[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6CZ1WR3KNVTKSWH4GNWT646":3,"skill-same:01M6CZ1WR3KNVTKSWH4GNWT646":83},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":44,"linkOnly":45,"markdownContent":46,"markdownBody":47,"frontMatter":48,"refName":53,"commitSha":54,"skillDirectory":55,"forksCount":56,"repositoryHtmlUrl":57,"repositoryHomepageUrl":58,"ownerHtmlUrl":59,"ownerBlogUrl":60,"ownerDescription":61,"updatedAt":62,"install":63,"resources":76},"01M6CZ1WR3KNVTKSWH4GNWT646","what-if-oracle",null,"Run structured What-If scenario analysis with multi-branch possibility exploration. Use this skill when the user asks speculative questions like \"what if...\", \"what would happen if...\", \"what are the possibilities\", \"explore scenarios\", \"scenario analysis\", \"possibility space\", \"what could go wrong\", \"best case \u002F worst case\", \"risk analysis\", \"contingency planning\", \"strategic options\", or any question about uncertain futures. Also trigger when the user faces a fork-in-the-road decision, wants to stress-test an idea, or needs to think through consequences before committing.","eric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one","eric861129","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F74950944?v=4","01M6CXHDYEYRPFGGV4EFXCSYCF","ChiYu-Huang","01M6CXHE2J5CN1EBTY0FKV3ZKW",52,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fwhat-if-oracle\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43],"oracle","what if oracle","question","go","strategies","stress-test","options","exploration","idea","write","read","run","branch","decision","explore","analysis","risk","futures","ux","planning","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: what-if-oracle\ndescription: Run structured What-If scenario analysis with multi-branch possibility exploration. Use this skill when the user asks speculative questions like \"what if...\", \"what would happen if...\", \"what are the possibilities\", \"explore scenarios\", \"scenario analysis\", \"possibility space\", \"what could go wrong\", \"best case \u002F worst case\", \"risk analysis\", \"contingency planning\", \"strategic options\", or any question about uncertain futures. Also trigger when the user faces a fork-in-the-road decision, wants to stress-test an idea, or needs to think through consequences before committing.\nallowed-tools: Read Write\nlicense: MIT license\nmetadata:\n  skill-author: AHK Strategies (ashrafkahoush-ux)\n---\n\n# What-If Oracle — Possibility Space Explorer\n\nA structured system for exploring uncertain futures through rigorous multi-branch scenario analysis. Instead of one prediction, the Oracle maps the full **possibility space** — branching timelines where each path has its own logic, probability, and consequences.\n\nBased on the What-If Statement paradigm: the idea that speculative questions (\"What if X?\") are not idle daydreaming but a **fundamental computing operation** — the mind's way of simulating futures before committing resources to one.\n\nPublished research: [The What-If Statement (DOI: 10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841)](https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841) | [IDNA Consolidation v2 (DOI: 10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18807387)](https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18807387)\n\n## Core Principle: 0·IF·1\n\nEvery scenario analysis has three elements:\n\n- **0** — The unexpressed state (what hasn't happened yet, the potential)\n- **1** — The expressed state (what IS, the current reality)\n- **IF** — The conditional bond (the decision, event, or change that transforms 0 into 1)\n\nThe quality of the analysis depends on the precision of the IF. A vague \"what if things go wrong?\" produces vague results. A precise \"what if our primary supplier raises prices 30% in Q3?\" produces actionable intelligence.\n\n## How to Run the Oracle\n\n### Phase 1 — Frame the Question\n\nTake the user's What-If question and sharpen it:\n\n**Decompose into components:**\n\n- **The Variable:** What specific thing changes? (one variable per analysis)\n- **The Magnitude:** By how much? (quantify if possible)\n- **The Timeframe:** Over what period?\n- **The Context:** What's the current state before the change?\n\n**If the question is vague, sharpen it:**\n\n- \"What if AI takes over?\" → \"What if 40% of current knowledge-work tasks are automated by AI within 3 years in [specific industry]?\"\n- \"What if we fail?\" → \"What if monthly revenue stays below $5K for 6 consecutive months starting now?\"\n\nPresent the sharpened question to the user for confirmation before proceeding.\n\n### Phase 2 — Map the Possibility Space\n\nGenerate **4-6 scenario branches** using this framework:\n\n| Branch             | Definition                                                                   | Purpose                                            |\n| ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- |\n| **Ω Best Case**    | Everything goes right. Key assumptions all validate. Lucky breaks occur.     | Define the ceiling — what's the maximum upside?    |\n| **α Likely Case**  | Most probable path given current evidence. No major surprises.               | Anchor expectations in reality                     |\n| **Δ Worst Case**   | Key assumptions fail. Two things go wrong simultaneously.                    | Define the floor — what's the maximum downside?    |\n| **Ψ Wild Card**    | An unexpected variable enters that nobody is tracking. Black swan territory. | Stress-test for the unimaginable                   |\n| **Φ Contrarian**   | The opposite of the consensus view turns out to be true.                     | Challenge groupthink and reveal hidden assumptions |\n| **∞ Second Order** | The first-order effects trigger cascading consequences nobody predicted.     | Map the ripple effects                             |\n\n### Phase 3 — Analyze Each Branch\n\nFor each scenario branch, provide:\n\n```\n╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗\n║  BRANCH: [Ω\u002Fα\u002FΔ\u002FΨ\u002FΦ\u002F∞] — [Branch Name]    ║\n╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n║  Probability: [X%]                           ║\n║  Timeframe: [When this could materialize]    ║\n║  Confidence: [HIGH\u002FMEDIUM\u002FLOW]               ║\n╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n║  NARRATIVE:                                  ║\n║  [2-3 sentences describing how this          ║\n║   scenario unfolds step by step]             ║\n║                                              ║\n║  KEY ASSUMPTIONS:                            ║\n║  • [What must be true for this to happen]    ║\n║  • [And this]                                ║\n║                                              ║\n║  TRIGGER CONDITIONS:                         ║\n║  • [Early signal that this branch is         ║\n║    becoming reality]                         ║\n║  • [Second signal]                           ║\n║                                              ║\n║  CONSEQUENCES:                               ║\n║  → Immediate: [What happens first]           ║\n║  → 30 days: [What follows]                   ║\n║  → 6 months: [Where it leads]               ║\n║                                              ║\n║  REQUIRED RESPONSE:                          ║\n║  [What action to take if this branch         ║\n║   activates — specific, actionable]          ║\n║                                              ║\n║  WHAT MOST PEOPLE MISS:                      ║\n║  [The non-obvious insight about this         ║\n║   scenario that conventional analysis        ║\n║   would overlook]                            ║\n╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝\n```\n\n### Phase 4 — Synthesis\n\nAfter analyzing all branches, provide:\n\n**Probability Distribution:**\n\n```\nΩ Best Case ····· [██████░░░░] 15%\nα Likely Case ··· [████████░░] 45%\nΔ Worst Case ···· [██████░░░░] 20%\nΨ Wild Card ····· [███░░░░░░░]  8%\nΦ Contrarian ···· [████░░░░░░]  7%\n∞ Second Order ·· [███░░░░░░░]  5%\n```\n\n**Robust Actions:** What actions are beneficial across MULTIPLE branches? These are the no-regret moves — do them regardless of which future materializes.\n\n**Hedge Actions:** What preparations protect against the worst branches without sacrificing upside?\n\n**Decision Triggers:** What specific, observable signals should cause you to update which branch is most likely? Define the tripwires.\n\n**The 1% Insight:** What is the one thing about this situation that almost everyone analyzing it would miss? The non-obvious pattern, the hidden assumption, the overlooked variable.\n\n## Golden Ratio Weighting\n\nWhen evidence exists, weight primary scenarios using the golden ratio:\n\n- **Primary future (most likely):** 61.8% of attention\u002Fresources\n- **Alternative future:** 38.2% of attention\u002Fresources\n\nThis prevents both overcommitment to a single path and dilution across too many contingencies. Nature uses this ratio for branching (trees, rivers, blood vessels). Strategic planning can too.\n\n## Modes\n\n### Quick Oracle (2-3 minutes)\n\n3 branches only: Best, Likely, Worst. Short narratives. For fast decisions.\n\n### Deep Oracle (5-10 minutes)\n\nAll 6 branches. Full analysis with consequences, triggers, and synthesis. For high-stakes decisions.\n\n### Scenario Chain\n\nTake the output of one Oracle analysis and feed it into another. \"If Branch Δ happens, what are the possibilities WITHIN that branch?\" Recursive depth for complex strategic planning.\n\n### Reverse Oracle\n\nStart from a desired outcome and work backward: \"What conditions must be true for X to happen? What's the most likely path TO that outcome?\" Useful for goal-setting and strategy design.\n\n### Competitive Oracle\n\nAnalyze the same What-If from multiple stakeholder perspectives: \"If we launch this product, what does the possibility space look like from OUR perspective vs. THEIR perspective vs. THE MARKET's perspective?\"\n\n## What This Is NOT\n\n- Not a prediction — it's a possibility map. The Oracle doesn't claim to know the future; it helps you prepare for multiple futures.\n- Not a crystal ball — probabilities are estimates based on available evidence, not certainties.\n- Not a substitute for action — the best scenario analysis in the world is worthless without subsequent decision and execution.