AGENT SKILL

performing-ransomware-response

Executes a structured ransomware incident response from detection through containment, forensic analysis, decryption assessment, recovery, and post-incident hardening, covering ransom negotiation, backup integrity verification, and regulatory notification. Use when actively responding to a ransomware outbreak or crypto-ransomware infection, or deciding on ransom payment and containment steps.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
performing-ransomware-response
tags
[ "ransomware", "encryption-recovery", "backup-restoration", "ransom-negotiation", "CISA-guidance" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0.0
mitre_f3
{ "tactics": [ "monetization", "stealth", "initial-access" ], "version": "1.1", "techniques": [ { "id": "F1018", "name": "Convert to Cryptocurrency", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" }, { "id": "F1017", "name": "Conversion to Physical Monetary Instruments", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" }, { "id": "F1025.003", "name": "Electronic Funds Transfer: Wire Transfer", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" }, { "id": "T1070", "name": "Indicator Removal", "source": "attack", "tactic": "stealth" }, { "id": "F1006", "name": "Account Takeover", "source": "f3", "tactic": "initial-access" } ] }
nist_csf
[ "RS.MA-01", "RS.MA-02", "RS.AN-03", "RC.RP-01" ]
subdomain
incident-response
description
Executes a structured ransomware incident response from detection through containment, forensic analysis, decryption assessment, recovery, and post-incident hardening, covering ransom negotiation, backup integrity verification, and regulatory notification. Use when actively responding to a ransomware outbreak or crypto-ransomware infection, or deciding on ransom payment and containment steps.
mitre_attack
[ "T1486", "T1490", "T1070", "T1078", "T1489" ]

02 资源文件 3

03 SKILL.md 正文

Performing Ransomware Response

When to Use

  • Ransomware has been detected executing or file encryption is actively occurring
  • Users report inability to open files with unfamiliar extensions appended
  • A ransom note is discovered on one or more systems
  • EDR detects mass file modification patterns consistent with encryption behavior
  • Threat intelligence warns of an imminent ransomware campaign targeting the organization

Do not use for general malware incidents that do not involve file encryption or extortion; use malware incident response procedures instead.

Prerequisites

  • Ransomware-specific incident response playbook reviewed and approved by executive leadership
  • Tested and verified offline backup strategy with air-gapped or immutable copies
  • Incident retainer with a specialized ransomware response firm (e.g., Mandiant, CrowdStrike Services, Kroll)
  • Legal counsel pre-engaged for OFAC sanctions screening and regulatory notification
  • Cyber insurance carrier contact information and policy coverage details
  • Bitcoin/cryptocurrency analysis capability or third-party engagement for payment tracing

Workflow

Step 1: Detect and Confirm Ransomware

Validate that the incident is ransomware and determine the variant:

  • Identify the ransomware by analyzing the ransom note filename, extension appended to encrypted files, and note content
  • Upload the ransom note and a sample encrypted file to ID Ransomware (id-ransomware.malwarehunterteam.com)
  • Check NoMoreRansom.org for available free decryptors
  • Determine the ransomware deployment method from EDR/SIEM logs
  • Identify the ransomware group (e.g., LockBit, BlackCat/ALPHV, Royal, Akira, Play)
Ransomware Identification:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Variant:          LockBit 3.0 (Black)
Extension:        .lockbit3
Ransom Note:      README-LOCKBIT.txt
Tor Site:         lockbit[redacted].onion
Deployment:       Group Policy Object pushing ransomware.exe to all domain-joined systems
Initial Access:   VPN credential compromise (no MFA)
Dwell Time:       12 days
Data Exfiltration: Yes - 47GB uploaded to MEGA via rclone prior to encryption

Step 2: Immediate Containment

Stop ransomware propagation before assessing damage:

  • Priority 1: Disconnect affected network segments from core infrastructure (pull the network cable, not shutdown)
  • Priority 2: Isolate all domain controllers immediately if GPO-based deployment is suspected
  • Priority 3: Disable the compromised accounts used for deployment
  • Priority 4: Block lateral movement protocols (SMB TCP/445, RDP TCP/3389, WinRM TCP/5985-5986)
  • Priority 5: Preserve at least one encrypted system live (do not power off) for memory forensics
  • Do NOT: Shut down encrypted systems; keep them powered on to preserve encryption keys in memory

Step 3: Assess Damage and Scope

Quantify the impact to inform recovery and business decisions:

  • Count the number of encrypted systems (workstations, servers, domain controllers)
  • Determine which business-critical systems and data are affected
  • Verify backup integrity: check that backups were not encrypted, deleted, or corrupted
  • Assess whether data exfiltration occurred (check for rclone, WinSCP, MEGA, cloud storage activity)
  • Determine the ransom demand amount and payment deadline
  • Check OFAC sanctions lists to verify the ransomware group is not a sanctioned entity (paying is legally risky)
Impact Assessment:
Encrypted Systems:      187 of 340 endpoints (55%)
Encrypted Servers:      12 of 28 (43%) - includes 2 file servers, 1 database server
Domain Controllers:     2 of 3 encrypted
Backup Status:          Veeam repository intact (offline copy verified clean)
Data Exfiltration:      Confirmed - 47GB to MEGA (file listing under analysis)
Ransom Demand:          $2.5M in Bitcoin (72-hour deadline)
OFAC Screening:         LockBit - not currently sanctioned entity (verify with counsel)

Step 4: Recovery Decision Matrix

Evaluate recovery options in consultation with legal, executive leadership, and cyber insurance:

