[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6AG36VJBJDM93YQCAKCBRZX":3,"skill-same:01M6AG36VJBJDM93YQCAKCBRZX":112},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":44,"commitSha":45,"skillDirectory":46,"forksCount":47,"repositoryHtmlUrl":48,"repositoryHomepageUrl":49,"ownerHtmlUrl":50,"ownerBlogUrl":51,"ownerDescription":52,"updatedAt":53,"install":54,"resources":67},"01M6AG36VJBJDM93YQCAKCBRZX","n8n-validation-expert",null,"Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, or the validation loop process.","davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","davila7","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F6216945?v=4","01M6ADEWWFPS191NFM0Y1EX1JH","Daniel Avila","01M6ADJHGM78PHQRD3XZTFDVKK",33481,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fn8n\u002Fn8n-validation-expert\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"validation","n8n","expert","n8n validation expert","operator","loop","results","process","guide","use","issues","help","structure","false","error","types","about","profiles","errors","when","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: n8n-validation-expert\ndescription: Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, or the validation loop process.\n---\n\n# n8n Validation Expert\n\nExpert guide for interpreting and fixing n8n validation errors.\n\n---\n\n## Validation Philosophy\n\n**Validate early, validate often**\n\nValidation is typically iterative:\n- Expect validation feedback loops\n- Usually 2-3 validate → fix cycles\n- Average: 23s thinking about errors, 58s fixing them\n\n**Key insight**: Validation is an iterative process, not one-shot!\n\n---\n\n## Error Severity Levels\n\n### 1. Errors (Must Fix)\n**Blocks workflow execution** - Must be resolved before activation\n\n**Types**:\n- `missing_required` - Required field not provided\n- `invalid_value` - Value doesn't match allowed options\n- `type_mismatch` - Wrong data type (string instead of number)\n- `invalid_reference` - Referenced node doesn't exist\n- `invalid_expression` - Expression syntax error\n\n**Example**:\n```json\n{\n  \"type\": \"missing_required\",\n  \"property\": \"channel\",\n  \"message\": \"Channel name is required\",\n  \"fix\": \"Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces, 1-80 characters)\"\n}\n```\n\n### 2. Warnings (Should Fix)\n**Doesn't block execution** - Workflow can be activated but may have issues\n\n**Types**:\n- `best_practice` - Recommended but not required\n- `deprecated` - Using old API\u002Ffeature\n- `performance` - Potential performance issue\n\n**Example**:\n```json\n{\n  \"type\": \"best_practice\",\n  \"property\": \"errorHandling\",\n  \"message\": \"Slack API can have rate limits\",\n  \"suggestion\": \"Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput' with retryOnFail\"\n}\n```\n\n### 3. Suggestions (Optional)\n**Nice to have** - Improvements that could enhance workflow\n\n**Types**:\n- `optimization` - Could be more efficient\n- `alternative` - Better way to achieve same result\n\n---\n\n## The Validation Loop\n\n### Pattern from Telemetry\n**7,841 occurrences** of this pattern:\n\n```\n1. Configure node\n   ↓\n2. validate_node_operation (23 seconds thinking about errors)\n   ↓\n3. Read error messages carefully\n   ↓\n4. Fix errors\n   ↓\n5. validate_node_operation again (58 seconds fixing)\n   ↓\n6. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)\n```\n\n### Example\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Iteration 1\nlet config = {\n  resource: \"channel\",\n  operation: \"create\"\n};\n\nconst result1 = validate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config,\n  profile: \"runtime\"\n});\n\u002F\u002F → Error: Missing \"name\"\n\n\u002F\u002F ⏱️  23 seconds thinking...\n\n\u002F\u002F Iteration 2\nconfig.name = \"general\";\n\nconst result2 = validate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config,\n  profile: \"runtime\"\n});\n\u002F\u002F → Error: Missing \"text\"\n\n\u002F\u002F ⏱️  58 seconds fixing...\n\n\u002F\u002F Iteration 3\nconfig.text = \"Hello!\";\n\nconst result3 = validate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config,\n  profile: \"runtime\"\n});\n\u002F\u002F → Valid! ✅\n```\n\n**This is normal!** Don't be discouraged by multiple iterations.\n\n---\n\n## Validation Profiles\n\nChoose the right profile for your stage:\n\n### minimal\n**Use when**: Quick checks during editing\n\n**Validates**:\n- Only required fields\n- Basic structure\n\n**Pros**: Fastest, most permissive\n**Cons**: May miss issues\n\n### runtime (RECOMMENDED)\n**Use when**: Pre-deployment validation\n\n**Validates**:\n- Required fields\n- Value types\n- Allowed values\n- Basic dependencies\n\n**Pros**: Balanced, catches real errors\n**Cons**: Some edge cases missed\n\n**This is the recommended profile for most use cases**\n\n### ai-friendly\n**Use when**: AI-generated configurations\n\n**Validates**:\n- Same as runtime\n- Reduces false positives\n- More tolerant of minor issues\n\n**Pros**: Less noisy for AI workflows\n**Cons**: May allow some questionable configs\n\n### strict\n**Use when**: Production deployment, critical workflows\n\n**Validates**:\n- Everything\n- Best practices\n- Performance concerns\n- Security issues\n\n**Pros**: Maximum safety\n**Cons**: Many warnings, some false positives\n\n---\n\n## Common Error Types\n\n### 1. missing_required\n**What it means**: A required field is not