performing-cloud-forensics-investigation
Collect and analyze cloud forensic evidence using AWS CLI, Azure CLI, or gcloud to snapshot volumes, capture instance metadata and security group configurations, and preserve cloud-native logs (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Audit Log). Use when investigating a suspected breach in AWS, Azure, or GCP, tracing unauthorized access through API logs, or analyzing a compromised VM, container, or serverless function.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- performing-cloud-forensics-investigation
- tags
- [ "forensics", "cloud-forensics", "aws", "azure", "gcp", "incident-response", "log-analysis" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "RS.AN-03", "DE.AE-02", "RS.MA-01" ]
- subdomain
- digital-forensics
- description
- Collect and analyze cloud forensic evidence using AWS CLI, Azure CLI, or gcloud to snapshot volumes, capture instance metadata and security group configurations, and preserve cloud-native logs (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Audit Log). Use when investigating a suspected breach in AWS, Azure, or GCP, tracing unauthorized access through API logs, or analyzing a compromised VM, container, or serverless function.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1005", "T1074", "T1119", "T1070", "T1078.004" ]
02 资源文件 3
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.4 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py8.4 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Performing Cloud Forensics Investigation
When to Use
- When investigating a security breach in AWS, Azure, or GCP cloud environments
- For collecting volatile and non-volatile evidence from cloud infrastructure
- When tracing unauthorized access through cloud service API logs
- During incident response requiring preservation of cloud-based evidence
- For analyzing compromised virtual machines, containers, or serverless functions
Prerequisites
- Administrative access to the cloud account under investigation
- AWS CLI, Azure CLI, or gcloud CLI configured with appropriate permissions
- Understanding of cloud-native logging (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Audit Log)
- Forensic workstation with cloud SDKs installed
- Knowledge of IAM, networking, and compute services in target cloud
- Evidence preservation procedures for cloud environments
Workflow
Step 1: Preserve Cloud Evidence and Establish Scope
# === AWS Evidence Preservation ===
# Snapshot compromised EC2 instance volumes
INSTANCE_ID="i-0abc123def456789"
VOLUME_IDS=$(aws ec2 describe-instances --instance-ids $INSTANCE_ID \
--query 'Reservations[].Instances[].BlockDeviceMappings[].Ebs.VolumeId' --output text)
for vol in $VOLUME_IDS; do
aws ec2 create-snapshot --volume-id $vol \
--description "Forensic snapshot - Case 2024-001 - $(date -u)" \
--tag-specifications "ResourceType=snapshot,Tags=[{Key=Case,Value=2024-001},{Key=Evidence,Value=true}]"
done
# Capture instance metadata
aws ec2 describe-instances --instance-ids $INSTANCE_ID \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/instance_metadata.json
# Capture security group rules
aws ec2 describe-security-groups --group-ids $(aws ec2 describe-instances \
--instance-ids $INSTANCE_ID --query 'Reservations[].Instances[].SecurityGroups[].GroupId' --output text) \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/security_groups.json
# Capture network interfaces
aws ec2 describe-network-interfaces --filters "Name=attachment.instance-id,Values=$INSTANCE_ID" \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/network_interfaces.json
# Isolate the instance (replace security group with forensic isolation SG)
aws ec2 modify-instance-attribute --instance-id $INSTANCE_ID \
--groups sg-forensic-isolation
# === Azure Evidence Preservation ===
# Snapshot a compromised VM disk
az snapshot create --resource-group forensics-rg \
--name "case-2024-001-osdisk-snapshot" \
--source "/subscriptions/SUB_ID/resourceGroups/RG/providers/Microsoft.Compute/disks/vm-osdisk"
# === GCP Evidence Preservation ===
gcloud compute disks snapshot compromised-disk \
--snapshot-names="case-2024-001-forensic" \
--zone=us-central1-a
Step 2: Collect Cloud API and Access Logs
# === AWS CloudTrail Logs ===
# Download CloudTrail events for the investigation period
aws cloudtrail lookup-events \
--start-time "2024-01-15T00:00:00Z" \
--end-time "2024-01-20T23:59:59Z" \
--max-results 1000 \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloudtrail_events.json
# Filter for specific user activity
aws cloudtrail lookup-events \
--lookup-attributes AttributeKey=Username,AttributeValue=compromised-user \
--start-time "2024-01-15T00:00:00Z" \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/user_activity.json
# Download S3 access logs
aws s3 sync s3://my-cloudtrail-bucket/AWSLogs/ /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloudtrail_s3/
