stop-slop
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-12
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- stop-slop
- metadata
- { "author": "Hardik Pandya (https://hvpandya.com)", "trigger": "Writing prose, editing drafts, reviewing content for AI patterns" }
- description
- Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
02 资源文件 6
- 参考文档CHANGELOG.md895 B
- 许可证LICENSE1.0 KB
- 参考文档README.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档references/examples.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/phrases.md2.8 KB
- 参考文档references/structures.md5.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Stop Slop
Eliminate predictable AI writing patterns from prose.
Core Rules
-
Cut filler phrases. Remove throat-clearing openers, emphasis crutches, and all adverbs. See references/phrases.md.
-
Break formulaic structures. Avoid binary contrasts, negative listings, dramatic fragmentation, rhetorical setups, false agency. See references/structures.md.
-
Use active voice. Every sentence needs a human subject doing something. No passive constructions. No inanimate objects performing human actions ("the complaint becomes a fix").
-
Be specific. No vague declaratives ("The reasons are structural"). Name the specific thing. No lazy extremes ("every," "always," "never") doing vague work.
-
Put the reader in the room. No narrator-from-a-distance voice. "You" beats "People." Specifics beat abstractions.
-
Vary rhythm. Mix sentence lengths. Two items beat three. End paragraphs differently. No em dashes.
-
Trust readers. State facts directly. Skip softening, justification, hand-holding.
-
Cut quotables. If it sounds like a pull-quote, rewrite it.
Quick Checks
Before delivering prose:
- Any adverbs? Kill them.
- Any passive voice? Find the actor, make them the subject.
- Inanimate thing doing a human verb ("the decision emerges")? Name the person.
- Sentence starts with a Wh- word? Restructure it.
- Any "here's what/this/that" throat-clearing? Cut to the point.
- Any "not X, it's Y" contrasts? State Y directly.
- Three consecutive sentences match length? Break one.
- Paragraph ends with punchy one-liner? Vary it.
- Em-dash anywhere? Remove it.
- Vague declarative ("The implications are significant")? Name the specific implication.
- Narrator-from-a-distance ("Nobody designed this")? Put the reader in the scene.
- Meta-joiners ("The rest of this essay...")? Delete. Let the essay move.
Scoring
Rate 1-10 on each dimension:
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Directness | Statements or announcements? |
| Rhythm | Varied or metronomic? |
| Trust | Respects reader intelligence? |
| Authenticity | Sounds human? |
| Density | Anything cuttable? |
Below 35/50: revise.
Examples
See references/examples.md for before/after transformations.
License
MIT
04 同仓库更多 Skills
create-master
基于佛教经典文献,生成特定高僧大德的 AI 教学角色
writing-dna-skill
从至少 20 篇完整文章中蒸馏可复用的写作 DNA,分析语言、文章结构、选题逻辑、素材策略、认知框架和视觉风格,并生成 Writing-DNA.md;按该 DNA 写作时会读取全部蒸馏产物和 5 篇相关原文。用于中英文作者、账号、品牌或出版物的风格分析与一致性写作。 Distill reusable Writing DNA from at least 20 complete articles for Chinese or English authors, publications, brands, and accounts; use for language, structure, topic logic, source strategy, cognitive-frame, and visual-style analysis.
shuorenhua
检查和清理中英文文本里的 AI 套路,适用于“去 AI 味”“说人话”“自然一点”“别像模板”“先标问题”这类改写和审稿需求;按场景控制力度,同时保留事实、术语、语域和责任主体。
naming
Name products, SaaS, brands, open source projects, bots, and apps. Use when the user needs to name something, find a brand name, or pick a product name. Metaphor-driven process that produces memorable, meaningful names and avoids AI slop.
humanizer-zh
去除文本中的 AI 生成痕迹。适用于编辑或审阅文本,使其听起来更自然、更像人类书写。 基于维基百科的"AI 写作特征"综合指南。检测并修复以下模式:夸大的象征意义、 宣传性语言、以 -ing 结尾的肤浅分析、模糊的归因、破折号过度使用、三段式法则、 AI 词汇、否定式排比、过多的连接性短语。
awesome-anti-ai-slop
Use this skill when evaluating, selecting, or comparing tools and workflows that reduce low-quality AI-generated writing, code, PRs, frontend UI, design, or team process artifacts. Provides a curated anti-AI-slop directory, starter stacks, evaluation criteria, and references for text, Chinese writing, academic writing, frontend taste, code quality, and governance workflows.