[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6DB9V2E8VW3WFFZYXDRCXNC":3,"skill-same:01M6DB9V2E8VW3WFFZYXDRCXNC":71},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":36,"linkOnly":37,"markdownContent":38,"markdownBody":39,"frontMatter":40,"refName":41,"commitSha":42,"skillDirectory":43,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":44,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":45,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":46,"install":47,"resources":60},"01M6DB9V2E8VW3WFFZYXDRCXNC","delegated-build-verify",null,"Use when delegating a large build to a generator (Codex fan-out, subagents, or a Workflow) and you must independently verify the result - the \"agent builds X, then you evaluate\" pattern. Turns a converged plan\u002Fgrill into an authoritative build-spec that doubles as the evaluation rubric, fans out the generator, then verifies with an active fabrication hunt. Triggers: \"build X then evaluate\".","Prekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain","Prekzursil","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F54636077?v=4","01M6DACZ1PCQHD99SCR1YXG28B","Andrei Mihai Visalon","01M6DACZ670WZF535V3WYYSS4Z",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fdelegated-build-verify\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"delegated build verify","verify","build","use","as","triggers","pattern","active","hunt","grill","spec","subagents","rubric","plan","Evaluation","workflow","codex","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: delegated-build-verify\ndescription: \"Use when delegating a large build to a generator (Codex fan-out, subagents, or a Workflow) and you must independently verify the result - the \\\"agent builds X, then you evaluate\\\" pattern. Turns a converged plan\u002Fgrill into an authoritative build-spec that doubles as the evaluation rubric, fans out the generator, then verifies with an active fabrication hunt. Triggers: \\\"build X then evaluate\\\".\"\n---\n# Delegated Build + Verify\n\nGenerator–verifier delegation for big builds. The generator (Codex threads \u002F a Workflow \u002F\nsubagents) writes the code or data; **YOU are the independent verifier**. Never let the\ngenerator grade its own homework — self-reported completion and coverage are gameable proxies.\n\n## When to use\n- The user says \"build X, then evaluate it\" \u002F \"fan out Codex to build this, then check it.\"\n- A large multi-part build you will delegate but must not ship on the generator's say-so.\n- Downstream of `grill-me-extensive`, once the scope has converged into decisions.\n\n## The pattern (in order — do not skip step 1)\n1. **Write the BUILD SPEC first — it IS the eval rubric.** Before any generation, author an\n   authoritative spec with: (a) **prime directives** (the non-negotiables — never-fabricate,\n   provenance, security\u002Fprivacy boundaries); (b) the data\u002FAPI contract + schema; (c) per-part\n   sourcing; (d) an explicit **§ Acceptance Criteria** that enumerates *every* gate. It must be\n   precise enough that a fresh reviewer can grade against it. Save it: the generator builds to\n   it, you evaluate against it. No spec → you have no rubric → don't generate yet.\n2. **Encode boundaries as STRUCTURAL gates, not per-item discipline.** e.g. a provenance \u002F\n   lawful-basis gate that auto-routes ungated data to a private\u002Fabsent state; a first-class\n   node so a forbidden attachment is impossible *by construction*. Invariants scale to 100k+\n   records; reminders don't.\n3. **Fan out the generator.** Codex threads \u002F a Workflow \u002F subagents, each carrying a scoped\n   slice of the spec **plus the prime directives embedded in its prompt**. Sequence hard\n   dependencies (schema before data). Worktree-isolate parallel writers so they don't collide.\n4. **VERIFY independently — with an ACTIVE FABRICATION HUNT.** Do NOT trust the generator's\n   self-reported completion\u002Fcoverage. Re-run the gates yourself; spot-hunt for fabricated,\n   unprovenanced, or derived-as-authoritative cells; read the actual test *summary* line, not\n   the exit code. Report: **completion** (done \u002F partial \u002F absent per part), **honest coverage\n   %**, and each **gate** pass\u002Ffail. **Fabrication or coverage-theater = automatic FAIL for\n   that slice**, however \"done\" it looks. Incomplete-but-honest beats complete-but-fabricated.\n\n## Red flags (STOP)\n| Thought | Reality |\n|---|---|\n| \"The generator said it's 100% covered.\" | Verify it yourself; self-reported coverage is a gameable proxy. |\n| \"No build-spec yet, I'll just start generating.\" | You have no rubric — write the spec first. |\n| \"I'll delegate without repeating the non-negotiables.\" | Drift + fabrication. Embed them in every slice. |\n| \"It looks complete, ship it.\" | Run the fabrication hunt before believing \"complete.