[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6BV4KXGRF0GK20VH95T819W":3,"skill-same:01M6BV4KXGRF0GK20VH95T819W":61},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":26,"linkOnly":27,"markdownContent":28,"markdownBody":29,"frontMatter":30,"refName":32,"commitSha":33,"skillDirectory":34,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":35,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":36,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":37,"install":38,"resources":50},"01M6BV4KXGRF0GK20VH95T819W","ask-matt",null,"Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.","bnferguson\u002Fdotfiles","bnferguson","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F47749?v=4","01M6BV4H2TJKK8P14W86V1ZCPP","Brandon Ferguson","01M6BV4H7GJWTZJ1BVHQ1TX11Y",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fask-matt\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25],"ask matt","ask","flow","repo","router","true","which","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: ask-matt\ndescription: Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.\ndisable-model-invocation: true\n---\n\n# Ask Matt\n\nYou don't remember every skill, so ask.\n\nA **flow** is a path through the skills. Most paths run along one **main flow**, and two **on-ramps** merge onto it. Everything else is standalone, or a vocabulary layer that runs underneath.\n\n## The main flow: idea → ship\n\nThe route most work travels. You have an idea and want it built.\n\n1. **`\u002Fgrill-with-docs`** sharpens the idea by interview. Start here whenever you are **working in a working directory**: it's stateful, retaining what it learns in `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs. (No working directory? Use `\u002Fgrill-me` instead, covered under Standalone. Both run the same `\u002Fgrilling` primitive; `grill-with-docs` is the one that leaves a paper trail, which makes it the better of the two whenever a repo is there to leave it in.)\n2. **Branch: can you settle every question in conversation?** If a question needs a runnable answer (state, business logic, a UI you have to see), detour through a prototype, bridged by **`\u002Fhandoff`** in both directions (a prototype lives in its own directory, which is exactly what `\u002Fhandoff` is for; see Phase boundaries):\n   - **`\u002Fhandoff`** out, then open a fresh session against that file,\n   - **`\u002Fprototype`** to answer the question with throwaway code,\n   - **`\u002Fhandoff`** back what you learned, and reference it from the original idea thread.\n3. **Branch: is this a multi-session build?**\n   - **Yes** → **`\u002Fto-spec`** (turn the thread into a spec), then **`\u002Fto-tickets`** to split it into tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its **blocking edges**. On a local tracker that's one file per ticket under `.scratch\u002F\u003Cfeature>\u002Fissues\u002F`, worked blockers-first by hand; on a real tracker the edges become native blocking links, so any ticket whose blockers are done can be grabbed: kick off **`\u002Fimplement`** per ticket, **`\u002Fclear`ing context between each one**. Each ticket is self-contained, so the last one's context is disposable.\n   - **No** → **`\u002Fimplement`** right here, in the same context window.\n\n   Either way, **`\u002Fimplement`** builds each issue by driving **`\u002Ftdd`** internally (one red-green slice at a time), then closes out by running **`\u002Fcode-review`**, a two-axis review (Standards + Spec) of the diff, before committing. Reach for **`\u002Ftdd`** on its own when you just want to build a concrete behaviour test-first without a full spec, and **`\u002Fcode-review`** on its own whenever you want to review a branch or PR against a fixed point.\n\n### Context hygiene\n\nKeep steps 1–3 in **one unbroken context window** (don't compact or clear until after `\u002Fto-tickets`) so the grilling, spec, and tickets all build on the same thinking. Each `\u002Fimplement` then starts fresh, working from the ticket.\n\nThe limit on this is the **[smart zone](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.aihero.dev\u002Fai-coding-dictionary\u002Fsmart-zone)**: the window (~150k tokens on state-of-the-art models) within which the model still reasons sharply. If a session approaches it before `\u002Fto-tickets`, don't push on degraded; `\u002Fcompact` at the nearest phase boundary and carry on (see Phase boundaries).\n\n## On-ramps\n\nA starting situation that generates work, then merges onto the main flow.\n\n- **Bugs and requests piling up** → **`\u002Ftriage`**. It moves issues through triage roles and produces agent-ready issues, which **`\u002Fimplement`** later picks up.\n\n  Triage is only for issues **you didn't create**: bug reports, incoming feature requests, anything that arrives raw. Tickets that `\u002Fto-tickets` produced are already agent-ready, so **don't triage them**.