provided\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Use `get_node_essentials` to see required fields\n2. Add the missing field to your configuration\n3. Provide an appropriate value\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"missing_required\",\n  \"property\": \"channel\",\n  \"message\": \"Channel name is required\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.channel = \"#general\";\n```\n\n### 2. invalid_value\n**What it means**: Value doesn't match allowed options\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Check error message for allowed values\n2. Use `get_node_essentials` to see options\n3. Update to a valid value\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"invalid_value\",\n  \"property\": \"operation\",\n  \"message\": \"Operation must be one of: post, update, delete\",\n  \"current\": \"send\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.operation = \"post\";  \u002F\u002F Use valid operation\n```\n\n### 3. type_mismatch\n**What it means**: Wrong data type for field\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Check expected type in error message\n2. Convert value to correct type\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"type_mismatch\",\n  \"property\": \"limit\",\n  \"message\": \"Expected number, got string\",\n  \"current\": \"100\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.limit = 100;  \u002F\u002F Number, not string\n```\n\n### 4. invalid_expression\n**What it means**: Expression syntax error\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Use n8n Expression Syntax skill\n2. Check for missing `{{}}` or typos\n3. Verify node\u002Ffield references\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"invalid_expression\",\n  \"property\": \"text\",\n  \"message\": \"Invalid expression: $json.name\",\n  \"current\": \"$json.name\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.text = \"={{$json.name}}\";  \u002F\u002F Add {{}}\n```\n\n### 5. invalid_reference\n**What it means**: Referenced node doesn't exist\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Check node name spelling\n2. Verify node exists in workflow\n3. Update reference to correct name\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"invalid_reference\",\n  \"property\": \"expression\",\n  \"message\": \"Node 'HTTP Requets' does not exist\",\n  \"current\": \"={{$node['HTTP Requets'].json.data}}\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix - correct typo\nconfig.expression = \"={{$node['HTTP Request'].json.data}}\";\n```\n\n---\n\n## Auto-Sanitization System\n\n### What It Does\n**Automatically fixes common operator structure issues** on ANY workflow update\n\n**Runs when**:\n- `n8n_create_workflow`\n- `n8n_update_partial_workflow`\n- Any workflow save operation\n\n### What It Fixes\n\n#### 1. Binary Operators (Two Values)\n**Operators**: equals, notEquals, contains, notContains, greaterThan, lessThan, startsWith, endsWith\n\n**Fix**: Removes `singleValue` property (binary operators compare two values)\n\n**Before**:\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"equals\",\n  \"singleValue\": true  \u002F\u002F ❌ Wrong!\n}\n```\n\n**After** (automatic):\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"equals\"\n  \u002F\u002F singleValue removed ✅\n}\n```\n\n#### 2. Unary Operators (One Value)\n**Operators**: isEmpty, isNotEmpty, true, false\n\n**Fix**: Adds `singleValue: true` (unary operators check single value)\n\n**Before**:\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"isEmpty\"\n  \u002F\u002F Missing singleValue ❌\n}\n```\n\n**After** (automatic):\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"isEmpty\",\n  \"singleValue\": true  \u002F\u002F ✅ Added\n}\n```\n\n#### 3. IF\u002FSwitch Metadata\n**Fix**: Adds complete `conditions.options` metadata for IF v2.2+ and Switch v3.2+\n\n### What It CANNOT Fix\n\n#### 1. Broken Connections\nReferences to non-existent nodes\n\n**Solution**: Use `cleanStaleConnections` operation in `n8n_update_partial_workflow`\n\n#### 2. Branch Count Mismatches\n3 Switch rules but only 2 output connections\n\n**Solution**: Add missing connections or remove extra rules\n\n#### 3. Paradoxical Corrupt States\nAPI returns corrupt data but rejects updates\n\n**Solution**: May require manual database intervention\n\n---\n\n## False Positives\n\n### What Are They?\nValidation warnings that are technically \"wrong\" but acceptable in your use case\n\n### Common False Positives\n\n#### 1. \"Missing error handling\"\n**Warning**: No error handling configured\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- Simple workflows where failures are obvious\n- Testing\u002Fdevelopment workflows\n- Non-critical notifications\n\n**When to fix**: Production workflows handling important data\n\n#### 2. \"No retry logic\"\n**Warning**: Node doesn't retry on failure\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- APIs with their own retry logic\n- Idempotent operations\n- Manual trigger workflows\n\n**When to fix**: Flaky external services, production automation\n\n#### 3. \"Missing rate limiting\"\n**Warning**: No rate limiting for API calls\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- Internal APIs with no limits\n- Low-volume workflows\n- APIs with server-side rate limiting\n\n**When to fix**: Public APIs, high-volume workflows\n\n#### 4. \"Unbounded query\"\n**Warning**: SELECT without LIMIT\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- Small known datasets\n- Aggregation queries\n- Development\u002Ftesting\n\n**When to fix**: Production queries on large tables\n\n### Reducing False Positives\n\n**Use `ai-friendly` profile**:\n```javascript\nvalidate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config: {...