[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6MZWWBZ7ENHMQ3Y4X36CJRV":3,"skill-same:01M6MZWWBZ7ENHMQ3Y4X36CJRV":91},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":40,"linkOnly":41,"markdownContent":42,"markdownBody":43,"frontMatter":44,"refName":62,"commitSha":63,"skillDirectory":64,"forksCount":65,"repositoryHtmlUrl":66,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":67,"ownerBlogUrl":68,"ownerDescription":69,"updatedAt":70,"install":71,"resources":84},"01M6MZWWBZ7ENHMQ3Y4X36CJRV","idea-lineage",null,"Trace one idea's evolution through the brain: first mention, best\narticulation, related concepts, reversals, contradictions, abandoned\nbranches, and the current live version. Use for single-idea conceptual\nlineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics.","garrytan\u002Fgbrain","garrytan","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F19957?v=4","01M6DJCCDDG53MTYYRTXAXFG17","Garry Tan","01M6MZQZCEN3RRMD33E1X9ZZR9",32847,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fplugin-variants\u002Fgbrain-coding\u002Fskills\u002Fidea-lineage\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39],"lineage","idea lineage","idea","map","when","for","concept","my","concepts","false","live","brain","get","metrics","branches","query","thinking","show","list","how","search","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: idea-lineage\nversion: 0.1.0\ndescription: |\n  Trace one idea's evolution through the brain: first mention, best\n  articulation, related concepts, reversals, contradictions, abandoned\n  branches, and the current live version. Use for single-idea conceptual\n  lineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics.\ntriggers:\n  - \"idea lineage\"\n  - \"trace the lineage of this idea\"\n  - \"how my thinking about\"\n  - \"how has my thinking about\"\n  - \"current version of this idea\"\n  - \"what is my current version of\"\n  - \"show reversals in my thinking about\"\n  - \"where did this idea come from\"\ntools:\n  - search\n  - query\n  - get_page\n  - list_pages\n  - takes_search\n  - find_contradictions\n  - find_trajectory\nmutating: false\nwhen_to_use: \"Use when the user asks: \\\"idea lineage\\\", \\\"trace the lineage of this idea\\\", \\\"how my thinking about\\\", \\\"how has my thinking about\\\", \\\"current version of this idea\\\".\"\n---\n\n# idea-lineage - Single-Idea Evolution Through the Brain\n\n> **Convention:** see [conventions\u002Fquality.md](..\u002Fconventions\u002Fquality.md) for\n> citation rules, quote fidelity, and source-backed claims.\n>\n> **Boundary:** see [docs\u002Ftakes-vs-facts.md](https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fdocs\u002Ftakes-vs-facts.md) for\n> the distinction between holder-attributed takes and the brain owner's hot\n> facts. Do not collapse those layers when summarizing lineage.\n\n## What this solves\n\nUsers often want to understand how one idea changed across time: when it first\nappeared, when it became sharp, what it displaced, what it contradicted, and\nwhat version is alive now. That is different from building a whole concept map\nand different from charting an entity's metric trajectory.\n\nUse this skill when the user asks about one idea, topic, phrase, or concept\npage and wants its evolution through the brain.\n\nCanonical examples:\n\n- \"Run idea lineage on founder-led sales.\"\n- \"How has my thinking about compounding trust changed?\"\n- \"What is my current version of this idea?\"\n- \"Where did this idea come from, and what did I abandon along the way?\"\n\n## What this is not\n\n- Not `concept-synthesis`: that skill deduplicates many concept stubs, tiers\n  them, writes concept pages, and builds a broad intellectual map.\n- Not `find_trajectory`: that operation charts typed facts or event rows for\n  an entity, such as MRR, role, location, or status over time.\n- Not a contradiction-probe runner: this skill may read cached contradiction\n  findings when available, but it does not launch expensive probes.\n- Not a writing mode by default: do not write a lineage page unless the user\n  explicitly asks for a saved artifact after seeing the read-only answer.