[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6ERTNG9NT8SQH5FHN91JRTS":3,"skill-same:01M6ERTNG9NT8SQH5FHN91JRTS":57},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":29,"linkOnly":30,"markdownContent":31,"markdownBody":32,"frontMatter":33,"refName":34,"commitSha":35,"skillDirectory":36,"forksCount":37,"repositoryHtmlUrl":38,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":39,"ownerBlogUrl":40,"ownerDescription":41,"updatedAt":42,"install":43,"resources":56},"01M6ERTNG9NT8SQH5FHN91JRTS","verification-before-completion",null,"Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always","nocksock\u002Fsuperpowers","nocksock","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F22164?v=4","01M6ERQWRTZARGFM7AX8HB89GZ","Nils Riedemann","01M6ERQWXFH5876Z6HEDH9TWYS",1,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fverification-before-completion\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28],"verification","verification before completion","work","use","evidence","claim","commands","complete","output","about","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: verification-before-completion\ndescription: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always\n---\n\n# Verification Before Completion\n\n## Overview\n\nClaiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.\n\n**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.\n\n**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**\n\n## The Iron Law\n\n```\nNO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE\n```\n\nIf you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.\n\n## The Gate Function\n\n```\nBEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:\n\n1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?\n2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)\n3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures\n4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?\n   - If NO: State actual status with evidence\n   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence\n5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim\n\nSkip any step = lying, not verifying\n```\n\n## Common Failures\n\n| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |\n|-------|----------|----------------|\n| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, \"should pass\" |\n| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |\n| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |\n| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |\n| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |\n| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports \"success\" |\n| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |\n\n## Red Flags - STOP\n\n- Using \"should\", \"probably\", \"seems to\"\n- Expressing satisfaction before verification (\"Great!\", \"Perfect!\", \"Done!\", etc.)\n- About to commit\u002Fpush\u002FPR without verification\n- Trusting agent success reports\n- Relying on partial verification\n- Thinking \"just this once\"\n- Tired and wanting work over\n- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**\n\n## Rationalization Prevention\n\n| Excuse | Reality |\n|--------|---------|\n| \"Should work now\" | RUN the verification |\n| \"I'm confident\" | Confidence ≠ evidence |\n| \"Just this once\" | No exceptions |\n| \"Linter passed\" | Linter ≠ compiler |\n| \"Agent said success\" | Verify independently |\n| \"I'm tired\" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |\n| \"Partial check is enough\" | Partial proves nothing |\n| \"Different words so rule doesn't apply\" | Spirit over letter |\n\n## Key Patterns\n\n**Tests:**\n```\n✅ [Run test command] [See: 34\u002F34 pass] \"All tests pass\"\n❌ \"Should pass now\" \u002F \"Looks correct\"\n```\n\n**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**\n```\n✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)\n❌ \"I've written a regression test\" (without red-green verification)\n```\n\n**Build:**\n```\n✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] \"Build passes\"\n❌ \"Linter passed\" (linter doesn't check compilation)\n```\n\n**Requirements:**\n```\n✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion\n❌ \"Tests pass, phase complete\"\n```\n\n**Agent delegation:**\n```\n✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state\n❌ Trust agent report\n```\n\n## Why This Matters\n\nFrom 24 failure memories:\n- your human partner said \"I don't believe you\" - trust broken\n- Undefined functions shipped - would crash\n- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features\n- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework\n- Violates: \"Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced.\"\n\n## When To Apply\n\n**ALWAYS before:**\n- ANY variation of success\u002Fcompletion claims\n- ANY expression of satisfaction\n- ANY positive statement about work state\n- Committing, PR creation, task completion\n- Moving to next task\n- Delegating to agents\n\n**Rule applies to:**\n- Exact phrases\n- Paraphrases and synonyms\n- Implications of success\n- ANY communication suggesting completion\u002Fcorrectness\n\n## The Bottom Line\n\n**No shortcuts for verification.**\n\nRun the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.\n\nThis is non-negotiable.\n","# Verification Before Completion\n\n## Overview\n\nClaiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.\n\n**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.\n\n**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**\n\n## The Iron Law\n\n```\nNO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE\n```\n\nIf you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.\n\n## The Gate Function\n\n```\nBEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:\n\n1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?\n2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)\n3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures\n4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?\n   - If NO: State actual status with evidence\n   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence\n5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim\n\nSkip any step = lying, not verifying\n```\n\n## Common Failures\n\n| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |\n|-------|----------|----------------|\n| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, \"should pass\" |\n| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |\n| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |\n| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |\n| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |\n| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports \"success\" |\n| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |\n\n## Red Flags - STOP\n\n- Using \"should\", \"probably\", \"seems to\"\n- Expressing satisfaction before verification (\"Great!\", \"Perfect!\", \"Done!\", etc.)