\n\n## Built By\n\n[AHK Strategies](https:\u002F\u002Fahkstrategies.net) — AI Horizon Knowledge\nFull platform: [themindbook.app](https:\u002F\u002Fthemindbook.app)\nResearch: [The What-If Statement (DOI: 10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841)](https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841)\n\n_\"The future is not empty. It contains completed states that exert pull on the present.\"_\n","# What-If Oracle — Possibility Space Explorer\n\nA structured system for exploring uncertain futures through rigorous multi-branch scenario analysis. Instead of one prediction, the Oracle maps the full **possibility space** — branching timelines where each path has its own logic, probability, and consequences.\n\nBased on the What-If Statement paradigm: the idea that speculative questions (\"What if X?\") are not idle daydreaming but a **fundamental computing operation** — the mind's way of simulating futures before committing resources to one.\n\nPublished research: [The What-If Statement (DOI: 10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841)](https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841) | [IDNA Consolidation v2 (DOI: 10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18807387)](https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18807387)\n\n## Core Principle: 0·IF·1\n\nEvery scenario analysis has three elements:\n\n- **0** — The unexpressed state (what hasn't happened yet, the potential)\n- **1** — The expressed state (what IS, the current reality)\n- **IF** — The conditional bond (the decision, event, or change that transforms 0 into 1)\n\nThe quality of the analysis depends on the precision of the IF. A vague \"what if things go wrong?\" produces vague results. A precise \"what if our primary supplier raises prices 30% in Q3?\" produces actionable intelligence.\n\n## How to Run the Oracle\n\n### Phase 1 — Frame the Question\n\nTake the user's What-If question and sharpen it:\n\n**Decompose into components:**\n\n- **The Variable:** What specific thing changes? (one variable per analysis)\n- **The Magnitude:** By how much? (quantify if possible)\n- **The Timeframe:** Over what period?\n- **The Context:** What's the current state before the change?\n\n**If the question is vague, sharpen it:**\n\n- \"What if AI takes over?\" → \"What if 40% of current knowledge-work tasks are automated by AI within 3 years in [specific industry]?\"\n- \"What if we fail?\" → \"What if monthly revenue stays below $5K for 6 consecutive months starting now?\"\n\nPresent the sharpened question to the user for confirmation before proceeding.\n\n### Phase 2 — Map the Possibility Space\n\nGenerate **4-6 scenario branches** using this framework:\n\n| Branch             | Definition                                                                   | Purpose                                            |\n| ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- |\n| **Ω Best Case**    | Everything goes right. Key assumptions all validate. Lucky breaks occur.     | Define the ceiling — what's the maximum upside?    |\n| **α Likely Case**  | Most probable path given current evidence. No major surprises.               | Anchor expectations in reality                     |\n| **Δ Worst Case**   | Key assumptions fail. Two things go wrong simultaneously.                    | Define the floor — what's the maximum downside?    |\n| **Ψ Wild Card**    | An unexpected variable enters that nobody is tracking. Black swan territory. | Stress-test for the unimaginable                   |\n| **Φ Contrarian**   | The opposite of the consensus view turns out to be true.                     | Challenge groupthink and reveal hidden assumptions |\n| **∞ Second Order** | The first-order effects trigger cascading consequences nobody predicted.     | Map the ripple effects                             |\n\n### Phase 3 — Analyze Each Branch\n\nFor each scenario branch, provide:\n\n```\n╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗\n║  BRANCH: [Ω\u002Fα\u002FΔ\u002FΨ\u002FΦ\u002F∞] — [Branch Name]    ║\n╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n║  Probability: [X%]                           ║\n║  Timeframe: [When this could materialize]    ║\n║  Confidence: [HIGH\u002FMEDIUM\u002FLOW]               ║\n╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n║  NARRATIVE:                                  ║\n║  [2-3 sentences describing how this          ║\n║   scenario unfolds step by step]             ║\n║                                              ║\n║  KEY ASSUMPTIONS:                            ║\n║  • [What must be true for this to happen]    ║\n║  • [And this]                                ║\n║                                              ║\n║  TRIGGER CONDITIONS:                         ║\n║  • [Early signal that this branch is         ║\n║    becoming reality]                         ║\n║  • [Second signal]                           ║\n║                                              ║\n║  CONSEQUENCES:                               ║\n║  → Immediate: [What happens first]           ║\n║  → 30 days: [What follows]                   ║\n║  → 6 months: [Where it leads]               ║\n║                                              ║\n║  REQUIRED RESPONSE:                          ║\n║  [What action to take if this branch         ║\n║   activates — specific, actionable]          ║\n║                                              ║\n║  WHAT MOST PEOPLE MISS:                      ║\n║  [The non-obvious insight about this         ║\n║   scenario that conventional analysis        ║\n║   would overlook]                            ║\n╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝\n```\n\n### Phase 4 — Synthesis\n\nAfter analyzing all branches, provide:\n\n**Probability Distribution:**\n\n```\nΩ Best Case ····· [██████░░░░] 15%\nα Likely Case ··· [████████░░] 45%\nΔ Worst Case ···· [██████░░░░] 20%\nΨ Wild Card ····· [███░░░░░░░]  8%\nΦ Contrarian ···· [████░░░░░░]  7%\n∞ Second Order ·· [███░░░░░░░]  5%\n```\n\n**Robust Actions:** What actions are beneficial across MULTIPLE branches? These are the no-regret moves — do them regardless of which future materializes.\n\n**Hedge Actions:** What preparations protect against the worst branches without sacrificing upside?\n\n**Decision Triggers:** What specific, observable signals should cause you to update which branch is most likely? Define the tripwires.\n\n**The 1% Insight:** What is the one thing about this situation that almost everyone analyzing it would miss? The non-obvious pattern, the hidden assumption, the overlooked variable.\n\n## Golden Ratio Weighting\n\nWhen evidence exists, weight primary scenarios using the golden ratio:\n\n- **Primary future (most likely):** 61.8% of attention\u002Fresources\n- **Alternative future:** 38.2% of attention\u002Fresources\n\nThis prevents both overcommitment to a single path and dilution across too many contingencies. Nature uses this ratio for branching (trees, rivers, blood vessels). Strategic planning can too.\n\n## Modes\n\n### Quick Oracle (2-3 minutes)\n\n3 branches only: Best, Likely, Worst. Short narratives. For fast decisions.\n\n### Deep Oracle (5-10 minutes)\n\nAll 6 branches. Full analysis with consequences, triggers, and synthesis. For high-stakes decisions.\n\n### Scenario Chain\n\nTake the output of one Oracle analysis and feed it into another. \"If Branch Δ happens, what are the possibilities WITHIN that branch?\" Recursive depth for complex strategic planning.\n\n### Reverse Oracle\n\nStart from a desired outcome and work backward: \"What conditions must be true for X to happen? What's the most likely path TO that outcome?\" Useful for goal-setting and strategy design.\n\n### Competitive Oracle\n\nAnalyze the same What-If from multiple stakeholder perspectives: \"If we launch this product, what does the possibility space look like from OUR perspective vs. THEIR perspective vs. THE MARKET's perspective?\"\n\n## What This Is NOT\n\n- Not a prediction — it's a possibility map. The Oracle doesn't claim to know the future; it helps you prepare for multiple futures.\n- Not a crystal ball — probabilities are estimates based on available evidence, not certainties.\n- Not a substitute for action — the best scenario analysis in the world is worthless without subsequent decision and execution.\n\n## Built By\n\n[AHK Strategies](https:\u002F\u002Fahkstrategies.net) — AI Horizon Knowledge\nFull platform: [themindbook.app](https:\u002F\u002Fthemindbook.app)\nResearch: [The What-If Statement (DOI: 10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841)](https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.18736841)\n\n_\"The future is not empty. It contains completed states that exert pull on the present.\"_\n",{"name":5,"license":49,"metadata":50,"description":7,"allowed-tools":52},"MIT license",{"skill-author":51},"AHK Strategies (ashrafkahoush-ux)","Read Write","main","cbdd44aae21131521c09e42762e36178c790eacf","public\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fwhat-if-oracle",13,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one","http:\u002F\u002Fhuangchiyu.com\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129","https:\u002F\u002Fhuangchiyu.com\u002FChiYu-Blog\u002F","開發工程師，專注於 C#／.NET 系統現代化、AI-assisted engineering、開源工具與技術寫作。","2026-04-16 14:28:14",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":64,"prompt":74,"zipAvailable":75},[65,68,71],{"tool":66,"command":67},"npx","npx skills add eric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one --skill what-if-oracle",{"tool":69,"command":70},"bunx","bunx skills add eric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one --skill what-if-oracle",{"tool":72,"command":73},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add eric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one --skill what-if-oracle","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fwhat-if-oracle\u002FSKILL.md",true,[77],{"path":78,"resourceType":79,"resourceTypeDesc":80,"sizeBytes":81,"sourceHtmlUrl":82},"references\u002Fscenario-templates.