AGENT SKILL

performing-asset-criticality-scoring-for-vulns

Build a multi-factor asset criticality scoring model—incorporating data sensitivity, business function dependency, regulatory scope, network exposure, and recoverability—to produce a 1-5 criticality tier that weights vulnerability prioritization and remediation SLAs. Use when prioritizing vulnerability remediation by business impact or aligning CMDB asset data with risk-based patching timelines.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
performing-asset-criticality-scoring-for-vulns
tags
[ "asset-criticality", "vulnerability-prioritization", "risk-management", "cmdb", "business-impact", "crown-jewels", "asset-classification" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
nist_csf
[ "ID.RA-01", "ID.RA-02", "ID.IM-02", "ID.RA-06" ]
subdomain
vulnerability-management
description
Build a multi-factor asset criticality scoring model—incorporating data sensitivity, business function dependency, regulatory scope, network exposure, and recoverability—to produce a 1-5 criticality tier that weights vulnerability prioritization and remediation SLAs. Use when prioritizing vulnerability remediation by business impact or aligning CMDB asset data with risk-based patching timelines.
mitre_attack
[ "T1190", "T1203", "T1068" ]

02 资源文件 9

03 SKILL.md 正文

Performing Asset Criticality Scoring for Vulns

Overview

Asset criticality scoring assigns a business impact rating to each IT asset so that vulnerability remediation efforts focus on systems with the greatest organizational risk. Without criticality context, a CVSS 9.0 vulnerability on a test server receives the same urgency as the same vulnerability on a payment processing database. This skill covers building a multi-factor scoring model incorporating data sensitivity, business function dependency, regulatory scope, network exposure, and recoverability to create a 1-5 criticality tier that directly modifies vulnerability remediation SLAs.

When to Use

  • When conducting security assessments that involve performing asset criticality scoring for vulns
  • When following incident response procedures for related security events
  • When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
  • When validating security controls through hands-on testing

Prerequisites

  • Configuration Management Database (CMDB) or asset inventory
  • Business Impact Analysis (BIA) data
  • Data classification policy
  • Network architecture documentation
  • Stakeholder input from business unit owners

Core Concepts

Asset Criticality Scoring Model

Factor Weight Score Range Description
Business Function Impact 25% 1-5 How critical is the supported business process
Data Sensitivity 25% 1-5 Type and sensitivity of data processed/stored
Regulatory Scope 15% 1-5 Regulatory requirements (PCI, HIPAA, SOX)
Network Exposure 15% 1-5 Internet-facing vs internal-only
Recoverability 10% 1-5 RTO/RPO requirements, DR capability
User Population 10% 1-5 Number of users/customers affected

Criticality Tier Definitions

Tier Score Range Label SLA Modifier Examples
1 4.5-5.0 Crown Jewels -50% SLA Domain controllers, payment systems, ERP
2 3.5-4.4 High Value -25% SLA Email servers, HR systems, CI/CD
3 2.5-3.4 Standard Baseline SLA Internal apps, file servers
4 1.5-2.4 Low Impact +25% SLA Test environments, printers
5 1.0-1.4 Minimal +50% SLA Decommissioning, isolated labs

Data Sensitivity Scoring

Score Classification Examples
5 Restricted/Secret PII, PHI, payment card data, trade secrets
4 Confidential Financial reports, HR records, source code
3 Internal Internal documents, policies, project files
2 Semi-public Marketing materials, press releases (draft)
1 Public Published content, public APIs

Workflow

Step 1: Define Scoring Criteria

class AssetCriticalityScorer:
    """Multi-factor asset criticality scoring engine."""

    WEIGHTS = {
        "business_function": 0.25,
        "data_sensitivity": 0.25,
        "regulatory_scope": 0.15,
        "network_exposure": 0.15,
        "recoverability": 0.10,
        "user_population": 0.10,
    }

    TIER_THRESHOLDS = [
        (4.5, 1, "Crown Jewels", -0.50),
        (3.5, 2, "High Value", -0.25),
        (2.5, 3, "Standard", 0.00),
        (1.5, 4, "Low Impact", 0.25),
        (1.0, 5, "Minimal", 0.50),
    ]

    def score_asset(self, asset):
        """Calculate criticality score for an asset."""
        weighted_score = sum(
            asset.get(factor, 3) * weight
            for factor, weight in self.WEIGHTS.items()
        )
        score = round(weighted_score, 2)

        for threshold, tier, label, sla_mod in self.TIER_THRESHOLDS:
            if score >= threshold:
                return {
                    "score": score,
                    "tier": tier,
                    "label": label,
                    "sla_modifier": sla_mod,
                }
        return {"score": score, "tier": 5, "label": "Minimal", "sla_modifier": 0.50}

    def adjust_vuln_sla(self, base_sla_days, asset_tier_data):
        """Adjust vulnerability SLA based on asset criticality."""
        modifier = asset_tier_data["sla_modifier"]
        adjusted = int(base_sla_days * (1 + modifier))
        return max(1, adjusted)  # Minimum 1 day SLA

Step 2: Integrate with Vulnerability Prioritization

def apply_criticality_to_vulns(vulns_df, asset_scores):
    """Enrich vulnerability data with asset criticality context."""
    for idx, vuln in vulns_df.iterrows():
        asset_id = vuln.get("asset_id", "")
        asset_data = asset_scores.get(asset_id, {"tier": 3, "sla_modifier": 0})

        vulns_df.at[idx, "asset_tier"] = asset_data["tier"]
        vulns_df.at[idx, "asset_label"] = asset_data.get("label", "Standard")

        base_sla = get_base_sla(vuln["severity"])
        adjusted_sla = int(base_sla * (1 + asset_data["sla_modifier"]))
        vulns_df.at[idx, "adjusted_sla_days"] = max(1, adjusted_sla)

    return vulns_df

Best Practices

  1. Involve business stakeholders in criticality scoring; IT alone cannot assess business impact
  2. Review and update criticality scores at least quarterly or when systems change roles
  3. Automate scoring where possible using CMDB tags and data classification labels
  4. Apply criticality tiers to vulnerability SLAs for risk-proportional remediation
  5. Validate scoring against actual incident impact data to calibrate the model
  6. Start with a simple 3-tier model before expanding to 5 tiers

Common Pitfalls

  • Classifying all assets as "critical" which defeats the purpose of tiering
  • Not updating criticality scores when systems are repurposed or decommissioned
  • Using only technical factors without business context
  • Applying uniform SLAs regardless of asset importance
  • Not documenting the scoring methodology for audit and consistency

Related Skills

  • performing-cve-prioritization-with-kev-catalog
  • building-vulnerability-aging-and-sla-tracking
  • performing-business-impact-analysis
  • implementing-asset-management-program

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w