\n- About to commit\u002Fpush\u002FPR without verification\n- Trusting agent success reports\n- Relying on partial verification\n- Thinking \"just this once\"\n- Tired and wanting work over\n- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**\n\n## Rationalization Prevention\n\n| Excuse | Reality |\n|--------|---------|\n| \"Should work now\" | RUN the verification |\n| \"I'm confident\" | Confidence ≠ evidence |\n| \"Just this once\" | No exceptions |\n| \"Linter passed\" | Linter ≠ compiler |\n| \"Agent said success\" | Verify independently |\n| \"I'm tired\" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |\n| \"Partial check is enough\" | Partial proves nothing |\n| \"Different words so rule doesn't apply\" | Spirit over letter |\n\n## Key Patterns\n\n**Tests:**\n```\n✅ [Run test command] [See: 34\u002F34 pass] \"All tests pass\"\n❌ \"Should pass now\" \u002F \"Looks correct\"\n```\n\n**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**\n```\n✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)\n❌ \"I've written a regression test\" (without red-green verification)\n```\n\n**Build:**\n```\n✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] \"Build passes\"\n❌ \"Linter passed\" (linter doesn't check compilation)\n```\n\n**Requirements:**\n```\n✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion\n❌ \"Tests pass, phase complete\"\n```\n\n**Agent delegation:**\n```\n✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state\n❌ Trust agent report\n```\n\n## Why This Matters\n\nFrom 24 failure memories:\n- your human partner said \"I don't believe you\" - trust broken\n- Undefined functions shipped - would crash\n- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features\n- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework\n- Violates: \"Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced.\"\n\n## When To Apply\n\n**ALWAYS before:**\n- ANY variation of success\u002Fcompletion claims\n- ANY expression of satisfaction\n- ANY positive statement about work state\n- Committing, PR creation, task completion\n- Moving to next task\n- Delegating to agents\n\n**Rule applies to:**\n- Exact phrases\n- Paraphrases and synonyms\n- Implications of success\n- ANY communication suggesting completion\u002Fcorrectness\n\n## The Bottom Line\n\n**No shortcuts for verification.**\n\nRun the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.\n\nThis is non-negotiable.\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","52d2d5a29297631b5e3ff61fbc8ca3c6505a26e2","skills\u002Fverification-before-completion",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock","http:\u002F\u002Fbleepbloop.studio\u002F","Hi, I'm Nils. I build interfaces for the web.","2026-03-19 04:55:50",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":44,"prompt":54,"zipAvailable":55},[45,48,51],{"tool":46,"command":47},"npx","npx skills add nocksock\u002Fsuperpowers --skill verification-before-completion",{"tool":49,"command":50},"bunx","bunx skills add nocksock\u002Fsuperpowers --skill verification-before-completion",{"tool":52,"command":53},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add nocksock\u002Fsuperpowers --skill verification-before-completion","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fverification-before-completion\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[58,82,98,115,128,139],{"skillNo":59,"name":60,"nameZh":6,"description":61,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":62,"categories":63,"keywords":77,"publishedAt":29},"01M6ERV5R58PKM81EH15XEYPMF","writing-skills","Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-skills\u002FSKILL.md",[64,69,72],{"categoryNo":65,"categoryName":66,"taxonomyType":67,"taxonomyTypeDesc":68},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":70,"categoryName":71,"taxonomyType":67,"taxonomyTypeDesc":68},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":73,"categoryName":74,"taxonomyType":75,"taxonomyTypeDesc":76},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者","PROFESSION","适用职业",[78,79,80,21,81,22],"writing","writing skills","deployment","editing",{"skillNo":83,"name":84,"nameZh":6,"description":85,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":86,"categories":87,"keywords":90,"publishedAt":29},"01M6ERV2JX5DJV2EHSC6FXHEHN","writing-plans","Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-plans\u002FSKILL.md",[88,89],{"categoryNo":70,"categoryName":71,"taxonomyType":67,"taxonomyTypeDesc":68},{"categoryNo":73,"categoryName":74,"taxonomyType":75,"taxonomyTypeDesc":76},[91,92,78,93,94,95,22,96,97],"writing plans","plans","task","spec","code","requirements","multi",{"skillNo":99,"name":100,"nameZh":6,"description":101,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":102,"categories":103,"keywords":109,"publishedAt":29},"01M6ERTZS70NCVS375DTD8HGKE","writing good code","use this skill whenever you write code. it provides a process for creating good, composable apis.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-good-code\u002FSKILL.md",[104,105,108],{"categoryNo":70,"categoryName":71,"taxonomyType":67,"taxonomyTypeDesc":68},{"categoryNo":106,"categoryName":107,"taxonomyType":75,"taxonomyTypeDesc":76},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师",{"categoryNo":73,"categoryName":74,"taxonomyType":75,"taxonomyTypeDesc":76},[78,95,100,110,111,112,22,113,114],"good","it","composable","write","process",{"skillNo":116,"name":117,"nameZh":6,"description":118,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":119,"categories":120,"keywords":121,"publishedAt":29},"01M6ERTVVRPKZVWK6M8EXPB5QE","write-review-elixir","Review Elixir code. ALWAYS use this skill before or after you added code written in elixir to ensure high code quality. Also use use this when asked to review existing elixir code.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwrite-or-review-elixir\u002FSKILL.md",[],[113,122,123,124,125,95,126,22,127],"elixir","write review elixir","review","code quality","quality","elixir code",{"skillNo":129,"name":130,"nameZh":6,"description":131,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":132,"categories":133,"keywords":134,"publishedAt":29},"01M6ERTRAM8PSJ9JTAW5J4ABFD","whats-next","Answers what to do next, what to work on next, where we're at","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwhats-next\u002FSKILL.md",[],[135,136,137,138,21],"whats next","next","do","work on",{"skillNo":140,"name":141,"nameZh":6,"description":142,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":143,"categories":144,"keywords":145,"publishedAt":29},"01M6ERTJAXFN4Y2ZSKX8CV1DJX","using-superpowers","Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnocksock\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fusing-superpowers\u002FSKILL.md",[],[146,147,148,149,150,22,151,152],"using superpowers","superpowers","how","tool","find","conversation","how to"]