[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6AFCTDCJGZDVV86QXY14JGA":3,"skill-same:01M6AFCTDCJGZDVV86QXY14JGA":114},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":44,"linkOnly":45,"markdownContent":46,"markdownBody":47,"frontMatter":48,"refName":73,"commitSha":74,"skillDirectory":75,"forksCount":76,"repositoryHtmlUrl":77,"repositoryHomepageUrl":78,"ownerHtmlUrl":79,"ownerBlogUrl":80,"ownerDescription":81,"updatedAt":82,"install":83,"resources":96},"01M6AFCTDCJGZDVV86QXY14JGA","implementing-security-chaos-engineering",null,"Implements security chaos engineering experiments that deliberately disable or degrade security controls to verify detection and response capabilities. Tests WAF bypass, firewall rule removal, log pipeline disruption, and EDR disablement scenarios using boto3 and subprocess. Use when validating SOC detection coverage and resilience.","mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills","mukul975","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F42860185?v=4","01M6ADEQR8T5M4EEG6C67BQCWF","Mahipal","01M6ADJPMYWG1E5GM1FWBE3128",36078,"Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fimplementing-security-chaos-engineering\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量","SCENARIO","使用场景",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43],"security","implementing security chaos engineering","engineering","firewall","testing","control-validation","resilience-testing","security-chaos-engineering","t1059","t1078","boto3","edr","resilience","pipeline","soc","security-operations","cybersecurity","waf","capabilities","validation","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: implementing-security-chaos-engineering\ndescription: 'Implements security chaos engineering experiments that deliberately\n  disable or degrade security controls to verify detection and response capabilities.\n  Tests WAF bypass, firewall rule removal, log pipeline disruption, and EDR disablement\n  scenarios using boto3 and subprocess. Use when validating SOC detection coverage\n  and resilience.\n\n  '\ndomain: cybersecurity\nsubdomain: security-operations\ntags:\n- security-chaos-engineering\n- detection-validation\n- resilience-testing\n- control-validation\n- security-operations\nversion: '1.0'\nauthor: mahipal\nlicense: Apache-2.0\nnist_ai_rmf:\n- MEASURE-2.7\n- MAP-5.1\n- MANAGE-2.4\natlas_techniques:\n- AML.T0070\n- AML.T0066\n- AML.T0082\nnist_csf:\n- DE.CM-01\n- RS.MA-01\n- GV.OV-01\n- DE.AE-02\nmitre_attack:\n- T1078\n- T1190\n- T1059\n- T1027\n- T1070\n---\n\n# Implementing Security Chaos Engineering\n\n\n## When to Use\n\n- When deploying or configuring implementing security chaos engineering capabilities in your environment\n- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements\n- When building or improving security architecture for this domain\n- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Familiarity with security operations concepts and tools\n- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution\n- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed\n- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities\n\n## Instructions\n\nDesign and execute security chaos experiments that intentionally break security\ncontrols to verify that detection, alerting, and response systems work correctly.\n\n```python\n# Example: Verify detection when a security group is opened\nimport boto3\nec2 = boto3.client(\"ec2\")\n\n# Chaos experiment: temporarily add 0.0.0.0\u002F0 rule\nec2.authorize_security_group_ingress(\n    GroupId=\"sg-12345\",\n    IpProtocol=\"tcp\", FromPort=22, ToPort=22,\n    CidrIp=\"0.0.0.0\u002F0\",\n)\n# Verify: does GuardDuty\u002FConfig alert fire within SLA?\n# Rollback: remove the rule after verification\n```\n\nKey experiments:\n1. Open a security group and verify Config Rule alerts\n2. Disable CloudTrail and verify detection time\n3. Create IAM admin user and verify alert triggers\n4. Simulate log pipeline failure and check monitoring gaps\n5. Deploy test malware hash and verify EDR response\n\n## Examples\n\n```python\n# Rollback function for safe experiment execution\ndef run_experiment(setup_fn, verify_fn, rollback_fn, timeout=300):\n    try:\n        setup_fn()\n        result = verify_fn(timeout)\n    finally:\n        rollback_fn()\n    return result\n```\n","# Implementing Security Chaos Engineering\n\n\n## When to Use\n\n- When deploying or configuring implementing security chaos engineering capabilities in your environment\n- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements\n- When building or improving security architecture for this domain\n- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Familiarity with security operations concepts and tools\n- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution\n- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed\n- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities\n\n## Instructions\n\nDesign and execute security chaos experiments that intentionally break security\ncontrols to verify that detection, alerting, and response systems work correctly.