},\n  profile: \"ai-friendly\"  \u002F\u002F Fewer false positives\n})\n```\n\n---\n\n## Validation Result Structure\n\n### Complete Response\n```javascript\n{\n  \"valid\": false,\n  \"errors\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"missing_required\",\n      \"property\": \"channel\",\n      \"message\": \"Channel name is required\",\n      \"fix\": \"Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces)\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"warnings\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"best_practice\",\n      \"property\": \"errorHandling\",\n      \"message\": \"Slack API can have rate limits\",\n      \"suggestion\": \"Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput'\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"suggestions\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"optimization\",\n      \"message\": \"Consider using batch operations for multiple messages\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"summary\": {\n    \"hasErrors\": true,\n    \"errorCount\": 1,\n    \"warningCount\": 1,\n    \"suggestionCount\": 1\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### How to Read It\n\n#### 1. Check `valid` field\n```javascript\nif (result.valid) {\n  \u002F\u002F ✅ Configuration is valid\n} else {\n  \u002F\u002F ❌ Has errors - must fix before deployment\n}\n```\n\n#### 2. Fix errors first\n```javascript\nresult.errors.forEach(error => {\n  console.log(`Error in ${error.property}: ${error.message}`);\n  console.log(`Fix: ${error.fix}`);\n});\n```\n\n#### 3. Review warnings\n```javascript\nresult.warnings.forEach(warning => {\n  console.log(`Warning: ${warning.message}`);\n  console.log(`Suggestion: ${warning.suggestion}`);\n  \u002F\u002F Decide if you need to address this\n});\n```\n\n#### 4. Consider suggestions\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Optional improvements\n\u002F\u002F Not required but may enhance workflow\n```\n\n---\n\n## Workflow Validation\n\n### validate_workflow (Structure)\n**Validates entire workflow**, not just individual nodes\n\n**Checks**:\n1. **Node configurations** - Each node valid\n2. **Connections** - No broken references\n3. **Expressions** - Syntax and references valid\n4. **Flow** - Logical workflow structure\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\nvalidate_workflow({\n  workflow: {\n    nodes: [...],\n    connections: {...}\n  },\n  options: {\n    validateNodes: true,\n    validateConnections: true,\n    validateExpressions: true,\n    profile: \"runtime\"\n  }\n})\n```\n\n### Common Workflow Errors\n\n#### 1. Broken Connections\n```json\n{\n  \"error\": \"Connection from 'Transform' to 'NonExistent' - target node not found\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Remove stale connection or create missing node\n\n#### 2. Circular Dependencies\n```json\n{\n  \"error\": \"Circular dependency detected: Node A → Node B → Node A\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Restructure workflow to remove loop\n\n#### 3. Multiple Start Nodes\n```json\n{\n  \"warning\": \"Multiple trigger nodes found - only one will execute\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Remove extra triggers or split into separate workflows\n\n#### 4. Disconnected Nodes\n```json\n{\n  \"warning\": \"Node 'Transform' is not connected to workflow flow\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Connect node or remove if unused\n\n---\n\n## Recovery Strategies\n\n### Strategy 1: Start Fresh\n**When**: Configuration is severely broken\n\n**Steps**:\n1. Note required fields from `get_node_essentials`\n2. Create minimal valid configuration\n3. Add features incrementally\n4. Validate after each addition\n\n### Strategy 2: Binary Search\n**When**: Workflow validates but executes incorrectly\n\n**Steps**:\n1. Remove half the nodes\n2. Validate and test\n3. If works: problem is in removed nodes\n4. If fails: problem is in remaining nodes\n5. Repeat until problem isolated\n\n### Strategy 3: Clean Stale Connections\n**When**: \"Node not found\" errors\n\n**Steps**:\n```javascript\nn8n_update_partial_workflow({\n  id: \"workflow-id\",\n  operations: [{\n    type: \"cleanStaleConnections\"\n  }]\n})\n```\n\n### Strategy 4: Use Auto-fix\n**When**: Operator structure errors\n\n**Steps**:\n```javascript\nn8n_autofix_workflow({\n  id: \"workflow-id\",\n  applyFixes: false  \u002F\u002F Preview first\n})\n\n\u002F\u002F Review fixes, then apply\nn8n_autofix_workflow({\n  id: \"workflow-id\",\n  applyFixes: true\n})\n```\n\n---\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### ✅ Do\n\n- Validate after every significant change\n- Read error messages completely\n- Fix errors iteratively (one at a time)\n- Use `runtime` profile for pre-deployment\n- Check `valid` field before assuming success\n- Trust auto-sanitization for operator issues\n- Use `get_node_essentials` when unclear about requirements\n- Document false positives you accept\n\n### ❌ Don't\n\n- Skip validation before activation\n- Try to fix all errors at once\n- Ignore error messages\n- Use `strict` profile during development (too noisy)\n- Assume validation passed (always check result)\n- Manually fix auto-sanitization issues\n- Deploy with unresolved errors\n- Ignore all warnings (some are important!)