pymoo
Multi-objective optimization framework. NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, Pareto fronts, constraint handling, benchmarks (ZDT, DTLZ), for engineering design and optimization problems.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- pymoo
- description
- Multi-objective optimization framework. NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, Pareto fronts, constraint handling, benchmarks (ZDT, DTLZ), for engineering design and optimization problems.
02 资源文件 10
- 参考文档references/algorithms.md6.0 KB
- 参考文档references/constraints_mcdm.md10.6 KB
- 参考文档references/operators.md8.6 KB
- 参考文档references/problems.md6.9 KB
- 参考文档references/visualization.md9.0 KB
- 脚本scripts/custom_problem_example.py4.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/decision_making_example.py4.5 KB
- 脚本scripts/many_objective_example.py2.1 KB
- 脚本scripts/multi_objective_example.py1.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/single_objective_example.py1.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Pymoo - Multi-Objective Optimization in Python
Overview
Pymoo is a comprehensive Python framework for optimization with emphasis on multi-objective problems. Solve single and multi-objective optimization using state-of-the-art algorithms (NSGA-II/III, MOEA/D), benchmark problems (ZDT, DTLZ), customizable genetic operators, and multi-criteria decision making methods. Excels at finding trade-off solutions (Pareto fronts) for problems with conflicting objectives.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Solving optimization problems with one or multiple objectives
- Finding Pareto-optimal solutions and analyzing trade-offs
- Implementing evolutionary algorithms (GA, DE, PSO, NSGA-II/III)
- Working with constrained optimization problems
- Benchmarking algorithms on standard test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG)
- Customizing genetic operators (crossover, mutation, selection)
- Visualizing high-dimensional optimization results
- Making decisions from multiple competing solutions
- Handling binary, discrete, continuous, or mixed-variable problems
Core Concepts
The Unified Interface
Pymoo uses a consistent minimize() function for all optimization tasks:
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
result = minimize(
problem, # What to optimize
algorithm, # How to optimize
termination, # When to stop
seed=1,
verbose=True
)
Result object contains:
result.X: Decision variables of optimal solution(s)result.F: Objective values of optimal solution(s)result.G: Constraint violations (if constrained)result.algorithm: Algorithm object with history
Problem Types
Single-objective: One objective to minimize/maximize Multi-objective: 2-3 conflicting objectives → Pareto front Many-objective: 4+ objectives → High-dimensional Pareto front Constrained: Objectives + inequality/equality constraints Dynamic: Time-varying objectives or constraints
Quick Start Workflows
Workflow 1: Single-Objective Optimization
When: Optimizing one objective function
Steps:
- Define or select problem
- Choose single-objective algorithm (GA, DE, PSO, CMA-ES)
- Configure termination criteria
- Run optimization
- Extract best solution
Example:
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
# Built-in problem
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)
# Configure Genetic Algorithm
algorithm = GA(
pop_size=100,
eliminate_duplicates=True
)
# Optimize
result = minimize(
problem,
algorithm,
('n_gen', 200),
seed=1,
verbose=True
)
print(f"Best solution: {result.X}")
print(f"Best objective: {result.F[0]}")
See: scripts/single_objective_example.py for complete example
Workflow 2: Multi-Objective Optimization (2-3 objectives)
When: Optimizing 2-3 conflicting objectives, need Pareto front
Algorithm choice: NSGA-II (standard for bi/tri-objective)
Steps:
- Define multi-objective problem
- Configure NSGA-II
- Run optimization to obtain Pareto front
- Visualize trade-offs
- Apply decision making (optional)
Example:
from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter
# Bi-objective benchmark problem
problem = get_problem("zdt1")
# NSGA-II algorithm
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)
# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 200), seed=1)
# Visualize Pareto front
plot = Scatter()
plot.add(result.F, label="Obtained Front")
plot.add(problem.pareto_front(), label="True Front", alpha=0.3)
plot.show()
print(f"Found {len(result.F)} Pareto-optimal solutions")
See: scripts/multi_objective_example.py for complete example
Workflow 3: Many-Objective Optimization (4+ objectives)
When: Optimizing 4 or more objectives
Algorithm choice: NSGA-III (designed for many objectives)
Key difference: Must provide reference directions for population guidance
Steps:
- Define many-objective problem
- Generate reference directions
- Configure NSGA-III with reference directions
- Run optimization
- Visualize using Parallel Coordinate Plot
Example:
from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga3 import NSGA3
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.util.ref_dirs import get_reference_directions
from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP
# Many-objective problem (5 objectives)
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5)
# Generate reference directions (required for NSGA-III)
ref_dirs = get_reference_directions("das-dennis", n_dim=5, n_partitions=12)