# Query CloudTrail with Athena for large-scale analysis
aws athena start-query-execution \
--query-string "SELECT eventTime, eventName, userIdentity.arn, sourceIPAddress, errorCode
FROM cloudtrail_logs
WHERE eventTime BETWEEN '2024-01-15' AND '2024-01-20'
AND sourceIPAddress NOT IN ('10.0.0.0/8')
ORDER BY eventTime" \
--result-configuration OutputLocation=s3://forensics-bucket/athena-results/
# === AWS VPC Flow Logs ===
aws logs filter-log-events \
--log-group-name "vpc-flow-logs" \
--start-time $(date -d "2024-01-15" +%s000) \
--end-time $(date -d "2024-01-20" +%s000) \
--filter-pattern "ACCEPT" \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/vpc_flow_logs.json
# === Azure Activity Log ===
az monitor activity-log list \
--start-time "2024-01-15T00:00:00Z" \
--end-time "2024-01-20T23:59:59Z" \
--output json > /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/azure_activity.json
# === GCP Audit Logs ===
gcloud logging read 'logName="projects/PROJECT_ID/logs/cloudaudit.googleapis.com%2Factivity"
AND timestamp>="2024-01-15T00:00:00Z"
AND timestamp<="2024-01-20T23:59:59Z"' \
--format=json > /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/gcp_audit.json
Step 3: Analyze IAM and Access Patterns
# Analyze compromised credentials usage
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json
from collections import defaultdict
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloudtrail_events.json') as f:
data = json.load(f)
# Analyze by source IP
ip_events = defaultdict(list)
error_events = []
critical_actions = []
for event in data.get('Events', []):
ct = json.loads(event.get('CloudTrailEvent', '{}'))
source_ip = ct.get('sourceIPAddress', 'Unknown')
event_name = ct.get('eventName', 'Unknown')
user_arn = ct.get('userIdentity', {}).get('arn', 'Unknown')
error = ct.get('errorCode')
timestamp = ct.get('eventTime', '')
ip_events[source_ip].append(event_name)
if error:
error_events.append({'time': timestamp, 'action': event_name, 'error': error, 'ip': source_ip})
# Flag critical actions
critical = ['CreateUser', 'CreateAccessKey', 'AttachUserPolicy', 'CreateRole',
'PutBucketPolicy', 'StopLogging', 'DeleteTrail', 'CreateKeyPair',
'RunInstances', 'AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress']
if event_name in critical:
critical_actions.append({'time': timestamp, 'action': event_name, 'user': user_arn, 'ip': source_ip})
print("=== SOURCE IP ANALYSIS ===")
for ip, events in sorted(ip_events.items(), key=lambda x: len(x[1]), reverse=True):
print(f" {ip}: {len(events)} events ({len(set(events))} unique actions)")
print(f"\n=== ACCESS ERRORS ({len(error_events)} total) ===")
for e in error_events[:10]:
print(f" [{e['time']}] {e['action']} -> {e['error']} from {e['ip']}")
print(f"\n=== CRITICAL ACTIONS ({len(critical_actions)} total) ===")
for a in critical_actions:
print(f" [{a['time']}] {a['action']} by {a['user']} from {a['ip']}")
PYEOF
Step 4: Acquire and Analyze VM Disk Image
# Create a forensic analysis instance from the snapshot
SNAPSHOT_ID="snap-0abc123def456789"
# Create volume from snapshot in isolated forensic VPC
FORENSIC_VOL=$(aws ec2 create-volume --snapshot-id $SNAPSHOT_ID \
--availability-zone us-east-1a \
--tag-specifications "ResourceType=volume,Tags=[{Key=Case,Value=2024-001}]" \
--query 'VolumeId' --output text)
# Attach to forensic analysis instance (read-only mount)
aws ec2 attach-volume --volume-id $FORENSIC_VOL \
--instance-id i-forensic-workstation \
--device /dev/xvdf
# On the forensic instance, mount read-only
sudo mount -o ro /dev/xvdf1 /mnt/evidence
# Perform standard disk forensics on the mounted volume
# Extract logs, analyze file system, check for persistence
ls /mnt/evidence/var/log/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/var/log/ /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/vm_logs/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/etc/crontab /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/persistence/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/home/*/.ssh/ /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/ssh_keys/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/home/*/.bash_history /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/bash_history/
Step 5: Generate Cloud Forensics Report
# Compile findings into structured report
python3 << 'PYEOF'
report = """
CLOUD FORENSICS INVESTIGATION REPORT
======================================
Case: 2024-001
Cloud Provider: AWS (Account: 123456789012)
Region: us-east-1
Investigation Period: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
EVIDENCE PRESERVED:
- EC2 Instance Snapshot: snap-0abc123def456789 (i-0abc123def456789)
- CloudTrail Logs: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
- VPC Flow Logs: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
- Instance Metadata: captured and hashed
- Security Group Configuration: captured at time of isolation
