intercepting-mobile-traffic-with-burpsuite
Intercepts and analyzes HTTP/HTTPS traffic from mobile applications using Burp Suite proxy to identify insecure API communications, authentication flaws, data leakage, and server-side vulnerabilities. Use when performing mobile application penetration testing, assessing API security, or evaluating client-server communication patterns. Activates for requests involving mobile traffic interception, Burp Suite mobile proxy, API security testing, or mobile HTTPS analysis.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- intercepting-mobile-traffic-with-burpsuite
- tags
- [ "mobile-security", "android", "ios", "burp-suite", "traffic-interception", "penetration-testing" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.PS-01", "PR.AA-05", "ID.RA-01", "DE.CM-09" ]
- subdomain
- mobile-security
- description
- Intercepts and analyzes HTTP/HTTPS traffic from mobile applications using Burp Suite proxy to identify insecure API communications, authentication flaws, data leakage, and server-side vulnerabilities. Use when performing mobile application penetration testing, assessing API security, or evaluating client-server communication patterns. Activates for requests involving mobile traffic interception, Burp Suite mobile proxy, API security testing, or mobile HTTPS analysis.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1059", "T1056", "T1036", "T1078" ]
02 资源文件 7
- 资产文件assets/template.md1.5 KB
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md1.7 KB
- 参考文档references/standards.md2.3 KB
- 参考文档references/workflows.md4.1 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py6.4 KB
- 脚本scripts/process.py9.7 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Intercepting Mobile Traffic with Burp Suite
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Testing mobile application API endpoints for authentication, authorization, and injection vulnerabilities
- Analyzing data transmitted between mobile apps and backend servers during penetration tests
- Evaluating certificate pinning implementations and their bypass difficulty
- Identifying sensitive data leakage in mobile network traffic
Do not use this skill to intercept traffic from applications you are not authorized to test -- traffic interception without authorization violates computer fraud laws.
Prerequisites
- Burp Suite Professional or Community Edition installed on testing workstation
- Android device/emulator or iOS device on the same network as Burp Suite host
- Burp Suite CA certificate installed on the target device
- For Android 7+: Network security config modification or Magisk module for system CA trust
- For SSL pinning bypass: Frida + Objection or custom Frida scripts
- Wi-Fi network where proxy configuration is possible
Workflow
Step 1: Configure Burp Suite Proxy Listener
Burp Suite > Proxy > Options > Proxy Listeners:
- Bind to address: All interfaces (or specific IP)
- Bind to port: 8080
- Enable "Support invisible proxying"
Verify the listener is active and note the workstation's IP address on the shared network.
Step 2: Configure Mobile Device Proxy
Android:
Settings > Wi-Fi > [Network] > Advanced > Manual Proxy
- Host: <burp_workstation_ip>
- Port: 8080
iOS:
Settings > Wi-Fi > [Network] > Configure Proxy > Manual
- Server: <burp_workstation_ip>
- Port: 8080
Step 3: Install Burp Suite CA Certificate
Android (below API 24):
# Export Burp CA from Proxy > Options > Import/Export CA Certificate
# Transfer to device and install via Settings > Security > Install from storage
Android (API 24+ / Android 7+): Apps targeting API 24+ do not trust user-installed CAs by default. Options:
# Option A: Modify app's network_security_config.xml (requires APK rebuild)
# Add to res/xml/network_security_config.xml:
# <network-security-config>
# <debug-overrides>
# <trust-anchors>
# <certificates src="user" />
# </trust-anchors>
# </debug-overrides>
# </network-security-config>
# Option B: Install as system CA (rooted device)
openssl x509 -inform DER -in burp-ca.der -out burp-ca.pem
HASH=$(openssl x509 -inform PEM -subject_hash_old -in burp-ca.pem | head -1)
cp burp-ca.pem "$HASH.0"
adb push "$HASH.0" /system/etc/security/cacerts/
adb shell chmod 644 /system/etc/security/cacerts/$HASH.0
# Option C: Magisk module (MagiskTrustUserCerts)
iOS:
1. Navigate to http://<burp_ip>:8080 in Safari
2. Download Burp CA certificate
3. Settings > General > VPN & Device Management > Install profile
4. Settings > General > About > Certificate Trust Settings > Enable full trust
Step 4: Intercept and Analyze Traffic
With proxy configured, open the target app and navigate through its functionality:
Burp Suite > Proxy > HTTP History: Review all captured requests and responses.
Key areas to analyze:
- Authentication tokens: JWT structure, token expiration, refresh mechanisms
- API endpoints: RESTful paths, GraphQL queries, parameter patterns
- Sensitive data in transit: PII, credentials, financial data
- Response headers: Security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options)
- Error responses: Stack traces, debug information, internal paths
Step 5: Test API Vulnerabilities Using Burp Repeater
Forward intercepted requests to Repeater for manual testing:
Right-click request > Send to Repeater
Test categories:
- Authentication bypass: Remove/modify auth tokens
- IDOR: Modify user IDs, object references
- Injection: SQL injection, NoSQL injection in parameters
- Rate limiting: Rapid request replay for brute force assessment
- Business logic: Modify prices, quantities, permissions in requests
Step 6: Automate Testing with Burp Scanner
Right-click request > Do active scan (Professional only)
Scanner checks:
- SQL injection (error-based, blind, time-based)
- XSS (reflected, stored)
- Command injection
- Path traversal
- XML/JSON injection
- Authentication flaws
Step 7: Handle Certificate Pinning
If traffic is not visible due to certificate pinning:
# Frida-based bypass (generic)
frida -U -f com.target.app -l ssl-pinning-bypass.js
# Objection bypass
objection --gadget com.target.app explore
ios sslpinning disable # or
android sslpinning disable
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| MITM Proxy | Man-in-the-middle proxy that terminates and re-establishes TLS connections to inspect encrypted traffic |
| Certificate Pinning | Client-side validation that restricts accepted server certificates beyond the OS trust store |
| Network Security Config | Android XML configuration controlling app trust anchors, cleartext traffic policy, and certificate pinning |
| Invisible Proxying | Burp feature handling non-proxy-aware clients that don't send CONNECT requests |
| IDOR | Insecure Direct Object Reference -- accessing resources by manipulating identifiers without authorization checks |
Tools & Systems
- Burp Suite Professional: Full-featured web application security testing proxy with active scanner
- Burp Suite Community: Free version with manual interception and basic tools
- Frida: Dynamic instrumentation for runtime SSL pinning bypass
- mitmproxy: Open-source alternative to Burp Suite for programmatic traffic analysis
- Charles Proxy: Alternative HTTP proxy with mobile-friendly certificate installation
Common Pitfalls
- Android 7+ CA trust: User-installed certificates are not trusted by apps targeting API 24+. Must use system CA installation or app modification.
- Certificate transparency: Some apps use Certificate Transparency logs to detect MITM. Check for CT enforcement in the app.
- Non-HTTP protocols: Burp Suite only handles HTTP/HTTPS. Use Wireshark for WebSocket, MQTT, gRPC, or custom binary protocols.
- VPN-based apps: Apps using VPN tunnels bypass device proxy settings. May need iptables rules on a rooted device to redirect traffic.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.