# Configure NSGA-III
algorithm = NSGA3(ref_dirs=ref_dirs)
# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 300), seed=1)
# Visualize with Parallel Coordinates
plot = PCP(labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(5)])
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()
See: scripts/many_objective_example.py for complete example
Workflow 4: Custom Problem Definition
When: Solving domain-specific optimization problem
Steps:
- Extend
ElementwiseProblemclass - Define
__init__with problem dimensions and bounds - Implement
_evaluatemethod for objectives (and constraints) - Use with any algorithm
Unconstrained example:
from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
import numpy as np
class MyProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__(
n_var=2, # Number of variables
n_obj=2, # Number of objectives
xl=np.array([0, 0]), # Lower bounds
xu=np.array([5, 5]) # Upper bounds
)
def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
# Define objectives
f1 = x[0]**2 + x[1]**2
f2 = (x[0]-1)**2 + (x[1]-1)**2
out["F"] = [f1, f2]
Constrained example:
class ConstrainedProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__(
n_var=2,
n_obj=2,
n_ieq_constr=2, # Inequality constraints
n_eq_constr=1, # Equality constraints
xl=np.array([0, 0]),
xu=np.array([5, 5])
)
def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
# Objectives
out["F"] = [f1, f2]
# Inequality constraints (g <= 0)
out["G"] = [g1, g2]
# Equality constraints (h = 0)
out["H"] = [h1]
Constraint formulation rules:
- Inequality: Express as
g(x) <= 0(feasible when ≤ 0) - Equality: Express as
h(x) = 0(feasible when = 0) - Convert
g(x) >= bto-(g(x) - b) <= 0
See: scripts/custom_problem_example.py for complete examples
Workflow 5: Constraint Handling
When: Problem has feasibility constraints
Approach options:
1. Feasibility First (Default - Recommended)
from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2
# Works automatically with constrained problems
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, termination)
# Check feasibility
feasible = result.CV[:, 0] == 0 # CV = constraint violation
print(f"Feasible solutions: {np.sum(feasible)}")
2. Penalty Method
from pymoo.constraints.as_penalty import ConstraintsAsPenalty
# Wrap problem to convert constraints to penalties
problem_penalized = ConstraintsAsPenalty(problem, penalty=1e6)
3. Constraint as Objective
from pymoo.constraints.as_obj import ConstraintsAsObjective
# Treat constraint violation as additional objective
problem_with_cv = ConstraintsAsObjective(problem)
4. Specialized Algorithms
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.sres import SRES
# SRES has built-in constraint handling
algorithm = SRES()
See: references/constraints_mcdm.md for comprehensive constraint handling guide
Workflow 6: Decision Making from Pareto Front
When: Have Pareto front, need to select preferred solution(s)
Steps:
- Run multi-objective optimization
- Normalize objectives to [0, 1]
- Define preference weights
- Apply MCDM method
- Visualize selected solution
Example using Pseudo-Weights:
from pymoo.mcdm.pseudo_weights import PseudoWeights
import numpy as np
# After obtaining result from multi-objective optimization
# Normalize objectives
F_norm = (result.F - result.F.min(axis=0)) / (result.F.max(axis=0) - result.F.min(axis=0))
# Define preferences (must sum to 1)
weights = np.array([0.3, 0.7]) # 30% f1, 70% f2
# Apply decision making
dm = PseudoWeights(weights)
selected_idx = dm.do(F_norm)
# Get selected solution
best_solution = result.X[selected_idx]
best_objectives = result.F[selected_idx]
print(f"Selected solution: {best_solution}")
print(f"Objective values: {best_objectives}")
Other MCDM methods:
- Compromise Programming: Select closest to ideal point
- Knee Point: Find balanced trade-off solutions
- Hypervolume Contribution: Select most diverse subset
See:
scripts/decision_making_example.pyfor complete examplereferences/constraints_mcdm.mdfor detailed MCDM methods
Workflow 7: Visualization
Choose visualization based on number of objectives:
2 objectives: Scatter Plot
from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter
plot = Scatter(title="Bi-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F, color="blue", alpha=0.7)
plot.show()
3 objectives: 3D Scatter
plot = Scatter(title="Tri-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F) # Automatically renders in 3D
plot.show()
4+ objectives: Parallel Coordinate Plot
from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP
plot = PCP(
labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(n_obj)],
normalize_each_axis=True
)
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()
Solution comparison: Petal Diagram
from pymoo.visualization.petal import Petal
plot = Petal(
bounds=[result.F.min(axis=0), result.F.max(axis=0)],
labels=["Cost", "Weight", "Efficiency"]
)
plot.add(solution_A, label="Design A")
plot.add(solution_B, label="Design B")
plot.show()
See: references/visualization.md for all visualization types and usage
Algorithm Selection Guide
Single-Objective Problems
| Algorithm | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| GA | General-purpose | Flexible, customizable operators |
| DE | Continuous optimization | Good global search |
| PSO | Smooth landscapes | Fast convergence |
| CMA-ES | Difficult/noisy problems | Self-adapting |
Multi-Objective Problems (2-3 objectives)
| Algorithm | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| NSGA-II | Standard benchmark | Fast, reliable, well-tested |
