implementing-digital-signatures-with-ed25519
Implements digital signatures using the Ed25519 algorithm (Curve25519), covering key-pair generation, signing, signature verification, and security tradeoffs versus RSA and ECDSA. Use when adding message or artifact signing and authentication-integrity checks to a system, or when advising on Ed25519 key properties and validation criteria.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- implementing-digital-signatures-with-ed25519
- tags
- [ "cryptography", "digital-signatures", "ed25519", "authentication", "integrity" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.DS-01", "PR.DS-02", "PR.DS-10" ]
- subdomain
- cryptography
- description
- Implements digital signatures using the Ed25519 algorithm (Curve25519), covering key-pair generation, signing, signature verification, and security tradeoffs versus RSA and ECDSA. Use when adding message or artifact signing and authentication-integrity checks to a system, or when advising on Ed25519 key properties and validation criteria.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1600", "T1573", "T1553" ]
02 资源文件 7
- 资产文件assets/template.md890 B
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md1.7 KB
- 参考文档references/standards.md1.3 KB
- 参考文档references/workflows.md1.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py5.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/process.py10.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Implementing Digital Signatures with Ed25519
Overview
Ed25519 is a high-performance digital signature algorithm using the Edwards curve Curve25519. It provides 128-bit security with 64-byte signatures and 32-byte keys, offering significant advantages over RSA and ECDSA including deterministic signatures (no random nonce needed), resistance to side-channel attacks, and fast verification. This skill covers implementing Ed25519 for document signing, code signing, and API authentication.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring implementing digital signatures with ed25519 capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with cryptography concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Objectives
- Generate Ed25519 key pairs for signing
- Sign messages and files with Ed25519
- Verify signatures against public keys
- Implement multi-signature verification
- Build a simple code signing system
- Compare Ed25519 performance with RSA and ECDSA
Key Concepts
Ed25519 vs RSA vs ECDSA
| Property | Ed25519 | RSA-3072 | ECDSA P-256 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 128-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Public key size | 32 bytes | 384 bytes | 64 bytes |
| Signature size | 64 bytes | 384 bytes | 64 bytes |
| Key generation | ~50 us | ~100 ms | ~1 ms |
| Sign | ~70 us | ~5 ms | ~200 us |
| Verify | ~200 us | ~200 us | ~500 us |
| Deterministic | Yes | No (PSS) | No (unless RFC 6979) |
Key Properties
- Deterministic: Same message + key always produces same signature
- Collision-resistant: No separate hash function needed
- Side-channel resistant: Constant-time implementation
- Small keys: 32 bytes each (public and private)
Security Considerations
- Ed25519 does not support key recovery from signatures
- Verify the full message, not a hash (Ed25519 hashes internally)
- Public keys must be validated before use (check for low-order points)
- Private keys should be stored encrypted at rest
- Ed25519 is not yet approved for all NIST use cases (Ed448 is preferred for federal)
Validation Criteria
- [ ] Key pair generation produces valid Ed25519 keys
- [ ] Signature verification succeeds for valid message
- [ ] Signature verification fails for tampered message
- [ ] Signature verification fails for wrong public key
- [ ] Deterministic: same input produces same signature
- [ ] File signing and verification works correctly
- [ ] Performance meets or exceeds RSA-3072
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.