\n\n- **Something's broken** → **`\u002Fdiagnosing-bugs`**. For the hard ones: the bug that resists a first glance, the intermittent flake, the regression that crept in between two known-good states. It refuses to theorise until it has a **tight feedback loop** (one command that already goes red on *this* bug), then fixes with a regression test. Its post-mortem hands off to **`\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture`** when the real finding is that there's no good seam to lock the bug down.\n\n- **A huge, foggy effort: a greenfield project or a huge feature build, too big for one session** → **`\u002Fwayfinder`**, the most cognitively demanding flow here. When the way from here to the destination isn't visible yet, it charts a **shared map** of **decision tickets** on the issue tracker and resolves them one at a time, producing **decisions, not deliverables**, until the fog is pushed back and the way is clear. Where **`\u002Fgrill-with-docs`** sharpens an idea you can hold in one session, wayfinder is for the idea you can't, and it's slower and denser, so save it for exactly that, never a well-scoped feature.\n\n  When the map clears, **it hands off, it doesn't build**: merge onto the main flow at **`\u002Fto-spec`**, which collapses the map's linked decisions into a buildable plan, then `\u002Fto-tickets` and `\u002Fimplement` as usual. Looping the map straight into `\u002Fimplement` skips that collapse and throws the linked detail away, so go straight to `\u002Fimplement` only when the effort turned out genuinely small.\n\n## Codebase health\n\nNot feature work, just upkeep.\n\n- **`\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture`** runs whenever you have a spare moment to keep the codebase good for agents to operate in. It surfaces **deepening opportunities**; picking one _generates an idea_ you can take into the main flow at `\u002Fgrill-with-docs`. It's the survey that finds the candidates; **`\u002Fcodebase-design`** (below) is the bench you design the chosen one on.\n\n## Vocabulary underneath\n\nTwo model-invoked references that run *beneath* the other skills, each the single source of truth for its vocabulary. Reach for them directly when the **words**, not the process, are the problem; or let the skills above pull them in.\n\n- **`\u002Fdomain-modeling`**: sharpen the project's *domain* language: challenge a fuzzy term, resolve an overloaded word (\"account\" doing three jobs), record a hard-to-reverse decision as an ADR. It's the active discipline `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` drives to keep `CONTEXT.md` a clean glossary.\n- **`\u002Fcodebase-design`** is the deep-module vocabulary (module, interface, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality) for designing a module's *shape*: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface at a clean seam. `\u002Ftdd` and `\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture` both speak it.\n\n## Phase boundaries\n\nA **phase** is a chunk of work inside a session: the grilling, the implementation, the QA. At the **boundary** between two of them you have five options, and picking between them is the fuzziest decision in this whole map:\n\n- **Continue**: stay put. Costs nothing, loses nothing.\n- **`\u002Fclear`**: empty the window, when nothing here matters to what's next.\n- **`\u002Fhandoff`** writes a portable markdown file. Narrow: only for a **new harness**, a **new directory**, a **colleague**, or forking a side task **mid-phase**. What it buys is portability.\n- **Subagent**: send a tightly-scoped task to its own window and get a report back.\n- **`\u002Fcompact`** compresses this context and seeds a fresh session with it. The **default**, at the bottom of the tree rather than the first reach.\n\nRead [PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md](PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md) for the ordered tree: the five questions, the reasoning behind each branch, and why the primary-source cost makes **Continue** the one to rule out first. Make the decision **at** a boundary; mid-phase, continue or split the rest into subagents.\n\n## Standalone\n\nOff the main flow entirely.\n\n- **`\u002Fgrill-me`**: the same relentless interview as `\u002Fgrill-with-docs`, but **stateless**: it saves nothing locally and builds no `CONTEXT.md`. Reach for it when you are **not working in a working directory** (sharpening a plan, a design, a piece of writing, anything with no repo under it). If you are in a working directory, use `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` instead: it runs the same interview and leaves a paper trail, so it is strictly the better one.\n- **`\u002Fgrilling`** is the interview primitive itself: rounds, the frontier, facts are the agent's job and decisions are yours. `\u002Fgrill-me` and `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` are the two named ways in, and `\u002Ftriage`, `\u002Fwayfinder` and `\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture` all run it internally. Reach for it directly only when you want the interview with no wrapper around it.