\n\n## Contract\n\nThis skill guarantees:\n\n- A single-idea scope is preserved. Broad corpus or \"map my concepts\" prompts\n  route to `skills\u002Fconcept-synthesis\u002FSKILL.md` instead.\n- Every lineage claim cites existing brain evidence: page slug, source id when\n  present, date, and short quote or snippet.\n- Missing evidence is labeled as a gap, not patched with plausible narrative.\n- Contradictions, reversals, and abandoned branches are separated from normal\n  temporal evolution.\n- The default mode is read-only and does not mutate brain pages.\n\n## Phases\n\n### Phase 1: Resolve the idea target\n\n1. Restate the idea in one sentence.\n2. Search for exact phrase variants with `search`.\n3. Run one semantic `query` for the natural-language version.\n4. Check `list_pages` for concept pages when the idea has an obvious concept\n   slug or title.\n5. If results point to an entity\u002Fmetric\u002Fstatus trajectory rather than a concept,\n   hand off to `find_trajectory` or the normal query\u002Fthink trajectory path.\n\nIf multiple distinct ideas share the same phrase, ask the user to choose the\nintended one before synthesizing.\n\n### Phase 2: Gather evidence\n\nCollect enough evidence to support or reject each output bucket:\n\n- Search chunks with dates and source slugs.\n- Full pages via `get_page` for the top relevant concept, note, transcript,\n  meeting, article, or project pages.\n- Related concept pages through backlinks, `related` frontmatter, or repeated\n  co-occurrence in search results.\n- Takes via `takes_search` when the idea appears as a belief, bet, hunch, or\n  attributed claim.\n- Cached contradiction findings via `find_contradictions` when the user asks\n  about inconsistency or the search results show obvious conflict.\n- `find_trajectory` only when the evidence is entity\u002Fattribute-shaped, such as\n  a role\u002Fstatus\u002Fmetric evolution that is relevant to the idea's story.\n\nPrefer fewer high-quality sources over a long unsorted pile. Read full pages\nwhen snippets imply a lineage milestone.\n\n### Phase 3: Classify lineage moments\n\nClassify evidence into these buckets:\n\n1. **First mention** - earliest dated evidence where the idea appears.\n2. **Best articulation** - the clearest or most complete expression, not\n   necessarily the newest.\n3. **Current live version** - the most recent high-authority version that still\n   appears active.\n4. **Reversals** - places where the user's stance changed direction.\n5. **Contradictions** - claims that cannot both be true at the same time or\n   under the same assumptions. Distinguish these from legitimate temporal\n   supersession.\n6. **Abandoned branches** - promising variants that appear and then disappear,\n   lose support, or are explicitly rejected.\n7. **Related concepts** - nearby ideas that shaped or inherited part of the\n   original idea.\n\nWhen a bucket has no evidence, write \"No clear evidence found\" with a brief note\nabout what was checked.\n\n### Phase 4: Synthesize the lineage\n\nWrite the answer in the output format below. Keep the synthesis proportional to\nthe evidence. Do not overfit a smooth evolution if the evidence is sparse,\nmessy, or contradictory.\n\n### Phase 5: Suggest optional next action\n\nIf useful, offer one concrete follow-up:\n\n- Save the lineage as a brain page.\n- Run broad `concept-synthesis` if the user actually wants the whole concept\n  map refreshed.\n- Run or inspect trajectory data if the idea turned out to depend on structured\n  entity facts.\n- Run a contradiction probe only when stale cached findings are insufficient\n  and the user explicitly wants that heavier pass.\n\n## Output Format\n\nUse this shape for normal answers:\n\n```markdown\n## Current Live Version\n[1-3 sentences. Include confidence: high \u002F medium \u002F low.]\n\n## Lineage\n- First mention: [date] - [claim] ([source-id:slug], \"short quote\")\n- Best articulation: [date] - [claim] ([source-id:slug], \"short quote\")\n- Turning point: [date] - [what changed] ([source-id:slug])\n\n## Reversals and Contradictions\n- Reversal: [what changed, with before\u002Fafter evidence]\n- Contradiction: [what conflicts, or \"No clear evidence found\"]\n\n## Abandoned Branches\n- [branch] - [why it appears abandoned, with evidence]\n\n## Related Concepts\n- [concept slug or title] - [relationship]\n\n## Evidence Gaps\n- [bucket or claim] - [what was checked and what is missing]\n```\n\nFor short answers, collapse sections, but keep the same distinctions. Always\ncite the source for each non-gap claim.