rtv-pdr
Use when a hard coding work-unit has failed once, is contentious, or scores HIGH on the ESE (Ensemble Semantic Entropy) gate — spawns N parallel Opus rollouts, runs a recursive tournament where fresh judge agents (never contestants) pick the winner, then optionally runs a PDR refine pass. Expensive; do NOT fire on routine tasks.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-02
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- rtv-pdr
- description
- Use when a hard coding work-unit has failed once, is contentious, or scores HIGH on the ESE (Ensemble Semantic Entropy) gate — spawns N parallel Opus rollouts, runs a recursive tournament where fresh judge agents (never contestants) pick the winner, then optionally runs a PDR refine pass. Expensive; do NOT fire on routine tasks.
03 SKILL.md 正文
RTV+PDR — Recursive Tournament Voting + Parallel-Distill-Refine
Test-time-compute scaling for hard coding work-units. Based on the methodology in arXiv:2604.16529.
Research caveat: The cited paper reports gains for Claude Opus 4.5 on SWE-bench Verified (70.9→77.6) and Terminal-Bench v2.0 (46.9→59.1). Results are model-version-specific and benchmark-specific; gains on arbitrary user tasks are not guaranteed.
When to use
Fire this workflow only when all of the following hold:
- The work-unit is hard or contentious (prior attempt failed, or high disagreement among reviewers).
- The ESE (Ensemble Semantic Entropy) escalation gate has flagged the unit as high-entropy.
- You have budget headroom — each invocation runs N Opus-class agents (rollouts + judges + optional refine).
Do NOT use for routine implementation, boilerplate, or tasks with an obvious single solution.
Cost profile
| N | Rollout calls | Tournament judges (worst case) | PDR refine | Total (approx) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 Opus | 2 Opus | 1 Opus + 1 judge | 7 Opus |
| 4 | 4 Opus | 3 Opus | 1 Opus + 1 judge | 9 Opus |
| 5 | 5 Opus | 4 Opus | 1 Opus + 1 judge | 11 Opus |
CLAUDE_CODE_FORK_SUBAGENT fork-cache is used automatically for parallel rollouts, cutting warmup cost.
Judges use model: opus by default (best verdict quality). To reduce cost, you may edit the judge calls to model: 'sonnet'; document this tradeoff if you do.
Judge independence guarantee
Judges are never contestants. Each pairwise comparison is run by a fresh agent that received no prior context from either rollout. This closes the self-choice bias gap identified in the RTV design.
Invocation
ESE-gated invocation pattern
PDR mode
Output shape
Workflow location
04 同仓库更多 Skills
clarify-requirements
Resolve genuine pre-execution ambiguity by scanning repo context, generating 1-6 grounded options, and asking 1-3 focused questions via AskUserQuestion. NOT for mid-task use (injection risk); NOT when the goal is already unambiguous; use to disambiguate vague prompts before any file edits.
openmm-md
Run FREE, open-source, Windows-native GPU molecular dynamics via the openmm-md MCP (OpenMM + CUDA on the local NVIDIA GPU). Use for protein / protein-ligand MD when you want a free stack or are on Windows without a Schrodinger license. Covers the full workflow (prepare, solvate, minimize, equilibrate, production, analyze, mmgbsa) AND an honest decision guide vs Schrodinger Desmond, including how to run Desmond legitimately on Linux or a cloud GPU with a real license. This is a deliberately LESSER free alternative and does NOT replace the schrodinger MCP tools. Do NOT use it to pick a free tool when a validated FEP+, WaterMap, IFD-MD, or Prime MM-GBSA result is actually required.
visual-review
Take screenshots of web pages and UI using Playwright for visual review and iteration
status
Diagnostic status report — shows metaswarm installation state, project setup, and potential issues
start
Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work
setup
Interactive project setup — detects your project, configures metaswarm, writes project-local files