AGENT SKILL

implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting

Implements API abuse detection using token bucket, sliding window, and fixed window rate-limiting algorithms backed by Redis, including adaptive limits that tighten during detected attacks and relax during normal traffic. Use when defending APIs against DDoS, brute force login attempts, credential stuffing, or scraping abuse and you need to design or tune rate-limiting logic.

适用职业开发工程师
使用场景后端与接口
License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting
tags
[ "api-security", "rate-limiting", "token-bucket", "sliding-window", "ddos-protection", "brute-force-prevention", "api-abuse", "api-gateway" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
nist_csf
[ "PR.PS-01", "ID.RA-01", "PR.DS-10", "DE.CM-01" ]
subdomain
api-security
description
Implements API abuse detection using token bucket, sliding window, and fixed window rate-limiting algorithms backed by Redis, including adaptive limits that tighten during detected attacks and relax during normal traffic. Use when defending APIs against DDoS, brute force login attempts, credential stuffing, or scraping abuse and you need to design or tune rate-limiting logic.
mitre_attack
[ "T1190", "T1059.007", "T1552.001", "T1003", "T1110" ]

02 资源文件 3

03 SKILL.md 正文

Implementing API Abuse Detection with Rate Limiting

Overview

API rate limiting is a critical security control that restricts the number of requests a client can make within a defined time period. It defends against denial-of-service (DDoS), brute force login attempts, credential stuffing, API scraping, and resource exhaustion attacks. Modern implementations use algorithms like token bucket, sliding window, and fixed window counters, often backed by distributed stores like Redis. Adaptive rate limiting dynamically tightens limits during detected attacks and relaxes during normal operation, achieving a 94% reduction in successful DDoS attempts compared to static IP-based approaches.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring implementing api abuse detection with rate limiting capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • API gateway (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Apigee) or reverse proxy (NGINX, Envoy)
  • Redis or Memcached for distributed rate limit counters
  • Monitoring and alerting infrastructure (Prometheus, Grafana, or SIEM)
  • Understanding of normal API traffic patterns and baselines
  • Python 3.8+ or Node.js for custom implementation

Rate Limiting Algorithms

Token Bucket Algorithm

The token bucket assigns each client a bucket with a fixed capacity of tokens. Tokens refill at a constant rate. Each request consumes one token. When the bucket is empty, requests are rejected. This allows controlled bursts while maintaining average limits.

"""Token Bucket Rate Limiter with Redis Backend

Implements a distributed token bucket algorithm for API rate limiting
with burst allowance and automatic refill.
"""

import time
import redis
import json
from typing import Tuple

class TokenBucketRateLimiter:
    def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis,
                 max_tokens: int = 100,
                 refill_rate: float = 10.0,
                 key_prefix: str = "ratelimit:tb"):
        self.redis = redis_client
        self.max_tokens = max_tokens
        self.refill_rate = refill_rate  # tokens per second
        self.key_prefix = key_prefix

    def _get_key(self, client_id: str) -> str:
        return f"{self.key_prefix}:{client_id}"

    def allow_request(self, client_id: str, tokens_required: int = 1) -> Tuple[bool, dict]:
        """Check if a request should be allowed under the rate limit.

        Returns (allowed, info) where info contains remaining tokens
        and retry-after seconds.
        """
        key = self._get_key(client_id)
        now = time.time()

        # Atomic token bucket operation using Lua script
        lua_script = """
        local key = KEYS[1]
        local max_tokens = tonumber(ARGV[1])
        local refill_rate = tonumber(ARGV[2])
        local now = tonumber(ARGV[3])
        local requested = tonumber(ARGV[4])

        local bucket = redis.call('HMGET', key, 'tokens', 'last_refill')
        local tokens = tonumber(bucket[1])
        local last_refill = tonumber(bucket[2])

        -- Initialize bucket if it doesn't exist
        if tokens == nil then
            tokens = max_tokens
            last_refill = now
        end

        -- Calculate refilled tokens
        local elapsed = now - last_refill
        local refilled = elapsed * refill_rate
        tokens = math.min(max_tokens, tokens + refilled)

