quality-zero-platform-control-plane
Use when working with `Prekzursil/quality-zero-platform`, enrolling or auditing governed repos, checking strict-zero wrapper workflows, ruleset drift, trusted-runner Codex remediation, or provider/bootstrap state for the personal-account control plane.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-02
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- quality-zero-platform-control-plane
- description
- Use when working with `Prekzursil/quality-zero-platform`, enrolling or auditing governed repos, checking strict-zero wrapper workflows, ruleset drift, trusted-runner Codex remediation, or provider/bootstrap state for the personal-account control plane.
02 资源文件 7
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml447 B
- 参考文档references/control-plane-map.md1.7 KB
- 参考文档references/live-truth-caveats.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档references/operator-flow.md1.5 KB
- 脚本scripts/audit_quality_zero_platform.dot.alt.py21.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/audit_quality_zero_platform.py23.6 KB
- 脚本scripts/audit_quality_zero_platform.root.alt.py19.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Quality Zero Platform Control Plane
Overview
Audit and operate the Prekzursil/quality-zero-platform strict-zero control plane without assuming rollout is complete. Read controller truth first, compare it with live GitHub state second, then classify the target repo as success, partial, or blocked.
Reference Map
- Run scripts/audit_quality_zero_platform.py for a repeatable enrollment or drift audit.
- Read references/control-plane-map.md to see which controller files own inventory, profiles, wrappers, prompts, rulesets, and provider bootstrap.
- Read references/operator-flow.md for the required audit order and stop rules.
- Read references/live-truth-caveats.md whenever the user wants current rollout status or asks whether the platform is already configured everywhere.
Required Discovery
- Confirm the task is about
Prekzursil/quality-zero-platformor a repo meant to be governed by it. - Resolve controller truth from:
inventory/repos.ymlprofiles/stacks/*.ymlprofiles/repos/*.ymltemplates/repo/.github/workflows/*templates/repo/AGENTS.mdscripts/quality/*scripts/provider_ui/*
- Compare live GitHub truth for the target repo:
- wrapper workflow presence
- wrapper
uses:refs - ruleset presence and required-context parity
- latest
Quality Zero Platform,Quality Zero Gate,Codecov Analytics, backlog, and remediation runs
- Treat missing provider secrets, missing provider URLs, or missing trusted-runner auth as rollout blockers, not code defects.
Workflow
- Run the audit helper with the target repo slug. Prefer
--controller-pathwhen a local checkout or worktree ofquality-zero-platformexists. Use--fixture-dironly for tests. - Read the helper result before proposing changes.
- Separate findings into:
- enrollment gap
- wrapper drift
- ruleset drift
- provider/bootstrap blocker
- actual code or scanner debt
- Recommend or apply only the smallest next step that matches the highest-signal drift category.
- If the repo is not enrolled, stop at the minimum onboarding contract:
- repo profile and inventory entry in the controller
- thin wrapper workflows
- repo-local
AGENTS.md - repo-local
bash scripts/verify
- If the repo is enrolled but drifted, fix drift before touching product code.
Output Contract
Always report:
- controller repo/ref used
- enrolled or not enrolled
- expected profile id
- expected ruleset name
- wrapper workflow state
- live ruleset state
- latest relevant workflow conclusions
- final status:
success,partial, orblocked - smallest next action
Stop Rules
- Do not claim fleet-wide success from local controller verification alone.
- Do not treat missing rulesets, stale wrapper refs, or missing provider secrets as "code fixed".
- Do not recommend pushing directly to a governed repo default branch from automation.
- Stop at
blockedwhen GitHub auth, trusted-runner auth, or provider inputs are missing.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming the controller template equals live rollout truth
- Ignoring stale pinned controller SHAs in repo wrapper workflows
- Looking only at provider dashboards without comparing wrapper files and rulesets
- Calling a repo "configured" when wrappers exist but rulesets or required contexts do not
- Mixing remediation-lane failures with backlog-lane cleanup
04 同仓库更多 Skills
clarify-requirements
Resolve genuine pre-execution ambiguity by scanning repo context, generating 1-6 grounded options, and asking 1-3 focused questions via AskUserQuestion. NOT for mid-task use (injection risk); NOT when the goal is already unambiguous; use to disambiguate vague prompts before any file edits.
openmm-md
Run FREE, open-source, Windows-native GPU molecular dynamics via the openmm-md MCP (OpenMM + CUDA on the local NVIDIA GPU). Use for protein / protein-ligand MD when you want a free stack or are on Windows without a Schrodinger license. Covers the full workflow (prepare, solvate, minimize, equilibrate, production, analyze, mmgbsa) AND an honest decision guide vs Schrodinger Desmond, including how to run Desmond legitimately on Linux or a cloud GPU with a real license. This is a deliberately LESSER free alternative and does NOT replace the schrodinger MCP tools. Do NOT use it to pick a free tool when a validated FEP+, WaterMap, IFD-MD, or Prime MM-GBSA result is actually required.
visual-review
Take screenshots of web pages and UI using Playwright for visual review and iteration
status
Diagnostic status report — shows metaswarm installation state, project setup, and potential issues
start
Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work
setup
Interactive project setup — detects your project, configures metaswarm, writes project-local files