\n\n## Quality Rules\n\n- Quote exact text when naming first mention or best articulation.\n- Include dates when the source has dates. If no date is available, say\n  \"undated\" rather than guessing.\n- Treat the user's direct statements as highest authority for the user's own\n  current view.\n- Treat holder-attributed takes as beliefs by that holder, not automatically\n  as facts about the world or the brain owner.\n- Mark confidence low when evidence comes from a single weak snippet, an\n  undated page, or a fuzzy semantic match.\n- Preserve source ids in citations when search or page payloads include them.\n\n## When it fails\n\nFollow the [agent operator protocol](..\u002Fconventions\u002Fagent-operator-protocol.md) for any gbrain error `code`, exit code, `[AGENT]` block or notice block. Specific to this skill:\n\n- `find_trajectory` or the concept search returns nothing with a degraded notice: keyword-only search misses earlier phrasings, so say so and do not claim \"this idea first appears in X\".\n- `get_page` returns `page_not_found` for a concept stub: resolve the slug by title search before tracing; report the gap instead of inventing a lineage step.\n\n## Anti-Patterns\n\n- Running `concept-synthesis` for a single-idea question.\n- Presenting an entity's MRR, ARR, role, or status trajectory as conceptual\n  lineage without explaining the distinction.\n- Treating normal temporal evolution as contradiction.\n- Inventing abandoned branches because the story would be more interesting.\n- Saving or rewriting brain pages without explicit user instruction.\n- Using real names, companies, funds, or fork-specific examples in bundled\n  fixtures or documentation.\n\n## Related Skills and Operations\n\n- `skills\u002Fconcept-synthesis\u002FSKILL.md` - broad mutating concept-map synthesis.\n- `skills\u002Fquery\u002FSKILL.md` - general brain search and cited answers.\n- `skills\u002Fbrain-ops\u002FSKILL.md` - source attribution and brain-first behavior.\n- `find_trajectory` - structured typed-fact and event timelines for entities.\n- `find_contradictions` - cached suspected contradiction findings.\n\n## Tools Used\n\n- `search` - keyword search for exact phrase variants and dated mentions.\n- `query` - semantic search for conceptual matches.\n- `get_page` - full context for candidate source pages.\n- `list_pages` - concept-page discovery and scoped page enumeration.\n- `takes_search` - holder-attributed beliefs, bets, hunches, and facts.\n- `find_contradictions` - cached contradiction findings when relevant.\n- `find_trajectory` - optional structured entity trajectory side-channel.\n","# idea-lineage - Single-Idea Evolution Through the Brain\n\n> **Convention:** see [conventions\u002Fquality.md](..\u002Fconventions\u002Fquality.md) for\n> citation rules, quote fidelity, and source-backed claims.\n>\n> **Boundary:** see [docs\u002Ftakes-vs-facts.md](https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fdocs\u002Ftakes-vs-facts.md) for\n> the distinction between holder-attributed takes and the brain owner's hot\n> facts. Do not collapse those layers when summarizing lineage.\n\n## What this solves\n\nUsers often want to understand how one idea changed across time: when it first\nappeared, when it became sharp, what it displaced, what it contradicted, and\nwhat version is alive now. That is different from building a whole concept map\nand different from charting an entity's metric trajectory.\n\nUse this skill when the user asks about one idea, topic, phrase, or concept\npage and wants its evolution through the brain.\n\nCanonical examples:\n\n- \"Run idea lineage on founder-led sales.\"\n- \"How has my thinking about compounding trust changed?\"\n- \"What is my current version of this idea?\"\n- \"Where did this idea come from, and what did I abandon along the way?\"\n\n## What this is not\n\n- Not `concept-synthesis`: that skill deduplicates many concept stubs, tiers\n  them, writes concept pages, and builds a broad intellectual map.