\n\n---\n\n## Detailed Guides\n\nFor comprehensive error catalogs and false positive examples:\n\n- **[ERROR_CATALOG.md](ERROR_CATALOG.md)** - Complete list of error types with examples\n- **[FALSE_POSITIVES.md](FALSE_POSITIVES.md)** - When warnings are acceptable\n\n---\n\n## Summary\n\n**Key Points**:\n1. **Validation is iterative** (avg 2-3 cycles, 23s + 58s)\n2. **Errors must be fixed**, warnings are optional\n3. **Auto-sanitization** fixes operator structures automatically\n4. **Use runtime profile** for balanced validation\n5. **False positives exist** - learn to recognize them\n6. **Read error messages** - they contain fix guidance\n\n**Validation Process**:\n1. Validate → Read errors → Fix → Validate again\n2. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)\n3. Review warnings and decide if acceptable\n4. Deploy with confidence\n\n**Related Skills**:\n- n8n MCP Tools Expert - Use validation tools correctly\n- n8n Expression Syntax - Fix expression errors\n- n8n Node Configuration - Understand required fields\n","# n8n Validation Expert\n\nExpert guide for interpreting and fixing n8n validation errors.\n\n---\n\n## Validation Philosophy\n\n**Validate early, validate often**\n\nValidation is typically iterative:\n- Expect validation feedback loops\n- Usually 2-3 validate → fix cycles\n- Average: 23s thinking about errors, 58s fixing them\n\n**Key insight**: Validation is an iterative process, not one-shot!\n\n---\n\n## Error Severity Levels\n\n### 1. Errors (Must Fix)\n**Blocks workflow execution** - Must be resolved before activation\n\n**Types**:\n- `missing_required` - Required field not provided\n- `invalid_value` - Value doesn't match allowed options\n- `type_mismatch` - Wrong data type (string instead of number)\n- `invalid_reference` - Referenced node doesn't exist\n- `invalid_expression` - Expression syntax error\n\n**Example**:\n```json\n{\n  \"type\": \"missing_required\",\n  \"property\": \"channel\",\n  \"message\": \"Channel name is required\",\n  \"fix\": \"Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces, 1-80 characters)\"\n}\n```\n\n### 2. Warnings (Should Fix)\n**Doesn't block execution** - Workflow can be activated but may have issues\n\n**Types**:\n- `best_practice` - Recommended but not required\n- `deprecated` - Using old API\u002Ffeature\n- `performance` - Potential performance issue\n\n**Example**:\n```json\n{\n  \"type\": \"best_practice\",\n  \"property\": \"errorHandling\",\n  \"message\": \"Slack API can have rate limits\",\n  \"suggestion\": \"Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput' with retryOnFail\"\n}\n```\n\n### 3. Suggestions (Optional)\n**Nice to have** - Improvements that could enhance workflow\n\n**Types**:\n- `optimization` - Could be more efficient\n- `alternative` - Better way to achieve same result\n\n---\n\n## The Validation Loop\n\n### Pattern from Telemetry\n**7,841 occurrences** of this pattern:\n\n```\n1. Configure node\n   ↓\n2. validate_node_operation (23 seconds thinking about errors)\n   ↓\n3. Read error messages carefully\n   ↓\n4. Fix errors\n   ↓\n5. validate_node_operation again (58 seconds fixing)\n   ↓\n6. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)\n```\n\n### Example\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Iteration 1\nlet config = {\n  resource: \"channel\",\n  operation: \"create\"\n};\n\nconst result1 = validate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config,\n  profile: \"runtime\"\n});\n\u002F\u002F → Error: Missing \"name\"\n\n\u002F\u002F ⏱️  23 seconds thinking...\n\n\u002F\u002F Iteration 2\nconfig.name = \"general\";\n\nconst result2 = validate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config,\n  profile: \"runtime\"\n});\n\u002F\u002F → Error: Missing \"text\"\n\n\u002F\u002F ⏱️  58 seconds fixing...\n\n\u002F\u002F Iteration 3\nconfig.text = \"Hello!\";\n\nconst result3 = validate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config,\n  profile: \"runtime\"\n});\n\u002F\u002F → Valid! ✅\n```\n\n**This is normal!** Don't be discouraged by multiple iterations.\n\n---\n\n## Validation Profiles\n\nChoose the right profile for your stage:\n\n### minimal\n**Use when**: Quick checks during editing\n\n**Validates**:\n- Only required fields\n- Basic structure\n\n**Pros**: Fastest, most permissive\n**Cons**: May miss issues\n\n### runtime (RECOMMENDED)\n**Use when**: Pre-deployment validation\n\n**Validates**:\n- Required fields\n- Value types\n- Allowed values\n- Basic dependencies\n\n**Pros**: Balanced, catches real errors\n**Cons**: Some edge cases missed\n\n**This is the recommended profile for most use cases**\n\n### ai-friendly\n**Use when**: AI-generated configurations\n\n**Validates**:\n- Same as runtime\n- Reduces false positives\n- More tolerant of minor issues\n\n**Pros**: Less noisy for AI workflows\n**Cons**: May allow some questionable configs\n\n### strict\n**Use when**: Production deployment, critical workflows\n\n**Validates**:\n- Everything\n- Best practices\n- Performance concerns\n- Security issues\n\n**Pros**: Maximum safety\n**Cons**: Many warnings, some false positives\n\n---\n\n## Common Error Types\n\n### 1. missing_required\n**What it means**: A required field is not provided\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Use `get_node_essentials` to see required