing reachability, exploitability, and existing mitigations. Use after a security scan when the user wants to separate real vulnerabilities from false positives.
user-invocable
false

03 SKILL.md 正文

Vulnerability Validation

Validate whether a reported security finding is actually exploitable in this codebase.

Prerequisites

Expected inputs:

  • .agent-security/findings.json
  • .agent-security/threat-model.md

Workflow

1. Load the Findings

Read the current findings file and determine which issues need validation.

2. Check Reachability

For each finding, determine:

  • Can an external user reach the code path?
  • What entry point leads to it?
  • Is authentication required?

3. Check Attacker Control

Trace the data flow from source to sink and decide how much of the input is attacker-controlled.

4. Check Existing Mitigations

Look for:

  • validation and sanitization
  • framework protections
  • auth gates
  • rate limits
  • CSP, ORM parameterization, or other platform guards

5. Assign Exploitability

Classify each issue as:

  • easy
  • medium
  • hard
  • not exploitable

6. Produce a Validated Findings File

Write:

  • .agent-security/validated-findings.json

Include reasoning, exploitability, and remediation priority.

Gotchas

  • A pattern match is not a vulnerability until reachability is proven.
  • A real code smell may still be non-exploitable in context.
  • Do not generate sensational findings without concrete attack paths.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

Nairon-AI
Nairon-AI/agentic-starter-pack

writing-shape

Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

内容创作者写作与文案
★ 4
Nairon-AI
Nairon-AI/agentic-starter-pack

writing-fragments

Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.

内容创作者写作与文案
★ 4
Nairon-AI
Nairon-AI/agentic-starter-pack

writing-beats

Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

内容创作者写作与文案
★ 4
Nairon-AI
Nairon-AI/agentic-starter-pack

stop-slop

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.

内容创作者写作与文案
★ 4
Nairon-AI
Nairon-AI/agentic-starter-pack

humanizer

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.

内容创作者写作与文案
★ 4
Nairon-AI
Nairon-AI/agentic-starter-pack

feedback

Prepare, deliver, and debrief timely interpersonal feedback using a question-first coaching flow, observable behavior, owned experience, and concrete impact. Use when drafting feedback, coaching managers, rehearsing a feedback conversation, praising specific behavior, or reviewing whether feedback landed.

★ 4