AGENT SKILL

performing-user-behavior-analytics

Performs User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) to detect anomalous user activities including impossible travel, unusual access patterns, privilege abuse, and insider threats using SIEM-based behavioral baselines and statistical analysis. Use when SOC teams need to identify compromised accounts or insider threats through deviation from established behavioral norms.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
performing-user-behavior-analytics
tags
[ "soc", "ueba", "user-behavior", "insider-threat", "anomaly-detection", "splunk", "baseline" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
nist_csf
[ "DE.CM-01", "DE.AE-02", "RS.MA-01", "DE.AE-06" ]
subdomain
soc-operations
description
Performs User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) to detect anomalous user activities including impossible travel, unusual access patterns, privilege abuse, and insider threats using SIEM-based behavioral baselines and statistical analysis. Use when SOC teams need to identify compromised accounts or insider threats through deviation from established behavioral norms.
mitre_attack
[ "T1078", "T1685.002", "T1685.005", "T1566", "T0816" ]

02 资源文件 7

03 SKILL.md 正文

Performing User Behavior Analytics

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • SOC teams need to detect compromised accounts through abnormal authentication patterns
  • Insider threat programs require behavioral monitoring beyond rule-based detection
  • Impossible travel or geographic anomalies indicate credential compromise
  • Privileged account monitoring requires baseline deviation detection

Do not use as the sole basis for disciplinary action — UEBA findings are indicators requiring investigation, not proof of malicious intent.

Prerequisites

  • SIEM with 30+ days of authentication and access log history for baseline creation
  • VPN, O365, and Active Directory authentication logs normalized to CIM
  • GeoIP database (MaxMind GeoLite2) for location-based anomaly detection
  • Identity enrichment data (department, role, manager, typical work hours)
  • Splunk Enterprise Security with UBA module or equivalent UEBA capability

Workflow

Step 1: Build User Authentication Baselines

Create behavioral baselines from historical data:

index=auth sourcetype IN ("o365:management:activity", "vpn_logs", "WinEventLog:Security")
earliest=-30d latest=-1d
| stats dc(src_ip) AS unique_ips,
        dc(src_country) AS unique_countries,
        dc(app) AS unique_apps,
        count AS total_logins,
        earliest(_time) AS first_login,
        latest(_time) AS last_login,
        values(src_country) AS countries,
        avg(eval(strftime(_time, "%H"))) AS avg_login_hour,
        stdev(eval(strftime(_time, "%H"))) AS stdev_login_hour
  by user
| eval avg_daily_logins = round(total_logins / 30, 1)
| eval login_hour_range = round(avg_login_hour, 0)." +/- ".round(stdev_login_hour, 1)." hrs"
| table user, unique_ips, unique_countries, unique_apps, avg_daily_logins,
        login_hour_range, countries

Step 2: Detect Impossible Travel

Identify logins from geographically distant locations within impossible timeframes:

index=auth sourcetype IN ("o365:management:activity", "vpn_logs")
action=success earliest=-24h
| iplocation src_ip
| sort user, _time
| streamstats current=f last(lat) AS prev_lat, last(lon) AS prev_lon,
              last(_time) AS prev_time, last(City) AS prev_city,
              last(Country) AS prev_country, last(src_ip) AS prev_ip
  by user
| where isnotnull(prev_lat)
| eval distance_km = round(
    6371 * acos(
      cos(pi()/180 * lat) * cos(pi()/180 * prev_lat) *
      cos(pi()/180 * (lon - prev_lon)) +
      sin(pi()/180 * lat) * sin(pi()/180 * prev_lat)
    ), 0)
| eval time_diff_hours = round((_time - prev_time) / 3600, 2)
| eval speed_kmh = if(time_diff_hours > 0, round(distance_km / time_diff_hours, 0), 0)
| where speed_kmh > 900 AND distance_km > 500
| eval alert = "IMPOSSIBLE TRAVEL: ".prev_city.", ".prev_country." -> ".City.", ".Country
| table _time, user, prev_city, prev_country, City, Country, distance_km,
        time_diff_hours, speed_kmh, alert
| sort - speed_kmh

Step 3: Detect Anomalous Login Timing

Identify logins outside a user's normal working hours:

index=auth action=success earliest=-7d
| eval hour = strftime(_time, "%H")
| eval day_of_week = strftime(_time, "%A")
| eval is_weekend = if(day_of_week IN ("Saturday", "Sunday"), 1, 0)
| eval is_off_hours = if(hour < 6 OR hour > 22, 1, 0)
| join user type=left [
    search index=auth action=success earliest=-60d latest=-7d
    | eval hour = strftime(_time, "%H")
    | stats avg(hour) AS baseline_avg_hour, stdev(hour) AS baseline_stdev_hour,
            perc95(hour) AS baseline_latest_hour by user
  ]
| where (is_off_hours=1 OR is_weekend=1) AND
        (hour > baseline_latest_hour + 2 OR hour < baseline_avg_hour - baseline_stdev_hour * 2)
| stats count, values(hour) AS login_hours, values(day_of_week) AS login_days,
        values(src_ip) AS source_ips
  by user, baseline_avg_hour, baseline_latest_hour
| where count > 0
| sort - count