fields\n2. Add the missing field to your configuration\n3. Provide an appropriate value\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"missing_required\",\n  \"property\": \"channel\",\n  \"message\": \"Channel name is required\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.channel = \"#general\";\n```\n\n### 2. invalid_value\n**What it means**: Value doesn't match allowed options\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Check error message for allowed values\n2. Use `get_node_essentials` to see options\n3. Update to a valid value\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"invalid_value\",\n  \"property\": \"operation\",\n  \"message\": \"Operation must be one of: post, update, delete\",\n  \"current\": \"send\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.operation = \"post\";  \u002F\u002F Use valid operation\n```\n\n### 3. type_mismatch\n**What it means**: Wrong data type for field\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Check expected type in error message\n2. Convert value to correct type\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"type_mismatch\",\n  \"property\": \"limit\",\n  \"message\": \"Expected number, got string\",\n  \"current\": \"100\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.limit = 100;  \u002F\u002F Number, not string\n```\n\n### 4. invalid_expression\n**What it means**: Expression syntax error\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Use n8n Expression Syntax skill\n2. Check for missing `{{}}` or typos\n3. Verify node\u002Ffield references\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"invalid_expression\",\n  \"property\": \"text\",\n  \"message\": \"Invalid expression: $json.name\",\n  \"current\": \"$json.name\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix\nconfig.text = \"={{$json.name}}\";  \u002F\u002F Add {{}}\n```\n\n### 5. invalid_reference\n**What it means**: Referenced node doesn't exist\n\n**How to fix**:\n1. Check node name spelling\n2. Verify node exists in workflow\n3. Update reference to correct name\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Error\n{\n  \"type\": \"invalid_reference\",\n  \"property\": \"expression\",\n  \"message\": \"Node 'HTTP Requets' does not exist\",\n  \"current\": \"={{$node['HTTP Requets'].json.data}}\"\n}\n\n\u002F\u002F Fix - correct typo\nconfig.expression = \"={{$node['HTTP Request'].json.data}}\";\n```\n\n---\n\n## Auto-Sanitization System\n\n### What It Does\n**Automatically fixes common operator structure issues** on ANY workflow update\n\n**Runs when**:\n- `n8n_create_workflow`\n- `n8n_update_partial_workflow`\n- Any workflow save operation\n\n### What It Fixes\n\n#### 1. Binary Operators (Two Values)\n**Operators**: equals, notEquals, contains, notContains, greaterThan, lessThan, startsWith, endsWith\n\n**Fix**: Removes `singleValue` property (binary operators compare two values)\n\n**Before**:\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"equals\",\n  \"singleValue\": true  \u002F\u002F ❌ Wrong!\n}\n```\n\n**After** (automatic):\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"equals\"\n  \u002F\u002F singleValue removed ✅\n}\n```\n\n#### 2. Unary Operators (One Value)\n**Operators**: isEmpty, isNotEmpty, true, false\n\n**Fix**: Adds `singleValue: true` (unary operators check single value)\n\n**Before**:\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"isEmpty\"\n  \u002F\u002F Missing singleValue ❌\n}\n```\n\n**After** (automatic):\n```javascript\n{\n  \"type\": \"boolean\",\n  \"operation\": \"isEmpty\",\n  \"singleValue\": true  \u002F\u002F ✅ Added\n}\n```\n\n#### 3. IF\u002FSwitch Metadata\n**Fix**: Adds complete `conditions.options` metadata for IF v2.2+ and Switch v3.2+\n\n### What It CANNOT Fix\n\n#### 1. Broken Connections\nReferences to non-existent nodes\n\n**Solution**: Use `cleanStaleConnections` operation in `n8n_update_partial_workflow`\n\n#### 2. Branch Count Mismatches\n3 Switch rules but only 2 output connections\n\n**Solution**: Add missing connections or remove extra rules\n\n#### 3. Paradoxical Corrupt States\nAPI returns corrupt data but rejects updates\n\n**Solution**: May require manual database intervention\n\n---\n\n## False Positives\n\n### What Are They?\nValidation warnings that are technically \"wrong\" but acceptable in your use case\n\n### Common False Positives\n\n#### 1. \"Missing error handling\"\n**Warning**: No error handling configured\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- Simple workflows where failures are obvious\n- Testing\u002Fdevelopment workflows\n- Non-critical notifications\n\n**When to fix**: Production workflows handling important data\n\n#### 2. \"No retry logic\"\n**Warning**: Node doesn't retry on failure\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- APIs with their own retry logic\n- Idempotent operations\n- Manual trigger workflows\n\n**When to fix**: Flaky external services, production automation\n\n#### 3. \"Missing rate limiting\"\n**Warning**: No rate limiting for API calls\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- Internal APIs with no limits\n- Low-volume workflows\n- APIs with server-side rate limiting\n\n**When to fix**: Public APIs, high-volume workflows\n\n#### 4. \"Unbounded query\"\n**Warning**: SELECT without LIMIT\n\n**When acceptable**:\n- Small known datasets\n- Aggregation queries\n- Development\u002Ftesting\n\n**When to fix**: Production queries on large tables\n\n### Reducing False Positives\n\n**Use `ai-friendly` profile**:\n```javascript\nvalidate_node_operation({\n  nodeType: \"nodes-base.slack\",\n  config: {...