\n- **`\u002Fresolving-merge-conflicts`** works an in-progress merge or rebase conflict hunk by hunk, resolving by **intent** traced to each side's primary source rather than by picking lines, then finishes the operation. It never runs `--abort`. Standalone and off every flow: reach for it when you are already mid-conflict.\n- **`\u002Fprototype`** is a small, throwaway program that answers one design question: does this state model feel right, or what should this UI look like. Throwaway is a constraint on how the code is written, not a promise to destroy it: the answer folds into the real code, and the prototype itself is kept as a **primary source** on a `prototype\u002F\u003Cname>` branch out of main, pointed at from the implementation issue. It's the detour in step 2 of the main flow, but reach for it any time a design question is hard to settle on paper.\n- **`\u002Fresearch`**: delegate reading legwork to a **background agent**: it investigates a question against **primary sources**, then leaves a cited Markdown file in the repo. Keep working while it reads. The file it produces is something to take *into* the main flow at `\u002Fgrill-with-docs`, since research feeds the thinking rather than replacing it.\n- **`\u002Fto-questionnaire`** comes in when the thing blocking you isn't in your head or the codebase but in **someone else's**, and it writes them a questionnaire to fill in. It's the inverse of `\u002Fgrill-me`: instead of interviewing you about the subject, it interviews you about the **send** (who it's going to, what you need back) and aims the questions at the gap. What comes back is material for `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` or `\u002Fto-spec`.\n- **`\u002Fwizard`** is for the steps only a **human** can take: provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, clicking through an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, running a one-off migration or cutover. It generates an interactive bash script that opens each URL, captures each value, and writes it into `.env` and GitHub secrets, so the procedure stops being something you re-explain to an agent every time. Model-invoked, so the agent reaches for it the moment it hits a wall only you can pass. If the agent could just do it itself, it should; this is for where a human is genuinely in the loop.\n- **`\u002Fwait-what`** is the corrective for a message that didn't land. Use it mid-conversation, inside any other skill, and the agent re-pitches what it just said with the context you were missing, in plain English, using the `CONTEXT.md` vocabulary. It works after the fact; `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` is the upfront cure, because a shared language agreed early is what stops the jargon arriving at all.\n- **`\u002Fteach`**: learn a concept over multiple sessions, using the current directory as a stateful workspace.\n- **`\u002Fwriting-for-agents`** is the reference for writing documents agents consume: skills, AGENTS.md, pointed-at docs.\n\n## Precondition\n\n**`\u002Fsetup-matt-pocock-skills`**: run before your first engineering flow to configure the issue tracker, triage labels, and doc layout the other skills assume. Custom issue trackers also work.\n","# Ask Matt\n\nYou don't remember every skill, so ask.\n\nA **flow** is a path through the skills. Most paths run along one **main flow**, and two **on-ramps** merge onto it. Everything else is standalone, or a vocabulary layer that runs underneath.\n\n## The main flow: idea → ship\n\nThe route most work travels. You have an idea and want it built.\n\n1. **`\u002Fgrill-with-docs`** sharpens the idea by interview. Start here whenever you are **working in a working directory**: it's stateful, retaining what it learns in `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs. (No working directory? Use `\u002Fgrill-me` instead, covered under Standalone. Both run the same `\u002Fgrilling` primitive; `grill-with-docs` is the one that leaves a paper trail, which makes it the better of the two whenever a repo is there to leave it in.)\n2. **Branch: can you settle every question in conversation?** If a question needs a runnable answer (state, business logic, a UI you have to see), detour through a prototype, bridged by **`\u002Fhandoff`** in both directions (a prototype lives in its own directory, which is exactly what `\u002Fhandoff` is for; see Phase boundaries):\n   - **`\u002Fhandoff`** out, then open a fresh session against that file,\n   - **`\u002Fprototype`** to answer the question with throwaway code,\n   - **`\u002Fhandoff`** back what you learned, and reference it from the original idea thread.\n3. **Branch: is this a multi-session build?**\n   - **Yes** → **`\u002Fto-spec`** (turn the thread into a spec), then **`\u002Fto-tickets`** to split it into tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its **blocking edges**. On a local tracker that's one file per ticket under `.scratch\u002F\u003Cfeature>\u002Fissues\u002F`, worked blockers-first by hand; on a real tracker the edges become native blocking links, so any ticket whose blockers are done can be grabbed: kick off **`\u002Fimplement`** per ticket, **`\u002Fclear`ing context between each one**. Each ticket is self-contained, so the last one's context is disposable.