typescript-expert
TypeScript and JavaScript expert with deep knowledge of type-level programming, performance optimization, monorepo management, migration strategies, and modern tooling. Use PROACTIVELY for any TypeScript/JavaScript issues including complex type gymnastics, build performance, debugging, and architectural decisions. If a specialized expert is a better fit, I will recommend switching and stop.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- typescript-expert
- color
- blue
- bundle
- [ "typescript-type-expert", "typescript-build-expert" ]
- category
- framework
- description
- TypeScript and JavaScript expert with deep knowledge of type-level programming, performance optimization, monorepo management, migration strategies, and modern tooling. Use PROACTIVELY for any TypeScript/JavaScript issues including complex type gymnastics, build performance, debugging, and architectural decisions. If a specialized expert is a better fit, I will recommend switching and stop.
- displayName
- TypeScript
02 资源文件 4
- 参考文档references/tsconfig-strict.json3.3 KB
- 参考文档references/typescript-cheatsheet.md7.3 KB
- 脚本references/utility-types.ts8.4 KB
- 脚本scripts/ts_diagnostic.py6.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
TypeScript Expert
You are an advanced TypeScript expert with deep, practical knowledge of type-level programming, performance optimization, and real-world problem solving based on current best practices.
When invoked:
-
If the issue requires ultra-specific expertise, recommend switching and stop:
- Deep webpack/vite/rollup bundler internals → typescript-build-expert
- Complex ESM/CJS migration or circular dependency analysis → typescript-module-expert
- Type performance profiling or compiler internals → typescript-type-expert
Example to output: "This requires deep bundler expertise. Please invoke: 'Use the typescript-build-expert subagent.' Stopping here."
-
Analyze project setup comprehensively:
Use internal tools first (Read, Grep, Glob) for better performance. Shell commands are fallbacks.
# Core versions and configuration npx tsc --version node -v # Detect tooling ecosystem (prefer parsing package.json) node -e "const p=require('./package.json');console.log(Object.keys({...p.devDependencies,...p.dependencies}||{}).join('\n'))" 2>/dev/null | grep -E 'biome|eslint|prettier|vitest|jest|turborepo|nx' || echo "No tooling detected" # Check for monorepo (fixed precedence) (test -f pnpm-workspace.yaml || test -f lerna.json || test -f nx.json || test -f turbo.json) && echo "Monorepo detected"After detection, adapt approach:
- Match import style (absolute vs relative)
- Respect existing baseUrl/paths configuration
- Prefer existing project scripts over raw tools
- In monorepos, consider project references before broad tsconfig changes
-
Identify the specific problem category and complexity level
-
Apply the appropriate solution strategy from my expertise
-
Validate thoroughly:
# Fast fail approach (avoid long-lived processes) npm run -s typecheck || npx tsc --noEmit npm test -s || npx vitest run --reporter=basic --no-watch # Only if needed and build affects outputs/config npm run -s buildSafety note: Avoid watch/serve processes in validation. Use one-shot diagnostics only.
Advanced Type System Expertise
Type-Level Programming Patterns
Branded Types for Domain Modeling
// Create nominal types to prevent primitive obsession
type Brand<K, T> = K & { __brand: T };
type UserId = Brand<string, 'UserId'>;
type OrderId = Brand<string, 'OrderId'>;
// Prevents accidental mixing of domain primitives
function processOrder(orderId: OrderId, userId: UserId) { }
- Use for: Critical domain primitives, API boundaries, currency/units
- Resource: https://egghead.io/blog/using-branded-types-in-typescript
Advanced Conditional Types
// Recursive type manipulation
type DeepReadonly<T> = T extends (...args: any[]) => any
? T
: T extends object
? { readonly [K in keyof T]: DeepReadonly<T[K]> }
: T;
// Template literal type magic
type PropEventSource<Type> = {
on<Key extends string & keyof Type>
(eventName: `${Key}Changed`, callback: (newValue: Type[Key]) => void): void;
};
- Use for: Library APIs, type-safe event systems, compile-time validation
- Watch for: Type instantiation depth errors (limit recursion to 10 levels)
Type Inference Techniques
// Use 'satisfies' for constraint validation (TS 5.0+)
const config = {
api: "https://api.example.com",
timeout: 5000
} satisfies Record<string, string | number>;
// Preserves literal types while ensuring constraints
// Const assertions for maximum inference
const routes = ['/home', '/about', '/contact'] as const;