},\n  profile: \"ai-friendly\"  \u002F\u002F Fewer false positives\n})\n```\n\n---\n\n## Validation Result Structure\n\n### Complete Response\n```javascript\n{\n  \"valid\": false,\n  \"errors\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"missing_required\",\n      \"property\": \"channel\",\n      \"message\": \"Channel name is required\",\n      \"fix\": \"Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces)\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"warnings\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"best_practice\",\n      \"property\": \"errorHandling\",\n      \"message\": \"Slack API can have rate limits\",\n      \"suggestion\": \"Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput'\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"suggestions\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"optimization\",\n      \"message\": \"Consider using batch operations for multiple messages\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"summary\": {\n    \"hasErrors\": true,\n    \"errorCount\": 1,\n    \"warningCount\": 1,\n    \"suggestionCount\": 1\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### How to Read It\n\n#### 1. Check `valid` field\n```javascript\nif (result.valid) {\n  \u002F\u002F ✅ Configuration is valid\n} else {\n  \u002F\u002F ❌ Has errors - must fix before deployment\n}\n```\n\n#### 2. Fix errors first\n```javascript\nresult.errors.forEach(error => {\n  console.log(`Error in ${error.property}: ${error.message}`);\n  console.log(`Fix: ${error.fix}`);\n});\n```\n\n#### 3. Review warnings\n```javascript\nresult.warnings.forEach(warning => {\n  console.log(`Warning: ${warning.message}`);\n  console.log(`Suggestion: ${warning.suggestion}`);\n  \u002F\u002F Decide if you need to address this\n});\n```\n\n#### 4. Consider suggestions\n```javascript\n\u002F\u002F Optional improvements\n\u002F\u002F Not required but may enhance workflow\n```\n\n---\n\n## Workflow Validation\n\n### validate_workflow (Structure)\n**Validates entire workflow**, not just individual nodes\n\n**Checks**:\n1. **Node configurations** - Each node valid\n2. **Connections** - No broken references\n3. **Expressions** - Syntax and references valid\n4. **Flow** - Logical workflow structure\n\n**Example**:\n```javascript\nvalidate_workflow({\n  workflow: {\n    nodes: [...],\n    connections: {...}\n  },\n  options: {\n    validateNodes: true,\n    validateConnections: true,\n    validateExpressions: true,\n    profile: \"runtime\"\n  }\n})\n```\n\n### Common Workflow Errors\n\n#### 1. Broken Connections\n```json\n{\n  \"error\": \"Connection from 'Transform' to 'NonExistent' - target node not found\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Remove stale connection or create missing node\n\n#### 2. Circular Dependencies\n```json\n{\n  \"error\": \"Circular dependency detected: Node A → Node B → Node A\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Restructure workflow to remove loop\n\n#### 3. Multiple Start Nodes\n```json\n{\n  \"warning\": \"Multiple trigger nodes found - only one will execute\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Remove extra triggers or split into separate workflows\n\n#### 4. Disconnected Nodes\n```json\n{\n  \"warning\": \"Node 'Transform' is not connected to workflow flow\"\n}\n```\n\n**Fix**: Connect node or remove if unused\n\n---\n\n## Recovery Strategies\n\n### Strategy 1: Start Fresh\n**When**: Configuration is severely broken\n\n**Steps**:\n1. Note required fields from `get_node_essentials`\n2. Create minimal valid configuration\n3. Add features incrementally\n4. Validate after each addition\n\n### Strategy 2: Binary Search\n**When**: Workflow validates but executes incorrectly\n\n**Steps**:\n1. Remove half the nodes\n2. Validate and test\n3. If works: problem is in removed nodes\n4. If fails: problem is in remaining nodes\n5. Repeat until problem isolated\n\n### Strategy 3: Clean Stale Connections\n**When**: \"Node not found\" errors\n\n**Steps**:\n```javascript\nn8n_update_partial_workflow({\n  id: \"workflow-id\",\n  operations: [{\n    type: \"cleanStaleConnections\"\n  }]\n})\n```\n\n### Strategy 4: Use Auto-fix\n**When**: Operator structure errors\n\n**Steps**:\n```javascript\nn8n_autofix_workflow({\n  id: \"workflow-id\",\n  applyFixes: false  \u002F\u002F Preview first\n})\n\n\u002F\u002F Review fixes, then apply\nn8n_autofix_workflow({\n  id: \"workflow-id\",\n  applyFixes: true\n})\n```\n\n---\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### ✅ Do\n\n- Validate after every significant change\n- Read error messages completely\n- Fix errors iteratively (one at a time)\n- Use `runtime` profile for pre-deployment\n- Check `valid` field before assuming success\n- Trust auto-sanitization for operator issues\n- Use `get_node_essentials` when unclear about requirements\n- Document false positives you accept\n\n### ❌ Don't\n\n- Skip validation before activation\n- Try to fix all errors at once\n- Ignore error messages\n- Use `strict` profile during development (too noisy)\n- Assume validation passed (always check result)\n- Manually fix auto-sanitization issues\n- Deploy with unresolved errors\n- Ignore all warnings (some are important!)