\n   - **No** → **`\u002Fimplement`** right here, in the same context window.\n\n   Either way, **`\u002Fimplement`** builds each issue by driving **`\u002Ftdd`** internally (one red-green slice at a time), then closes out by running **`\u002Fcode-review`**, a two-axis review (Standards + Spec) of the diff, before committing. Reach for **`\u002Ftdd`** on its own when you just want to build a concrete behaviour test-first without a full spec, and **`\u002Fcode-review`** on its own whenever you want to review a branch or PR against a fixed point.\n\n### Context hygiene\n\nKeep steps 1–3 in **one unbroken context window** (don't compact or clear until after `\u002Fto-tickets`) so the grilling, spec, and tickets all build on the same thinking. Each `\u002Fimplement` then starts fresh, working from the ticket.\n\nThe limit on this is the **[smart zone](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.aihero.dev\u002Fai-coding-dictionary\u002Fsmart-zone)**: the window (~150k tokens on state-of-the-art models) within which the model still reasons sharply. If a session approaches it before `\u002Fto-tickets`, don't push on degraded; `\u002Fcompact` at the nearest phase boundary and carry on (see Phase boundaries).\n\n## On-ramps\n\nA starting situation that generates work, then merges onto the main flow.\n\n- **Bugs and requests piling up** → **`\u002Ftriage`**. It moves issues through triage roles and produces agent-ready issues, which **`\u002Fimplement`** later picks up.\n\n  Triage is only for issues **you didn't create**: bug reports, incoming feature requests, anything that arrives raw. Tickets that `\u002Fto-tickets` produced are already agent-ready, so **don't triage them**.\n\n- **Something's broken** → **`\u002Fdiagnosing-bugs`**. For the hard ones: the bug that resists a first glance, the intermittent flake, the regression that crept in between two known-good states. It refuses to theorise until it has a **tight feedback loop** (one command that already goes red on *this* bug), then fixes with a regression test. Its post-mortem hands off to **`\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture`** when the real finding is that there's no good seam to lock the bug down.\n\n- **A huge, foggy effort: a greenfield project or a huge feature build, too big for one session** → **`\u002Fwayfinder`**, the most cognitively demanding flow here. When the way from here to the destination isn't visible yet, it charts a **shared map** of **decision tickets** on the issue tracker and resolves them one at a time, producing **decisions, not deliverables**, until the fog is pushed back and the way is clear. Where **`\u002Fgrill-with-docs`** sharpens an idea you can hold in one session, wayfinder is for the idea you can't, and it's slower and denser, so save it for exactly that, never a well-scoped feature.\n\n  When the map clears, **it hands off, it doesn't build**: merge onto the main flow at **`\u002Fto-spec`**, which collapses the map's linked decisions into a buildable plan, then `\u002Fto-tickets` and `\u002Fimplement` as usual. Looping the map straight into `\u002Fimplement` skips that collapse and throws the linked detail away, so go straight to `\u002Fimplement` only when the effort turned out genuinely small.\n\n## Codebase health\n\nNot feature work, just upkeep.\n\n- **`\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture`** runs whenever you have a spare moment to keep the codebase good for agents to operate in. It surfaces **deepening opportunities**; picking one _generates an idea_ you can take into the main flow at `\u002Fgrill-with-docs`. It's the survey that finds the candidates; **`\u002Fcodebase-design`** (below) is the bench you design the chosen one on.\n\n## Vocabulary underneath\n\nTwo model-invoked references that run *beneath* the other skills, each the single source of truth for its vocabulary. Reach for them directly when the **words**, not the process, are the problem; or let the skills above pull them in.\n\n- **`\u002Fdomain-modeling`**: sharpen the project's *domain* language: challenge a fuzzy term, resolve an overloaded word (\"account\" doing three jobs), record a hard-to-reverse decision as an ADR. It's the active discipline `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` drives to keep `CONTEXT.md` a clean glossary.\n- **`\u002Fcodebase-design`** is the deep-module vocabulary (module, interface, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality) for designing a module's *shape*: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface at a clean seam. `\u002Ftdd` and `\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture` both speak it.\n\n## Phase boundaries\n\nA **phase** is a chunk of work inside a session: the grilling, the implementation, the QA. At the **boundary** between two of them you have five options, and picking between them is the fuzziest decision in this whole map:\n\n- **Continue**: stay put. Costs nothing, loses nothing.