brainstorming-extension
Enforces design review gate after brainstorming — bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-02
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- brainstorming-extension
- triggers
- [ "after:superpowers:brainstorming", "design document committed" ]
- description
- Enforces design review gate after brainstorming — bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline
- auto_activate
- true
03 SKILL.md 正文
Brainstorming Extension - Mandatory Review Gate Bridge
Purpose
This skill bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline by enforcing the Design Review Gate after any design document is created. Without this bridge, brainstorming flows directly into writing-plans, bypassing the 5-agent design review that catches architectural, security, and requirements issues before expensive implementation begins.
This is a critical workflow enforcement point, not a passive extension.
The Problem This Solves
superpowers:brainstorming has a built-in terminal state: "The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans." This creates a pipeline bypass:
WITHOUT this extension (broken flow):
superpowers:brainstorming
└── Commits design doc
└── writing-plans (DIRECTLY — no review!)
└── executing-plans
└── Implementation begins on UNREVIEWED design
WITH this extension (correct flow):
superpowers:brainstorming
└── Commits design doc
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MANDATORY DESIGN REVIEW GATE │
│ (Enforced by CLAUDE.md + start-task) │
│ │
│ 5 parallel review agents: │
│ • Product Manager (use cases) │
│ • Architect (architecture) │
│ • Designer (UX/API) │
│ • Security Design (threats) │
│ • CTO (TDD readiness) │
│ │
│ ALL FIVE must APPROVE │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
ALL APPROVED? ────No────► Iterate on design (max 3)
│
Yes
│
▼
writing-plans → plan-review-gate → orchestrated-execution
How Enforcement Works
YAML frontmatter triggers (auto_activate, triggers) are metadata hints — Claude Code does not enforce them automatically. Instead, this enforcement works through three redundant mechanisms:
1. CLAUDE.md Template (Primary)
The CLAUDE.md template contains a "Workflow Enforcement (MANDATORY)" section that explicitly states:
After brainstorming: STOP → Run Design Review Gate → Wait for all 5 agents to APPROVE → Only then proceed
This instruction is loaded into every conversation and overrides conflicting skill instructions.
2. start-task Command (Secondary)
The /start-task command's Problem Definition Phase includes an explicit "MANDATORY HANDOFF" block that requires the design review gate after brainstorming.
3. This Skill Document (Reference)
When this skill is loaded (either by name or auto-activation), it provides the detailed procedure below.
Procedure: After Brainstorming Completes
When superpowers:brainstorming commits a design document:
Step 1: Announce the Gate
## Design Review Gate Activated
Your design document has been committed. Before proceeding to implementation,
I'll run it through our 5-agent review panel.
Spawning reviews:
- Product Manager Agent (use case/requirements validation)
- Architect Agent (technical architecture)
- Designer Agent (UX/API design)
- Security Design Agent (threat modeling/security review)
- CTO Agent (TDD readiness)
This typically takes 2-3 minutes...
Step 2: Invoke the Design Review Gate
Invoke the design-review-gate skill with the path to the design document. This spawns all 5 review agents in parallel.
Step 3: Report Results
If ALL APPROVED:
## Design Review Gate: PASSED
All five reviewers have approved your design!
| Agent | Verdict | Notes |
| --------------- | -------- | ------------------------------------- |
| Product Manager | APPROVED | Clear use cases, measurable benefits |
| Architect | APPROVED | Clean architecture, follows patterns |
| Designer | APPROVED | Good API design, clear error states |
| Security Design | APPROVED | No high-risk threats, mitigations OK |
| CTO | APPROVED | TDD specs present, ready to implement |
### Next Steps
1. Create epic for this feature
2. Create implementation plan (writing-plans)
3. Run plan through Plan Review Gate (3 adversarial reviewers)
4. Set up worktree for isolated development
5. Begin orchestrated execution
Ready to proceed? [Yes / No]
If ANY NEEDS_REVISION:
## Design Review Gate: NEEDS REVISION
Some reviewers found issues that need to be addressed.
### Blocking Issues
[Agent-specific issues listed here]
### Questions Requiring Answers
[Questions listed here]
---
Please revise the design document and I'll re-run the review gate.
(Iteration 1 of 3)
Step 4: Iterate or Proceed
- If NEEDS_REVISION: Help user address issues, re-run gate (max 3 iterations)
- If ALL APPROVED: Proceed to planning phase
- After 3 failed iterations: Escalate to human decision (Override / Defer / Cancel)
Skip Conditions
The review gate can be skipped ONLY when:
- The user explicitly requests it ("skip the review gate")
- AND the agent confirms with the user before skipping
- AND the design is genuinely simple (< 1 day of work, < 3 files)
Related Skills
superpowers:brainstorming— The upstream skill this bridges fromdesign-review-gate— The 5-agent review implementationplan-review-gate— The next gate in the pipeline (after writing-plans)orchestrated-execution— The execution framework after planning
04 同仓库更多 Skills
clarify-requirements
Resolve genuine pre-execution ambiguity by scanning repo context, generating 1-6 grounded options, and asking 1-3 focused questions via AskUserQuestion. NOT for mid-task use (injection risk); NOT when the goal is already unambiguous; use to disambiguate vague prompts before any file edits.
openmm-md
Run FREE, open-source, Windows-native GPU molecular dynamics via the openmm-md MCP (OpenMM + CUDA on the local NVIDIA GPU). Use for protein / protein-ligand MD when you want a free stack or are on Windows without a Schrodinger license. Covers the full workflow (prepare, solvate, minimize, equilibrate, production, analyze, mmgbsa) AND an honest decision guide vs Schrodinger Desmond, including how to run Desmond legitimately on Linux or a cloud GPU with a real license. This is a deliberately LESSER free alternative and does NOT replace the schrodinger MCP tools. Do NOT use it to pick a free tool when a validated FEP+, WaterMap, IFD-MD, or Prime MM-GBSA result is actually required.
visual-review
Take screenshots of web pages and UI using Playwright for visual review and iteration
status
Diagnostic status report — shows metaswarm installation state, project setup, and potential issues
start
Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work
setup
Interactive project setup — detects your project, configures metaswarm, writes project-local files