hypogenic
Automated hypothesis generation and testing using large language models. Use this skill when generating scientific hypotheses from datasets, combining literature insights with empirical data, testing hypotheses against observational data, or conducting systematic hypothesis exploration for research discovery in domains like deception detection, AI content detection, mental health analysis, or other empirical research tasks.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- hypogenic
- description
- Automated hypothesis generation and testing using large language models. Use this skill when generating scientific hypotheses from datasets, combining literature insights with empirical data, testing hypotheses against observational data, or conducting systematic hypothesis exploration for research discovery in domains like deception detection, AI content detection, mental health analysis, or other empirical research tasks.
02 资源文件 2
- 许可证LICENSE.txt143 B
- 参考文档references/config_template.yaml4.0 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Hypogenic
Overview
Hypogenic provides automated hypothesis generation and testing using large language models to accelerate scientific discovery. The framework supports three approaches: HypoGeniC (data-driven hypothesis generation), HypoRefine (synergistic literature and data integration), and Union methods (mechanistic combination of literature and data-driven hypotheses).
Quick Start
Get started with Hypogenic in minutes:
# Install the package
uv pip install hypogenic
# Clone example datasets
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/HypoGeniC-datasets.git ./data
# Run basic hypothesis generation
hypogenic_generation --config ./data/your_task/config.yaml --method hypogenic --num_hypotheses 20
# Run inference on generated hypotheses
hypogenic_inference --config ./data/your_task/config.yaml --hypotheses output/hypotheses.json
Or use Python API:
from hypogenic import BaseTask
# Create task with your configuration
task = BaseTask(config_path="./data/your_task/config.yaml")
# Generate hypotheses
task.generate_hypotheses(method="hypogenic", num_hypotheses=20)
# Run inference
results = task.inference(hypothesis_bank="./output/hypotheses.json")
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when working on:
- Generating scientific hypotheses from observational datasets
- Testing multiple competing hypotheses systematically
- Combining literature insights with empirical patterns
- Accelerating research discovery through automated hypothesis ideation
- Domains requiring hypothesis-driven analysis: deception detection, AI-generated content identification, mental health indicators, predictive modeling, or other empirical research
Key Features
Automated Hypothesis Generation
- Generate 10-20+ testable hypotheses from data in minutes
- Iterative refinement based on validation performance
- Support for both API-based (OpenAI, Anthropic) and local LLMs
Literature Integration
- Extract insights from research papers via PDF processing
- Combine theoretical foundations with empirical patterns
- Systematic literature-to-hypothesis pipeline with GROBID
Performance Optimization
- Redis caching reduces API costs for repeated experiments
- Parallel processing for large-scale hypothesis testing
- Adaptive refinement focuses on challenging examples
Flexible Configuration
- Template-based prompt engineering with variable injection
- Custom label extraction for domain-specific tasks
- Modular architecture for easy extension
Proven Results
- 8.97% improvement over few-shot baselines
- 15.75% improvement over literature-only approaches
- 80-84% hypothesis diversity (non-redundant insights)
- Human evaluators report significant decision-making improvements
Core Capabilities
1. HypoGeniC: Data-Driven Hypothesis Generation
Generate hypotheses solely from observational data through iterative refinement.
Process:
- Initialize with a small data subset to generate candidate hypotheses
- Iteratively refine hypotheses based on performance
- Replace poorly-performing hypotheses with new ones from challenging examples
Best for: Exploratory research without existing literature, pattern discovery in novel datasets
2. HypoRefine: Literature and Data Integration
Synergistically combine existing literature with empirical data through an agentic framework.
Process:
- Extract insights from relevant research papers (typically 10 papers)
- Generate theory-grounded hypotheses from literature
- Generate data-driven hypotheses from observational patterns
- Refine both hypothesis banks through iterative improvement
Best for: Research with established theoretical foundations, validating or extending existing theories
3. Union Methods
Mechanistically combine literature-only hypotheses with framework outputs.