\n- **`\u002Fclear`**: empty the window, when nothing here matters to what's next.\n- **`\u002Fhandoff`** writes a portable markdown file. Narrow: only for a **new harness**, a **new directory**, a **colleague**, or forking a side task **mid-phase**. What it buys is portability.\n- **Subagent**: send a tightly-scoped task to its own window and get a report back.\n- **`\u002Fcompact`** compresses this context and seeds a fresh session with it. The **default**, at the bottom of the tree rather than the first reach.\n\nRead [PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md](PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md) for the ordered tree: the five questions, the reasoning behind each branch, and why the primary-source cost makes **Continue** the one to rule out first. Make the decision **at** a boundary; mid-phase, continue or split the rest into subagents.\n\n## Standalone\n\nOff the main flow entirely.\n\n- **`\u002Fgrill-me`**: the same relentless interview as `\u002Fgrill-with-docs`, but **stateless**: it saves nothing locally and builds no `CONTEXT.md`. Reach for it when you are **not working in a working directory** (sharpening a plan, a design, a piece of writing, anything with no repo under it). If you are in a working directory, use `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` instead: it runs the same interview and leaves a paper trail, so it is strictly the better one.\n- **`\u002Fgrilling`** is the interview primitive itself: rounds, the frontier, facts are the agent's job and decisions are yours. `\u002Fgrill-me` and `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` are the two named ways in, and `\u002Ftriage`, `\u002Fwayfinder` and `\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture` all run it internally. Reach for it directly only when you want the interview with no wrapper around it.\n- **`\u002Fresolving-merge-conflicts`** works an in-progress merge or rebase conflict hunk by hunk, resolving by **intent** traced to each side's primary source rather than by picking lines, then finishes the operation. It never runs `--abort`. Standalone and off every flow: reach for it when you are already mid-conflict.\n- **`\u002Fprototype`** is a small, throwaway program that answers one design question: does this state model feel right, or what should this UI look like. Throwaway is a constraint on how the code is written, not a promise to destroy it: the answer folds into the real code, and the prototype itself is kept as a **primary source** on a `prototype\u002F\u003Cname>` branch out of main, pointed at from the implementation issue. It's the detour in step 2 of the main flow, but reach for it any time a design question is hard to settle on paper.\n- **`\u002Fresearch`**: delegate reading legwork to a **background agent**: it investigates a question against **primary sources**, then leaves a cited Markdown file in the repo. Keep working while it reads. The file it produces is something to take *into* the main flow at `\u002Fgrill-with-docs`, since research feeds the thinking rather than replacing it.\n- **`\u002Fto-questionnaire`** comes in when the thing blocking you isn't in your head or the codebase but in **someone else's**, and it writes them a questionnaire to fill in. It's the inverse of `\u002Fgrill-me`: instead of interviewing you about the subject, it interviews you about the **send** (who it's going to, what you need back) and aims the questions at the gap. What comes back is material for `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` or `\u002Fto-spec`.\n- **`\u002Fwizard`** is for the steps only a **human** can take: provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, clicking through an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, running a one-off migration or cutover. It generates an interactive bash script that opens each URL, captures each value, and writes it into `.env` and GitHub secrets, so the procedure stops being something you re-explain to an agent every time. Model-invoked, so the agent reaches for it the moment it hits a wall only you can pass. If the agent could just do it itself, it should; this is for where a human is genuinely in the loop.\n- **`\u002Fwait-what`** is the corrective for a message that didn't land. Use it mid-conversation, inside any other skill, and the agent re-pitches what it just said with the context you were missing, in plain English, using the `CONTEXT.md` vocabulary. It works after the fact; `\u002Fgrill-with-docs` is the upfront cure, because a shared language agreed early is what stops the jargon arriving at all.\n- **`\u002Fteach`**: learn a concept over multiple sessions, using the current directory as a stateful workspace.\n- **`\u002Fwriting-for-agents`** is the reference for writing documents agents consume: skills, AGENTS.md, pointed-at docs.