\" |\n\n## Related\n- Upstream scope: `grill-me-extensive`. Verify discipline: `verification-before-completion`.\n- Anti-reward-hacking rationale: basic-memory `agentic-repair-reliability`,\n  `verified-green-read-summary-not-coverage`.\n","# Delegated Build + Verify\n\nGenerator–verifier delegation for big builds. The generator (Codex threads \u002F a Workflow \u002F\nsubagents) writes the code or data; **YOU are the independent verifier**. Never let the\ngenerator grade its own homework — self-reported completion and coverage are gameable proxies.\n\n## When to use\n- The user says \"build X, then evaluate it\" \u002F \"fan out Codex to build this, then check it.\"\n- A large multi-part build you will delegate but must not ship on the generator's say-so.\n- Downstream of `grill-me-extensive`, once the scope has converged into decisions.\n\n## The pattern (in order — do not skip step 1)\n1. **Write the BUILD SPEC first — it IS the eval rubric.** Before any generation, author an\n   authoritative spec with: (a) **prime directives** (the non-negotiables — never-fabricate,\n   provenance, security\u002Fprivacy boundaries); (b) the data\u002FAPI contract + schema; (c) per-part\n   sourcing; (d) an explicit **§ Acceptance Criteria** that enumerates *every* gate. It must be\n   precise enough that a fresh reviewer can grade against it. Save it: the generator builds to\n   it, you evaluate against it. No spec → you have no rubric → don't generate yet.\n2. **Encode boundaries as STRUCTURAL gates, not per-item discipline.** e.g. a provenance \u002F\n   lawful-basis gate that auto-routes ungated data to a private\u002Fabsent state; a first-class\n   node so a forbidden attachment is impossible *by construction*. Invariants scale to 100k+\n   records; reminders don't.\n3. **Fan out the generator.** Codex threads \u002F a Workflow \u002F subagents, each carrying a scoped\n   slice of the spec **plus the prime directives embedded in its prompt**. Sequence hard\n   dependencies (schema before data). Worktree-isolate parallel writers so they don't collide.\n4. **VERIFY independently — with an ACTIVE FABRICATION HUNT.** Do NOT trust the generator's\n   self-reported completion\u002Fcoverage. Re-run the gates yourself; spot-hunt for fabricated,\n   unprovenanced, or derived-as-authoritative cells; read the actual test *summary* line, not\n   the exit code. Report: **completion** (done \u002F partial \u002F absent per part), **honest coverage\n   %**, and each **gate** pass\u002Ffail. **Fabrication or coverage-theater = automatic FAIL for\n   that slice**, however \"done\" it looks. Incomplete-but-honest beats complete-but-fabricated.\n\n## Red flags (STOP)\n| Thought | Reality |\n|---|---|\n| \"The generator said it's 100% covered.\" | Verify it yourself; self-reported coverage is a gameable proxy. |\n| \"No build-spec yet, I'll just start generating.\" | You have no rubric — write the spec first. |\n| \"I'll delegate without repeating the non-negotiables.\" | Drift + fabrication. Embed them in every slice. |\n| \"It looks complete, ship it.\" | Run the fabrication hunt before believing \"complete.\" |\n\n## Related\n- Upstream scope: `grill-me-extensive`. Verify discipline: `verification-before-completion`.\n- Anti-reward-hacking rationale: basic-memory `agentic-repair-reliability`,\n  `verified-green-read-summary-not-coverage`.\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","a298c929b6cbd662e1fce54302ce520d5ceea1a5",".agents\u002Fskills\u002Fdelegated-build-verify","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil","2026-11-02 14:30:57",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":48,"prompt":58,"zipAvailable":59},[49,52,55],{"tool":50,"command":51},"npx","npx skills add Prekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain --skill delegated-build-verify",{"tool":53,"command":54},"bunx","bunx skills add Prekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain --skill delegated-build-verify",{"tool":56,"command":57},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add Prekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain --skill delegated-build-verify","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fdelegated-build-verify\u002FSKILL.md",true,[61,67],{"path":62,"resourceType":63,"resourceTypeDesc":64,"sizeBytes":65,"sourceHtmlUrl":66},"examples\u002FExampleActor.cpp","OTHER","其他",1152,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fsapsapshen\u002Fai-memory-router\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills-store\u002Fglobal\u002Funreal-engine-cpp-pro\u002Fexamples\u002FExampleActor.cpp",{"path":68,"resourceType":63,"resourceTypeDesc":64,"sizeBytes":69,"sourceHtmlUrl":70},"examples\u002FExampleActor.h",1455,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fsapsapshen\u002Fai-memory-router\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills-store\u002Fglobal\u002Funreal-engine-cpp-pro\u002Fexamples\u002FExampleActor.h",[72,93,123,150,164,180],{"skillNo":73,"name":74,"nameZh":6,"description":75,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":76,"categories":77,"keywords":78,"publishedAt":36},"01M6DF7D7478R55P46REYH4QAC","clarify-requirements","Resolve genuine pre-execution ambiguity by scanning repo context, generating 1-6 grounded options, and asking 1-3 focused questions via AskUserQuestion. NOT for mid-task use (injection risk); NOT when the goal is already unambiguous; use to disambiguate vague prompts before any file edits.