[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6AESWXJVBHGS33XV0VYSNBW":3,"skill-same:01M6AESWXJVBHGS33XV0VYSNBW":150},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":28,"publishedAt":46,"linkOnly":47,"markdownContent":48,"markdownBody":49,"frontMatter":50,"refName":67,"commitSha":68,"skillDirectory":69,"forksCount":70,"repositoryHtmlUrl":71,"repositoryHomepageUrl":72,"ownerHtmlUrl":73,"ownerBlogUrl":74,"ownerDescription":75,"updatedAt":76,"install":77,"resources":90},"01M6AESWXJVBHGS33XV0VYSNBW","hardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark",null,"Hardens Windows endpoints using CIS (Center for Internet Security) Benchmark recommendations to reduce attack surface, enforce security baselines, and meet compliance requirements. Use when deploying new Windows workstations or servers, remediating audit findings, or establishing organization-wide security baselines. Activates for requests involving Windows hardening, CIS benchmarks, GPO security baselines, or endpoint configuration compliance.","mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills","mukul975","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F42860185?v=4","01M6ADEQR8T5M4EEG6C67BQCWF","Mahipal","01M6ADJPMYWG1E5GM1FWBE3128",35990,"Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000037","律师与法务","PROFESSION","适用职业",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45],"hardening windows endpoint with cis benchmark","windows","benchmark","hardening","endpoint","cis-benchmark","baseline-configuration","t1059","t1055","gpo","windows-security","security","endpoint-security","compliance","audit","pr","cybersecurity","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: hardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\ndescription: 'Hardens Windows endpoints using CIS (Center for Internet Security) Benchmark\n  recommendations to reduce attack surface, enforce security baselines, and meet compliance\n  requirements. Use when deploying new Windows workstations or servers, remediating\n  audit findings, or establishing organization-wide security baselines. Activates\n  for requests involving Windows hardening, CIS benchmarks, GPO security baselines,\n  or endpoint configuration compliance.\n\n  '\ndomain: cybersecurity\nsubdomain: endpoint-security\ntags:\n- endpoint\n- hardening\n- windows-security\n- CIS-benchmark\n- GPO\n- baseline-configuration\nversion: 1.0.0\nauthor: mahipal\nlicense: Apache-2.0\nnist_csf:\n- PR.PS-01\n- PR.PS-02\n- DE.CM-01\n- PR.IR-01\nmitre_attack:\n- T1055\n- T1547\n- T1059\n- T1036\n---\n# Hardening Windows Endpoint with CIS Benchmark\n\n## When to Use\n\nUse this skill when:\n- Deploying new Windows 10\u002F11 or Server 2019\u002F2022 endpoints that require security hardening\n- Establishing organization-wide security baselines using CIS Level 1 or Level 2 profiles\n- Remediating findings from compliance audits (PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2) that reference CIS benchmarks\n- Validating existing endpoint configurations against current CIS benchmark versions\n\n**Do not use** this skill for Linux endpoints (use hardening-linux-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark) or for cloud-native workloads that require CIS cloud benchmarks.\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Windows 10\u002F11 Enterprise or Windows Server 2019\u002F2022 target endpoints\n- Active Directory Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) for enterprise deployment\n- CIS-CAT Pro Assessor or CIS-CAT Lite for automated benchmark assessment\n- Administrative access to target endpoints or domain controller\n- Current CIS Benchmark PDF for the target Windows version (download from cisecurity.org)\n\n## Workflow\n\n### Step 1: Select CIS Benchmark Profile Level\n\nCIS provides two profile levels for Windows endpoints:\n\n**Level 1 (L1) - Corporate\u002FEnterprise Environment**:\n- Practical hardening settings that can be applied to most organizations\n- Minimal impact on functionality and user experience\n- Covers: password policy, audit policy, user rights, security options, Windows Firewall\n\n**Level 2 (L2) - High Security\u002FSensitive Data**:\n- Includes all L1 settings plus additional restrictions\n- May impact usability (disabling autorun, restricting remote desktop, enhanced audit logging)\n- Appropriate for systems handling PII, PHI, PCI data, or classified information\n\nSelect profile based on data classification and risk tolerance of the endpoint.