create-pr
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-15
- Stars
- ★ 3.4w
- Forks
- 4.0k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- create-pr
- description
- Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
02 资源文件 11
- 参考文档FORMS.md11.6 KB
- 许可证LICENSE.txt1.4 KB
- 参考文档REFERENCE.md16.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/check_bounding_boxes.py2.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/check_fillable_fields.py268 B
- 脚本scripts/convert_pdf_to_images.py1008 B
- 脚本scripts/create_validation_image.py1.2 KB
- 脚本scripts/extract_form_field_info.py4.2 KB
- 脚本scripts/extract_form_structure.py3.9 KB
- 脚本scripts/fill_fillable_fields.py3.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/fill_pdf_form_with_annotations.py3.2 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Create Pull Request
Create pull requests following Sentry's engineering practices.
Requires: GitHub CLI (gh) authenticated and available.
Process
Step 1: Verify Branch State
# Check current branch and status
git status
git log main..HEAD --oneline
Ensure:
- All changes are committed
- Branch is up to date with remote
- Changes are rebased on main if needed
Step 2: Analyze Changes
Review what will be included in the PR:
# See all commits that will be in the PR
git log main..HEAD
# See the full diff
git diff main...HEAD
Understand the scope and purpose of all changes before writing the description.
Step 3: Write the PR Description
Follow this structure:
<brief description of what the PR does>
<why these changes are being made - the motivation>
<alternative approaches considered, if any>
<any additional context reviewers need>
Do NOT include:
- "Test plan" sections
- Checkbox lists of testing steps
- Redundant summaries of the diff
Do include:
- Clear explanation of what and why
- Links to relevant issues or tickets
- Context that isn't obvious from the code
- Notes on specific areas that need careful review
Step 4: Create the PR
gh pr create --title "<type>(<scope>): <description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
<description body here>
EOF
)"
Title format follows commit conventions:
feat(scope): Add new featurefix(scope): Fix the bugref: Refactor something
Step 5: Add Reviewers (if known)
# Request review from specific people
gh pr edit --add-reviewer username1,username2
# Or request from a team
gh pr edit --add-reviewer @getsentry/team-name
Limit to 1-3 reviewers to maintain clear ownership.
PR Description Examples
Feature PR
Add Slack thread replies for alert notifications
When an alert is updated or resolved, we now post a reply to the original
Slack thread instead of creating a new message. This keeps related
notifications grouped and reduces channel noise.
Previously considered posting edits to the original message, but threading
better preserves the timeline of events and works when the original message
is older than Slack's edit window.
Refs SENTRY-1234
Bug Fix PR
Handle null response in user API endpoint
The user endpoint could return null for soft-deleted accounts, causing
dashboard crashes when accessing user properties. This adds a null check
and returns a proper 404 response.
Found while investigating SENTRY-5678.
Fixes SENTRY-5678
Refactor PR
Extract validation logic to shared module
Moves duplicate validation code from the alerts, issues, and projects
endpoints into a shared validator class. No behavior change.
This prepares for adding new validation rules in SENTRY-9999 without
duplicating logic across endpoints.
Issue References
Reference issues in the PR body:
| Syntax | Effect |
|---|---|
Fixes #1234 |
Closes GitHub issue on merge |
Fixes SENTRY-1234 |
Closes Sentry issue |
Refs GH-1234 |
Links without closing |
Refs LINEAR-ABC-123 |
Links Linear issue |
Guidelines
- One PR per feature/fix - Don't bundle unrelated changes
- Keep PRs reviewable - Smaller PRs get faster, better reviews
- Explain the why - Code shows what; description explains why
- Mark WIP early - Use draft PRs for early feedback
References
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.