\n- Not `find_trajectory`: that operation charts typed facts or event rows for\n  an entity, such as MRR, role, location, or status over time.\n- Not a contradiction-probe runner: this skill may read cached contradiction\n  findings when available, but it does not launch expensive probes.\n- Not a writing mode by default: do not write a lineage page unless the user\n  explicitly asks for a saved artifact after seeing the read-only answer.\n\n## Contract\n\nThis skill guarantees:\n\n- A single-idea scope is preserved. Broad corpus or \"map my concepts\" prompts\n  route to `skills\u002Fconcept-synthesis\u002FSKILL.md` instead.\n- Every lineage claim cites existing brain evidence: page slug, source id when\n  present, date, and short quote or snippet.\n- Missing evidence is labeled as a gap, not patched with plausible narrative.\n- Contradictions, reversals, and abandoned branches are separated from normal\n  temporal evolution.\n- The default mode is read-only and does not mutate brain pages.\n\n## Phases\n\n### Phase 1: Resolve the idea target\n\n1. Restate the idea in one sentence.\n2. Search for exact phrase variants with `search`.\n3. Run one semantic `query` for the natural-language version.\n4. Check `list_pages` for concept pages when the idea has an obvious concept\n   slug or title.\n5. If results point to an entity\u002Fmetric\u002Fstatus trajectory rather than a concept,\n   hand off to `find_trajectory` or the normal query\u002Fthink trajectory path.\n\nIf multiple distinct ideas share the same phrase, ask the user to choose the\nintended one before synthesizing.\n\n### Phase 2: Gather evidence\n\nCollect enough evidence to support or reject each output bucket:\n\n- Search chunks with dates and source slugs.\n- Full pages via `get_page` for the top relevant concept, note, transcript,\n  meeting, article, or project pages.\n- Related concept pages through backlinks, `related` frontmatter, or repeated\n  co-occurrence in search results.\n- Takes via `takes_search` when the idea appears as a belief, bet, hunch, or\n  attributed claim.\n- Cached contradiction findings via `find_contradictions` when the user asks\n  about inconsistency or the search results show obvious conflict.\n- `find_trajectory` only when the evidence is entity\u002Fattribute-shaped, such as\n  a role\u002Fstatus\u002Fmetric evolution that is relevant to the idea's story.\n\nPrefer fewer high-quality sources over a long unsorted pile. Read full pages\nwhen snippets imply a lineage milestone.\n\n### Phase 3: Classify lineage moments\n\nClassify evidence into these buckets:\n\n1. **First mention** - earliest dated evidence where the idea appears.\n2. **Best articulation** - the clearest or most complete expression, not\n   necessarily the newest.\n3. **Current live version** - the most recent high-authority version that still\n   appears active.\n4. **Reversals** - places where the user's stance changed direction.\n5. **Contradictions** - claims that cannot both be true at the same time or\n   under the same assumptions. Distinguish these from legitimate temporal\n   supersession.\n6. **Abandoned branches** - promising variants that appear and then disappear,\n   lose support, or are explicitly rejected.\n7. **Related concepts** - nearby ideas that shaped or inherited part of the\n   original idea.\n\nWhen a bucket has no evidence, write \"No clear evidence found\" with a brief note\nabout what was checked.\n\n### Phase 4: Synthesize the lineage\n\nWrite the answer in the output format below. Keep the synthesis proportional to\nthe evidence. Do not overfit a smooth evolution if the evidence is sparse,\nmessy, or contradictory.\n\n### Phase 5: Suggest optional next action\n\nIf useful, offer one concrete follow-up:\n\n- Save the lineage as a brain page.\n- Run broad `concept-synthesis` if the user actually wants the whole concept\n  map refreshed.\n- Run or inspect trajectory data if the idea turned out to depend on structured\n  entity facts.\n- Run a contradiction probe only when stale cached findings are insufficient\n  and the user explicitly wants that heavier pass.\n\n## Output Format\n\nUse this shape for normal answers:\n\n```markdown\n## Current Live Version\n[1-3 sentences. Include confidence: high \u002F medium \u002F low.]