[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6CD3F40FT6FVY0Z2ZZVEZQ4":3,"skill-same:01M6CD3F40FT6FVY0Z2ZZVEZQ4":70},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":30,"linkOnly":31,"markdownContent":32,"markdownBody":33,"frontMatter":34,"refName":35,"commitSha":36,"skillDirectory":37,"forksCount":38,"repositoryHtmlUrl":39,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":40,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":41,"install":42,"resources":55},"01M6CD3F40FT6FVY0Z2ZZVEZQ4","subagent-driven-development",null,"Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session","cercova-studios\u002F10x-swe","cercova-studios","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F217108198?v=4","01M6CCYGHXTH80N3BXRW6KESTE","Cercova Studios","01M6CCYGPADH5MJDR0VNNR775C",1,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29],"development","subagent driven development","subagent","driven","tasks","session","use","implementation","plans","with","when","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: subagent-driven-development\ndescription: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session\n---\n\n# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Start implementation on main\u002Fmaster branch without explicit user consent\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:using-git-worktrees** - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n","# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Start implementation on main\u002Fmaster branch without explicit user consent\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:using-git-worktrees** - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","12441d84a8a292fcc94f47bc98877cbefd9b52e2","plugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios","2026-11-12 00:33:06",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":43,"prompt":53,"zipAvailable":54},[44,47,50],{"tool":45,"command":46},"npx","npx skills add cercova-studios\u002F10x-swe --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":48,"command":49},"bunx","bunx skills add cercova-studios\u002F10x-swe --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":51,"command":52},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add cercova-studios\u002F10x-swe --skill subagent-driven-development","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",true,[56,62,66],{"path":57,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":60,"sourceHtmlUrl":61},"code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",630,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md",{"path":63,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":64,"sourceHtmlUrl":65},"implementer-prompt.md",2195,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md",{"path":67,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":68,"sourceHtmlUrl":69},"spec-reviewer-prompt.md",1999,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md",[71,111,147,166,185,197],{"skillNo":72,"name":73,"nameZh":6,"description":74,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":75,"licenseFileUrl":76,"sourceHtmlUrl":77,"categories":78,"keywords":84,"publishedAt":30},"01M6CD3T6EQ9N5KPNXCM6ABHVA","turnstile-spin","Set up Cloudflare Turnstile end-to-end in a project. Scan the codebase, create the widget via the Cloudflare API, embed it where user requests need bot verification (form submissions, SPA actions, API endpoints, download links, comment or vote submissions, etc.), wire canonical server-side siteverify in the customer's existing backend, validate, and persist the skill. Load this when a user asks to add Turnstile, set up CAPTCHA, protect a form or endpoint from bots, or fix a Turnstile integration. Uses Cloudflare's documented Turnstile contract.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fturnstile-spin\u002FLICENSE","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Fturnstile-spin\u002FSKILL.md",[79],{"categoryNo":80,"categoryName":81,"taxonomyType":82,"taxonomyTypeDesc":83},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口","SCENARIO","使用场景",[85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,29],"turnstile spin","SET","nextjs","actions","up","fix","cloudflare","bot","api","permissions","create","astro","server","verification","plugin","endpoints","customer","backend","sveltekit","integration","app","bots","spa","project","end","SWE",{"skillNo":112,"name":113,"nameZh":6,"description":114,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":75,"licenseFileUrl":115,"sourceHtmlUrl":116,"categories":117,"keywords":129,"publishedAt":30},"01M6CD0BJYRNV610HYYPX933RE","frontend-design","Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Ffrontend-design\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002F10x-swe\u002Fskills\u002Ffrontend-design\u002FSKILL.md",[118,121,124],{"categoryNo":119,"categoryName":120,"taxonomyType":82,"taxonomyTypeDesc":83},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":82,"taxonomyTypeDesc":83},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000015","视觉设计",{"categoryNo":125,"categoryName":126,"taxonomyType":127,"taxonomyTypeDesc":128},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[130,131,132,95,133,134,135,136,137,138,25,139,140,141,142,143,144,29,28,145,146],"frontend design","frontend","design","web","quality","applications","creative","web components","Production","code","components","user","generic","aesthetics","pages","high","build",{"skillNo":148,"name":149,"nameZh":6,"description":150,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":151,"categories":152,"keywords":153,"publishedAt":30},"01M6CD4QX8C4DST98AY21HEYCM","source-insights","Prepare inspected source evidence, preserve exact citations, and publish reviewed insights into an explicit local library.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fknowledge\u002Fskills\u002Fsource-insights\u002FSKILL.md",[],[154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,24,163,164,165],"source insights","insights","source","publish","Citations","evidence","library","workflows","prepare","global","local","preserve",{"skillNo":167,"name":168,"nameZh":6,"description":169,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":170,"categories":171,"keywords":175,"publishedAt":30},"01M6CD4N1HVNC1EXPEBZT7YS31","skill-graph","Discover skills and workflows through independent lexical search, relationship paths and a terminal graph.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fknowledge\u002Fskills\u002Fskill-graph\u002FSKILL.md",[172],{"categoryNo":173,"categoryName":174,"taxonomyType":82,"taxonomyTypeDesc":83},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[176,177,99,161,178,179,180,163,181,182,183,110,184],"graph","skill graph","terminal","10x","search","discover skills","discover","paths","relationship",{"skillNo":186,"name":187,"nameZh":6,"description":188,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":189,"categories":190,"keywords":191,"publishedAt":30},"01M6CD4HQKXNZ57YEGD8QVK6Z6","session-search","Recall public session turns with exact provenance, bounded excerpts and independent piped exports.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fknowledge\u002Fskills\u002Fsession-search\u002FSKILL.md",[],[180,24,192,193,161,194,195,163,28,155,156,196],"session search","public","provenance","recall","bounded",{"skillNo":198,"name":199,"nameZh":6,"description":200,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":201,"categories":202,"keywords":209,"publishedAt":30},"01M6CD4ET7DVNBYPDAMAYMSK2T","newsletter","Produce a private local AI newsletter from bounded public research, with cited deep dives, HTML\u002FMarkdown output, Dagu scheduling and seven-day retention.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcercova-studios\u002F10x-swe\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fknowledge\u002Fskills\u002Fnewsletter\u002FSKILL.md",[203,206],{"categoryNo":204,"categoryName":205,"taxonomyType":82,"taxonomyTypeDesc":83},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000005","邮件与沟通",{"categoryNo":207,"categoryName":208,"taxonomyType":82,"taxonomyTypeDesc":83},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究",[199,210,211,212,213,193,161,214,215,216,217,163,28,218,219,164,196,220],"local ai","dagu","produce","research","markdown","scheduling","html","daily","deep","retention","output"]