Option Pros Cons Recommended When
Restore from backup No payment, no legal risk Recovery time may be days Clean backups available
Free decryptor No payment, fast Rare availability Variant has published decryptor
Negotiate and pay Potentially faster No guarantee, legal risk, funds threat actors No backups, business survival at stake
Rebuild from scratch Clean environment Longest timeline, data loss Backups compromised, willing to accept data loss

Step 5: Execute Recovery

Implement the chosen recovery strategy:

If restoring from backup:

  1. Build a clean isolated network segment for recovery operations
  2. Rebuild domain controllers first from clean media (do NOT restore DC backups older than the dwell time)
  3. Reset ALL user and service account passwords before joining any system to the new domain
  4. Restore servers in priority order: authentication, DNS, DHCP, then business-critical applications
  5. Restore workstations via reimaging, not file-level restore
  6. Restore data from verified clean backups to rebuilt file servers
  7. Reconnect to production network only after validation

If using a decryptor:

  1. Test the decryptor on a non-critical system first
  2. Decrypt in order of business priority
  3. Scan all decrypted systems for residual malware before reconnection

Step 6: Post-Ransomware Hardening

Implement controls to prevent recurrence:

  • Enforce MFA on all remote access (VPN, RDP, cloud portals)
  • Implement 3-2-1-1-0 backup strategy (3 copies, 2 media types, 1 offsite, 1 immutable, 0 errors)
  • Deploy application whitelisting on servers
  • Implement network segmentation between workstation and server VLANs
  • Enable Protected Users security group for privileged accounts
  • Disable NTLM authentication where possible
  • Deploy LAPS (Local Administrator Password Solution) for local admin accounts

Key Concepts

Term Definition
Double Extortion Ransomware tactic combining file encryption with data exfiltration and threat to publish stolen data
Immutable Backup Backup storage that cannot be modified or deleted for a defined retention period, protecting against ransomware targeting backups
OFAC Sanctions U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control restrictions that may prohibit ransom payments to sanctioned entities or jurisdictions
Dwell Time Days the attacker was present before deploying ransomware; critical for determining which backups are clean
Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) Criminal business model where ransomware developers lease their malware to affiliates who conduct attacks
Rclone Legitimate cloud sync tool commonly abused by ransomware operators for data exfiltration before encryption
3-2-1-1-0 Backup Rule Backup strategy requiring 3 copies, 2 media types, 1 offsite, 1 immutable/air-gapped, and 0 errors in recovery testing

Tools & Systems

  • ID Ransomware: Online service to identify ransomware variant from ransom note or encrypted file sample
  • NoMoreRansom.org: Europol-backed project providing free decryption tools for certain ransomware families
  • Veeam / Commvault: Enterprise backup platforms with immutable repository and instant VM recovery capabilities
  • KAPE: Rapid forensic triage collection from encrypted systems to determine initial access and dwell time
  • Cado Response: Cloud-native forensics platform for investigating ransomware that affects cloud infrastructure

Common Scenarios

Scenario: LockBit 3.0 via Compromised VPN

Context: Attackers compromised VPN credentials (no MFA), spent 12 days performing reconnaissance, disabled antivirus via GPO, exfiltrated 47GB of data, and deployed LockBit 3.0 across the domain via GPO at 2:00 AM on a Sunday.

Approach:

  1. Disconnect all network segments at the core switch level
  2. Verify offline backup integrity (Veeam repository on immutable storage)
  3. Preserve two encrypted servers powered on for memory forensics
  4. Engage incident response retainer and cyber insurance carrier
  5. Begin recovery in isolated network: rebuild DCs, reset all passwords, restore in priority order
  6. Conduct forensic investigation in parallel to determine initial access and full adversary activity

Pitfalls:

  • Restoring from backups that were created during the 12-day dwell time (may contain backdoors)
  • Paying the ransom without OFAC screening and legal counsel review
  • Reconnecting recovered systems to the production network before full password reset
  • Not checking for data exfiltration, leaving the organization exposed to the extortion threat

Output Format

RANSOMWARE INCIDENT REPORT
===========================
Incident:           INC-2025-1892
Ransomware Family:  LockBit 3.0 (Black)
Date Detected:      2025-11-17T06:45:00Z
Initial Access:     VPN credential compromise (no MFA)
Dwell Time:         12 days

IMPACT SUMMARY
Encrypted Systems:  187 endpoints, 12 servers
Business Impact:    Full operations disruption
Data Exfiltrated:   47GB (finance, HR, legal documents)
Ransom Demand:      $2.5M BTC (72-hour deadline)
Backup Status:      Veeam immutable repository - CLEAN

RECOVERY APPROACH
Decision:           Restore from backup (no ransom payment)
Recovery Start:     2025-11-17T10:00:00Z
DC Rebuild:         Complete - 2025-11-17T18:00:00Z
Critical Systems:   Restored - 2025-11-18T12:00:00Z
Full Recovery:      Estimated 2025-11-21

CONTAINMENT TIMELINE
06:45 UTC - Ransomware detected by SOC analyst
07:00 UTC - Network segments disconnected
07:15 UTC - Incident commander activated IR plan
07:30 UTC - Backup integrity verification started
08:00 UTC - Memory forensics initiated on 2 live systems
10:00 UTC - Recovery operations commenced in clean room

POST-INCIDENT ACTIONS
1. MFA enforced on all VPN and remote access
2. 3-2-1-1-0 backup architecture implemented
3. Network segmentation between workstation/server VLANs
4. LAPS deployed for local administrator passwords
5. Regulatory notifications filed (GDPR 72-hour, state AG)

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w