AGENT SKILL

slashcommandcreator

Autonomous meta-skill for creating high-quality custom slash commands using 5-phase workflow with multi-agent validation and quality gates. Use when user requests new slash command, reusable prompt automation, or wants to convert repetitive workflows into documented commands.

License 许可
MIT
所属仓库
loriensleafs/brain
最近更新
2026-03-11
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
slashcommandcreator
model
claude-opus-4-5
agents
[ "architect", "security", "critic", "independent-thinker", "implementer" ]
license
MIT
metadata
{ "version": "1.0.0", "timelessness": "high" }
description
Autonomous meta-skill for creating high-quality custom slash commands using 5-phase workflow with multi-agent validation and quality gates. Use when user requests new slash command, reusable prompt automation, or wants to convert repetitive workflows into documented commands.

02 资源文件 14

03 SKILL.md 正文

SlashCommandCreator Skill

Purpose

Create production-ready custom slash commands following ai-agents quality standards.

Triggers

  • create slash command for [purpose]
  • SlashCommandCreator: [description]
  • design slash command that [does something]

When to Use

  • User requests "create slash command for [purpose]"
  • Repetitive prompts identified in workflow
  • Converting manual workflows to automation
  • Need reusable, documented command patterns

5-Phase Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery & Analysis

Agent Mode: Analyst

Tasks:

  1. Clarify user intent: What prompt is being repeated?
  2. Search existing commands: ls .claude/commands/**/*.md
  3. Decision: Slash command vs skill (see decision matrix in CLAUDE.md)
  4. Apply 11 thinking models from skillcreator framework
  5. Document findings in .agents/analysis/slashcommand-[name]-analysis.md

Deliverable: Analysis document with recommendation

Phase 2: Design

Agent Mode: Architect

Tasks:

  1. Command naming (namespace conventions)
  2. Argument design:
    • Simple commands: use $ARGUMENTS
    • Complex commands: use $1, $2, $3 (positional)
  3. Frontmatter schema:
    • description (trigger-based per creator-001)
    • argument-hint (if using arguments)
    • allowed-tools (if using bash commands with ! or file references with @)
    • model (opus for complex reasoning)
    • disable-model-invocation (if pure prompt template)
  4. Dynamic context evaluation:
    • Bash execution (!git log --oneline -5)
    • File references (@.agents/HANDOFF.md)
  5. Extended thinking evaluation:
    • Add ultrathink keyword for complex reasoning (>5 steps)
    • Token budget consideration (<31,999 tokens)

Deliverable: Design specification with frontmatter + prompt

Phase 3: Multi-Agent Validation

Agent Mode: Orchestrator (coordinates 4 agents)

Agents:

  1. Security:

    • Review allowed-tools constraints
    • Flag overly permissive wildcards
    • Verify bash commands are safe
  2. Architect:

    • Check for duplication (similar existing commands)
    • Verify appropriate scope (not too broad/narrow)
    • Validate namespace conventions
  3. Independent-Thinker:

    • Challenge necessity: Is this really needed?
    • Propose alternatives
    • Question assumptions
  4. Critic:

    • Frontmatter completeness check
    • Trigger-based description validation
    • Argument-hint clarity

Unanimous Approval Required: All 4 agents must approve.

<!-- WHY: Ensures no single agent dimension (security, scope, necessity, completeness) is overlooked. Prevents security vulnerabilities from passing due to focus on functionality alone. Pattern proven by skillcreator 3.2.0 multi-agent synthesis. -->

Invocation Pattern:

// Security review
Agent(subagent_type="security", prompt="Review allowed-tools for command: [spec]")

// Architecture review
Agent(subagent_type="architect", prompt="Check for duplication: [spec]")

// Challenge necessity
Agent(subagent_type="independent-thinker", prompt="Is this command truly needed? [spec]")

// Frontmatter completeness
Agent(subagent_type="critic", prompt="Validate frontmatter completeness: [spec]")

Deliverable: Validation report with approvals or revision requests

Phase 4: Implementation

Agent Mode: Implementer

Tasks:

  1. Run bun run ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/new_slash_command.ts
  2. Create .claude/commands/[namespace]/[command].md
  3. Write frontmatter + prompt body
  4. Test invocation with sample arguments
  5. Update command catalog (if exists)