        -- Check if enough tokens available
        local allowed = 0
        if tokens >= requested then
            tokens = tokens - requested
            allowed = 1
        end

        -- Update bucket state
        redis.call('HMSET', key, 'tokens', tokens, 'last_refill', now)
        redis.call('EXPIRE', key, 3600)  -- TTL for cleanup

        -- Calculate retry-after if denied
        local retry_after = 0
        if allowed == 0 then
            retry_after = math.ceil((requested - tokens) / refill_rate)
        end

        return {allowed, math.floor(tokens), retry_after}
        """
        result = self.redis.eval(
            lua_script, 1, key,
            self.max_tokens, self.refill_rate, now, tokens_required
        )

        allowed = bool(result[0])
        remaining = int(result[1])
        retry_after = int(result[2])

        return allowed, {
            "remaining": remaining,
            "limit": self.max_tokens,
            "retry_after": retry_after,
            "reset": int(now + (self.max_tokens - remaining) / self.refill_rate)
        }

Sliding Window Rate Limiter

"""Sliding Window Rate Limiter

Tracks requests over a continuously moving time window,
providing smoother rate limiting than fixed windows with
only a 2.3% false positive rate.
"""

class SlidingWindowRateLimiter:
    def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis,
                 window_seconds: int = 60,
                 max_requests: int = 100,
                 key_prefix: str = "ratelimit:sw"):
        self.redis = redis_client
        self.window = window_seconds
        self.max_requests = max_requests
        self.key_prefix = key_prefix

    def allow_request(self, client_id: str) -> Tuple[bool, dict]:
        key = f"{self.key_prefix}:{client_id}"
        now = time.time()
        window_start = now - self.window

        # Atomic sliding window using sorted set
        pipe = self.redis.pipeline()
        # Remove expired entries
        pipe.zremrangebyscore(key, 0, window_start)
        # Add current request
        pipe.zadd(key, {f"{now}:{id(now)}": now})
        # Count requests in window
        pipe.zcard(key)
        # Set TTL
        pipe.expire(key, self.window + 1)
        results = pipe.execute()

        current_count = results[2]
        allowed = current_count <= self.max_requests

        if not allowed:
            # Remove the request we just added since it's denied
            self.redis.zremrangebyscore(key, now, now)

        return allowed, {
            "remaining": max(0, self.max_requests - current_count),
            "limit": self.max_requests,
            "window": self.window,
            "current_count": current_count
        }

Adaptive Rate Limiter

"""Adaptive Rate Limiter

Dynamically adjusts rate limits based on detected attack patterns.
Tightens limits during attacks and relaxes during normal operation.
"""

from enum import Enum
from dataclasses import dataclass

class ThreatLevel(Enum):
    NORMAL = "normal"
    ELEVATED = "elevated"
    HIGH = "high"
    CRITICAL = "critical"

@dataclass
class AdaptiveLimits:
    requests_per_minute: int
    burst_size: int
    block_duration_seconds: int

THREAT_LIMITS = {
    ThreatLevel.NORMAL: AdaptiveLimits(100, 20, 0),
    ThreatLevel.ELEVATED: AdaptiveLimits(50, 10, 60),
    ThreatLevel.HIGH: AdaptiveLimits(20, 5, 300),
    ThreatLevel.CRITICAL: AdaptiveLimits(5, 2, 3600),
}

class AdaptiveRateLimiter:
    def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis):
        self.redis = redis_client
        self.token_bucket = TokenBucketRateLimiter(redis_client)
        self.sliding_window = SlidingWindowRateLimiter(redis_client)

    def assess_threat_level(self, client_id: str) -> ThreatLevel:
        """Assess the current threat level for a client based on behavior."""
        metrics_key = f"metrics:{client_id}"
        metrics = self.redis.hgetall(metrics_key)

        if not metrics:
            return ThreatLevel.NORMAL

        error_rate = float(metrics.get(b'error_rate', 0))
        auth_failures = int(metrics.get(b'auth_failures_5m', 0))
        unique_endpoints = int(metrics.get(b'unique_endpoints_5m', 0))
        request_rate = float(metrics.get(b'requests_per_second', 0))