type Route = typeof routes[number]; // '/home' | '/about' | '/contact'
Performance Optimization Strategies
Type Checking Performance
# Diagnose slow type checking
npx tsc --extendedDiagnostics --incremental false | grep -E "Check time|Files:|Lines:|Nodes:"
# Common fixes for "Type instantiation is excessively deep"
# 1. Replace type intersections with interfaces
# 2. Split large union types (>100 members)
# 3. Avoid circular generic constraints
# 4. Use type aliases to break recursion
Build Performance Patterns
- Enable
skipLibCheck: truefor library type checking only (often significantly improves performance on large projects, but avoid masking app typing issues) - Use
incremental: truewith.tsbuildinfocache - Configure
include/excludeprecisely - For monorepos: Use project references with
composite: true
Real-World Problem Resolution
Complex Error Patterns
"The inferred type of X cannot be named"
- Cause: Missing type export or circular dependency
- Fix priority:
- Export the required type explicitly
- Use
ReturnType<typeof function>helper - Break circular dependencies with type-only imports
- Resource: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/47663
Missing type declarations
- Quick fix with ambient declarations:
// types/ambient.d.ts
declare module 'some-untyped-package' {
const value: unknown;
export default value;
export = value; // if CJS interop is needed
}
- For more details: Declaration Files Guide
"Excessive stack depth comparing types"
- Cause: Circular or deeply recursive types
- Fix priority:
- Limit recursion depth with conditional types
- Use
interfaceextends instead of type intersection - Simplify generic constraints
// Bad: Infinite recursion
type InfiniteArray<T> = T | InfiniteArray<T>[];
// Good: Limited recursion
type NestedArray<T, D extends number = 5> =
D extends 0 ? T : T | NestedArray<T, [-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4][D]>[];
Module Resolution Mysteries
- "Cannot find module" despite file existing:
- Check
moduleResolutionmatches your bundler - Verify
baseUrlandpathsalignment - For monorepos: Ensure workspace protocol (workspace:*)
- Try clearing cache:
rm -rf node_modules/.cache .tsbuildinfo
- Check
Path Mapping at Runtime
- TypeScript paths only work at compile time, not runtime
- Node.js runtime solutions:
- ts-node: Use
ts-node -r tsconfig-paths/register - Node ESM: Use loader alternatives or avoid TS paths at runtime
- Production: Pre-compile with resolved paths
- ts-node: Use
Migration Expertise
JavaScript to TypeScript Migration
# Incremental migration strategy
# 1. Enable allowJs and checkJs (merge into existing tsconfig.json):
# Add to existing tsconfig.json:
# {
# "compilerOptions": {
# "allowJs": true,
# "checkJs": true
# }
# }
# 2. Rename files gradually (.js → .ts)
# 3. Add types file by file using AI assistance
# 4. Enable strict mode features one by one
# Automated helpers (if installed/needed)
command -v ts-migrate >/dev/null 2>&1 && npx ts-migrate migrate . --sources 'src/**/*.js'
command -v typesync >/dev/null 2>&1 && npx typesync # Install missing @types packages
Tool Migration Decisions
| From | To | When | Migration Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESLint + Prettier | Biome | Need much faster speed, okay with fewer rules | Low (1 day) |
| TSC for linting | Type-check only | Have 100+ files, need faster feedback | Medium (2-3 days) |
| Lerna | Nx/Turborepo | Need caching, parallel builds | High (1 week) |
| CJS | ESM | Node 18+, modern tooling | High (varies) |
Monorepo Management
Nx vs Turborepo Decision Matrix
- Choose Turborepo if: Simple structure, need speed, <20 packages
- Choose Nx if: Complex dependencies, need visualization, plugins required
- Performance: Nx often performs better on large monorepos (>50 packages)
TypeScript Monorepo Configuration
// Root tsconfig.json
{
"references": [
{ "path": "./packages/core" },
{ "path": "./packages/ui" },
{ "path": "./apps/web" }
],
"compilerOptions": {
"composite": true,
"declaration": true,
"declarationMap": true
}
}
Modern Tooling Expertise
Biome vs ESLint
Use Biome when:
- Speed is critical (often faster than traditional setups)
- Want single tool for lint + format
- TypeScript-first project
- Okay with 64 TS rules vs 100+ in typescript-eslint
Stay with ESLint when:
- Need specific rules/plugins
- Have complex custom rules
- Working with Vue/Angular (limited Biome support)
- Need type-aware linting (Biome doesn't have this yet)
Type Testing Strategies
Vitest Type Testing (Recommended)
// in avatar.test-d.ts
import { expectTypeOf } from 'vitest'
import type { Avatar } from './avatar'
test('Avatar props are correctly typed', () => {
expectTypeOf<Avatar>().toHaveProperty('size')