\n\n### Step 2: Import CIS GPO Baselines\n\nCIS provides pre-built GPO templates (Build Kits) for each benchmark version:\n\n```powershell\n# Download CIS Build Kit from CIS WorkBench (requires CIS SecureSuite membership)\n# Extract the GPO backup to a staging directory\n\n# Import the CIS GPO into Active Directory\nImport-GPO -BackupGpoName \"CIS Microsoft Windows 11 Enterprise v3.0.0 L1\" `\n  -TargetName \"CIS-Win11-L1-Baseline\" `\n  -Path \"C:\\CIS-GPO-Backups\\Win11-Enterprise\" `\n  -CreateIfNeeded\n\n# Link GPO to target OU\nNew-GPLink -Name \"CIS-Win11-L1-Baseline\" `\n  -Target \"OU=Workstations,DC=corp,DC=example,DC=com\" `\n  -LinkEnabled Yes\n```\n\n### Step 3: Apply Key CIS Benchmark Categories\n\n**Account Policies (Section 1)**:\n```\nPassword Policy:\n  - Minimum password length: 14 characters (1.1.4)\n  - Maximum password age: 365 days (1.1.3)\n  - Password complexity: Enabled (1.1.5)\n  - Store passwords using reversible encryption: Disabled (1.1.6)\n\nAccount Lockout Policy:\n  - Account lockout threshold: 5 invalid logon attempts (1.2.1)\n  - Account lockout duration: 15 minutes (1.2.2)\n  - Reset account lockout counter after: 15 minutes (1.2.3)\n```\n\n**Local Policies - Audit Policy (Section 17)**:\n```\nAudit Policy Configuration:\n  - Audit Credential Validation: Success and Failure (17.1.1)\n  - Audit Security Group Management: Success (17.2.5)\n  - Audit Logon: Success and Failure (17.5.1)\n  - Audit Process Creation: Success (17.6.1)\n  - Audit Removable Storage: Success and Failure (17.6.4)\n```\n\n**Security Options (Section 2.3)**:\n```\n  - Interactive logon: Do not display last user name: Enabled (2.3.7.1)\n  - Interactive logon: Machine inactivity limit: 900 seconds (2.3.7.3)\n  - Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts: Enabled (2.3.10.2)\n  - Network security: LAN Manager authentication level: Send NTLMv2 response only (2.3.11.7)\n  - UAC: Run all administrators in Admin Approval Mode: Enabled (2.3.17.6)\n```\n\n**Windows Firewall (Section 9)**:\n```\n  - Domain Profile: Firewall state: On (9.1.1)\n  - Domain Profile: Inbound connections: Block (9.1.2)\n  - Private Profile: Firewall state: On (9.2.1)\n  - Public Profile: Firewall state: On (9.3.1)\n  - Public Profile: Inbound connections: Block (9.3.2)\n```\n\n### Step 4: Validate with CIS-CAT Assessment\n\n```powershell\n# Run CIS-CAT Pro Assessor against target endpoint\n# CIS-CAT produces an HTML\u002FXML report with pass\u002Ffail per recommendation\n\n.\\Assessor-CLI.bat `\n  -b \"benchmarks\\CIS_Microsoft_Windows_11_Enterprise_Benchmark_v3.0.0-xccdf.xml\" `\n  -p \"Level 1 (L1) - Corporate\u002FEnterprise Environment\" `\n  -rd \"C:\\CIS-Reports\" `\n  -nts\n\n# Review report for failed controls\n# Score target: 95%+ for L1, 90%+ for L2 (due to operational exceptions)\n```\n\n### Step 5: Document Exceptions and Compensating Controls\n\nFor each CIS recommendation that cannot be applied:\n1. Document the specific recommendation ID and title\n2. State the business justification for the exception\n3. Define the compensating control that addresses the residual risk\n4. Set a review date (quarterly) to reassess the exception\n5. Obtain sign-off from the information security officer\n\nExample exception:\n```\nRecommendation: 2.3.7.3 - Interactive logon: Machine inactivity limit: 900 seconds\nException: Kiosk systems in manufacturing floor require 1800 seconds\nCompensating Control: Physical badge-access to manufacturing area, CCTV monitoring\nReview