        # Scoring-based threat assessment
        score = 0
        if auth_failures > 10:
            score += 3
        elif auth_failures > 5:
            score += 2
        elif auth_failures > 2:
            score += 1

        if error_rate > 0.8:
            score += 3
        elif error_rate > 0.5:
            score += 2

        if request_rate > 50:
            score += 2
        elif request_rate > 20:
            score += 1

        if unique_endpoints > 50:
            score += 2  # Possible enumeration

        if score >= 7:
            return ThreatLevel.CRITICAL
        elif score >= 5:
            return ThreatLevel.HIGH
        elif score >= 3:
            return ThreatLevel.ELEVATED
        return ThreatLevel.NORMAL

    def allow_request(self, client_id: str, endpoint: str) -> Tuple[bool, dict]:
        """Rate limit with adaptive thresholds based on threat level."""
        threat_level = self.assess_threat_level(client_id)
        limits = THREAT_LIMITS[threat_level]

        # Check if client is currently blocked
        block_key = f"blocked:{client_id}"
        if self.redis.exists(block_key):
            ttl = self.redis.ttl(block_key)
            return False, {
                "blocked": True,
                "threat_level": threat_level.value,
                "retry_after": ttl,
                "reason": "Temporarily blocked due to suspicious activity"
            }

        # Apply rate limit with threat-adjusted parameters
        self.token_bucket.max_tokens = limits.burst_size
        self.token_bucket.refill_rate = limits.requests_per_minute / 60.0

        allowed, info = self.token_bucket.allow_request(client_id)

        if not allowed and limits.block_duration_seconds > 0:
            # Block the client for the threat-level duration
            self.redis.setex(block_key, limits.block_duration_seconds, threat_level.value)

        info["threat_level"] = threat_level.value
        return allowed, info

    def record_request_outcome(self, client_id: str, status_code: int, endpoint: str):
        """Track request outcomes for threat assessment."""
        metrics_key = f"metrics:{client_id}"
        pipe = self.redis.pipeline()

        pipe.hincrby(metrics_key, 'total_requests', 1)
        if status_code in (401, 403):
            pipe.hincrby(metrics_key, 'auth_failures_5m', 1)
        if status_code >= 400:
            pipe.hincrby(metrics_key, 'errors_5m', 1)

        # Track unique endpoints for enumeration detection
        pipe.sadd(f"endpoints:{client_id}", endpoint)
        pipe.expire(metrics_key, 300)  # 5-minute window
        pipe.expire(f"endpoints:{client_id}", 300)
        pipe.execute()

NGINX Rate Limiting Configuration

# Define rate limit zones
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api_general:10m rate=10r/s;
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api_auth:10m rate=3r/s;
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api_sensitive:10m rate=1r/s;

# Apply rate limits to API routes
server {
    listen 443 ssl;

    # General API endpoints - 10 req/s with burst of 20
    location /api/v1/ {
        limit_req zone=api_general burst=20 nodelay;
        limit_req_status 429;
        proxy_pass http://api_backend;
    }

    # Authentication endpoints - strict 3 req/s
    location /api/v1/auth/ {
        limit_req zone=api_auth burst=5;
        limit_req_status 429;
        proxy_pass http://api_backend;
    }

    # Sensitive data endpoints - 1 req/s
    location /api/v1/admin/ {
        limit_req zone=api_sensitive burst=3;
        limit_req_status 429;
        proxy_pass http://api_backend;
    }

    # Custom 429 response with Retry-After header
    error_page 429 = @rate_limited;
    location @rate_limited {
        add_header Retry-After 30;
        add_header X-RateLimit-Limit $limit_req_status;
        return 429 '{"error": "rate_limit_exceeded", "retry_after": 30}';
    }
}

Response Headers

Always include standard rate limit headers:

HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
X-RateLimit-Limit: 100
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 0
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1672531200
Retry-After: 30
Content-Type: application/json

{"error": "rate_limit_exceeded", "retry_after": 30}

References

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w