pymc
Bayesian modeling with PyMC. Build hierarchical models, MCMC (NUTS), variational inference, LOO/WAIC comparison, posterior checks, for probabilistic programming and inference.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- pymc
- description
- Bayesian modeling with PyMC. Build hierarchical models, MCMC (NUTS), variational inference, LOO/WAIC comparison, posterior checks, for probabilistic programming and inference.
02 资源文件 7
- 脚本assets/hierarchical_model_template.py11.6 KB
- 脚本assets/linear_regression_template.py7.9 KB
- 参考文档references/distributions.md10.6 KB
- 参考文档references/sampling_inference.md10.1 KB
- 参考文档references/workflows.md13.8 KB
- 脚本scripts/model_comparison.py12.1 KB
- 脚本scripts/model_diagnostics.py10.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
PyMC Bayesian Modeling
Overview
PyMC is a Python library for Bayesian modeling and probabilistic programming. Build, fit, validate, and compare Bayesian models using PyMC's modern API (version 5.x+), including hierarchical models, MCMC sampling (NUTS), variational inference, and model comparison (LOO, WAIC).
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Building Bayesian models (linear/logistic regression, hierarchical models, time series, etc.)
- Performing MCMC sampling or variational inference
- Conducting prior/posterior predictive checks
- Diagnosing sampling issues (divergences, convergence, ESS)
- Comparing multiple models using information criteria (LOO, WAIC)
- Implementing uncertainty quantification through Bayesian methods
- Working with hierarchical/multilevel data structures
- Handling missing data or measurement error in a principled way
Standard Bayesian Workflow
Follow this workflow for building and validating Bayesian models:
1. Data Preparation
import pymc as pm
import arviz as az
import numpy as np
# Load and prepare data
X = ... # Predictors
y = ... # Outcomes
# Standardize predictors for better sampling
X_mean = X.mean(axis=0)
X_std = X.std(axis=0)
X_scaled = (X - X_mean) / X_std
Key practices:
- Standardize continuous predictors (improves sampling efficiency)
- Center outcomes when possible
- Handle missing data explicitly (treat as parameters)
- Use named dimensions with
coordsfor clarity
2. Model Building
coords = {
'predictors': ['var1', 'var2', 'var3'],
'obs_id': np.arange(len(y))
}
with pm.Model(coords=coords) as model:
# Priors
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=1)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='predictors')
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
# Linear predictor
mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X_scaled, beta)
# Likelihood
y_obs = pm.Normal('y_obs', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y, dims='obs_id')
Key practices:
- Use weakly informative priors (not flat priors)
- Use
HalfNormalorExponentialfor scale parameters - Use named dimensions (
dims) instead ofshapewhen possible - Use
pm.Data()for values that will be updated for predictions
3. Prior Predictive Check
Always validate priors before fitting:
with model:
prior_pred = pm.sample_prior_predictive(samples=1000, random_seed=42)
# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(prior_pred, group='prior')
Check:
- Do prior predictions span reasonable values?
- Are extreme values plausible given domain knowledge?
- If priors generate implausible data, adjust and re-check
4. Fit Model
with model:
# Optional: Quick exploration with ADVI
# approx = pm.fit(n=20000)
# Full MCMC inference
idata = pm.sample(
draws=2000,
tune=1000,
chains=4,
target_accept=0.9,
random_seed=42,
idata_kwargs={'log_likelihood': True} # For model comparison
)
Key parameters:
draws=2000: Number of samples per chaintune=1000: Warmup samples (discarded)chains=4: Run 4 chains for convergence checkingtarget_accept=0.9: Higher for difficult posteriors (0.95-0.99)- Include
log_likelihood=Truefor model comparison
5. Check Diagnostics
Use the diagnostic script:
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
results = check_diagnostics(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])
Check:
- R-hat < 1.01: Chains have converged
- ESS > 400: Sufficient effective samples
- No divergences: NUTS sampled successfully
- Trace plots: Chains should mix well (fuzzy caterpillar)
If issues arise:
- Divergences → Increase
target_accept=0.95, use non-centered parameterization - Low ESS → Sample more draws, reparameterize to reduce correlation
- High R-hat → Run longer, check for multimodality
6. Posterior Predictive Check
Validate model fit:
with model:
pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata, extend_inferencedata=True, random_seed=42)
# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(idata)
Check:
- Do posterior predictions capture observed data patterns?
- Are systematic deviations evident (model misspecification)?
