performing-sca-dependency-scanning-with-snyk
This skill covers implementing Software Composition Analysis (SCA) using Snyk to detect vulnerable open-source dependencies in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses scanning package manifests and lockfiles, automated fix pull request generation, license compliance checking, continuous monitoring of deployed applications, and integration with GitHub, GitLab, and Jenkins pipelines.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- performing-sca-dependency-scanning-with-snyk
- tags
- [ "devsecops", "cicd", "sca", "snyk", "dependency-scanning", "secure-sdlc" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.PS-01", "GV.SC-07", "ID.IM-04", "PR.PS-04" ]
- subdomain
- devsecops
- description
- This skill covers implementing Software Composition Analysis (SCA) using Snyk to detect vulnerable open-source dependencies in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses scanning package manifests and lockfiles, automated fix pull request generation, license compliance checking, continuous monitoring of deployed applications, and integration with GitHub, GitLab, and Jenkins pipelines.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1195", "T1554", "T1059.004" ]
02 资源文件 7
- 资产文件assets/template.md3.0 KB
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.3 KB
- 参考文档references/standards.md2.7 KB
- 参考文档references/workflows.md3.8 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py6.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/process.py8.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Performing SCA Dependency Scanning with Snyk
When to Use
- When applications use open-source packages that may contain known vulnerabilities
- When compliance requires tracking and remediating vulnerable dependencies (PCI DSS, SOC 2)
- When needing automated fix PRs for vulnerable dependencies in CI/CD
- When license compliance requires visibility into open-source license obligations
- When continuous monitoring is needed for newly disclosed vulnerabilities in deployed dependencies
Do not use for scanning proprietary application code for logic vulnerabilities (use SAST), for runtime vulnerability detection (use DAST), or for container OS package scanning alone (use Trivy for a free alternative).
Prerequisites
- Snyk account (free tier covers up to 200 tests per month for open source)
- Snyk CLI installed or Snyk GitHub/GitLab integration configured
- SNYK_TOKEN environment variable set with API authentication token
- Project with supported package manifests: package.json, requirements.txt, pom.xml, go.mod, Gemfile, etc.
Workflow
Step 1: Install and Authenticate Snyk CLI
# Install Snyk CLI
npm install -g snyk
# Authenticate with Snyk
snyk auth $SNYK_TOKEN
# Test the connection
snyk test --json | jq '.summary'
Step 2: Scan Dependencies in CI/CD Pipeline
# .github/workflows/dependency-scan.yml
name: Dependency Security Scan
on:
push:
branches: [main]
pull_request:
branches: [main]
schedule:
- cron: '0 8 * * 1' # Weekly Monday 8am
jobs:
snyk-scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20'
- name: Install dependencies
run: npm ci
- name: Run Snyk to check for vulnerabilities
uses: snyk/actions/node@master
env:
SNYK_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SNYK_TOKEN }}
with:
args: >
--severity-threshold=high
--fail-on=upgradable
--json-file-output=snyk-results.json
- name: Upload results to Snyk
if: always()
uses: snyk/actions/node@master
env:
SNYK_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SNYK_TOKEN }}
with:
command: monitor
args: --project-name=${{ github.repository }}
- name: Upload SARIF
if: always()
run: |
npx snyk-to-html -i snyk-results.json -o snyk-report.html
Step 3: Configure Snyk for Multiple Languages
# Python project scanning
snyk test --file=requirements.txt --severity-threshold=high --json > snyk-python.json
# Java/Maven project
snyk test --file=pom.xml --severity-threshold=medium --json > snyk-java.json
# Go module scanning
snyk test --file=go.mod --severity-threshold=high --json > snyk-go.json
# Docker image dependency scanning
snyk container test myapp:latest --severity-threshold=high --json > snyk-container.json
# Monorepo: scan all projects
snyk test --all-projects --severity-threshold=high --json > snyk-all.json
# IaC scanning (bonus)
snyk iac test terraform/ --severity-threshold=medium --json > snyk-iac.json
Step 4: Configure Snyk Policies for Organization
# .snyk policy file
version: v1.25.0
ignore:
SNYK-JS-LODASH-1018905:
- '*':
reason: "Prototype pollution in lodash. Not exploitable in our usage - no user input reaches affected function."