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",4150,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fwhat-if-oracle\u002Freferences\u002Fscenario-templates.md",[84,117,145,170,190,215],{"skillNo":85,"name":86,"nameZh":6,"description":87,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":88,"categories":89,"keywords":102,"publishedAt":44},"01M6CZ1QHGJE91A95MSN5EK5Q9","venue-templates","Access comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fvenue-templates\u002FSKILL.md",[90,93,96,97],{"categoryNo":91,"categoryName":92,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":94,"categoryName":95,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究",{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":98,"categoryName":99,"taxonomyType":100,"taxonomyTypeDesc":101},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者","PROFESSION","适用职业",[103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,34,33,113,114,115,116],"templates","venue templates","research","guidelines","NeurIPS","ICML","LaTeX","science","Bash","access","edit","proposals","Academic","requirements",{"skillNo":118,"name":119,"nameZh":6,"description":120,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":121,"categories":122,"keywords":127,"publishedAt":44},"01M6CZ1KBQD2E5RTFB3BGVX7CD","the-fool","Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fthe-fool\u002FSKILL.md",[123,124],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":125,"categoryName":126,"taxonomyType":100,"taxonomyTypeDesc":101},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师",[128,129,27,130,131,35,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,114,140,141,142,143,144],"the fool","review","workflow","architecture","code","audit","forge","devil","team","designer","reviewer","challenge","stress test","evidence","expert","poke","ideas",{"skillNo":146,"name":147,"nameZh":6,"description":148,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":149,"categories":150,"keywords":154,"publishedAt":44},"01M6CZ1ES826S7P1X3333E40TA","scientific-writing","Core skill for the deep research and writing tool. Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs (never bullet points). Use two-stage process with (1) section outlines with key points using research-lookup then (2) convert to flowing prose. IMRAD structure, citations (APA\u002FAMA\u002FVancouver), figures\u002Ftables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT\u002FSTROBE\u002FPRISMA), for research papers and journal submissions.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fscientific-writing\u002FSKILL.md",[151,152,153],{"categoryNo":91,"categoryName":92,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":98,"categoryName":99,"taxonomyType":100,"taxonomyTypeDesc":101},[155,156,106,157,158,159,160,161,111,162,34,33,113,163,164,165,166,167,168,169],"writing","scientific writing","core","reporting","deep research","Citations","Outlines","tool","use","never","structure","deep","full","stage","prisma",{"skillNo":171,"name":172,"nameZh":6,"description":173,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":174,"categories":175,"keywords":177,"publishedAt":44},"01M6CZ1B2JGJTB9FRD0TW4RXXE","scientific-brainstorming","Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fscientific-brainstorming\u002FSKILL.md",[176],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[178,179,105,180,43,181,182,183,163,184,185,186,31,187,188,168,189],"brainstorming","scientific brainstorming","sessions","data","hypothesis","open","ideation","creative","do","connections","research ideation","generation",{"skillNo":191,"name":192,"nameZh":6,"description":193,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":194,"categories":195,"keywords":202,"publishedAt":44},"01M6CZ16JG8N7A2ZX04BGE8J2Y","research-lookup","Look up current research information using the Parallel Chat API (primary) or Perplexity sonar-pro-search (academic paper searches). Automatically routes queries to the best backend. Use for finding papers, gathering research data, and verifying scientific information.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fresearch-lookup\u002FSKILL.md",[196,199,200,201],{"categoryNo":197,"categoryName":198,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":94,"categoryName":95,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":125,"categoryName":126,"taxonomyType":100,"taxonomyTypeDesc":101},[105,203,204,205,181,206,207,111,208,209,34,33,113,163,210,211,212,213,214,115],"lookup","research lookup","search","perplexity","api","parallel","openrouter","backend","up","look","queries","chat",{"skillNo":216,"name":217,"nameZh":6,"description":218,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":219,"categories":220,"keywords":226,"publishedAt":44},"01M6CZ1261Y15GCCNVK5NPGWTG","research-grants","Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Feric861129\u002FSKILLS_All-in-one\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpublic\u002FSKILLS\u002FWriting & Research\u002Fresearch-grants\u002FSKILL.md",[221,222,223],{"categoryNo":94,"categoryName":95,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":224,"categoryName":225,"taxonomyType":100,"taxonomyTypeDesc":101},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000040","财务",[105,227,228,129,229,230,111,34,33,113,114,231,232,116],"research grants","grants","compliance","Budget","innovation","review criteria"]