implementing-api-security-posture-management
Implements API Security Posture Management (API-SPM) to continuously discover, classify, and risk-score APIs -- including internal, external, partner, and shadow endpoints -- while aggregating findings from DAST, SAST, SCA, and runtime monitoring into a unified risk view. Use when building continuous API inventory and risk-scoring, detecting configuration drift or policy violations, or unifying API risk visibility across an organization.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- implementing-api-security-posture-management
- tags
- [ "api-security", "aspm", "api-posture-management", "api-discovery", "risk-scoring", "api-governance", "continuous-monitoring", "api-inventory" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.PS-01", "ID.RA-01", "PR.DS-10", "DE.CM-01" ]
- subdomain
- api-security
- description
- Implements API Security Posture Management (API-SPM) to continuously discover, classify, and risk-score APIs -- including internal, external, partner, and shadow endpoints -- while aggregating findings from DAST, SAST, SCA, and runtime monitoring into a unified risk view. Use when building continuous API inventory and risk-scoring, detecting configuration drift or policy violations, or unifying API risk visibility across an organization.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1190", "T1059.007", "T1552.001" ]
02 资源文件 8
- 脚本bin/resolve_caller_target.sh634 B
- 脚本bin/self_goal.py9.0 KB
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md1.4 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py6.1 KB
- 脚本tests/test_caller_targeting.sh1.2 KB
- 脚本tests/test_self_goal.py12.3 KB
- 脚本tests/test_self_goal.sh1.7 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Implementing API Security Posture Management
Overview
API Security Posture Management (API-SPM) provides continuous visibility into an organization's API attack surface by automatically discovering, classifying, and risk-scoring all APIs including internal, external, partner, and shadow endpoints. Unlike point-in-time testing tools, API-SPM operates continuously to detect configuration drift, policy violations, missing security controls, sensitive data exposure, and compliance gaps. It aggregates findings from DAST, SAST, SCA, and runtime monitoring tools to provide a unified view of API risk posture across the organization.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring implementing api security posture management capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- API gateway with traffic logging (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Apigee, Envoy)
- OpenAPI specifications for documented APIs
- SIEM or log aggregation platform (Splunk, Elastic)
- CI/CD pipeline access for shift-left integration
- Cloud provider APIs for infrastructure discovery
- Python 3.8+ for custom posture assessment tooling
Core Components
1. API Discovery and Inventory
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""API Security Posture Management Engine
Continuously discovers, classifies, and risk-scores APIs
to maintain a comprehensive security posture inventory.
"""
import json
import re
import hashlib
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Set
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
class APIClassification(Enum):
EXTERNAL = "external"
INTERNAL = "internal"
PARTNER = "partner"
SHADOW = "shadow"
DEPRECATED = "deprecated"
class RiskLevel(Enum):
CRITICAL = 4
HIGH = 3
MEDIUM = 2
LOW = 1
INFO = 0
@dataclass
class SecurityControl:
name: str
present: bool
required: bool
severity: RiskLevel
details: str = ""
@dataclass
class APIEndpoint:
api_id: str
method: str
path: str
service_name: str
classification: APIClassification
owner: Optional[str] = None
version: Optional[str] = None
first_discovered: str = ""
last_seen: str = ""
documented: bool = False
security_controls: List[SecurityControl] = field(default_factory=list)
risk_score: float = 0.0
sensitive_data_types: Set[str] = field(default_factory=set)
compliance_tags: Set[str] = field(default_factory=set)
traffic_volume_daily: int = 0
class APIPostureManager:
SENSITIVE_PATTERNS = {
"ssn": re.compile(r'\b\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4}\b'),
"credit_card": re.compile(r'\b\d{4}[- ]?\d{4}[- ]?\d{4}[- ]?\d{4}\b'),
"email": re.compile(r'\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z|a-z]{2,}\b'),
"api_key": re.compile(r'\b[A-Za-z0-9]{32,}\b'),
"jwt": re.compile(r'eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+\.eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]+'),
"phone": re.compile(r'\b\+?1?\d{10,15}\b'),
}
def __init__(self):
self.inventory: Dict[str, APIEndpoint] = {}
self.policy_rules: List[dict] = []
def generate_api_id(self, method: str, path: str, service: str) -> str:
raw = f"{service}:{method}:{path}"
return hashlib.sha256(raw.encode()).hexdigest()[:16]
def register_api(self, method: str, path: str, service_name: str,
classification: APIClassification,
documented: bool = False, owner: str = None) -> APIEndpoint:
api_id = self.generate_api_id(method, path, service_name)
now = datetime.now().isoformat()
if api_id in self.inventory:
endpoint = self.inventory[api_id]
endpoint.last_seen = now
return endpoint
endpoint = APIEndpoint(
api_id=api_id,
method=method,
path=path,
service_name=service_name,
classification=classification,
owner=owner,
first_discovered=now,
last_seen=now,
documented=documented
)
self.inventory[api_id] = endpoint
return endpoint
def assess_security_controls(self, endpoint: APIEndpoint,
traffic_sample: dict) -> List[SecurityControl]:
"""Evaluate security controls present on an API endpoint."""
