scaffold
Project-aware file generation. Reads existing codebase conventions (naming, structure, imports, exports, test patterns) then generates new files that match exactly. Wires generated files into the project's registration points.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-13
- Stars
- ★ 929
- Forks
- 84
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- scaffold
- license
- MIT
- description
- Project-aware file generation. Reads existing codebase conventions (naming, structure, imports, exports, test patterns) then generates new files that match exactly. Wires generated files into the project's registration points.
- auto-trigger
- false
- user-invocable
- true
- trigger_keywords
- [ "scaffold", "generate component", "generate module", "generate service", "new component", "new module", "new route", "new service", "create component", "stub out", "bootstrap" ]
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档__benchmarks__/component-from-exemplar.md1.0 KB
- 参考文档__benchmarks__/existing-dir.md983 B
03 SKILL.md 正文
/scaffold — Project-Aware File Generator
Orientation
Use when: Creating a new component, module, service, route, hook, domain, or utility with existing examples in the project.
Do NOT use when: The file has no precedent (use /marshal for unconstrained generation), you're modifying existing files (use /refactor), or the project has no conventions yet.
Needs: target type, name, and optional description.
Protocol
Step 1: IDENTIFY THE TARGET
Parse the user's request into:
- type: component | module | service | route | hook | domain | utility | custom
- name: the name the user gave (e.g., "UserProfile", "auth-service", "settings route")
- description: what it does, if provided (otherwise leave blank for now)
If the type is ambiguous, ask ONE clarifying question. Do not ask more than one.
Step 2: FIND EXEMPLARS
Search the codebase for 2-3 existing files of the same type.
Search strategy by type:
| Type | Search Pattern | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| component | **/*.tsx in the same directory or sibling directories |
Functional components with similar complexity |
| module | Same directory as where new module will live | Registration pattern, exports, config shape |
| service | **/services/**, **/lib/** |
Class vs function, singleton vs factory, error handling |
| route | Router config files, **/routes.*, **/pages/** |
Route definition format, lazy loading, guards |
| hook | **/hooks/**, **/use*.ts |
Naming, parameter patterns, return types, cleanup |
| domain | Top-level domain/feature directories | Manifest structure, entry point, internal layout |
| utility | **/utils/**, **/helpers/** |
Pure function style, type signatures, JSDoc |
For each exemplar, extract:
- File naming convention (PascalCase, kebab-case, camelCase, snake_case)
- Directory placement (co-located with component? separate
hooks/dir?) - Import style (path aliases? relative? named imports? default exports?)
- Export style (named exports? default? re-exported from barrel/index file?)
- Internal patterns (how state is managed, how errors are handled, JSDoc or no)
- Test co-location (
.test.tsnext to file?__tests__/directory? separatetests/tree?) - Types pattern (inline? separate
.types.ts? shared types file?)
Output a brief analysis (3-5 lines) summarizing the conventions you found.
Step 3: DETERMINE THE FILE SET
Based on the exemplars, determine which files to generate. Not every project needs every file. Only generate what the project's conventions call for.
Decision matrix:
| File | Generate IF... |
|---|---|
| Main file | Always |
Types file (.types.ts) |
Project separates types into their own files (check exemplars) |
Test file (.test.ts) |
Project has co-located tests for this type of file |
| Barrel/index file | Project uses barrel exports AND this file's directory doesn't already have one |
| Barrel update | Project uses barrel exports AND the directory already has an index file |
Style file (.module.css, .styled.ts) |
Project uses co-located styles for this type |
Storybook file (.stories.tsx) |
Project has stories for this type of file |
Do NOT generate:
- Empty placeholder files with only a TODO comment
- Test files that only contain
describe('...', () => { it.todo('...') }) - Types files that only re-export from elsewhere
- Any file type the project doesn't already use
Step 4: GENERATE THE FILES
For each file in the set, generate content by adapting the closest exemplar.
Rules:
- Match the exemplar's structure exactly — same section order, same patterns
- Replace names and specific logic, keep structural patterns
- Every generated file must be syntactically valid and importable
- No placeholder comments (
// TODO: implement,// Add logic here) - No empty function bodies unless the exemplar has them
- Minimal but functional — renders something, has at least one real method, returns a typed value
- Match the project's TypeScript strictness
Match the exemplar's props pattern, state management, utility imports, async patterns, and error handling exactly.
Step 5: WIRE IT IN
Find every registration point the exemplars use and add the new file there.