Deliverable: Working slash command file

Phase 5: Quality Gates (Automatic)

Agent Mode: Implementer (automatic validation)

Tasks:

  1. Run bun run ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/validate_slash_command.ts --path [file]
  2. Fix violations if any
  3. Re-run validation until exit code 0
  4. Commit with conventional commit message

Deliverable: Validated slash command ready for use

Invocation Examples

SlashCommandCreator: create command for exporting Brain memories to JSON

SlashCommandCreator: design slash command for running security audit

create slash command that summarizes recent PR comments

Decision Matrix: Slash Command vs Skill

Use Slash Command When:

  • Prompt is <200 lines
  • No multi-step conditional logic
  • Simple argument substitution
  • No external script orchestration

Use Skill When:

  • Prompt is >200 lines
  • Multi-agent coordination required
  • Complex scripting logic
  • Requires dedicated tests

Verification/Success Criteria

Before marking complete:

  • [ ] Frontmatter has description (trigger-based)
  • [ ] Frontmatter has argument-hint (if uses arguments)
  • [ ] Frontmatter has allowed-tools (if uses bash/file refs)
  • [ ] No overly permissive wildcards in allowed-tools
  • [ ] Description follows trigger-based pattern (creator-001)
  • [ ] File is <200 lines (or converted to skill)
  • [ ] Passes markdownlint-cli2 validation
  • [ ] Passes validate_slash_command.ts validation
  • [ ] Tested with sample arguments
  • [ ] Committed with conventional commit message

Success Criteria:

Metric Target
Validation Exit code 0 from validate_slash_command.ts
Testing Command runs without errors with sample arguments
Documentation Description clearly explains when to use command
Security All bash/file refs have explicit allowed-tools entries

Anti-Patterns

Avoid Why Instead
Creating commands > 200 lines Too complex for slash command format Convert to a skill instead
Overly permissive allowed-tools wildcards Security risk List specific tools needed
Skipping multi-agent validation Miss security, scope, or necessity issues Run all 4 validation agents
Duplicate commands for similar purposes Confusing discoverability Check existing commands first
Generic description without trigger keywords Model cannot find the command Include specific "Use when" phrases

Quality Gates Checklist

All checks from Verification section plus:

  • [ ] Multi-agent approval (security, architect, independent-thinker, critic)
  • [ ] No duplication with existing commands
  • [ ] Appropriate scope (not too broad/narrow)
  • [ ] Frontmatter completeness validated

Scripts

new_slash_command.ts

Creates a new slash command from a template.

bun run ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/new_slash_command.ts --name <name>

validate_slash_command.ts

Validates slash command structure and frontmatter.

bun run ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/validate_slash_command.ts --path <file>

References

  • Search Brain memory for slashcommand-best-practices

04 同仓库更多 Skills

loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

validation-authority

Treat upstream validators as authoritative. Align local config to them. Use when validation fails unexpectedly, before modifying validator behavior, or when tempted to change upstream tool code.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

using-brain-memory

Guidance for using Brain semantic memory effectively. Applies Zettelkasten atomic note principles with observations and relations. Use when deciding whether to query or create notes, structuring note content, or understanding the semantic knowledge graph.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

threat-modeling

Structured security analysis using OWASP Four-Question Framework and STRIDE methodology. Generates threat matrices with risk ratings, mitigations, and prioritization. Use for attack surface analysis, security architecture review, or when asking what can go wrong.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

taste-lints

Custom lints with agent-readable remediation instructions. Enforces taste invariants (file size, naming conventions, structured logging, complexity) and surfaces errors that agents can act on directly. Use when writing or reviewing code to catch style violations early.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

style-enforcement

Validate code against style rules from .editorconfig, StyleCop.json, and Directory.Build.props. Detects line ending violations, naming convention issues, indentation problems, and charset mismatches across C#, Python, TypeScript, and JavaScript. Produces JSON reports for pre-commit hooks and CI pipelines.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

steering-matcher

Match file paths against steering file glob patterns to determine applicable steering guidance. Use when orchestrator needs to inject context-aware guidance based on files being modified.

★ 0