Step 4: Detect Unusual Data Access Patterns

Monitor for abnormal file or database access volumes:

index=file_access OR index=sharepoint earliest=-24h
| stats sum(bytes) AS total_bytes, dc(file_path) AS unique_files,
        count AS access_count by user
| join user type=left [
    search index=file_access OR index=sharepoint earliest=-30d latest=-1d
    | stats avg(eval(count)) AS baseline_avg_files,
            stdev(eval(count)) AS baseline_stdev_files,
            avg(eval(sum(bytes))) AS baseline_avg_bytes
      by user
  ]
| eval bytes_gb = round(total_bytes / 1073741824, 2)
| eval z_score_files = round((unique_files - baseline_avg_files) / baseline_stdev_files, 2)
| where z_score_files > 3 OR bytes_gb > 5
| eval anomaly_level = case(
    z_score_files > 5, "CRITICAL",
    z_score_files > 3, "HIGH",
    bytes_gb > 10, "CRITICAL",
    bytes_gb > 5, "HIGH",
    1=1, "MEDIUM"
  )
| sort - z_score_files
| table user, unique_files, bytes_gb, baseline_avg_files, z_score_files, anomaly_level

Step 5: Detect Privilege Abuse Patterns

Monitor privileged account usage anomalies:

index=wineventlog sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security"
(EventCode=4672 OR EventCode=4624 OR EventCode=4648) earliest=-24h
| eval is_privileged = if(EventCode=4672, 1, 0)
| eval is_explicit_cred = if(EventCode=4648, 1, 0)
| stats sum(is_privileged) AS priv_events,
        sum(is_explicit_cred) AS explicit_cred_events,
        dc(ComputerName) AS unique_hosts,
        values(ComputerName) AS hosts_accessed
  by TargetUserName, src_ip
| join TargetUserName type=left [
    search index=wineventlog EventCode IN (4672, 4624, 4648) earliest=-30d latest=-1d
    | stats dc(ComputerName) AS baseline_hosts,
            avg(eval(count)) AS baseline_daily_events by TargetUserName
  ]
| where unique_hosts > baseline_hosts * 2 OR priv_events > baseline_daily_events * 3
| eval risk_score = (unique_hosts / baseline_hosts * 30) + (priv_events / baseline_daily_events * 20)
| sort - risk_score
| table TargetUserName, src_ip, unique_hosts, baseline_hosts, priv_events,
        baseline_daily_events, risk_score, hosts_accessed

Step 6: Generate Risk Score and Prioritize Investigation

Aggregate all UEBA signals into a composite risk score:

| inputlookup ueba_impossible_travel.csv
| append [| inputlookup ueba_off_hours_access.csv]
| append [| inputlookup ueba_data_access_anomaly.csv]
| append [| inputlookup ueba_privilege_abuse.csv]
| stats sum(risk_points) AS total_risk,
        values(anomaly_type) AS anomaly_types,
        dc(anomaly_type) AS anomaly_count
  by user
| lookup identity_lookup_expanded identity AS user
  OUTPUT department, managedBy, priority AS user_priority
| eval final_risk = total_risk * case(
    user_priority="critical", 2.0,
    user_priority="high", 1.5,
    user_priority="medium", 1.0,
    1=1, 0.8
  )
| sort - final_risk
| head 20
| table user, department, managedBy, anomaly_types, anomaly_count, total_risk, final_risk

Key Concepts

Term Definition
UEBA User and Entity Behavior Analytics — behavioral analysis detecting anomalies against established baselines
Impossible Travel Login events from geographically distant locations within timeframes making physical travel impossible
Behavioral Baseline Statistical profile of normal user activity patterns built from 30-90 days of historical data
Z-Score Statistical measure of how many standard deviations an observation is from the mean — values > 3 indicate anomalies
Risk Score Composite numerical score aggregating multiple behavioral anomalies weighted by asset criticality
Peer Group Analysis Comparing a user's behavior to others in the same department/role to identify outliers

Tools & Systems

  • Splunk UBA: Dedicated User Behavior Analytics module integrating with Splunk ES for ML-driven anomaly detection
  • Microsoft Sentinel UEBA: Built-in UEBA capability in Azure Sentinel with entity pages and investigation graphs
  • Exabeam Advanced Analytics: Standalone UEBA platform with session stitching and automatic timeline creation
  • Securonix: Cloud-native SIEM/UEBA with pre-built behavioral models for insider threat detection

Common Scenarios

  • Compromised Account: Impossible travel + off-hours login + unusual app access = likely credential compromise
  • Insider Data Theft: Employee accessing 10x normal file volume in notice period before departure
  • Privilege Escalation Abuse: Admin account used from unusual location accessing systems outside normal scope
  • Shared Account Detection: Service account logging in from multiple geographies simultaneously
  • Dormant Account Reactivation: Account with no activity for 90+ days suddenly performing privileged operations

Output Format

UEBA ANOMALY REPORT — Weekly Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Period:       2024-03-11 to 2024-03-17
Users Baselined:  2,847
Anomalies Detected: 23

TOP RISK USERS:
#  User          Dept       Risk   Anomalies
1. jsmith        Finance    94.5   Impossible travel (NYC->Moscow, 2h), off-hours access, 15GB download
2. admin_svc01   IT Ops     82.0   Login from 12 new IPs, 47 hosts accessed (baseline: 8)
3. mwilson       HR         67.3   Off-hours file access (2AM), 3x normal download volume

INVESTIGATION STATUS:
  jsmith:      Escalated to Tier 2 — possible account compromise (IR-2024-0445)
  admin_svc01: Under review — may be new automation deployment (checking with IT Ops)
  mwilson:     Pending HR context — employee on notice period, monitoring increased

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w