implementing-code-signing-for-artifacts
Implements code signing for build artifacts (binaries, packages, containers) using GPG, Sigstore, and platform-specific signing tools, establishing trust chains and verifying signatures in deployment pipelines. Use when establishing artifact integrity checks against supply-chain tampering, proving authenticity to customers, building zero-trust pipelines that reject unsigned artifacts, or meeting SLSA Level 2+ provenance requirements.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- implementing-code-signing-for-artifacts
- tags
- [ "devsecops", "cicd", "code-signing", "supply-chain", "sigstore", "secure-sdlc" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.PS-01", "GV.SC-07", "ID.IM-04", "PR.PS-04" ]
- subdomain
- devsecops
- description
- Implements code signing for build artifacts (binaries, packages, containers) using GPG, Sigstore, and platform-specific signing tools, establishing trust chains and verifying signatures in deployment pipelines. Use when establishing artifact integrity checks against supply-chain tampering, proving authenticity to customers, building zero-trust pipelines that reject unsigned artifacts, or meeting SLSA Level 2+ provenance requirements.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1195", "T1554", "T1059.004", "T1610", "T1611" ]
02 资源文件 13
- 资产文件assets/template.md1.2 KB
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档references/architecture_patterns.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/standards.md1.5 KB
- 参考文档references/system_design_workflows.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/tech_decision_guide.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/workflows.md1.8 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py5.9 KB
- 脚本scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py3.1 KB
- 脚本scripts/dependency_analyzer.py3.1 KB
- 脚本scripts/process.py7.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/project_architect.py3.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Implementing Code Signing for Artifacts
When to Use
- When establishing artifact integrity verification to prevent supply chain tampering
- When compliance requires cryptographic proof that build artifacts are authentic and unmodified
- When distributing software to customers who need to verify publisher identity
- When implementing zero-trust deployment pipelines that reject unsigned artifacts
- When meeting SLSA Level 2+ requirements for provenance and integrity
Do not use for encrypting artifacts (signing provides integrity, not confidentiality), for container image signing specifically (use cosign), or for source code authentication (use commit signing).
Prerequisites
- GPG key pair for traditional signing or Sigstore account for keyless signing
- Code signing certificate from a Certificate Authority for public distribution
- CI/CD pipeline with access to signing keys or identity provider
- Verification infrastructure in deployment pipelines
Workflow
Step 1: Generate and Manage Signing Keys
# Generate GPG key for artifact signing
gpg --full-generate-key --batch <<EOF
Key-Type: eddsa
Key-Curve: ed25519
Subkey-Type: eddsa
Subkey-Curve: ed25519
Name-Real: CI Build System
Name-Email: ci-signing@company.com
Expire-Date: 1y
%no-protection
EOF
# Export public key for distribution
gpg --armor --export ci-signing@company.com > signing-key.pub
# Export private key for CI/CD (store in secrets manager)
gpg --armor --export-secret-keys ci-signing@company.com > signing-key.priv
Step 2: Sign Build Artifacts in CI/CD
# .github/workflows/build-sign.yml
name: Build and Sign
on:
push:
tags: ['v*']
jobs:
build-sign:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: write
id-token: write # For Sigstore keyless signing
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Build artifacts
run: |
make build
sha256sum dist/* > dist/checksums.sha256
- name: Import GPG Key
run: |
echo "${{ secrets.GPG_PRIVATE_KEY }}" | gpg --batch --import
gpg --list-secret-keys
- name: Sign artifacts
run: |
for file in dist/*; do
gpg --detach-sign --armor --local-user ci-signing@company.com "$file"
done
- name: Install cosign for keyless signing
uses: sigstore/cosign-installer@v3
- name: Keyless sign with Sigstore
run: |
for file in dist/*.tar.gz; do
cosign sign-blob "$file" \
--output-signature "${file}.sig" \
--output-certificate "${file}.cert" \
--yes
done
- name: Create Release with signed artifacts
uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2
with:
files: |
dist/*
dist/*.asc
dist/*.sig
dist/*.cert
Step 3: Verify Signatures in Deployment Pipeline
# Verify GPG signature
gpg --import signing-key.pub
gpg --verify artifact.tar.gz.asc artifact.tar.gz
# Verify Sigstore keyless signature
cosign verify-blob artifact.tar.gz \
--signature artifact.tar.gz.sig \
--certificate artifact.tar.gz.cert \
--certificate-identity ci-signing@company.com \
--certificate-oidc-issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
# Verify checksums
sha256sum --check checksums.sha256
Step 4: Sign npm Packages with Provenance
{
"scripts": {
"prepublishOnly": "npm run build && npm run test"
},
"publishConfig": {
"provenance": true
}
}
# Publish npm package with provenance attestation
npm publish --provenance
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Code Signing | Cryptographic process of signing software artifacts to verify publisher identity and artifact integrity |
| Detached Signature | Signature stored in a separate file from the artifact, allowing independent distribution |
| Keyless Signing | Sigstore's approach using short-lived certificates tied to OIDC identities instead of long-lived keys |
| Provenance | Metadata describing how, where, and by whom an artifact was built |
| Transparency Log | Append-only log (Rekor) that records all signing events for public auditability |
| Trust Chain | Hierarchical chain from root CA to signing certificate establishing trust in the signer's identity |
| SLSA | Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts — framework defining levels of supply chain security |
Tools & Systems
- GPG/PGP: Traditional asymmetric cryptography tool for signing and verifying artifacts
- Sigstore (cosign): Modern keyless signing infrastructure using OIDC identity and transparency logs
- Rekor: Sigstore's transparency log recording all signing events immutably
- Fulcio: Sigstore's certificate authority issuing short-lived certificates bound to OIDC identities
- notation: Microsoft's artifact signing tool for OCI registries (Project Notary v2)
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Establishing Signed Release Pipeline
Context: An open-source project needs to sign release artifacts so users can verify authenticity and detect tampering.
Approach:
- Use Sigstore keyless signing in GitHub Actions (no key management overhead)
- Sign all release binaries with
cosign sign-blobusing OIDC identity - Generate and sign checksums file for bulk verification
- Upload signatures, certificates, and checksums alongside release artifacts
- Document verification instructions in the project README
- Add verification step to the Homebrew formula or apt repository
Pitfalls: GPG key compromise requires revoking and re-signing all artifacts. Sigstore keyless signing avoids this by using ephemeral keys. Long-lived signing keys in CI/CD secrets are a supply chain risk if the CI system is compromised.
Output Format
Artifact Signing Report
========================
Pipeline: Build and Sign v2.3.0
Date: 2026-02-23
Signing Method: Sigstore Keyless + GPG
SIGNED ARTIFACTS:
app-v2.3.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz
GPG: PASS (ci-signing@company.com, EdDSA/Ed25519)
Sigstore: PASS (Rekor entry: 24658135, Fulcio cert issued)
SHA256: a1b2c3d4...
app-v2.3.0-darwin-arm64.tar.gz
GPG: PASS
Sigstore: PASS (Rekor entry: 24658136)
SHA256: e5f6g7h8...
checksums.sha256
GPG: PASS (detached signature)
TRANSPARENCY LOG:
Entries recorded: 3
Log index range: 24658135-24658137
Verification: https://search.sigstore.dev
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.