Variants:
- Literature ∪ HypoGeniC: Combines literature hypotheses with data-driven generation
- Literature ∪ HypoRefine: Combines literature hypotheses with integrated approach
Best for: Comprehensive hypothesis coverage, eliminating redundancy while maintaining diverse perspectives
Installation
Install via pip:
uv pip install hypogenic
Optional dependencies:
- Redis server (port 6832): Enables caching of LLM responses to significantly reduce API costs during iterative hypothesis generation
- s2orc-doc2json: Required for processing literature PDFs in HypoRefine workflows
- GROBID: Required for PDF preprocessing (see Literature Processing section)
Clone example datasets:
# For HypoGeniC examples
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/HypoGeniC-datasets.git ./data
# For HypoRefine/Union examples
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/Hypothesis-agent-datasets.git ./data
Dataset Format
Datasets must follow HuggingFace datasets format with specific naming conventions:
Required files:
<TASK>_train.json: Training data<TASK>_val.json: Validation data<TASK>_test.json: Test data
Required keys in JSON:
text_features_1throughtext_features_n: Lists of strings containing feature valueslabel: List of strings containing ground truth labels
Example (headline click prediction):
{
"headline_1": [
"What Up, Comet? You Just Got *PROBED*",
"Scientists Made a Breakthrough in Quantum Computing"
],
"headline_2": [
"Scientists Everywhere Were Holding Their Breath Today. Here's Why.",
"New Quantum Computer Achieves Milestone"
],
"label": [
"Headline 2 has more clicks than Headline 1",
"Headline 1 has more clicks than Headline 2"
]
}
Important notes:
- All lists must have the same length
- Label format must match your
extract_label()function output format - Feature keys can be customized to match your domain (e.g.,
review_text,post_content, etc.)
Configuration
Each task requires a config.yaml file specifying:
Required elements:
- Dataset paths (train/val/test)
- Prompt templates for:
- Observations generation
- Batched hypothesis generation
- Hypothesis inference
- Relevance checking
- Adaptive methods (for HypoRefine)
Template capabilities:
- Dataset placeholders for dynamic variable injection (e.g.,
${text_features_1},${num_hypotheses}) - Custom label extraction functions for domain-specific parsing
- Role-based prompt structure (system, user, assistant roles)
Configuration structure:
task_name: your_task_name
train_data_path: ./your_task_train.json
val_data_path: ./your_task_val.json
test_data_path: ./your_task_test.json
prompt_templates:
# Extra keys for reusable prompt components
observations: |
Feature 1: ${text_features_1}
Feature 2: ${text_features_2}
Observation: ${label}
# Required templates
batched_generation:
system: "Your system prompt here"
user: "Your user prompt with ${num_hypotheses} placeholder"
inference:
system: "Your inference system prompt"
user: "Your inference user prompt"
# Optional templates for advanced features
few_shot_baseline: {...}
is_relevant: {...}
adaptive_inference: {...}
adaptive_selection: {...}
Refer to references/config_template.yaml for a complete example configuration.
Literature Processing (HypoRefine/Union Methods)
To use literature-based hypothesis generation, you must preprocess PDF papers:
Step 1: Setup GROBID (first time only)
bash ./modules/setup_grobid.sh
Step 2: Add PDF files
Place research papers in literature/YOUR_TASK_NAME/raw/
Step 3: Process PDFs
# Start GROBID service
bash ./modules/run_grobid.sh
# Process PDFs for your task
cd examples
python pdf_preprocess.py --task_name YOUR_TASK_NAME
This converts PDFs to structured format for hypothesis extraction. Automated literature search will be supported in future releases.
CLI Usage
Hypothesis Generation
hypogenic_generation --help
Key parameters:
- Task configuration file path
- Model selection (API-based or local)
- Generation method (HypoGeniC, HypoRefine, or Union)
- Number of hypotheses to generate
- Output directory for hypothesis banks
Hypothesis Inference
hypogenic_inference --help
Key parameters:
- Task configuration file path
- Hypothesis bank file path
- Test dataset path
- Inference method (default or multi-hypothesis)
- Output file for results
Python API Usage
For programmatic control and custom workflows, use Hypogenic directly in your Python code:
Basic HypoGeniC Generation
from hypogenic import BaseTask
# Clone example datasets first
# git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/HypoGeniC-datasets.git ./data
# Load your task with custom extract_label function
task = BaseTask(
config_path="./data/your_task/config.yaml",
extract_label=lambda text: extract_your_label(text)
)
# Generate hypotheses
task.generate_hypotheses(
method="hypogenic",
num_hypotheses=20,
output_path="./output/hypotheses.json"
)
# Run inference
results = task.inference(
hypothesis_bank="./output/hypotheses.json",
test_data="./data/your_task/your_task_test.json"
)
HypoRefine/Union Methods
# For literature-integrated approaches
# git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/Hypothesis-agent-datasets.git ./data
# Generate with HypoRefine
task.generate_hypotheses(
method="hyporefine",
num_hypotheses=15,
literature_path="./literature/your_task/",
output_path="./output/"
)
# This generates 3 hypothesis banks:
# - HypoRefine (integrated approach)
# - Literature-only hypotheses
# - Literature∪HypoRefine (union)
Multi-Hypothesis Inference
from examples.multi_hyp_inference import run_multi_hypothesis_inference
# Test multiple hypotheses simultaneously
results = run_multi_hypothesis_inference(
config_path="./data/your_task/config.yaml",
hypothesis_bank="./output/hypotheses.json",
test_data="./data/your_task/your_task_test.json"
)
Custom Label Extraction
The extract_label() function is critical for parsing LLM outputs. Implement it based on your task:
def extract_label(llm_output: str) -> str:
"""Extract predicted label from LLM inference text.