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftools\u002Fworkspace-hooks\u002Fskills\u002Fclarify-requirements\u002FSKILL.md",[],[79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,22,88,89,90,91,92],"clarify requirements","clarify","requirements","risk","options","task","prompts","goal","scanning","context","repo","injection","execution","file",{"skillNo":94,"name":95,"nameZh":6,"description":96,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":97,"categories":98,"keywords":104,"publishedAt":36},"01M6DF79CA4BHJS66J8EZDBPWJ","openmm-md","Run FREE, open-source, Windows-native GPU molecular dynamics via the openmm-md MCP (OpenMM + CUDA on the local NVIDIA GPU). Use for protein \u002F protein-ligand MD when you want a free stack or are on Windows without a Schrodinger license. Covers the full workflow (prepare, solvate, minimize, equilibrate, production, analyze, mmgbsa) AND an honest decision guide vs Schrodinger Desmond, including how to run Desmond legitimately on Linux or a cloud GPU with a real license. This is a deliberately LESSER free alternative and does NOT replace the schrodinger MCP tools. Do NOT use it to pick a free tool when a validated FEP+, WaterMap, IFD-MD, or Prime MM-GBSA result is actually required.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftools\u002Fmcp\u002Fopenmm-md-mcp\u002Fskill\u002Fopenmm-md\u002FSKILL.md",[99],{"categoryNo":100,"categoryName":101,"taxonomyType":102,"taxonomyTypeDesc":103},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,34,117,22,118,119,120,121,122],"openmm md","how","decision","pick","linux","analyze","tool","stack","open","NVIDIA","gpu","license","windows","free","molecular dynamics","local","do","MCP",{"skillNo":124,"name":125,"nameZh":6,"description":126,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":127,"categories":128,"keywords":135,"publishedAt":36},"01M6DF76C1MG85VEWP8VZCBNMN","visual-review","Take screenshots of web pages and UI using Playwright for visual review and iteration","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftools\u002Feditor\u002Fmetaswarm\u002Fskills\u002Fvisual-review\u002FSKILL.md",[129,132],{"categoryNo":130,"categoryName":131,"taxonomyType":102,"taxonomyTypeDesc":103},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000003","演示文稿",{"categoryNo":133,"categoryName":134,"taxonomyType":102,"taxonomyTypeDesc":103},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",[136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,106,146,147,148,149],"review","visual","visual review","pages","web","false","iteration","take","check","slides","ui","screenshot","playwright","screenshots",{"skillNo":151,"name":152,"nameZh":6,"description":153,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":154,"categories":155,"keywords":156,"publishedAt":36},"01M6DF73AQVCBZKEN0YXEX9FXP","status","Diagnostic status report — shows metaswarm installation state, project setup, and potential issues","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftools\u002Feditor\u002Fmetaswarm\u002Fskills\u002Fstatus\u002FSKILL.md",[],[152,157,158,159,160,161,162,163],"setup","report","project","installation","project setup","issues","state",{"skillNo":165,"name":166,"nameZh":6,"description":167,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":168,"categories":169,"keywords":171,"publishedAt":36},"01M6DF6X6C2XB0P6GX76P7TTYV","start","Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftools\u002Feditor\u002Fmetaswarm\u002Fskills\u002Fstart\u002FSKILL.md",[170],{"categoryNo":100,"categoryName":101,"taxonomyType":102,"taxonomyTypeDesc":103},[166,172,84,173,174,175,22,176,177,178,179],"start issue","issue","ready","work on issue","user","work","work on","development",{"skillNo":181,"name":157,"nameZh":6,"description":182,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":183,"categories":184,"keywords":185,"publishedAt":36},"01M6DF6QMJ9AJKFKHHKRT005PQ","Interactive project setup — detects your project, configures metaswarm, writes project-local files","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FPrekzursil\u002Fagent-skills-toolchain\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftools\u002Feditor\u002Fmetaswarm\u002Fskills\u002Fsetup\u002FSKILL.md",[],[157,159,120,186,161,187],"files","interactive"]