controls = []
# Authentication check
has_auth = any(h in traffic_sample.get('request_headers', {})
for h in ['Authorization', 'X-API-Key', 'Cookie'])
controls.append(SecurityControl(
name="authentication",
present=has_auth,
required=True,
severity=RiskLevel.CRITICAL,
details="No authentication mechanism detected" if not has_auth else "Authentication present"
))
# TLS/HTTPS check
is_https = traffic_sample.get('scheme', '').lower() == 'https'
controls.append(SecurityControl(
name="transport_encryption",
present=is_https,
required=True,
severity=RiskLevel.CRITICAL,
details="API accessible over HTTP without TLS" if not is_https else "HTTPS enforced"
))
# Rate limiting check
has_rate_limit = any(h.startswith('X-RateLimit') or h == 'Retry-After'
for h in traffic_sample.get('response_headers', {}).keys())
controls.append(SecurityControl(
name="rate_limiting",
present=has_rate_limit,
required=True,
severity=RiskLevel.HIGH,
details="No rate limiting headers detected" if not has_rate_limit else "Rate limiting active"
))
# CORS policy check
cors_origin = traffic_sample.get('response_headers', {}).get('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '')
has_strict_cors = cors_origin and cors_origin != '*'
controls.append(SecurityControl(
name="cors_policy",
present=has_strict_cors,
required=endpoint.classification == APIClassification.EXTERNAL,
severity=RiskLevel.HIGH if cors_origin == '*' else RiskLevel.MEDIUM,
details=f"CORS origin: {cors_origin}" if cors_origin else "No CORS headers"
))
# Security headers
sec_headers = traffic_sample.get('response_headers', {})
required_headers = {
'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff',
'Strict-Transport-Security': None,
'X-Frame-Options': None,
'Cache-Control': 'no-store',
}
missing = [h for h in required_headers if h not in sec_headers]
controls.append(SecurityControl(
name="security_headers",
present=len(missing) == 0,
required=True,
severity=RiskLevel.MEDIUM,
details=f"Missing headers: {', '.join(missing)}" if missing else "All security headers present"
))
# Input validation (check for schema validation errors in logs)
has_validation = traffic_sample.get('has_schema_validation', False)
controls.append(SecurityControl(
name="input_validation",
present=has_validation,
required=True,
severity=RiskLevel.HIGH,
details="No schema validation detected" if not has_validation else "Input validation active"
))
endpoint.security_controls = controls
return controls
def calculate_risk_score(self, endpoint: APIEndpoint) -> float:
"""Calculate a composite risk score (0-100) for an API endpoint."""
score = 0.0
max_score = 0.0
# Security controls scoring
for control in endpoint.security_controls:
weight = control.severity.value * 5
max_score += weight
if not control.present and control.required:
score += weight
# Classification risk multiplier
classification_weights = {
APIClassification.EXTERNAL: 1.5,
APIClassification.PARTNER: 1.3,
APIClassification.SHADOW: 2.0,
APIClassification.DEPRECATED: 1.8,
APIClassification.INTERNAL: 1.0,
}
multiplier = classification_weights.get(endpoint.classification, 1.0)
# Documentation penalty
if not endpoint.documented:
score += 10
# Sensitive data penalty
score += len(endpoint.sensitive_data_types) * 5
# Normalize to 0-100
if max_score > 0:
normalized = min(100, (score / max_score) * 100 * multiplier)
else:
normalized = 0
endpoint.risk_score = round(normalized, 1)
return endpoint.risk_score
def generate_posture_report(self) -> dict:
"""Generate organization-wide API security posture report."""
