AGENT SKILL

difficult-workplace-conversations

Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-14
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
difficult-workplace-conversations
description
Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.
allowed-tools
Read, Glob, Grep

02 资源文件 5

03 SKILL.md 正文

Difficult Conversations Skill

A structured framework for approaching challenging workplace conversations including conflicts, performance issues, sensitive feedback, and emotionally charged discussions.

When to Use This Skill

  • Preparing for a challenging conversation with a colleague
  • Addressing performance issues with a team member
  • Delivering difficult feedback to a peer or manager
  • Navigating conflict between team members
  • Discussing sensitive topics (salary, promotion, termination)
  • Handling emotional or defensive reactions
  • Following up after difficult discussions

Core Framework: Preparation-Delivery-Followup

Difficult conversations succeed or fail based on three phases:

Phase 1: Preparation (Before)

Purpose: Set yourself up for a productive conversation

  1. Clarify the Issue

    • What specifically happened? (Observable facts only)
    • What is the impact? (On you, team, work)
    • What do you need to change?
  2. Check Your Emotions

    • What am I feeling? Why?
    • Am I calm enough to have this conversation?
    • What might trigger me during this conversation?
  3. Consider Their Perspective

    • How might they see this situation?
    • What constraints or pressures might they have?
    • What do they care about that I can acknowledge?
  4. Define Your Goal

    • What outcome do I want?
    • What is the minimum acceptable result?
    • What am I willing to compromise on?

Phase 2: Delivery (During)

Purpose: Have the conversation effectively

  1. Open Neutrally

    • Start with facts, not judgments
    • Express intent to understand, not accuse
    • Create psychological safety
  2. Share Your Perspective

    • Describe behavior, not character
    • Focus on impact, not intention
    • Use "I" statements, not "you always"
  3. Listen Actively

    • Ask clarifying questions
    • Acknowledge their viewpoint
    • Look for shared interests
  4. Seek Resolution

    • Propose specific actions
    • Agree on next steps
    • Set check-in timeline

Phase 3: Followup (After)

Purpose: Ensure lasting resolution

  1. Document Agreements

    • What was agreed?
    • Who does what by when?
    • How will you measure success?
  2. Check Progress

    • Follow up as promised
    • Acknowledge improvements
    • Address continued issues promptly
  3. Maintain Relationship

    • Separate issue from person
    • Rebuild trust over time
    • Watch for regression

Key Principles

Separate Impact from Intent

What happened: Observable behavior What I felt: Your emotional response What I assume: Their intention (often wrong)

Focus conversation on behavior and impact, not assumed intentions.

The SBI Model

Situation: When and where did this happen? Behavior: What specifically did they do/say? Impact: What was the effect on you, the team, or the work?

Managing Emotions

If You Feel Before Acting
Angry Wait 24 hours, write but don't send
Hurt Talk to neutral party first
Anxious Practice the conversation
Defensive Identify your contribution

When to Escalate

Escalate when:

  • Safety is at risk
  • Legal issues involved
  • Repeated conversations haven't worked
  • Power dynamics prevent resolution
  • You need documentation

Conversation Types

Performance Feedback

  • Lead with specific examples
  • Connect to expectations/standards
  • Focus on future improvement
  • Offer support and resources

Conflict Resolution

  • Hear both sides separately first
  • Identify underlying interests
  • Look for win-win solutions
  • Document agreements

Sensitive Topics

  • Choose private, neutral setting
  • Allow time for processing
  • Be direct but compassionate
  • Respect confidentiality

Receiving Feedback

  • Thank them for feedback
  • Ask clarifying questions
  • Don't defend immediately
  • Reflect before responding

References (Load When Needed)

Detailed Frameworks

See Also

  • feedback-mastery skill - SBI feedback model (overlaps but more feedback-focused)
  • professional-effective-communication skill - General communication patterns

Example Scenarios

Scenario 1: Addressing Missed Deadlines

**Issue:** Team member missed 3 deadlines in past month
**Impact:** Project delayed, others blocked
**Goal:** Understand root cause, agree on prevention plan

**Opening:** "I wanted to check in about the recent deliverables. I've noticed
the last three have come in past deadline, and I'd like to understand what's
happening and how we can address it together."

Scenario 2: Peer Conflict

**Issue:** Colleague publicly criticized your work in meeting
**Impact:** Embarrassed, trust damaged
**Goal:** Address behavior, rebuild working relationship

**Opening:** "I'd like to talk about what happened in yesterday's standup.
When you said my code 'missed obvious issues,' I felt called out in front
of the team. I'd like to understand your concerns and find a better way
to handle code quality feedback."

Scenario 3: Asking Manager for Raise

**Issue:** Feel underpaid relative to market/contribution
**Impact:** Demotivation, considering leaving
**Goal:** Discuss compensation, get timeline or adjustment

**Opening:** "I'd like to discuss my compensation. I've been here two years,
taken on the payments project leadership, and want to make sure my salary
reflects my contributions and the current market."

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

In Preparation

  • Scripting every word - You'll sound robotic; prepare themes, not scripts
  • Building a case - This isn't a trial; seek understanding, not winning
  • Waiting too long - Issues compound; address promptly

In Delivery

  • Starting with "You always..." - Triggers defensiveness immediately
  • Burying the lead - Get to the point; don't soften excessively
  • Asking leading questions - "Don't you think..." isn't asking

In Followup

  • Forgetting to check in - Without follow-up, nothing changes
  • Holding grudges - Issue resolved means relationship continues
  • Over-documenting - Not everything needs written record

Success Metrics

A successful difficult conversation:

  • Both parties feel heard
  • Specific actions are agreed
  • Relationship is preserved or improved
  • The issue doesn't recur (or has clear escalation)
  • Neither party is blindsided later

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w