react-component-performance
Diagnose slow React components and suggest targeted performance fixes.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- react-component-performance
- metadata
- { "risk": "safe", "source": "Dimillian/Skills (MIT)", "date_added": "2026-03-25" }
- description
- Diagnose slow React components and suggest targeted performance fixes.
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml238 B
- 参考文档references/examples.md2.3 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
React Component Performance
Overview
Identify render hotspots, isolate expensive updates, and apply targeted optimizations without changing UI behavior.
When to Use
- When the user asks to profile or improve a slow React component.
- When you need to reduce re-renders, list lag, or expensive render work in React UI.
Workflow
- Reproduce or describe the slowdown.
- Identify what triggers re-renders (state updates, props churn, effects).
- Isolate fast-changing state from heavy subtrees.
- Stabilize props and handlers; memoize where it pays off.
- Reduce expensive work (computation, DOM size, list length).
- Validate: open React DevTools Profiler → record the interaction → inspect the Flamegraph for components rendering longer than ~16 ms → compare against a pre-optimization baseline recording.
Checklist
- Measure: use React DevTools Profiler or log renders; capture baseline.
- Find churn: identify state updated on a timer, scroll, input, or animation.
- Split: move ticking state into a child; keep heavy lists static.
- Memoize: wrap leaf rows with
memoonly when props are stable. - Stabilize props: use
useCallback/useMemofor handlers and derived values. - Avoid derived work in render: precompute, or compute inside memoized helpers.
- Control list size: window/virtualize long lists; avoid rendering hidden items.
- Keys: ensure stable keys; avoid index when order can change.
- Effects: verify dependency arrays; avoid effects that re-run on every render.
- Style/layout: watch for expensive layout thrash or large Markdown/diff renders.
Optimization Patterns
Isolate ticking state
Move a timer or animation counter into a child so the parent list never re-renders on each tick.
// ❌ Before – entire parent (and list) re-renders every second
function Dashboard({ items }: { items: Item[] }) {
const [tick, setTick] = useState(0);
useEffect(() => {
const id = setInterval(() => setTick(t => t + 1), 1000);
return () => clearInterval(id);
}, []);
return (
<>
<Clock tick={tick} />
<ExpensiveList items={items} /> {/* re-renders every second */}
</>
);
}
// ✅ After – only <Clock> re-renders; list is untouched
function Clock() {
const [tick, setTick] = useState(0);
useEffect(() => {
const id = setInterval(() => setTick(t => t + 1), 1000);
return () => clearInterval(id);
}, []);
return <span>{tick}s</span>;
}
function Dashboard({ items }: { items: Item[] }) {
return (
<>
<Clock />
<ExpensiveList items={items} />
</>
);
}
Stabilize callbacks with useCallback + memo
// ❌ Before – new handler reference on every render busts Row memo
function List({ items }: { items: Item[] }) {
const handleClick = (id: string) => console.log(id); // new ref each render
return items.map(item => <Row key={item.id} item={item} onClick={handleClick} />);
}
// ✅ After – stable handler; Row only re-renders when its own item changes
const Row = memo(({ item, onClick }: RowProps) => (
<li onClick={() => onClick(item.id)}>{item.name}</li>
));
function List({ items }: { items: Item[] }) {
const handleClick = useCallback((id: string) => console.log(id), []);
return items.map(item => <Row key={item.id} item={item} onClick={handleClick} />);
}
Prefer derived data outside render
// ❌ Before – recomputes on every render
function Summary({ orders }: { orders: Order[] }) {
const total = orders.reduce((sum, o) => sum + o.amount, 0); // runs every render
return <p>Total: {total}</p>;
}
// ✅ After – recomputes only when orders changes
function Summary({ orders }: { orders: Order[] }) {
const total = useMemo(() => orders.reduce((sum, o) => sum + o.amount, 0), [orders]);
return <p>Total: {total}</p>;
}
Additional patterns
- Split rows: extract list rows into memoized components with narrow props.
- Defer heavy rendering: lazy-render or collapse expensive content until expanded.
Profiling Validation Steps
- Open React DevTools → Profiler tab.
- Click Record, perform the slow interaction, then Stop.
- Switch to Flamegraph view; any bar labeled with a component and time > ~16 ms is a candidate.
- Use Ranked chart to sort by self render time and target the top offenders.
- Apply one optimization at a time, re-record, and compare render counts and durations against the baseline.
Example Reference
Load references/examples.md when the user wants a concrete refactor example.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.