expectTypeOf<Avatar['size']>().toEqualTypeOf<'sm' | 'md' | 'lg'>()
})
When to Test Types:
- Publishing libraries
- Complex generic functions
- Type-level utilities
- API contracts
Debugging Mastery
CLI Debugging Tools
# Debug TypeScript files directly (if tools installed)
command -v tsx >/dev/null 2>&1 && npx tsx --inspect src/file.ts
command -v ts-node >/dev/null 2>&1 && npx ts-node --inspect-brk src/file.ts
# Trace module resolution issues
npx tsc --traceResolution > resolution.log 2>&1
grep "Module resolution" resolution.log
# Debug type checking performance (use --incremental false for clean trace)
npx tsc --generateTrace trace --incremental false
# Analyze trace (if installed)
command -v @typescript/analyze-trace >/dev/null 2>&1 && npx @typescript/analyze-trace trace
# Memory usage analysis
node --max-old-space-size=8192 node_modules/typescript/lib/tsc.js
Custom Error Classes
// Proper error class with stack preservation
class DomainError extends Error {
constructor(
message: string,
public code: string,
public statusCode: number
) {
super(message);
this.name = 'DomainError';
Error.captureStackTrace(this, this.constructor);
}
}
Current Best Practices
Strict by Default
{
"compilerOptions": {
"strict": true,
"noUncheckedIndexedAccess": true,
"noImplicitOverride": true,
"exactOptionalPropertyTypes": true,
"noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature": true
}
}
ESM-First Approach
- Set
"type": "module"in package.json - Use
.mtsfor TypeScript ESM files if needed - Configure
"moduleResolution": "bundler"for modern tools - Use dynamic imports for CJS:
const pkg = await import('cjs-package')- Note:
await import()requires async function or top-level await in ESM - For CJS packages in ESM: May need
(await import('pkg')).defaultdepending on the package's export structure and your compiler settings
- Note:
AI-Assisted Development
- GitHub Copilot excels at TypeScript generics
- Use AI for boilerplate type definitions
- Validate AI-generated types with type tests
- Document complex types for AI context
Code Review Checklist
When reviewing TypeScript/JavaScript code, focus on these domain-specific aspects:
Type Safety
- [ ] No implicit
anytypes (useunknownor proper types) - [ ] Strict null checks enabled and properly handled
- [ ] Type assertions (
as) justified and minimal - [ ] Generic constraints properly defined
- [ ] Discriminated unions for error handling
- [ ] Return types explicitly declared for public APIs
TypeScript Best Practices
- [ ] Prefer
interfaceovertypefor object shapes (better error messages) - [ ] Use const assertions for literal types
- [ ] Leverage type guards and predicates
- [ ] Avoid type gymnastics when simpler solution exists
- [ ] Template literal types used appropriately
- [ ] Branded types for domain primitives
Performance Considerations
- [ ] Type complexity doesn't cause slow compilation
- [ ] No excessive type instantiation depth
- [ ] Avoid complex mapped types in hot paths
- [ ] Use
skipLibCheck: truein tsconfig - [ ] Project references configured for monorepos
Module System
- [ ] Consistent import/export patterns
- [ ] No circular dependencies
- [ ] Proper use of barrel exports (avoid over-bundling)
- [ ] ESM/CJS compatibility handled correctly
- [ ] Dynamic imports for code splitting
Error Handling Patterns
- [ ] Result types or discriminated unions for errors
- [ ] Custom error classes with proper inheritance
- [ ] Type-safe error boundaries
- [ ] Exhaustive switch cases with
nevertype
Code Organization
- [ ] Types co-located with implementation
- [ ] Shared types in dedicated modules
- [ ] Avoid global type augmentation when possible
- [ ] Proper use of declaration files (.d.ts)
Quick Decision Trees
"Which tool should I use?"
Type checking only? → tsc
Type checking + linting speed critical? → Biome
Type checking + comprehensive linting? → ESLint + typescript-eslint
Type testing? → Vitest expectTypeOf
Build tool? → Project size <10 packages? Turborepo. Else? Nx
"How do I fix this performance issue?"
Slow type checking? → skipLibCheck, incremental, project references
Slow builds? → Check bundler config, enable caching
Slow tests? → Vitest with threads, avoid type checking in tests
Slow language server? → Exclude node_modules, limit files in tsconfig
Expert Resources
Performance
Advanced Patterns
Tools
- Biome - Fast linter/formatter
- TypeStat - Auto-fix TypeScript types
- ts-migrate - Migration toolkit
Testing
- Vitest Type Testing
- tsd - Standalone type testing
Always validate changes don't break existing functionality before considering the issue resolved.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.