AGENT SKILL

commit-smart

Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-14
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
commit-smart
description
Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api

03 SKILL.md 正文

Smart Commit

Create meaningful conventional commits by analyzing your actual changes.

Workflow

Step 1: Assess the working tree

Run these commands to understand the current state:

git status
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat

Step 2: Handle unstaged changes

If nothing is staged (git diff --cached is empty):

  1. Show the user what files have changed
  2. Suggest what to stage based on logical grouping (e.g., "these 3 files are all related to the auth refactor")
  3. Ask if they want to stage all, or select specific files
  4. Stage the approved files with git add <files>

If changes are already staged, proceed to analysis.

Step 3: Analyze the diff

Read the full staged diff:

git diff --cached

Determine the commit type from the changes:

Signal Type
New files with new functionality feat
New test files or test additions test
Changes to existing logic fixing incorrect behavior fix
Structural changes without behavior change refactor
package.json, tsconfig, CI config changes chore
Build/bundler config changes build
README, docs, comments only docs
Formatting, whitespace, semicolons only style
Performance improvements perf

Determine the scope from the primary directory or module affected:

  • src/api/ -> api
  • src/components/auth/ -> auth
  • tests/ -> tests
  • Root config files -> omit scope
  • Multiple unrelated areas -> omit scope

Step 4: Check for user overrides

If the user provided arguments via $ARGUMENTS:

  • Single word (e.g., fix) -> use as commit type
  • Two words (e.g., refactor api) -> use as type and scope
  • Otherwise -> use auto-detected values

Step 5: Compose the commit message

Format: type(scope): imperative short description

Rules:

  • Subject line max 72 characters
  • Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "refactor", not "added", "fixes")
  • Don't end with a period
  • Body explains WHY this change was made, not what changed (the diff shows what)
  • If changes are trivial (typo fix, formatting), skip the body

Example:

feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation

Tokens were expiring mid-session for users with slow connections.
Rotating refresh tokens extends the session without compromising
security, since each refresh token can only be used once.

Step 6: Confirm and commit

Show the user the proposed commit message and ask for confirmation.

If confirmed, run:

git commit -m "<message>"

Then verify with:

git log --oneline -1

Show the committed hash and message.

Tips

  • Run after completing a logical unit of work, not after every file change
  • If the diff is too large for one commit, suggest splitting into multiple commits
  • For breaking changes, add ! after the scope: feat(api)!: change response format
  • The body should answer "if someone reads this commit in 6 months, will they understand WHY?"

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w