\n\n```python\n# Example: Verify detection when a security group is opened\nimport boto3\nec2 = boto3.client(\"ec2\")\n\n# Chaos experiment: temporarily add 0.0.0.0\u002F0 rule\nec2.authorize_security_group_ingress(\n    GroupId=\"sg-12345\",\n    IpProtocol=\"tcp\", FromPort=22, ToPort=22,\n    CidrIp=\"0.0.0.0\u002F0\",\n)\n# Verify: does GuardDuty\u002FConfig alert fire within SLA?\n# Rollback: remove the rule after verification\n```\n\nKey experiments:\n1. Open a security group and verify Config Rule alerts\n2. Disable CloudTrail and verify detection time\n3. Create IAM admin user and verify alert triggers\n4. Simulate log pipeline failure and check monitoring gaps\n5. Deploy test malware hash and verify EDR response\n\n## Examples\n\n```python\n# Rollback function for safe experiment execution\ndef run_experiment(setup_fn, verify_fn, rollback_fn, timeout=300):\n    try:\n        setup_fn()\n        result = verify_fn(timeout)\n    finally:\n        rollback_fn()\n    return result\n```\n",{"name":5,"tags":49,"author":51,"domain":40,"license":15,"version":52,"nist_csf":53,"subdomain":39,"description":58,"nist_ai_rmf":59,"mitre_attack":63,"atlas_techniques":69},[31,50,30,29,39],"detection-validation","mahipal","1.0",[54,55,56,57],"DE.CM-01","RS.MA-01","GV.OV-01","DE.AE-02","Implements security chaos engineering experiments that deliberately disable or degrade security controls to verify detection and response capabilities. Tests WAF bypass, firewall rule removal, log pipeline disruption, and EDR disablement scenarios using boto3 and subprocess. Use when validating SOC detection coverage and resilience.\n",[60,61,62],"MEASURE-2.7","MAP-5.1","MANAGE-2.4",[64,65,66,67,68],"T1078","T1190","T1059","T1027","T1070",[70,71,72],"AML.T0070","AML.T0066","AML.T0082","main","54a798831d2266a3ca61ce68a7acb80b81160d57","skills\u002Fimplementing-security-chaos-engineering",4414,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills","https:\u002F\u002Fmahipal.engineer\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975","Mahipal.engineer","🔐 Cybersecurity | 💻 Dev | 📷 Street Photographer\r\n🎓 MSc | 📚 Research & AI Security","2026-08-31 12:32:44",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":84,"prompt":94,"zipAvailable":95},[85,88,91],{"tool":86,"command":87},"npx","npx skills add mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill implementing-security-chaos-engineering",{"tool":89,"command":90},"bunx","bunx skills add mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill implementing-security-chaos-engineering",{"tool":92,"command":93},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill implementing-security-chaos-engineering","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fimplementing-security-chaos-engineering\u002FSKILL.md",true,[97,102,108],{"path":98,"resourceType":98,"resourceTypeDesc":99,"sizeBytes":100,"sourceHtmlUrl":101},"LICENSE","许可证",11255,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fimplementing-security-chaos-engineering\u002FLICENSE",{"path":103,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":106,"sourceHtmlUrl":107},"references\u002Fapi-reference.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",1479,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fimplementing-security-chaos-engineering\u002Freferences\u002Fapi-reference.md",{"path":109,"resourceType":110,"resourceTypeDesc":111,"sizeBytes":112,"sourceHtmlUrl":113},"scripts\u002Fagent.py","SCRIPT","脚本",8328,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fimplementing-security-chaos-engineering\u002Fscripts\u002Fagent.py",[115,142,166,189,215,242],{"skillNo":116,"name":117,"nameZh":6,"description":118,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":119,"categories":120,"keywords":124,"publishedAt":44},"01M6AGDM3HJXTKXX15ZZ0ZVCJ3","verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore","Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI\u002FCD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fverifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore\u002FSKILL.md",[121],{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[125,126,127,128,24,40,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,37,136,137,138,139,140,141],"sigstore","provenance","slsa","verifying