total = len(self.inventory)
if total == 0:
return {"error": "No APIs in inventory"}
risk_distribution = {level.name: 0 for level in RiskLevel}
classification_counts = {c.value: 0 for c in APIClassification}
undocumented = 0
missing_auth = 0
missing_tls = 0
for endpoint in self.inventory.values():
self.calculate_risk_score(endpoint)
if endpoint.risk_score >= 75:
risk_distribution["CRITICAL"] += 1
elif endpoint.risk_score >= 50:
risk_distribution["HIGH"] += 1
elif endpoint.risk_score >= 25:
risk_distribution["MEDIUM"] += 1
else:
risk_distribution["LOW"] += 1
classification_counts[endpoint.classification.value] += 1
if not endpoint.documented:
undocumented += 1
for control in endpoint.security_controls:
if control.name == "authentication" and not control.present:
missing_auth += 1
if control.name == "transport_encryption" and not control.present:
missing_tls += 1
avg_risk = sum(e.risk_score for e in self.inventory.values()) / total
return {
"report_date": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"total_apis": total,
"average_risk_score": round(avg_risk, 1),
"risk_distribution": risk_distribution,
"classification": classification_counts,
"undocumented_apis": undocumented,
"missing_authentication": missing_auth,
"missing_tls": missing_tls,
"top_risks": sorted(
[{"api_id": e.api_id, "method": e.method, "path": e.path,
"service": e.service_name, "risk_score": e.risk_score,
"classification": e.classification.value}
for e in self.inventory.values()],
key=lambda x: x["risk_score"],
reverse=True
)[:20]
}
2. Policy Enforcement
Define and enforce security policies across all APIs:
# api-security-policies.yaml
policies:
- name: require-authentication
description: All external APIs must require authentication
scope:
classification: [external, partner]
rule:
control: authentication
required: true
severity: critical
remediation: "Add OAuth2, API key, or JWT authentication"
- name: enforce-tls
description: All APIs must use HTTPS
scope:
classification: [external, internal, partner]
rule:
control: transport_encryption
required: true
severity: critical
remediation: "Configure TLS certificates and redirect HTTP to HTTPS"
- name: require-rate-limiting
description: External APIs must implement rate limiting
scope:
classification: [external]
rule:
control: rate_limiting
required: true
severity: high
remediation: "Configure rate limiting at API gateway level"
- name: no-wildcard-cors
description: APIs must not use wildcard CORS origins
scope:
classification: [external]
rule:
control: cors_policy
condition: "origin != '*'"
severity: high
remediation: "Specify explicit allowed origins in CORS configuration"
- name: documentation-required
description: All APIs must have OpenAPI documentation
scope:
classification: [external, partner]
rule:
documented: true
severity: medium
remediation: "Create and publish OpenAPI specification"
- name: deprecation-sunset
description: Deprecated APIs must have sunset headers
scope:
classification: [deprecated]
rule:
header_present: "Sunset"
severity: medium
remediation: "Add Sunset header with planned removal date"
Continuous Monitoring Dashboard Metrics
| Metric | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| API Discovery Coverage | % of APIs with documentation | > 95% |
| Average Risk Score | Mean risk score across all APIs | < 25 |
| Critical Findings | Number of critical-risk APIs | 0 |
| Shadow API Count | Undocumented/unmanaged APIs | 0 |
| Authentication Coverage | % of APIs with auth controls | 100% |
| TLS Coverage | % of APIs using HTTPS | 100% |
| Policy Compliance | % of APIs meeting all policies | > 90% |
| Mean Time to Remediate | Average days to fix findings | < 7 days |
References
- OX Security ASPM Guide 2025: https://www.ox.security/blog/application-security-posture-management-aspm/
- IBM ASPM Overview: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/aspm
- StackHawk Best ASPM Tools: https://www.stackhawk.com/blog/best-aspm-tools/
- AppSentinels API Security Posture Management: https://appsentinels.ai/blog/api-security-posture-management-from-reactive-protection-to-continuous-governance/
- Palo Alto Networks ASPM: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/aspm-application-security-posture-management
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.