| R-NSGA-II | Preference regions | Reference point guidance |
| MOEA/D | Decomposable problems | Scalarization approach |
Many-Objective Problems (4+ objectives)
| Algorithm | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| NSGA-III | 4-15 objectives | Reference direction-based |
| RVEA | Adaptive search | Reference vector evolution |
| AGE-MOEA | Complex landscapes | Adaptive geometry |
Constrained Problems
| Approach | Algorithm | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility-first | Any algorithm | Large feasible region |
| Specialized | SRES, ISRES | Heavy constraints |
| Penalty | GA + penalty | Algorithm compatibility |
See: references/algorithms.md for comprehensive algorithm reference
Benchmark Problems
Quick problem access:
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
# Single-objective
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)
problem = get_problem("rosenbrock", n_var=10)
# Multi-objective
problem = get_problem("zdt1") # Convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt2") # Non-convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt3") # Disconnected front
# Many-objective
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5, n_var=12)
problem = get_problem("dtlz7", n_obj=4)
See: references/problems.md for complete test problem reference
Genetic Operator Customization
Standard operator configuration:
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.operators.crossover.sbx import SBX
from pymoo.operators.mutation.pm import PM
algorithm = GA(
pop_size=100,
crossover=SBX(prob=0.9, eta=15),
mutation=PM(eta=20),
eliminate_duplicates=True
)
Operator selection by variable type:
Continuous variables:
- Crossover: SBX (Simulated Binary Crossover)
- Mutation: PM (Polynomial Mutation)
Binary variables:
- Crossover: TwoPointCrossover, UniformCrossover
- Mutation: BitflipMutation
Permutations (TSP, scheduling):
- Crossover: OrderCrossover (OX)
- Mutation: InversionMutation
See: references/operators.md for comprehensive operator reference
Performance and Troubleshooting
Common issues and solutions:
Problem: Algorithm not converging
- Increase population size
- Increase number of generations
- Check if problem is multimodal (try different algorithms)
- Verify constraints are correctly formulated
Problem: Poor Pareto front distribution
- For NSGA-III: Adjust reference directions
- Increase population size
- Check for duplicate elimination
- Verify problem scaling
Problem: Few feasible solutions
- Use constraint-as-objective approach
- Apply repair operators
- Try SRES/ISRES for constrained problems
- Check constraint formulation (should be g <= 0)
Problem: High computational cost
- Reduce population size
- Decrease number of generations
- Use simpler operators
- Enable parallelization (if problem supports)
Best practices:
- Normalize objectives when scales differ significantly
- Set random seed for reproducibility
- Save history to analyze convergence:
save_history=True - Visualize results to understand solution quality
- Compare with true Pareto front when available
- Use appropriate termination criteria (generations, evaluations, tolerance)
- Tune operator parameters for problem characteristics
Resources
This skill includes comprehensive reference documentation and executable examples:
references/
Detailed documentation for in-depth understanding:
- algorithms.md: Complete algorithm reference with parameters, usage, and selection guidelines
- problems.md: Benchmark test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG) with characteristics
- operators.md: Genetic operators (sampling, selection, crossover, mutation) with configuration
- visualization.md: All visualization types with examples and selection guide
- constraints_mcdm.md: Constraint handling techniques and multi-criteria decision making methods
Search patterns for references:
- Algorithm details:
grep -r "NSGA-II\|NSGA-III\|MOEA/D" references/ - Constraint methods:
grep -r "Feasibility First\|Penalty\|Repair" references/ - Visualization types:
grep -r "Scatter\|PCP\|Petal" references/
scripts/
Executable examples demonstrating common workflows:
- single_objective_example.py: Basic single-objective optimization with GA
- multi_objective_example.py: Multi-objective optimization with NSGA-II, visualization
- many_objective_example.py: Many-objective optimization with NSGA-III, reference directions
- custom_problem_example.py: Defining custom problems (constrained and unconstrained)
- decision_making_example.py: Multi-criteria decision making with different preferences
Run examples:
python3 scripts/single_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/multi_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/many_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/custom_problem_example.py
python3 scripts/decision_making_example.py
Additional Notes
Installation:
uv pip install pymoo
Dependencies: NumPy, SciPy, matplotlib, autograd (optional for gradient-based)
Documentation: https://pymoo.org/
Version: This skill is based on pymoo 0.6.x
Common patterns:
- Always use
ElementwiseProblemfor custom problems - Constraints formulated as
g(x) <= 0andh(x) = 0 - Reference directions required for NSGA-III
- Normalize objectives before MCDM
- Use appropriate termination:
('n_gen', N)orget_termination("f_tol", tol=0.001)
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.