hunting-for-data-staging-before-exfiltration
Detect data-staging activity (MITRE ATT&CK T1074) by analyzing EDR/Sysmon process-creation and file-system telemetry (Event ID 4688, Sysmon 1/11) for 7-Zip/RAR/tar archive creation, unusual temp or hidden folder access, and anomalous consolidation of files from multiple directories. Use when hunting for pre-exfiltration staging behavior, building detection rules for archiver abuse, or validating monitoring coverage for T1074.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- hunting-for-data-staging-before-exfiltration
- tags
- [ "data-staging", "exfiltration", "t1074", "archive-detection", "edr", "threat-hunting", "dlp" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "DE.CM-01", "DE.AE-02", "DE.AE-07", "ID.RA-05" ]
- subdomain
- threat-hunting
- description
- Detect data-staging activity (MITRE ATT&CK T1074) by analyzing EDR/Sysmon process-creation and file-system telemetry (Event ID 4688, Sysmon 1/11) for 7-Zip/RAR/tar archive creation, unusual temp or hidden folder access, and anomalous consolidation of files from multiple directories. Use when hunting for pre-exfiltration staging behavior, building detection rules for archiver abuse, or validating monitoring coverage for T1074.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1046", "T1057", "T1082", "T1083", "T1048" ]
- d3fend_techniques
- [ "File Metadata Consistency Validation", "Content Format Conversion", "File Content Analysis", "Platform Hardening", "File Format Verification" ]
02 资源文件 3
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py8.7 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Hunting for Data Staging Before Exfiltration
Overview
Before exfiltrating data, adversaries typically stage collected files in a central location (MITRE ATT&CK T1074). This involves creating archives with tools like 7-Zip, RAR, or tar, consolidating files from multiple directories, and using temporary or hidden staging directories. This skill detects staging behavior by analyzing process creation logs for archiver activity, monitoring file system events in common staging paths, and identifying anomalous file consolidation patterns.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require hunting for data staging before exfiltration
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- EDR or Sysmon telemetry with process creation and file system events
- Windows Event Logs (Event ID 4688) or Sysmon Event ID 1, 11
- Python 3.8+ with standard library
- Access to process creation logs in JSON/CSV format
Steps
- Detect Archive Tool Execution — Monitor for 7z.exe, rar.exe, tar, zip, and WinRAR process creation with compression arguments
- Identify Staging Directories — Flag file writes to common staging locations (Recycle Bin, %TEMP%, ProgramData, hidden directories)
- Detect Large File Consolidation — Identify patterns of multiple file reads followed by writes to a single directory
- Monitor Sensitive Path Access — Track bulk reads from document directories, database paths, and network shares
- Analyze Archive Metadata — Extract and analyze archive file sizes, creation times, and source paths
- Score Staging Risk — Apply heuristic scoring based on archive size, source diversity, staging path suspicion, and timing
- Generate Hunt Report — Produce a structured report with staging event timeline and MITRE ATT&CK mapping
Expected Output
- JSON report of detected staging events with risk scores
- Archive creation timeline with source file analysis
- MITRE ATT&CK mapping (T1074.001, T1074.002, T1560)
- Staging directory heat map showing suspicious write activity
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.