Date: 2026-06-01\nApproved By: CISO\n```\n\n### Step 6: Continuous Compliance Monitoring\n\nConfigure recurring CIS-CAT scans via scheduled tasks or SCCM:\n```powershell\n# Create scheduled task for weekly CIS-CAT assessment\n$action = New-ScheduledTaskAction -Execute \"C:\\CIS-CAT\\Assessor-CLI.bat\" `\n  -Argument \"-b benchmarks\\CIS_Win11_v3.0.0-xccdf.xml -p Level1 -rd C:\\CIS-Reports -nts\"\n$trigger = New-ScheduledTaskTrigger -Weekly -DaysOfWeek Sunday -At 2am\n$principal = New-ScheduledTaskPrincipal -UserId \"SYSTEM\" -RunLevel Highest\nRegister-ScheduledTask -TaskName \"CIS-Benchmark-Scan\" -Action $action `\n  -Trigger $trigger -Principal $principal\n```\n\nFeed results into SIEM for drift detection and dashboard reporting.\n\n## Key Concepts\n\n| Term | Definition |\n|------|-----------|\n| **CIS Benchmark** | Consensus-based security configuration guide developed by CIS with input from government, industry, and academia |\n| **Level 1 Profile** | Practical security baseline suitable for most organizations with minimal operational impact |\n| **Level 2 Profile** | Extended security baseline for high-security environments that may reduce functionality |\n| **CIS-CAT** | CIS Configuration Assessment Tool that automates benchmark compliance checking |\n| **Build Kit** | Pre-configured GPO templates provided by CIS that implement benchmark recommendations |\n| **Scoring** | CIS recommendations are either Scored (compliance-measurable) or Not Scored (best-practice guidance) |\n\n## Tools & Systems\n\n- **CIS-CAT Pro Assessor**: Automated benchmark compliance scanner (requires CIS SecureSuite license)\n- **Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit (SCT)**: Microsoft's own GPO baselines (complementary to CIS)\n- **Group Policy Management Console (GPMC)**: Enterprise GPO deployment and management\n- **LGPO.exe**: Microsoft tool for applying GPOs to standalone (non-domain) systems\n- **Nessus\u002FTenable**: Vulnerability scanner with CIS benchmark audit files\n\n## Common Pitfalls\n\n- **Applying L2 to all endpoints**: Level 2 restrictions (disabling Autoplay, restricting Remote Desktop) break workflows on standard workstations. Reserve L2 for endpoints handling sensitive data.\n- **Not testing GPOs in pilot OU**: Deploy CIS GPOs to a test OU with representative hardware\u002Fsoftware before organization-wide rollout to avoid breaking line-of-business applications.\n- **Ignoring CIS benchmark version updates**: CIS benchmarks update with each Windows feature release. Running an outdated benchmark misses new security settings and generates false compliance reports.\n- **Forgetting local admin accounts**: CIS benchmarks assume domain-joined endpoints. Standalone systems require LGPO.exe or Microsoft Intune for baseline enforcement.\n- **No exception process**: Applying 100% of CIS recommendations is rarely feasible. Without a formal exception process, teams either ignore hardening or break applications.\n","# Hardening Windows Endpoint with CIS Benchmark\n\n## When to Use\n\nUse this skill when:\n- Deploying new Windows 10\u002F11 or Server 2019\u002F2022 endpoints that require security hardening\n- Establishing organization-wide security baselines using CIS Level 1 or Level 2 profiles\n- Remediating findings from compliance audits (PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2) that reference CIS benchmarks\n- Validating existing endpoint configurations against current CIS benchmark versions\n\n**Do not use** this skill for Linux endpoints (use hardening-linux-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark) or for cloud-native workloads that require CIS cloud benchmarks.