Common wiring points (check which ones the project uses):
| Wiring Point | How to Find It | What to Add |
|---|---|---|
| Barrel exports | index.ts in the same or parent directory |
export { NewThing } from './NewThing' |
| Route registration | Router config file (search for exemplar's route) | New route entry matching the pattern |
| Module registry | Bootstrap/registration file | New registration call |
| Navigation/sidebar | Nav config array | New nav entry if appropriate |
| Lazy loading map | Dynamic import map | New lazy import entry |
| Type unions | Discriminated unions that list all variants | New variant if this is a new "type" of thing |
Rules:
- Only wire into registration points that the exemplars actually use
- Match the exact format — same spacing, same trailing commas, same comments
- If a registration point uses alphabetical ordering, maintain it
- Never create new registration points — only add to existing ones
Step 6: VERIFY
Run typecheck — every generated file must pass. Fix failures before exiting. If typecheck is unavailable, do a manual read-through for syntax and import correctness.
Fringe Cases
- Target directory or file already exists: Do not silently overwrite. Confirm with the user before proceeding. Output: "A file at
{path}already exists. Overwrite it?" and wait for confirmation. - Template or exemplar not found: List the available file types in the codebase and ask which one to use as the exemplar. Never scaffold from memory if no exemplar exists.
- Language or framework not detected: Ask the user directly rather than guessing. One question: "What type of file should this be? (e.g., React component, Express route, utility function)"
- Typecheck fails after generation: Fix the issue before exiting — do not leave the user with broken generated files.
- No wiring point found: Note the missing registration explicitly in the exit summary rather than silently leaving the file unwired.
Contextual Gates
Reversibility: Amber — creates new files and modifies registration points; git checkout to undo.
Cost: No cost actions — file generation only; no agents spawned, no confirmation needed.
Trust: No gates — safe at all trust levels; overwrite confirmation is in Fringe Cases.
Quality Gates
All of these must be true before the skill exits:
- [ ] Found 2+ exemplar files of the same type in the project
- [ ] Generated files match the project's naming convention exactly
- [ ] Generated files match the project's import/export style exactly
- [ ] No placeholder comments, TODO stubs, or empty function bodies
- [ ] Every generated file is syntactically valid TypeScript/JavaScript
- [ ] Main file is wired into the project (barrel export, route, registry, etc.)
- [ ] Test file exists IF AND ONLY IF the project co-locates tests for this type
- [ ] Types file exists IF AND ONLY IF the project separates types for this type
- [ ] Typecheck passes (or manual verification if typecheck unavailable)
Exit Protocol
Output a summary in this format:
SCAFFOLD COMPLETE
Created:
- path/to/MainFile.tsx (component)
- path/to/MainFile.test.tsx (test)
- path/to/MainFile.types.ts (types)
Wired into:
- path/to/index.ts (barrel export)
- path/to/routes.ts (route registration)
Conventions matched from:
- path/to/ExemplarA.tsx
- path/to/ExemplarB.tsx
Typecheck: PASS
---HANDOFF---
- Scaffolded: {name} ({type})
- Created: {N} files, wired into {N} registration points
- Conventions matched from: {exemplar names}
- Reversibility: green -- new files only, delete to undo
---
04 同仓库更多 Skills
workspace
Multi-repo campaign coordinator. Same lifecycle as fleet -- scope claims, discovery relay, wave-based execution -- but the unit of work is a repo, not a file. Coordinates campaigns across repositories with shared context.
wiki
Markdown-first knowledge base where the LLM acts as librarian. Ingests raw sources, compiles and interlinks topic files, self-maintains an index. No vector DB or embeddings required -- uses LLM-native navigation over structured markdown up to ~400K words.
watch
File sentinel that monitors the working directory for changes and marker comments, then auto-triggers appropriate skills. Poll-based via git diff against the last scan commit. Writes intake items for batch processing and routes marker actions through /do. Use for automatic reactions to file changes; do NOT use for one-off inspection or tasks needing human judgment per file.
verify
Self-test the Citadel hook pipeline from within a live session. Exercises real tool calls (Write, Edit, Bash, Read) and checks that hooks fired, telemetry accumulated, and no errors occurred. Reports HOOK HEALTH: PASS or HOOK HEALTH: FAIL with a per-hook breakdown.
unharness
Safely leave Citadel using the active adoption receipt. Produces a no-write, reviewable plan, preserves a portable archive, removes only exact owned material, and reports modified or externally registered surfaces as retained or unknown. Legacy installs must be imported before exact leave is claimed.
triage
GitHub issue and PR investigator. Pulls open issues/PRs, classifies them, searches the codebase for root cause or reviews contributed code, proposes fixes with file:line references, and optionally implements fixes. Use for investigating GitHub issues and reviewing PRs; do NOT use for general code review unrelated to GitHub issues.