FINDINGS:
1. Initial Access:
- Compromised IAM access key AKIA... used from IP 203.0.113.45
- First unauthorized API call: 2024-01-15 14:32:00 UTC
- IP geolocation: Foreign jurisdiction (not company IP range)
2. Persistence:
- New IAM user 'backup-admin' created with AdministratorAccess
- New access key pair generated for backup-admin
- SSH key added to EC2 instance authorized_keys
3. Lateral Movement:
- S3 bucket policies modified to allow public access
- Security group rules modified to allow SSH from 0.0.0.0/0
- 3 additional EC2 instances launched for crypto-mining
4. Data Exfiltration:
- S3 bucket 'company-confidential' accessed 234 times
- 12 GB of data downloaded via GetObject API calls
- Data transferred to external IP 185.x.x.x
5. Anti-Forensics:
- CloudTrail logging disabled at 2024-01-18 03:00 UTC
- CloudWatch log groups deleted
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Rotate all IAM credentials immediately
- Enable MFA on all accounts
- Restore CloudTrail logging
- Review and restrict S3 bucket policies
- Implement GuardDuty for continuous monitoring
"""
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloud_forensics_report.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write(report)
print(report)
PYEOF
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Cloud API logging | Service logs recording all API calls (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Audit Log) |
| Volume snapshots | Point-in-time copies of cloud disk volumes for forensic preservation |
| VPC Flow Logs | Network traffic metadata logs showing source, destination, and action |
| IAM credential compromise | Unauthorized use of access keys, tokens, or assumed roles |
| Instance metadata | EC2/VM configuration data including network, storage, and security settings |
| Shared responsibility | Cloud provider secures infrastructure; customer secures data and access |
| Evidence volatility | Cloud resources can be terminated; evidence must be preserved quickly |
| Multi-region artifacts | Attacks may span regions requiring cross-region log collection |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| AWS CLI | Command-line interface for AWS service interaction and log collection |
| CloudTrail | AWS API call logging service for investigation and auditing |
| Azure Monitor | Azure logging and diagnostics platform |
| GCP Cloud Logging | Google Cloud audit and access logging service |
| Athena | AWS serverless SQL query service for analyzing CloudTrail logs at scale |
| Prowler | Open-source AWS security assessment and forensic collection tool |
| ScoutSuite | Multi-cloud security auditing tool |
| CADO Response | Cloud-native digital forensics and incident response platform |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Compromised IAM Access Keys Identify the compromised key in CloudTrail, trace all API calls made with the key, determine the source IPs and actions taken, check for persistence mechanisms (new users, roles, keys), revoke the compromised credentials, assess data access scope.
Scenario 2: Cryptojacking on EC2 Instances Detect unauthorized instance launches in CloudTrail, snapshot the mining instances for analysis, examine security group changes that allowed C2 communication, identify the initial access vector (stolen keys, SSRF), calculate resource costs incurred.
Scenario 3: S3 Data Breach Analyze S3 access logs and CloudTrail for GetObject/PutBucketPolicy events, identify who modified bucket policies to allow public access, determine the scope of data exposure, check for data downloads from unauthorized IPs, assess regulatory reporting requirements.
Scenario 4: Container Escape in EKS/AKS/GKE Collect Kubernetes audit logs and cloud provider logs, analyze pod creation events for privilege escalation attempts, examine node-level logs for container escape evidence, check for unauthorized access to cloud metadata service (169.254.169.254), trace lateral movement to cloud APIs.
Output Format
Cloud Forensics Summary:
Cloud: AWS (us-east-1) Account: 123456789012
Investigation: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
Incident Type: IAM Credential Compromise + Data Exfiltration
Evidence Collected:
EBS Snapshots: 3 volumes preserved
CloudTrail Events: 12,456 (1,234 from attacker IP)
VPC Flow Logs: 45,678 records
S3 Access Logs: 2,345 entries
Attack Timeline:
2024-01-15 14:32 - Compromised access key first used from 203.0.113.45
2024-01-15 14:45 - New IAM user created with admin privileges
2024-01-16 02:00 - S3 bucket policy modified (public access enabled)
2024-01-16 03:00 - 12 GB downloaded from company-confidential bucket
2024-01-18 03:00 - CloudTrail logging disabled
Impact Assessment:
Data Exposed: 12 GB from 3 S3 buckets
Resources Created: 3 EC2 instances (crypto mining)
Estimated Cost: $4,500 in unauthorized compute
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.