AGENT SKILL

ideate-month

Plan next month's content calendar from a theme, signals and last month's results. "what should we post next month"

使用场景视觉设计
License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-08
Stars
★ 43
Forks
9

01 前言 Front Matter

name
ideate-month
effort
high
description
Plan next month's content calendar from a theme, signals and last month's results. "what should we post next month"
argument-hint
[--brand <name>] [--month <YYYY-MM>] [--theme <text>] [--signals <pasted material>]
user-invocable
true

03 SKILL.md 正文

/socialforge:ideate-month — the month before the calendar exists

Script location. If your host does not set ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}, the scripts are in this plugin's scripts/ folder, next to skills/. Run them with Python 3.10 or newer: python, or python3 where python is not found (macOS, many Linux systems).

SocialForge's pipeline starts at parse-calendar — someone hands it a calendar. This skill is for when nobody has: the client asks "what should this month be about?", and that question is the actual work they are paying for.

The output is a draft calendar in the exact shape parse-calendar ingests, so an approved plan flows into production with zero re-typing.

Inputs — use whichever exist, say which were missing

  1. The brand profile (required) — pillars, voice, platforms, compliance rules from brand-config.json. No profile → stop and run /socialforge:brand-setup first. Ideating without pillars produces generic content for nobody.
  2. A theme or business context (optional) — a launch, a season, a campaign the client named.
  3. Raw signals (optional) — pasted news, industry threads, competitor moves, sales-call notes, community questions. Mine them; never use them as filler. Every signal either maps to a pillar and a concrete angle, or it is dropped and listed as dropped, with the reason.
  4. Last month's results (optional) — measured first, anecdote second:
    • Measured: run python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/ingest_performance.py" --action wins --brand {brand} --month {last-month}. If a performance.json exists (built by /socialforge:ingest-performance from the platform's own analytics export), this returns winners ranked with a sample floor and a margin over the month's median engagement rate — plus an honest no_clear_wins when the month was flat. A win here is validated audience demand: plan its compounding follow-ups.
    • Anecdotal: the review gallery, status tracker, or anything the client reports as having worked. Usable, but labeled — see the output rules.
    • If the measured path has no data, say so and offer to ingest an export first; a two-minute CSV ingest upgrades the whole plan's foundation.
  5. A research brief (optional) — if /socialforge:research-month wrote output/{brand}/{month}/research-brief.md, read it as evidence (outlier posts, customer language, competitor ad themes) and carry its basis labels into "What last month validated" and "Signals used / dropped"; its hypotheses are leads, not wins.

Process

  1. Read the brand profile. List pillars, platforms, posting cadence.
  2. Check the measured path first (ingest_performance.py --action wins), then fold in anecdotal reports. Identify the 1–3 clear wins and design follow-ups that compound them — the deeper dive, the objection it raised, the adjacent question it opened. Not a repost of the same idea. Honesty rules: a no_clear_wins verdict is itself a finding — plan from pillars and signals and say the wins rung had nothing; never promote an unranked post (below the sample floor) to a win because it felt good.
  3. Mine any signals into angles, each tagged with its pillar. Drop what does not map — and say so.
  4. Design 1–2 series — connected multi-part sequences with an arc (setup → develop → payoff), each part standing alone but rewarding the follower. A month of disconnected posts is a feed; a series builds a habit.
  5. Fill the remaining cadence with one-off posts across pillars.
  6. Assign every post a tier honestly: HERO (heavy production, big swing), HUB (core pillar content), HYGIENE (light, frequent presence).
  7. Balance platforms per the brand's platform config — not everything everywhere.

Output structure

# Month plan — {brand}, {YYYY-MM}

## The month's spine
[2-3 sentences: the theme, the wins being compounded, what the month should
have achieved by its last post]

## Series ({n})
### Series A: [name] — [pillar]
Arc: [what part 1 sets up, how it develops, where it pays off]
Parts: [P03, P07, P11] — see calendar below

## What last month validated (if performance was provided)
- [win — measured: 4.1% ER, 2.3x month median] → [the compounding follow-up now on the calendar, with post id]
- [win — anecdotal: client-reported] → [follow-up, labeled so the client knows the basis differs]

## Signals used / dropped (if signals were provided)
- USED: [signal] → [P05: the angle]
- DROPPED: [signal] — [why it does not serve this brand's pillars]

## Draft calendar (calendar-data.json compatible)
```json
{
  "month": "YYYY-MM",
  "brand": "{brand}",
  "status": "DRAFT — needs client approval",
  "posts": [
    {
      "post_id": "P01",
      "date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
      "platform": "linkedin",
      "content_type": "carousel",
      "tier": "HUB",
      "topic": "[specific enough that a stranger could brief a designer from it]",
      "pillar": "[brand pillar]",
      "series": "[series name or null]",
      "rationale": "[one line: why this post, why this day]"
    }
  ]
}

What I did not have

[Which optional inputs were missing and what they would have improved]


## Critical rules

- **Every post traces to a pillar, a win, or a signal.** A post that traces to
  none of them is filler; cut it and say the cadence target was not met rather
  than padding.
- **Topics must be briefable.** "5 mistakes agencies make with reporting
  (carousel, one mistake per slide)" is a topic. "Engagement post" is not.
- **At least one series per month.** Disconnected posts build reach at best; a
  series builds return visits.
- **Wins get follow-ups, not reposts.** The follow-up answers what the win
  opened, from the validated angle — never the same post again slightly
  reworded.
- **Tier honestly.** A month of all-HERO is a burnout plan; all-HYGIENE is
  invisible. Typical shape: 1–2 HERO, 40–50% HUB, the rest HYGIENE.
- **The draft is a draft.** Output carries `status: DRAFT` and this skill never
  writes calendar-data.json to the workspace itself — the client approves, then
  `/socialforge:parse-calendar` ingests it as the approved source of truth.
- **State what was missing.** A plan built without performance data or signals
  is a weaker plan; the client should know that, not discover it.

## Pairs with

- `/socialforge:ingest-performance` — feeds the wins rung from the platform's own numbers; run it on last month before planning this one
- `/socialforge:parse-calendar` — ingests the approved draft verbatim
- `/socialforge:reactive-post` — mid-month trend response; this skill plans, that one reacts
- `/socialforge:price-check` — quote the month's video load before the client approves it

04 同仓库更多 Skills