build provenance with slsa sigstore","incident response","identity","pr","code","artifacts","ci","supply-chain","supply-chain-security","t1195","attestation","code-signing","cosign","keyless",{"skillNo":143,"name":144,"nameZh":6,"description":145,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":146,"categories":147,"keywords":149,"publishedAt":44},"01M6AGDGBPWYVZ2F11GFKJ4HZ9","validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation","Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote\u002Ftpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware\u002Fkernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation\u002FSKILL.md",[148],{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[150,138,151,152,24,153,40,131,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165],"boot","TPM","validating tpm measured boot attestation","policy","verification","ZeRO","firmware","Tools","measured-boot","PCR","integrity","secrets","remote-attestation","tpm2-tools","integrity-verification","trusted-computing",{"skillNo":167,"name":168,"nameZh":6,"description":169,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":170,"categories":171,"keywords":174,"publishedAt":44},"01M6AGDCW0Y4FXZ3362GT1941M","validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery","Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable\u002Fair-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidating-backup-integrity-for-recovery\u002FSKILL.md",[172,173],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[160,175,176,177,28,40,178,43,154,179,180,181,182,183,184,33,185,186,187,188],"backup","recovery","validating backup integrity for recovery","infrastructure","compliance","hash-verification","incident-response","ransomware","cryptocurrency","detection","t1490","immutable","disaster-recovery","restore-testing",{"skillNo":190,"name":191,"nameZh":6,"description":192,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":193,"categories":194,"keywords":196,"publishedAt":44},"01M6AGD9GBG2KZ336AE763J3WH","triaging-windows-with-kape","Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment\u002Ftriage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftriaging-windows-with-kape\u002FSKILL.md",[195],{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[197,198,199,40,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,157,212,213,214],"windows","kape","triaging windows with kape","registry","browser","logs","windows-forensics","dfir","mft","mftecmd","data","prefetch","eric-zimmerman","digital-forensics","SET","collection","pecmd","artifact-collection",{"skillNo":216,"name":217,"nameZh":6,"description":218,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":219,"categories":220,"keywords":222,"publishedAt":44},"01M6AGD5PW5J4EVZM958WD74ZQ","triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework","Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track\u002FTrack*\u002FAttend\u002FAct decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftriaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework\u002FSKILL.md",[221],{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[223,224,225,40,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241],"vulnerabilities","framework","triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework","status","planning","CISA","vulnerability-management","risk-management","nessus","qualys","openvas","cvss","remediation","risk","vulnerability","api","prioritization","ssvc","decision-tree",{"skillNo":243,"name":244,"nameZh":6,"description":245,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":246,"categories":247,"keywords":249,"publishedAt":44},"01M6AGD24TTQQM4CXG69E3B9TJ","triaging-security-incident","Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM\u002FEDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftriaging-security-incident\u002FSKILL.md",[248],{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[24,250,40,251,252,253,38,254,255,256,35,33,257,185,258,259,260,261,262,263],"triaging security incident","siem","file","ioc","NIST-800-61","NIST","severity","execution","analysis","classification","severity-classification","incident-triage","SANS-PICERL","SOC-operations"]