\n\n---\n\n## Detailed Guides\n\nFor comprehensive error catalogs and false positive examples:\n\n- **[ERROR_CATALOG.md](ERROR_CATALOG.md)** - Complete list of error types with examples\n- **[FALSE_POSITIVES.md](FALSE_POSITIVES.md)** - When warnings are acceptable\n\n---\n\n## Summary\n\n**Key Points**:\n1. **Validation is iterative** (avg 2-3 cycles, 23s + 58s)\n2. **Errors must be fixed**, warnings are optional\n3. **Auto-sanitization** fixes operator structures automatically\n4. **Use runtime profile** for balanced validation\n5. **False positives exist** - learn to recognize them\n6. **Read error messages** - they contain fix guidance\n\n**Validation Process**:\n1. Validate → Read errors → Fix → Validate again\n2. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)\n3. Review warnings and decide if acceptable\n4. Deploy with confidence\n\n**Related Skills**:\n- n8n MCP Tools Expert - Use validation tools correctly\n- n8n Expression Syntax - Fix expression errors\n- n8n Node Configuration - Understand required fields\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","2b749c82b5d11fac39d9a6e021ce3f5b8a541bd1","cli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fn8n\u002Fn8n-validation-expert",3931,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","https:\u002F\u002Faitmpl.com","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7","https:\u002F\u002Fdanielavila.me","Building AI dev tools with LLMs","2026-11-14 06:14:46",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":55,"prompt":65,"zipAvailable":66},[56,59,62],{"tool":57,"command":58},"npx","npx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill n8n-validation-expert",{"tool":60,"command":61},"bunx","bunx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill n8n-validation-expert",{"tool":63,"command":64},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill n8n-validation-expert","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fn8n\u002Fn8n-validation-expert\u002FSKILL.md",true,[68,74,78,82,86,90,94,100,104,108],{"path":69,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":72,"sourceHtmlUrl":73},"ERROR_CATALOG.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",17237,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fn8n\u002Fn8n-validation-expert\u002FERROR_CATALOG.md",{"path":75,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":76,"sourceHtmlUrl":77},"FALSE_POSITIVES.md",14753,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fn8n\u002Fn8n-validation-expert\u002FFALSE_POSITIVES.md",{"path":79,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":80,"sourceHtmlUrl":81},"README.md",7956,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fn8n\u002Fn8n-validation-expert\u002FREADME.md",{"path":83,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":84,"sourceHtmlUrl":85},"references\u002Fandroid.md",7337,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fasermax\u002Fclaude-plugins\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fmahou\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidate\u002Freferences\u002Fandroid.md",{"path":87,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":88,"sourceHtmlUrl":89},"references\u002Fbrowser.md",3366,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fasermax\u002Fclaude-plugins\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fmahou\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidate\u002Freferences\u002Fbrowser.md",{"path":91,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":92,"sourceHtmlUrl":93},"references\u002Fhttp.md",2401,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fasermax\u002Fclaude-plugins\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fmahou\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidate\u002Freferences\u002Fhttp.md",{"path":95,"resourceType":96,"resourceTypeDesc":97,"sizeBytes":98,"sourceHtmlUrl":99},"scripts\u002Fandroid\u002Frelaunch.sh","SCRIPT","脚本",384,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fasermax\u002Fclaude-plugins\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fmahou\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidate\u002Fscripts\u002Fandroid\u002Frelaunch.sh",{"path":101,"resourceType":96,"resourceTypeDesc":97,"sizeBytes":102,"sourceHtmlUrl":103},"scripts\u002Fandroid\u002Ftap.sh",1166,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fasermax\u002Fclaude-plugins\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fmahou\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidate\u002Fscripts\u002Fandroid\u002Ftap.sh",{"path":105,"resourceType":96,"resourceTypeDesc":97,"sizeBytes":106,"sourceHtmlUrl":107},"scripts\u002Fandroid\u002Ftexts.sh",1130,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fasermax\u002Fclaude-plugins\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fmahou\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidate\u002Fscripts\u002Fandroid\u002Ftexts.sh",{"path":109,"resourceType":96,"resourceTypeDesc":97,"sizeBytes":110,"sourceHtmlUrl":111},"scripts\u002Fandroid\u002Fwait-for.sh",496,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fasermax\u002Fclaude-plugins\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fmahou\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidate\u002Fscripts\u002Fandroid\u002Fwait-for.sh",[113,143,170,203,238,262],{"skillNo":114,"name":115,"nameZh":6,"description":116,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":117,"categories":118,"keywords":124,"publishedAt":39},"01M70NHBTQ8BV0A2SCAZXEPHCX","wealthville-pool-scoring","Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter\u002FHold\u002FExit\u002FReduce\u002FAvoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fweb-data\u002Fwealthville-pool-scoring\u002FSKILL.md",[119],{"categoryNo":120,"categoryName":121,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,28,38,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142],"scoring","pool","wealthville