- Consider alternative models if fit is poor
7. Analyze Results
# Summary statistics
print(az.summary(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma']))
# Posterior distributions
az.plot_posterior(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])
# Coefficient estimates
az.plot_forest(idata, var_names=['beta'], combined=True)
8. Make Predictions
X_new = ... # New predictor values
X_new_scaled = (X_new - X_mean) / X_std
with model:
pm.set_data({'X_scaled': X_new_scaled})
post_pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(
idata.posterior,
var_names=['y_obs'],
random_seed=42
)
# Extract prediction intervals
y_pred_mean = post_pred.posterior_predictive['y_obs'].mean(dim=['chain', 'draw'])
y_pred_hdi = az.hdi(post_pred.posterior_predictive, var_names=['y_obs'])
Common Model Patterns
Linear Regression
For continuous outcomes with linear relationships:
with pm.Model() as linear_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)
Use template: assets/linear_regression_template.py
Logistic Regression
For binary outcomes:
with pm.Model() as logistic_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
logit_p = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p, observed=y_obs)
Hierarchical Models
For grouped data (use non-centered parameterization):
with pm.Model(coords={'groups': group_names}) as hierarchical_model:
# Hyperpriors
mu_alpha = pm.Normal('mu_alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
sigma_alpha = pm.HalfNormal('sigma_alpha', sigma=1)
# Group-level (non-centered)
alpha_offset = pm.Normal('alpha_offset', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='groups')
alpha = pm.Deterministic('alpha', mu_alpha + sigma_alpha * alpha_offset, dims='groups')
# Observation-level
mu = alpha[group_idx]
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)
Use template: assets/hierarchical_model_template.py
Critical: Always use non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models to avoid divergences.
Poisson Regression
For count data:
with pm.Model() as poisson_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
log_lambda = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Poisson('y', mu=pm.math.exp(log_lambda), observed=y_obs)
For overdispersed counts, use NegativeBinomial instead.
Time Series
For autoregressive processes:
with pm.Model() as ar_model:
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
rho = pm.Normal('rho', mu=0, sigma=0.5, shape=ar_order)
init_dist = pm.Normal.dist(mu=0, sigma=sigma)
y = pm.AR('y', rho=rho, sigma=sigma, init_dist=init_dist, observed=y_obs)
Model Comparison
Comparing Models
Use LOO or WAIC for model comparison:
from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models, check_loo_reliability
# Fit models with log_likelihood
models = {
'Model1': idata1,
'Model2': idata2,
'Model3': idata3
}
# Compare using LOO
comparison = compare_models(models, ic='loo')
# Check reliability
check_loo_reliability(models)
Interpretation:
- Δloo < 2: Models are similar, choose simpler model
- 2 < Δloo < 4: Weak evidence for better model
- 4 < Δloo < 10: Moderate evidence
- Δloo > 10: Strong evidence for better model
Check Pareto-k values:
- k < 0.7: LOO reliable
- k > 0.7: Consider WAIC or k-fold CV
Model Averaging
When models are similar, average predictions:
from scripts.model_comparison import model_averaging
averaged_pred, weights = model_averaging(models, var_name='y_obs')
Distribution Selection Guide
For Priors
Scale parameters (σ, τ):
pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)- Default choicepm.Exponential('sigma', lam=1)- Alternativepm.Gamma('sigma', alpha=2, beta=1)- More informative
Unbounded parameters:
pm.Normal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)- For standardized datapm.StudentT('theta', nu=3, mu=0, sigma=1)- Robust to outliers
Positive parameters:
pm.LogNormal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)pm.Gamma('theta', alpha=2, beta=1)
Probabilities:
pm.Beta('p', alpha=2, beta=2)- Weakly informativepm.Uniform('p', lower=0, upper=1)- Non-informative (use sparingly)
Correlation matrices:
pm.LKJCorr('corr', n=n_vars, eta=2)- eta=1 uniform, eta>1 prefers identity
For Likelihoods
Continuous outcomes:
pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma)- Default for continuous datapm.StudentT('y', nu=nu, mu=mu, sigma=sigma)- Robust to outliers
Count data:
pm.Poisson('y', mu=lambda)- Equidispersed countspm.NegativeBinomial('y', mu=mu, alpha=alpha)- Overdispersed countspm.ZeroInflatedPoisson('y', psi=psi, mu=mu)- Excess zeros
Binary outcomes:
pm.Bernoulli('y', p=p)orpm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p)
Categorical outcomes:
pm.Categorical('y', p=probs)
See: references/distributions.md for comprehensive distribution reference
Sampling and Inference
MCMC with NUTS
Default and recommended for most models:
idata = pm.sample(
draws=2000,
tune=1000,
chains=4,
target_accept=0.9,
random_seed=42
)
Adjust when needed:
- Divergences →
target_accept=0.95or higher - Slow sampling → Use ADVI for initialization
- Discrete parameters → Use
pm.Metropolis()for discrete vars
Variational Inference
Fast approximation for exploration or initialization:
with model:
approx = pm.fit(n=20000, method='advi')
# Use for initialization
start = approx.sample(return_inferencedata=False)[0]
idata = pm.sample(start=start)
Trade-offs:
- Much faster than MCMC
- Approximate (may underestimate uncertainty)
- Good for large models or quick exploration
See: references/sampling_inference.md for detailed sampling guide
Diagnostic Scripts
Comprehensive Diagnostics
from scripts.model_diagnostics import create_diagnostic_report
create_diagnostic_report(
idata,
var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'],
output_dir='diagnostics/'
)
Creates:
- Trace plots
- Rank plots (mixing check)
- Autocorrelation plots
- Energy plots
- ESS evolution
- Summary statistics CSV
Quick Diagnostic Check
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
results = check_diagnostics(idata)
Checks R-hat, ESS, divergences, and tree depth.