\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Windows 10\u002F11 Enterprise or Windows Server 2019\u002F2022 target endpoints\n- Active Directory Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) for enterprise deployment\n- CIS-CAT Pro Assessor or CIS-CAT Lite for automated benchmark assessment\n- Administrative access to target endpoints or domain controller\n- Current CIS Benchmark PDF for the target Windows version (download from cisecurity.org)\n\n## Workflow\n\n### Step 1: Select CIS Benchmark Profile Level\n\nCIS provides two profile levels for Windows endpoints:\n\n**Level 1 (L1) - Corporate\u002FEnterprise Environment**:\n- Practical hardening settings that can be applied to most organizations\n- Minimal impact on functionality and user experience\n- Covers: password policy, audit policy, user rights, security options, Windows Firewall\n\n**Level 2 (L2) - High Security\u002FSensitive Data**:\n- Includes all L1 settings plus additional restrictions\n- May impact usability (disabling autorun, restricting remote desktop, enhanced audit logging)\n- Appropriate for systems handling PII, PHI, PCI data, or classified information\n\nSelect profile based on data classification and risk tolerance of the endpoint.\n\n### Step 2: Import CIS GPO Baselines\n\nCIS provides pre-built GPO templates (Build Kits) for each benchmark version:\n\n```powershell\n# Download CIS Build Kit from CIS WorkBench (requires CIS SecureSuite membership)\n# Extract the GPO backup to a staging directory\n\n# Import the CIS GPO into Active Directory\nImport-GPO -BackupGpoName \"CIS Microsoft Windows 11 Enterprise v3.0.0 L1\" `\n  -TargetName \"CIS-Win11-L1-Baseline\" `\n  -Path \"C:\\CIS-GPO-Backups\\Win11-Enterprise\" `\n  -CreateIfNeeded\n\n# Link GPO to target OU\nNew-GPLink -Name \"CIS-Win11-L1-Baseline\" `\n  -Target \"OU=Workstations,DC=corp,DC=example,DC=com\" `\n  -LinkEnabled Yes\n```\n\n### Step 3: Apply Key CIS Benchmark Categories\n\n**Account Policies (Section 1)**:\n```\nPassword Policy:\n  - Minimum password length: 14 characters (1.1.4)\n  - Maximum password age: 365 days (1.1.3)\n  - Password complexity: Enabled (1.1.5)\n  - Store passwords using reversible encryption: Disabled (1.1.6)\n\nAccount Lockout Policy:\n  - Account lockout threshold: 5 invalid logon attempts (1.2.1)\n  - Account lockout duration: 15 minutes (1.2.2)\n  - Reset account lockout counter after: 15 minutes (1.2.3)\n```\n\n**Local Policies - Audit Policy (Section 17)**:\n```\nAudit Policy Configuration:\n  - Audit Credential Validation: Success and Failure (17.1.1)\n  - Audit Security Group Management: Success (17.2.5)\n  - Audit Logon: Success and Failure (17.5.1)\n  - Audit Process Creation: Success (17.6.1)\n  - Audit Removable Storage: Success and Failure (17.6.4)\n```\n\n**Security Options (Section 2.3)**:\n```\n  - Interactive logon: Do not display last user name: Enabled (2.3.7.1)\n  - Interactive logon: Machine inactivity limit: 900 seconds (2.3.7.3)\n  - Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts: Enabled (2.3.10.2)\n  - Network security: LAN Manager authentication level: Send NTLMv2 response only (2.3.11.7)\n  - UAC: Run all administrators in Admin Approval Mode: Enabled (2.3.17.6)\n```\n\n**Windows Firewall (Section 9)**:\n```\n  - Domain Profile: Firewall state: On (9.1.1)\n  - Domain Profile: Inbound connections: Block (9.1.2)\n  - Private Profile: Firewall state: On (9.2.1)\n  - Public Profile: Firewall state: On (9.3.1)\n  - Public Profile: Inbound connections: Block (9.3.2)\n```\n\n### Step 4: Validate with CIS-CAT Assessment\n\n```powershell\n# Run CIS-CAT Pro Assessor against target endpoint\n# CIS-CAT produces an HTML\u002FXML report with pass\u002Ffail per recommendation\n\n.