Default behavior: searches for 'final answer:\s+(.*)' pattern.
Customize for your domain-specific output format.
"""
import re
match = re.search(r'final answer:\s+(.*)', llm_output, re.IGNORECASE)
if match:
return match.group(1).strip()
return llm_output.strip()
Important: Extracted labels must match the format of label values in your dataset for correct accuracy calculation.
Workflow Examples
Example 1: Data-Driven Hypothesis Generation (HypoGeniC)
Scenario: Detecting AI-generated content without prior theoretical framework
Steps:
- Prepare dataset with text samples and labels (human vs. AI-generated)
- Create
config.yamlwith appropriate prompt templates - Run hypothesis generation:
hypogenic_generation --config config.yaml --method hypogenic --num_hypotheses 20 - Run inference on test set:
hypogenic_inference --config config.yaml --hypotheses output/hypotheses.json --test_data data/test.json - Analyze results for patterns like formality, grammatical precision, and tone differences
Example 2: Literature-Informed Hypothesis Testing (HypoRefine)
Scenario: Deception detection in hotel reviews building on existing research
Steps:
- Collect 10 relevant papers on linguistic deception cues
- Prepare dataset with genuine and fraudulent reviews
- Configure
config.yamlwith literature processing and data generation templates - Run HypoRefine:
hypogenic_generation --config config.yaml --method hyporefine --papers papers/ --num_hypotheses 15 - Test hypotheses examining pronoun frequency, detail specificity, and other linguistic patterns
- Compare literature-based and data-driven hypothesis performance
Example 3: Comprehensive Hypothesis Coverage (Union Method)
Scenario: Mental stress detection maximizing hypothesis diversity
Steps:
- Generate literature hypotheses from mental health research papers
- Generate data-driven hypotheses from social media posts
- Run Union method to combine and deduplicate:
hypogenic_generation --config config.yaml --method union --literature_hypotheses lit_hyp.json - Inference captures both theoretical constructs (posting behavior changes) and data patterns (emotional language shifts)
Performance Optimization
Caching: Enable Redis caching to reduce API costs and computation time for repeated LLM calls
Parallel Processing: Leverage multiple workers for large-scale hypothesis generation and testing
Adaptive Refinement: Use challenging examples to iteratively improve hypothesis quality
Expected Outcomes
Research using hypogenic has demonstrated:
- 14.19% accuracy improvement in AI-content detection tasks
- 7.44% accuracy improvement in deception detection tasks
- 80-84% of hypothesis pairs offering distinct, non-redundant insights
- High helpfulness ratings from human evaluators across multiple research domains
Troubleshooting
Issue: Generated hypotheses are too generic
Solution: Refine prompt templates in config.yaml to request more specific, testable hypotheses
Issue: Poor inference performance Solution: Ensure dataset has sufficient training examples, adjust hypothesis generation parameters, or increase number of hypotheses
Issue: Label extraction failures
Solution: Implement custom extract_label() function for domain-specific output parsing
Issue: GROBID PDF processing fails
Solution: Ensure GROBID service is running (bash ./modules/run_grobid.sh) and PDFs are valid research papers
Creating Custom Tasks
To add a new task or dataset to Hypogenic:
Step 1: Prepare Your Dataset
Create three JSON files following the required format:
your_task_train.jsonyour_task_val.jsonyour_task_test.json
Each file must have keys for text features (text_features_1, etc.) and label.
Step 2: Create config.yaml
Define your task configuration with:
- Task name and dataset paths
- Prompt templates for observations, generation, inference
- Any extra keys for reusable prompt components
- Placeholder variables (e.g.,
${text_features_1},${num_hypotheses})
Step 3: Implement extract_label Function
Create a custom label extraction function that parses LLM outputs for your domain:
from hypogenic import BaseTask
def extract_my_label(llm_output: str) -> str:
"""Custom label extraction for your task.
Must return labels in same format as dataset 'label' field.