\n\n## Lineage\n- First mention: [date] - [claim] ([source-id:slug], \"short quote\")\n- Best articulation: [date] - [claim] ([source-id:slug], \"short quote\")\n- Turning point: [date] - [what changed] ([source-id:slug])\n\n## Reversals and Contradictions\n- Reversal: [what changed, with before\u002Fafter evidence]\n- Contradiction: [what conflicts, or \"No clear evidence found\"]\n\n## Abandoned Branches\n- [branch] - [why it appears abandoned, with evidence]\n\n## Related Concepts\n- [concept slug or title] - [relationship]\n\n## Evidence Gaps\n- [bucket or claim] - [what was checked and what is missing]\n```\n\nFor short answers, collapse sections, but keep the same distinctions. Always\ncite the source for each non-gap claim.\n\n## Quality Rules\n\n- Quote exact text when naming first mention or best articulation.\n- Include dates when the source has dates. If no date is available, say\n  \"undated\" rather than guessing.\n- Treat the user's direct statements as highest authority for the user's own\n  current view.\n- Treat holder-attributed takes as beliefs by that holder, not automatically\n  as facts about the world or the brain owner.\n- Mark confidence low when evidence comes from a single weak snippet, an\n  undated page, or a fuzzy semantic match.\n- Preserve source ids in citations when search or page payloads include them.\n\n## When it fails\n\nFollow the [agent operator protocol](..\u002Fconventions\u002Fagent-operator-protocol.md) for any gbrain error `code`, exit code, `[AGENT]` block or notice block. Specific to this skill:\n\n- `find_trajectory` or the concept search returns nothing with a degraded notice: keyword-only search misses earlier phrasings, so say so and do not claim \"this idea first appears in X\".\n- `get_page` returns `page_not_found` for a concept stub: resolve the slug by title search before tracing; report the gap instead of inventing a lineage step.\n\n## Anti-Patterns\n\n- Running `concept-synthesis` for a single-idea question.\n- Presenting an entity's MRR, ARR, role, or status trajectory as conceptual\n  lineage without explaining the distinction.\n- Treating normal temporal evolution as contradiction.\n- Inventing abandoned branches because the story would be more interesting.\n- Saving or rewriting brain pages without explicit user instruction.\n- Using real names, companies, funds, or fork-specific examples in bundled\n  fixtures or documentation.\n\n## Related Skills and Operations\n\n- `skills\u002Fconcept-synthesis\u002FSKILL.md` - broad mutating concept-map synthesis.\n- `skills\u002Fquery\u002FSKILL.md` - general brain search and cited answers.\n- `skills\u002Fbrain-ops\u002FSKILL.md` - source attribution and brain-first behavior.\n- `find_trajectory` - structured typed-fact and event timelines for entities.\n- `find_contradictions` - cached suspected contradiction findings.\n\n## Tools Used\n\n- `search` - keyword search for exact phrase variants and dated mentions.\n- `query` - semantic search for conceptual matches.\n- `get_page` - full context for candidate source pages.\n- `list_pages` - concept-page discovery and scoped page enumeration.\n- `takes_search` - holder-attributed beliefs, bets, hunches, and facts.\n- `find_contradictions` - cached contradiction findings when relevant.\n- `find_trajectory` - optional structured entity trajectory side-channel.\n",{"name":5,"tools":45,"version":51,"mutating":41,"triggers":52,"description":60,"when_to_use":61},[39,34,46,47,48,49,50],"get_page","list_pages","takes_search","find_contradictions","find_trajectory","0.1.0",[20,53,54,55,56,57,58,59],"trace the lineage of this idea","how my thinking about","how has my thinking about","current version of this idea","what is my current version of","show reversals in my thinking about","where did this idea come from","Trace one idea's evolution through the brain: first mention, best\narticulation, related concepts, reversals, contradictions, abandoned\nbranches, and the current live version. Use for single-idea conceptual\nlineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics.\n","Use when the user asks: \"idea lineage\", \"trace the lineage of this idea\", \"how my thinking about\", \"how has my thinking about\", \"current version of this idea\".","master","074ec301549ded4930f04d2c3b22d709a6c095cc","plugin-variants\u002Fgbrain-coding\u002Fskills\u002Fidea-lineage",4902,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan","https:\u002F\u002Fblog.garrytan.com","Writes software, dreams. ","2026-11-14 04:11:30",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":72,"prompt":82,"zipAvailable":83},[73,76,79],{"tool":74,"command":75},"npx","npx skills add garrytan\u002Fgbrain --skill idea-lineage",{"tool":77,"command":78},"bunx","bunx skills add garrytan\u002Fgbrain --skill idea-lineage",{"tool":80,"command":81},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add garrytan\u002Fgbrain --skill idea-lineage","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fplugin-variants\u002Fgbrain-coding\u002Fskills\u002Fidea-lineage\u002FSKILL.md",true,[85],{"path":86,"resourceType":87,"resourceTypeDesc":88,"sizeBytes":89,"sourceHtmlUrl":90},"routing-eval.jsonl","OTHER","其他",916,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fplugin-variants\u002Fgbrain-coding\u002Fskills\u002Fidea-lineage\u002Frouting-eval.jsonl",[92,102,108,130,156,169],{"skillNo":93,"name":94,"nameZh":6,"description":6,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":95,"categories":96,"keywords":97,"publishedAt":40},"01M6N109FNGH1PK49T734PZXGB","query-helper","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-catalog\u002Fskills\u002Fquery-helper\u002FSKILL.md",[],[98,99,34,39,100,101,28],"query helper","helper","page","find",{"skillNo":103,"name":104,"nameZh":6,"description":6,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":105,"categories":106,"keywords":107,"publishedAt":40},"01M6N108A23GW6NGQEQ0E7GV0A","broken","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-catalog\u002Fskills\u002Fbroken\u002FSKILL.md",[],[104],{"skillNo":109,"name":110,"nameZh":6,"description":111,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":112,"categories":113,"keywords":114,"publishedAt":40},"01M6N105E88C5K2H03H0CC79G1","brain-ops","Read, enrich, and write brain pages with source attribution.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-catalog\u002Fskills\u002Fbrain-ops\u002FSKILL.md",[],[115,30,116,117,118,100,119,120,121,122,34,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,39],"brain ops","ops","true","attribution","read","write","up","look","pages","people","with","enrich","web","path","source",{"skillNo":131,"name":132,"nameZh":6,"description":133,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":134,"categories":135,"keywords":141,"publishedAt":40},"01M6N102GRMF22TVCNT6RK5MRD","meeting-prep","Build a briefing before you meet someone, from their recent threads, open loops and what they care about.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-catalog-query\u002Fskills\u002Fmeeting-prep\u002FSKILL.md",[136],{"categoryNo":137,"categoryName":138,"taxonomyType":139,"taxonomyTypeDesc":140},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000034","行政与办公人员","PROFESSION","适用职业",[142,143,144,145,146,39,147,148,149,34,28,150,151,152,153,154,24,155],"meeting","prep","meeting prep","me","prepare","brief","open","build","loops","about","you","briefing","threads","Meet",{"skillNo":157,"name":158,"nameZh":6,"description":159,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":160,"categories":161,"keywords":162,"publishedAt":40},"01M6N1005QK7REHX5KGMNR5PF0","inbox-zero","Triage the inbox into replies, delegations and archives.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-catalog-query\u002Fskills\u002Finbox-zero\u002FSKILL.md",[],[163,164,165,39,166,28,167,26,168],"inbox zero","ZeRO","inbox","clear","replies","triage",{"skillNo":170,"name":171,"nameZh":6,"description":172,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":173,"categories":174,"keywords":175,"publishedAt":40},"01M6N0ZXQ8RRRW71PNV61T57GP","deal-memo","Draft an investment memo from the deal pages and the founder history already in the brain.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgarrytan\u002Fgbrain\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-catalog-query\u002Fskills\u002Fdeal-memo\u002FSKILL.md",[],[176,177,178,123,30,179,180,120,181,117,39,182],"deal memo","deal","memo","draft","investment","history","founder"]