AGENT SKILL

performing-privileged-account-access-review

Conducts systematic reviews of privileged accounts to validate access rights, identify excessive or stale permissions, and enforce least privilege across PAM infrastructure. Use when auditing privileged access for compliance, periodic access recertification, or investigating whether privileged entitlements are still justified.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
performing-privileged-account-access-review
tags
[ "pam", "access-review", "privileged-accounts", "least-privilege", "compliance", "audit", "identity-governance" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
nist_csf
[ "PR.AA-01", "PR.AA-02", "PR.AA-05", "PR.AA-06" ]
subdomain
identity-access-management
description
Conducts systematic reviews of privileged accounts to validate access rights, identify excessive or stale permissions, and enforce least privilege across PAM infrastructure. Use when auditing privileged access for compliance, periodic access recertification, or investigating whether privileged entitlements are still justified.
mitre_attack
[ "T1078", "T1110", "T1556", "T1098" ]

02 资源文件 7

03 SKILL.md 正文

Performing Privileged Account Access Review

Overview

Privileged Account Access Review is a critical identity governance process that validates whether users with elevated permissions still require their access. This review covers domain admins, service accounts, database administrators, cloud IAM roles, and application-level privileged accounts. Regular access reviews are mandated by SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and SOX compliance frameworks, typically required quarterly for high-privilege accounts.

When to Use

  • When conducting security assessments that involve performing privileged account access review
  • When following incident response procedures for related security events
  • When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
  • When validating security controls through hands-on testing

Prerequisites

  • PAM solution deployed (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Delinea, or equivalent)
  • Identity governance platform (SailPoint, Saviynt, or equivalent)
  • Complete inventory of privileged accounts across all platforms
  • Defined access review policy with SLAs and escalation procedures
  • Designated reviewers (account owners, managers, security team)

Core Concepts

Privileged Account Categories

Category Examples Risk Level Review Frequency
Domain Admins Enterprise Admin, Domain Admin, Schema Admin Critical Monthly
Service Accounts SQL service, backup agents, monitoring agents High Quarterly
Cloud IAM AWS root, Azure Global Admin, GCP Owner Critical Monthly
Database Admin DBA accounts, sa/sys accounts High Quarterly
Application Admin App admin roles, API keys with admin scope Medium Semi-annually
Emergency/Break-glass Firecall accounts, emergency access Critical After each use

Four-Pillar Review Framework

DISCOVER                    VALIDATE                    REMEDIATE                 MONITOR
    │                           │                           │                       │
    ├─ Enumerate all            ├─ Verify business          ├─ Remove excess        ├─ Continuous
    │  privileged accounts      │  justification            │  privileges           │  monitoring
    │                           │                           │                       │
    ├─ Identify orphaned        ├─ Confirm account          ├─ Disable orphaned     ├─ Anomaly
    │  accounts                 │  ownership                │  accounts             │  detection
    │                           │                           │                       │
    ├─ Map permissions to       ├─ Check compliance         ├─ Enforce password     ├─ Session
    │  business roles           │  with policies            │  rotation             │  recording
    │                           │                           │                       │
    └─ Classify by risk         └─ Review last usage        └─ Implement JIT        └─ Audit
       level                       and activity                access                  logging

Workflow

Step 1: Account Discovery and Inventory

Enumerate all privileged accounts across the environment:

Active Directory:

  • Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins groups
  • Accounts with AdminCount=1 attribute
  • Service accounts with SPN (Service Principal Names)
  • Accounts with delegation rights (Unconstrained/Constrained)

Cloud Platforms:

  • AWS: IAM users/roles with AdministratorAccess, PowerUserAccess, or iam:* permissions
  • Azure: Global Administrator, Privileged Role Administrator, Security Administrator roles
  • GCP: Owner, Editor roles at organization/project level

Databases:

  • SQL Server: sysadmin, db_owner, securityadmin fixed roles
  • Oracle: DBA, SYSDBA, SYSOPER privileges
  • PostgreSQL: superuser, createrole, createdb attributes

Step 2: Establish Review Criteria

Each privileged account must be evaluated against:

  1. Business Justification: Does the user's current role require this privilege?
  2. Least Privilege: Can the task be performed with lower privileges?
  3. Account Activity: Has the account been active in the last 90 days?
  4. Compliance Status: Does the account meet password policy, MFA requirements?
  5. Separation of Duties: Does the access create SoD conflicts?
  6. Ownership: Is a responsible owner assigned and active?

Step 3: Conduct the Review

For each account, the designated reviewer must:

  1. Review the account details, permissions, and last activity date
  2. Approve (certify) the access if still required with documented justification
  3. Revoke access if no longer needed or the reviewer cannot justify the privilege
  4. Flag for investigation if anomalous activity or policy violations are detected
  5. Escalate if the reviewer cannot make a determination

Decision matrix:

Condition Action
Active user, justified privilege Certify - maintain access
Active user, excessive privilege Remediate - reduce to least privilege
Inactive > 90 days Disable account, notify owner
No owner identified Disable account, escalate to security
SoD conflict detected Remediate - reassign or add compensating controls
Break-glass account Verify last use was authorized, reset credentials

Step 4: Remediation and Enforcement

After reviews are completed:

  • Revoke access for accounts that were not certified within the SLA period
  • Implement automatic revocation for accounts not reviewed within 14 days
  • Rotate credentials for all certified privileged accounts
  • Convert standing privileges to just-in-time (JIT) access where possible
  • Update PAM vault with current account inventory

Step 5: Reporting and Documentation

Generate review reports including:

  • Total accounts reviewed vs. total in scope
  • Certification rate (approved vs. revoked)
  • Average review completion time
  • Overdue reviews and escalations
  • Remediation actions taken
  • Comparison with previous review cycle

Validation Checklist

  • [ ] Complete inventory of all privileged accounts documented
  • [ ] All accounts assigned to a responsible owner/reviewer
  • [ ] Review criteria and decision matrix defined
  • [ ] Reviewers completed certification within SLA (14 days)
  • [ ] Revoked accounts disabled and credentials rotated
  • [ ] Orphaned accounts identified and disabled
  • [ ] Service accounts reviewed for least privilege
  • [ ] Break-glass accounts audited for authorized use only
  • [ ] Review report generated with metrics and trends
  • [ ] Remediation tickets created and tracked to completion
  • [ ] Evidence preserved for compliance audit

References

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w