\n\n## Precondition\n\n**`\u002Fsetup-matt-pocock-skills`**: run before your first engineering flow to configure the issue tracker, triage labels, and doc layout the other skills assume. Custom issue trackers also work.\n",{"name":5,"description":7,"disable-model-invocation":31},true,"main","e63965e4644984470d4cc8b3014a8b001f0c2666",".agents\u002Fskills\u002Fask-matt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson","2026-11-11 03:04:59",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":39,"prompt":49,"zipAvailable":31},[40,43,46],{"tool":41,"command":42},"npx","npx skills add bnferguson\u002Fdotfiles --skill ask-matt",{"tool":44,"command":45},"bunx","bunx skills add bnferguson\u002Fdotfiles --skill ask-matt",{"tool":47,"command":48},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add bnferguson\u002Fdotfiles --skill ask-matt","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fask-matt\u002FSKILL.md",[51,57],{"path":52,"resourceType":53,"resourceTypeDesc":54,"sizeBytes":55,"sourceHtmlUrl":56},"agents\u002Fopenai.yaml","REFERENCE","参考文档",137,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fask-matt\u002Fagents\u002Fopenai.yaml",{"path":58,"resourceType":53,"resourceTypeDesc":54,"sizeBytes":59,"sourceHtmlUrl":60},"PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md",4249,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fask-matt\u002FPHASE-BOUNDARIES.md",[62,95,112,143,152,165],{"skillNo":63,"name":64,"nameZh":6,"description":65,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":66,"licenseFileUrl":67,"sourceHtmlUrl":68,"categories":69,"keywords":75,"publishedAt":26},"01M6BVA3RS3M016FANZ6792F9H","skill-creator","Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fclaude\u002Fconfig\u002Fskills\u002Fskill-creator\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fclaude\u002Fconfig\u002Fskills\u002Fskill-creator\u002FSKILL.md",[70],{"categoryNo":71,"categoryName":72,"taxonomyType":73,"taxonomyTypeDesc":74},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94],"creator","skill creator","specialized","workflows","create","update","capabilities","knowledge","tool","integrations","guide","new skill","existing skill","users","with","for","Existing","when","new",{"skillNo":96,"name":97,"nameZh":6,"description":98,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":99,"categories":100,"keywords":109,"publishedAt":26},"01M6BV94WN2RPYM8N6PN8TBNT8","writing-shape","Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-shape\u002FSKILL.md",[101,104],{"categoryNo":102,"categoryName":103,"taxonomyType":73,"taxonomyTypeDesc":74},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":105,"categoryName":106,"taxonomyType":107,"taxonomyTypeDesc":108},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者","PROFESSION","适用职业",[110,111],"writing shape","writing",{"skillNo":113,"name":114,"nameZh":6,"description":115,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":66,"licenseFileUrl":116,"sourceHtmlUrl":117,"categories":118,"keywords":125,"publishedAt":26},"01M6BV8QDFJ6PXBVK5NFBZT5M7","webapp-testing","Test local web applications using Playwright. Use when verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, or viewing browser logs.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FSKILL.md",[119,122],{"categoryNo":120,"categoryName":121,"taxonomyType":73,"taxonomyTypeDesc":74},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":123,"categoryName":124,"taxonomyType":73,"taxonomyTypeDesc":74},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,93],"webapp","webapp testing","testing","browser","frontend","screenshots","playwright","test","web","debugging","ui","logs","applications","behavior","use","local","test local",{"skillNo":144,"name":145,"nameZh":6,"description":146,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":147,"categories":148,"keywords":149,"publishedAt":26},"01M6BV8MDXKXNVHKS3QF3YDFTF","wait-what","Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwait-what\u002FSKILL.md",[],[150,151],"wait what","land",{"skillNo":153,"name":154,"nameZh":6,"description":155,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":156,"categories":157,"keywords":161,"publishedAt":26},"01M6BV756DJHT5BDA1HVRVHJJ7","prototype","Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fprototype\u002FSKILL.md",[158],{"categoryNo":159,"categoryName":160,"taxonomyType":107,"taxonomyTypeDesc":108},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师",[154,162,163,136,164],"design","explore","state",{"skillNo":166,"name":167,"nameZh":6,"description":168,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":169,"categories":170,"keywords":172,"publishedAt":26},"01M6BV6SBW166685KVBPWM2K4N","improve-codebase-architecture","Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbnferguson\u002Fdotfiles\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fimprove-codebase-architecture\u002FSKILL.md",[171],{"categoryNo":123,"categoryName":124,"taxonomyType":73,"taxonomyTypeDesc":74},[173,174,175,176],"architecture","improve","improve codebase architecture","report"]