Common Issues and Solutions
Divergences
Symptom: idata.sample_stats.diverging.sum() > 0
Solutions:
- Increase
target_accept=0.95or0.99 - Use non-centered parameterization (hierarchical models)
- Add stronger priors to constrain parameters
- Check for model misspecification
Low Effective Sample Size
Symptom: ESS < 400
Solutions:
- Sample more draws:
draws=5000 - Reparameterize to reduce posterior correlation
- Use QR decomposition for regression with correlated predictors
High R-hat
Symptom: R-hat > 1.01
Solutions:
- Run longer chains:
tune=2000, draws=5000 - Check for multimodality
- Improve initialization with ADVI
Slow Sampling
Solutions:
- Use ADVI initialization
- Reduce model complexity
- Increase parallelization:
cores=8, chains=8 - Use variational inference if appropriate
Best Practices
Model Building
- Always standardize predictors for better sampling
- Use weakly informative priors (not flat)
- Use named dimensions (
dims) for clarity - Non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models
- Check prior predictive before fitting
Sampling
- Run multiple chains (at least 4) for convergence
- Use
target_accept=0.9as baseline (higher if needed) - Include
log_likelihood=Truefor model comparison - Set random seed for reproducibility
Validation
- Check diagnostics before interpretation (R-hat, ESS, divergences)
- Posterior predictive check for model validation
- Compare multiple models when appropriate
- Report uncertainty (HDI intervals, not just point estimates)
Workflow
- Start simple, add complexity gradually
- Prior predictive check → Fit → Diagnostics → Posterior predictive check
- Iterate on model specification based on checks
- Document assumptions and prior choices
Resources
This skill includes:
References (references/)
-
distributions.md: Comprehensive catalog of PyMC distributions organized by category (continuous, discrete, multivariate, mixture, time series). Use when selecting priors or likelihoods. -
sampling_inference.md: Detailed guide to sampling algorithms (NUTS, Metropolis, SMC), variational inference (ADVI, SVGD), and handling sampling issues. Use when encountering convergence problems or choosing inference methods. -
workflows.md: Complete workflow examples and code patterns for common model types, data preparation, prior selection, and model validation. Use as a cookbook for standard Bayesian analyses.
Scripts (scripts/)
-
model_diagnostics.py: Automated diagnostic checking and report generation. Functions:check_diagnostics()for quick checks,create_diagnostic_report()for comprehensive analysis with plots. -
model_comparison.py: Model comparison utilities using LOO/WAIC. Functions:compare_models(),check_loo_reliability(),model_averaging().
Templates (assets/)
-
linear_regression_template.py: Complete template for Bayesian linear regression with full workflow (data prep, prior checks, fitting, diagnostics, predictions). -
hierarchical_model_template.py: Complete template for hierarchical/multilevel models with non-centered parameterization and group-level analysis.
Quick Reference
Model Building
with pm.Model(coords={'var': names}) as model:
# Priors
param = pm.Normal('param', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='var')
# Likelihood
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=..., sigma=..., observed=data)
Sampling
idata = pm.sample(draws=2000, tune=1000, chains=4, target_accept=0.9)
Diagnostics
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
check_diagnostics(idata)
Model Comparison
from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models
compare_models({'m1': idata1, 'm2': idata2}, ic='loo')
Predictions
with model:
pm.set_data({'X': X_new})
pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata.posterior)
Additional Notes
- PyMC integrates with ArviZ for visualization and diagnostics
- Use
pm.model_to_graphviz(model)to visualize model structure - Save results with
idata.to_netcdf('results.nc') - Load with
az.from_netcdf('results.nc') - For very large models, consider minibatch ADVI or data subsampling
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.