expires: 2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z
created: 2026-02-23T00:00:00.000Z
SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6241864:
- '*':
reason: "SSRF in requests redirect handling. Mitigated by allowlist at proxy layer."
expires: 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
patch: {}
# Severity threshold for CI failures
failOnSeverity: high
Step 5: Enable Automated Fix Pull Requests
# Snyk fix: generate fix PRs for vulnerable dependencies
snyk fix --dry-run # Preview changes
# Apply fixes locally
snyk fix
# Enable auto-fix PRs via Snyk dashboard:
# 1. Navigate to Organization Settings > Integrations > GitHub
# 2. Enable "Automatic fix pull requests"
# 3. Set "Fix only direct dependencies" or "Fix direct and transitive"
# 4. Configure branch target (main or develop)
Step 6: License Compliance Scanning
# Check license compliance
snyk test --json | jq '.licensesPolicy'
# Snyk license policy configuration via organization settings:
# - Approved licenses: MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause, ISC
# - Restricted licenses: GPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0 (copyleft risk)
# - Unknown licenses: Flag for manual review
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| SCA | Software Composition Analysis — identifies vulnerabilities and license risks in open-source dependencies |
| Transitive Dependency | A dependency of a direct dependency, often invisible to developers but still a vulnerability vector |
| Fix PR | Automated pull request generated by Snyk that upgrades a vulnerable dependency to a patched version |
| Snyk Monitor | Continuous monitoring mode that watches deployed projects for newly disclosed vulnerabilities |
| Exploit Maturity | Snyk's assessment of whether a vulnerability has known exploits, proof-of-concept, or no known exploit |
| Reachable Vulnerability | A vulnerability in a function that is actually called by the application code, not just present in the dependency |
| License Policy | Organization-level rules defining which open-source licenses are approved, restricted, or require review |
Tools & Systems
- Snyk Open Source: SCA tool for scanning dependencies across 10+ language ecosystems
- Snyk CLI: Command-line interface for local and CI/CD scanning of dependencies
- Snyk Advisor: Package health scoring tool evaluating maintenance, popularity, and security signals
- OWASP Dependency-Check: Free alternative SCA tool using NVD data for vulnerability matching
- npm audit / pip-audit: Language-specific built-in audit tools for basic vulnerability checking
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Triaging a Critical Transitive Dependency Vulnerability
Context: Snyk reports a critical RCE vulnerability in a transitive dependency (log4j in a Java application). The direct dependency has not released a patch.
Approach:
- Use
snyk test --jsonand examine the dependency path to identify which direct dependency pulls in the vulnerable transitive - Check exploit maturity: if "Mature" or "Proof of Concept", prioritize immediately
- If no direct fix exists, use Snyk's patch mechanism or override the transitive version in the build config
- For Maven: add
<dependencyManagement>section to force the safe version of the transitive dependency - For npm: add an
overridessection in package.json to pin the safe version - Add a Snyk ignore with expiration date if no patch is available yet
- Monitor the direct dependency for a release that updates the transitive
Pitfalls: Ignoring transitive vulnerabilities because "we don't use that function directly" is risky. Attackers can chain vulnerabilities across dependency boundaries. Version overrides can break API compatibility between the direct and transitive dependency.
Output Format
Snyk Dependency Scan Report
=============================
Project: org/web-application
Manifest: package.json
Dependencies: 342 (47 direct, 295 transitive)
Scan Date: 2026-02-23
VULNERABILITY SUMMARY:
Critical: 1 (1 fixable)
High: 4 (3 fixable)
Medium: 12 (8 fixable)
Low: 23 (15 fixable)
CRITICAL:
SNYK-JS-EXPRESS-1234567
Package: express@4.17.1 (direct)
Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8)
Exploit: Mature
Fix: Upgrade to express@4.21.0
Path: express@4.17.1
HIGH:
SNYK-JS-JSONWEBTOKEN-5678901
Package: jsonwebtoken@8.5.1 (transitive)
Severity: High (CVSS 7.6)
Exploit: Proof of Concept
Fix: Upgrade passport@0.7.0 (which upgrades jsonwebtoken)
Path: passport@0.6.0 > jsonwebtoken@8.5.1
LICENSE ISSUES:
[RESTRICTED] GPL-3.0: some-package@1.2.3 (transitive via other-pkg)
QUALITY GATE: FAILED (1 Critical with fix available)
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.