performing-service-account-audit
Audit service accounts across enterprise infrastructure to identify orphaned, over-privileged, and non-compliant accounts. This skill covers discovery of service accounts in Active Directory, cloud pl
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- performing-service-account-audit
- tags
- [ "iam", "identity", "access-control", "service-accounts", "audit", "governance" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.AA-01", "PR.AA-02", "PR.AA-05", "PR.AA-06" ]
- subdomain
- identity-access-management
- description
- Audit service accounts across enterprise infrastructure to identify orphaned, over-privileged, and non-compliant accounts. This skill covers discovery of service accounts in Active Directory, cloud pl
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1078", "T1110", "T1556", "T1098", "T1069" ]
02 资源文件 7
- 资产文件assets/template.md926 B
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.2 KB
- 参考文档references/standards.md885 B
- 参考文档references/workflows.md989 B
- 脚本scripts/agent.py6.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/process.py11.5 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Performing Service Account Audit
Overview
Audit service accounts across enterprise infrastructure to identify orphaned, over-privileged, and non-compliant accounts. This skill covers discovery of service accounts in Active Directory, cloud platforms, databases, and applications, assessing privilege levels, identifying missing owners, and enforcing lifecycle policies.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve performing service account audit
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with identity access management concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Objectives
- Discover all service accounts across AD, cloud, databases, and applications
- Identify orphaned accounts with no valid owner or associated application
- Assess privilege levels and flag over-privileged service accounts
- Check for non-rotating passwords and weak authentication
- Map service account dependencies for safe remediation
- Generate compliance reports for SOX, PCI DSS, and HIPAA audits
Key Concepts
Service Account Types
- AD Service Accounts: Windows services, scheduled tasks, IIS app pools
- Managed Service Accounts (gMSA): AD-managed automatic password rotation
- Cloud IAM Service Accounts: AWS IAM roles/users, Azure service principals, GCP service accounts
- Database Service Accounts: Application connection accounts, replication accounts
- Application Service Accounts: API keys, bot accounts, integration accounts
Audit Dimensions
- Ownership: Who is responsible for this account?
- Purpose: What application/service uses this account?
- Privileges: What permissions does this account have?
- Authentication: How does this account authenticate (password, key, certificate)?
- Rotation: When was the credential last changed?
- Activity: When was this account last used?
Workflow
Step 1: Discovery - Active Directory
- Query AD for all service accounts (filter by description, OU, naming convention)
- Identify accounts with
ServicePrincipalNameset - List accounts in privileged groups (Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins)
- Check for gMSA vs traditional service accounts
- Identify accounts with
PasswordNeverExpiresflag
Step 2: Discovery - Cloud Platforms
- AWS: List IAM users with access keys, check last used date, identify unused roles
- Azure: Enumerate service principals, app registrations, managed identities
- GCP: List service accounts, check key age, identify unused permissions
Step 3: Assessment
- Flag accounts with admin/privileged group membership
- Check password age against rotation policy (90 days max)
- Identify accounts with no login activity in 90+ days
- Verify account ownership against CMDB/asset inventory
- Check for shared credentials (same password hash across accounts)
Step 4: Risk Classification
- Critical: Domain/cloud admin privileges, no password rotation
- High: Access to sensitive data, no identified owner
- Medium: Standard service permissions, password older than 90 days
- Low: Read-only access, managed credentials (gMSA, managed identity)
Step 5: Remediation
- Disable orphaned accounts after validation with application teams
- Convert traditional service accounts to gMSA where possible
- Rotate credentials older than policy threshold
- Reduce privileges to minimum required
- Assign owners and document dependencies
Security Controls
| Control | NIST 800-53 | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Account Management | AC-2 | Service account lifecycle |
| Account Review | AC-2(3) | Periodic review of accounts |
| Least Privilege | AC-6 | Minimum service account permissions |
| Authenticator Management | IA-5 | Service credential rotation |
| Audit Review | AU-6 | Review service account activity |
Common Pitfalls
- Disabling service accounts without verifying application dependencies first
- Not discovering service accounts outside of Active Directory
- Missing cloud service principals and managed identities
- Not checking for interactive logon rights on service accounts
- Failing to document dependencies before remediation
Verification
- [ ] Service accounts inventoried across all platforms
- [ ] Each account has assigned owner
- [ ] Privileged service accounts documented with justification
- [ ] Password rotation compliance checked
- [ ] Orphaned accounts flagged for remediation
- [ ] gMSA migration candidates identified
- [ ] Compliance report generated
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.