"""
# Example: Extract from specific format
if "Final prediction:" in llm_output:
return llm_output.split("Final prediction:")[-1].strip()
# Fallback to default pattern
import re
match = re.search(r'final answer:\s+(.*)', llm_output, re.IGNORECASE)
return match.group(1).strip() if match else llm_output.strip()
# Use your custom task
task = BaseTask(
config_path="./your_task/config.yaml",
extract_label=extract_my_label
)
Step 4: (Optional) Process Literature
For HypoRefine/Union methods:
- Create
literature/your_task_name/raw/directory - Add relevant research paper PDFs
- Run GROBID preprocessing
- Process with
pdf_preprocess.py
Step 5: Generate and Test
Run hypothesis generation and inference using CLI or Python API:
# CLI approach
hypogenic_generation --config your_task/config.yaml --method hypogenic --num_hypotheses 20
hypogenic_inference --config your_task/config.yaml --hypotheses output/hypotheses.json
# Or use Python API (see Python API Usage section)
Repository Structure
Understanding the repository layout:
hypothesis-generation/
├── hypogenic/ # Core package code
├── hypogenic_cmd/ # CLI entry points
├── hypothesis_agent/ # HypoRefine agent framework
├── literature/ # Literature processing utilities
├── modules/ # GROBID and preprocessing modules
├── examples/ # Example scripts
│ ├── generation.py # Basic HypoGeniC generation
│ ├── union_generation.py # HypoRefine/Union generation
│ ├── inference.py # Single hypothesis inference
│ ├── multi_hyp_inference.py # Multiple hypothesis inference
│ └── pdf_preprocess.py # Literature PDF processing
├── data/ # Example datasets (clone separately)
├── tests/ # Unit tests
└── IO_prompting/ # Prompt templates and experiments
Key directories:
- hypogenic/: Main package with BaseTask and generation logic
- examples/: Reference implementations for common workflows
- literature/: Tools for PDF processing and literature extraction
- modules/: External tool integrations (GROBID, etc.)
Related Publications
HypoBench (2025)
Liu, H., Huang, S., Hu, J., Zhou, Y., & Tan, C. (2025). HypoBench: Towards Systematic and Principled Benchmarking for Hypothesis Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11524.
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11524
- Description: Benchmarking framework for systematic evaluation of hypothesis generation methods
BibTeX:
@misc{liu2025hypobenchsystematicprincipledbenchmarking,
title={HypoBench: Towards Systematic and Principled Benchmarking for Hypothesis Generation},
author={Haokun Liu and Sicong Huang and Jingyu Hu and Yangqiaoyu Zhou and Chenhao Tan},
year={2025},
eprint={2504.11524},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.AI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11524},
}
Literature Meets Data (2024)
Liu, H., Zhou, Y., Li, M., Yuan, C., & Tan, C. (2024). Literature Meets Data: A Synergistic Approach to Hypothesis Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17309.
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17309
- Code: https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/hypothesis-generation
- Description: Introduces HypoRefine and demonstrates synergistic combination of literature-based and data-driven hypothesis generation
BibTeX:
@misc{liu2024literaturemeetsdatasynergistic,
title={Literature Meets Data: A Synergistic Approach to Hypothesis Generation},
author={Haokun Liu and Yangqiaoyu Zhou and Mingxuan Li and Chenfei Yuan and Chenhao Tan},
year={2024},
eprint={2410.17309},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.AI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17309},
}
Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Models (2024)
Zhou, Y., Liu, H., Srivastava, T., Mei, H., & Tan, C. (2024). Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of EMNLP Workshop of NLP for Science.
- Paper: https://aclanthology.org/2024.nlp4science-1.10/
- Description: Original HypoGeniC framework for data-driven hypothesis generation
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{zhou2024hypothesisgenerationlargelanguage,
title={Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Models},
author={Yangqiaoyu Zhou and Haokun Liu and Tejes Srivastava and Hongyuan Mei and Chenhao Tan},
booktitle = {Proceedings of EMNLP Workshop of NLP for Science},
year={2024},
url={https://aclanthology.org/2024.nlp4science-1.10/},
}
Additional Resources
Official Links
- GitHub Repository: https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/hypothesis-generation
- PyPI Package: https://pypi.org/project/hypogenic/
- License: MIT License
- Issues & Support: https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/hypothesis-generation/issues
Example Datasets
Clone these repositories for ready-to-use examples:
# HypoGeniC examples (data-driven only)
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/HypoGeniC-datasets.git ./data
# HypoRefine/Union examples (literature + data)
git clone https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/Hypothesis-agent-datasets.git ./data
Community & Contributions
- Contributors: 7+ active contributors
- Stars: 89+ on GitHub
- Topics: research-tool, interpretability, hypothesis-generation, scientific-discovery, llm-application
For contributions or questions, visit the GitHub repository and check the issues page.
Local Resources
references/
config_template.yaml - Complete example configuration file with all required prompt templates and parameters. This includes:
- Full YAML structure for task configuration
- Example prompt templates for all methods
- Placeholder variable documentation
- Role-based prompt examples
scripts/
Scripts directory is available for:
- Custom data preparation utilities
- Format conversion tools
- Analysis and evaluation scripts
- Integration with external tools
assets/
Assets directory is available for:
- Example datasets and templates
- Sample hypothesis banks
- Visualization outputs
- Documentation supplements
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.