implementing-container-network-policies-with-calico
Uses Calico's own policy CRDs beyond the upstream Kubernetes API - GlobalNetworkPolicy, HostEndpoint, NetworkSet, policy tiers, and DNS-based egress rules - applied and audited with calicoctl. Use when a policy must span namespaces or protect the host itself, when egress has to be expressed by domain name, or when ordering policies into tiers. Keywords: calicoctl, GlobalNetworkPolicy, HostEndpoint, NetworkSet, tier, DNS egress, order. Do not use for portable upstream NetworkPolicy - use implementing-network-policies-for-kubernetes; for installing Calico and writing standard policy with it use implementing-kubernetes-network-policy-with-calico.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- implementing-container-network-policies-with-calico
- tags
- [ "container-security", "kubernetes", "calico", "network-policy", "microsegmentation", "cni" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.PS-01", "PR.IR-01", "ID.AM-08", "DE.CM-01" ]
- subdomain
- container-security
- description
- Uses Calico's own policy CRDs beyond the upstream Kubernetes API - GlobalNetworkPolicy, HostEndpoint, NetworkSet, policy tiers, and DNS-based egress rules - applied and audited with calicoctl. Use when a policy must span namespaces or protect the host itself, when egress has to be expressed by domain name, or when ordering policies into tiers. Keywords: calicoctl, GlobalNetworkPolicy, HostEndpoint, NetworkSet, tier, DNS egress, order. Do not use for portable upstream NetworkPolicy - use implementing-network-policies-for-kubernetes; for installing Calico and writing standard policy with it use implementing-kubernetes-network-policy-with-calico.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1610", "T1611", "T1609", "T1525" ]
02 资源文件 3
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md1.9 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py7.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Implementing Container Network Policies with Calico
Overview
Calico provides Kubernetes-native and extended network policy enforcement through its CNI plugin. This skill covers creating and auditing Calico NetworkPolicy and GlobalNetworkPolicy resources to implement pod-to-pod traffic control, namespace isolation, egress restrictions, and DNS-based policy rules using calicoctl and the Kubernetes API.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring implementing container network policies with calico capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- Kubernetes cluster with Calico CNI installed
- Python 3.9+ with
kubernetesclient library - calicoctl CLI tool installed and configured
- kubectl access with RBAC permissions for network policy management
Steps
Step 1: Audit Existing Network Policies
Use calicoctl and kubectl to inventory current network policies and identify unprotected namespaces.
Step 2: Implement Default-Deny Policies
Create default-deny ingress and egress policies per namespace as a zero-trust baseline.
Step 3: Create Workload-Specific Allow Rules
Define granular allow rules for legitimate pod-to-pod and pod-to-service communication.
Step 4: Validate Policy Enforcement
Test connectivity between pods to verify policies are correctly enforced.
Expected Output
JSON audit report listing all network policies, unprotected namespaces, policy rule counts, and connectivity test results.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.