pool scoring","liquidity","which","for","exit","now","reduce","with","record","track","verdict","evm","solana","how","public","look",{"skillNo":144,"name":145,"nameZh":6,"description":146,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":147,"categories":148,"keywords":150,"publishedAt":39},"01M70MB6VR8ERJ4EM8D5KHBMEV","technical-debt-auditor","Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO\u002FFIXME\u002FHACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like \"where should I focus refactoring\", \"find code smells\", \"audit my codebase\", \"what technical debt do we have\", \"prioritize cleanup work\", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions \"code rot\", \"legacy cleanup\", \"refactoring priorities\", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say \"technical debt\" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdevelopment\u002Ftechnical-debt-auditor\u002FSKILL.md",[149],{"categoryNo":120,"categoryName":121,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},[151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,38,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169],"technical debt","debt","technical","technical debt auditor","auditor","coverage","complexity","markers","project","cleanup","unused","code","todo","work","plan","focus","signals","audit","dependency",{"skillNo":171,"name":172,"nameZh":6,"description":173,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":174,"categories":175,"keywords":185,"publishedAt":39},"01M70KPYH9QNHCNME5GJQGE22K","readonly-sql-guard","Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production\u002FERP\u002Fanalytics database (a \"query\" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write\u002FDDL\u002Fside-effect\u002Ftransaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdatabase\u002Freadonly-sql-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[176,179,180],{"categoryNo":177,"categoryName":178,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":120,"categoryName":121,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},{"categoryNo":181,"categoryName":182,"taxonomyType":183,"taxonomyTypeDesc":184},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000033","数据分析师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[186,187,188,189,190,191,192,130,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,28,200,201,38,202],"readonly","guard","sql guard","sql","readonly sql guard","erp","effect","read-only","db","just","tool","calls","only","MCP","access","database","query",{"skillNo":204,"name":205,"nameZh":6,"description":206,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":207,"licenseFileUrl":208,"sourceHtmlUrl":209,"categories":210,"keywords":214,"publishedAt":39},"01M6AFY6F7CC2BBZP1QD6VTNVC","web-artifacts-builder","Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn\u002Fui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn\u002Fui components - not for simple single-file HTML\u002FJSX artifacts.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[211],{"categoryNo":212,"categoryName":213,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,130,237],"artifacts builder","web","web artifacts builder","artifacts","builder","state","routing","state management","component","css","frontend","ui","Tools","file","components","shadcn","react","Tailwind","suite","jsx","html","single-file","ui components",{"skillNo":239,"name":240,"nameZh":6,"description":241,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":207,"licenseFileUrl":242,"sourceHtmlUrl":243,"categories":244,"keywords":249,"publishedAt":39},"01M6AFWF33SFV9Z3SF4PEEE4BF","webapp-testing","Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FSKILL.md",[245,248],{"categoryNo":246,"categoryName":247,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":212,"categoryName":213,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},[250,251,252,253,254,216,255,225,226,256,257,258,259,130,260,134,261],"webapp testing","testing","webapp","browser","playwright","applications","debugging","toolkit","logs","screenshots","local","behavior",{"skillNo":263,"name":264,"nameZh":6,"description":265,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":207,"licenseFileUrl":266,"sourceHtmlUrl":267,"categories":268,"keywords":276,"publishedAt":39},"01M6AF67Q67JJJ5V51JR2P52KA","discernment-nudge","After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FSKILL.md",[269,272,273],{"categoryNo":270,"categoryName":271,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":120,"categoryName":121,"taxonomyType":122,"taxonomyTypeDesc":123},{"categoryNo":274,"categoryName":275,"taxonomyType":183,"taxonomyTypeDesc":184},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[277,278,279,30,280,281,282,283,218,284,228,162,285,286,287,288,289,198,290,38,291,292,293,294,295,140,296],"discernment nudge","nudge","interpretation","run","reasoning","data","writing","lookup","content","review","conversation","short","up","invoke","you","analysis","claims","argument","assemble","recommendations"]