\\Assessor-CLI.bat `\n  -b \"benchmarks\\CIS_Microsoft_Windows_11_Enterprise_Benchmark_v3.0.0-xccdf.xml\" `\n  -p \"Level 1 (L1) - Corporate\u002FEnterprise Environment\" `\n  -rd \"C:\\CIS-Reports\" `\n  -nts\n\n# Review report for failed controls\n# Score target: 95%+ for L1, 90%+ for L2 (due to operational exceptions)\n```\n\n### Step 5: Document Exceptions and Compensating Controls\n\nFor each CIS recommendation that cannot be applied:\n1. Document the specific recommendation ID and title\n2. State the business justification for the exception\n3. Define the compensating control that addresses the residual risk\n4. Set a review date (quarterly) to reassess the exception\n5. Obtain sign-off from the information security officer\n\nExample exception:\n```\nRecommendation: 2.3.7.3 - Interactive logon: Machine inactivity limit: 900 seconds\nException: Kiosk systems in manufacturing floor require 1800 seconds\nCompensating Control: Physical badge-access to manufacturing area, CCTV monitoring\nReview Date: 2026-06-01\nApproved By: CISO\n```\n\n### Step 6: Continuous Compliance Monitoring\n\nConfigure recurring CIS-CAT scans via scheduled tasks or SCCM:\n```powershell\n# Create scheduled task for weekly CIS-CAT assessment\n$action = New-ScheduledTaskAction -Execute \"C:\\CIS-CAT\\Assessor-CLI.bat\" `\n  -Argument \"-b benchmarks\\CIS_Win11_v3.0.0-xccdf.xml -p Level1 -rd C:\\CIS-Reports -nts\"\n$trigger = New-ScheduledTaskTrigger -Weekly -DaysOfWeek Sunday -At 2am\n$principal = New-ScheduledTaskPrincipal -UserId \"SYSTEM\" -RunLevel Highest\nRegister-ScheduledTask -TaskName \"CIS-Benchmark-Scan\" -Action $action `\n  -Trigger $trigger -Principal $principal\n```\n\nFeed results into SIEM for drift detection and dashboard reporting.\n\n## Key Concepts\n\n| Term | Definition |\n|------|-----------|\n| **CIS Benchmark** | Consensus-based security configuration guide developed by CIS with input from government, industry, and academia |\n| **Level 1 Profile** | Practical security baseline suitable for most organizations with minimal operational impact |\n| **Level 2 Profile** | Extended security baseline for high-security environments that may reduce functionality |\n| **CIS-CAT** | CIS Configuration Assessment Tool that automates benchmark compliance checking |\n| **Build Kit** | Pre-configured GPO templates provided by CIS that implement benchmark recommendations |\n| **Scoring** | CIS recommendations are either Scored (compliance-measurable) or Not Scored (best-practice guidance) |\n\n## Tools & Systems\n\n- **CIS-CAT Pro Assessor**: Automated benchmark compliance scanner (requires CIS SecureSuite license)\n- **Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit (SCT)**: Microsoft's own GPO baselines (complementary to CIS)\n- **Group Policy Management Console (GPMC)**: Enterprise GPO deployment and management\n- **LGPO.exe**: Microsoft tool for applying GPOs to standalone (non-domain) systems\n- **Nessus\u002FTenable**: Vulnerability scanner with CIS benchmark audit files\n\n## Common Pitfalls\n\n- **Applying L2 to all endpoints**: Level 2 restrictions (disabling Autoplay, restricting Remote Desktop) break workflows on standard workstations. Reserve L2 for endpoints handling sensitive data.\n- **Not testing GPOs in pilot OU**: Deploy CIS GPOs to a test OU with representative hardware\u002Fsoftware before organization-wide rollout to avoid breaking line-of-business applications.\n- **Ignoring CIS benchmark version updates**: CIS benchmarks update with each Windows feature release. Running an outdated benchmark misses new security settings and generates false compliance reports.\n- **Forgetting local admin accounts**: CIS benchmarks assume domain-joined endpoints. Standalone systems require LGPO.exe or Microsoft Intune for baseline enforcement.\n- **No exception process**: Applying 100% of CIS recommendations is rarely feasible. Without a formal exception process, teams either ignore hardening or break applications.\n",{"name":5,"tags":51,"author":54,"domain":45,"license":15,"version":55,"nist_csf":56,"subdomain":41,"description":61,"mitre_attack":62},[33,32,39,52,53,35],"CIS-benchmark","GPO","mahipal","1.0.0",[57,58,59,60],"PR.PS-01","PR.PS-02","DE.CM-01","PR.IR-01","Hardens Windows endpoints using CIS (Center for Internet Security) Benchmark recommendations to reduce attack surface, enforce security baselines, and meet compliance requirements. Use when deploying new Windows workstations or servers, remediating audit findings, or establishing organization-wide security baselines. Activates for requests involving Windows hardening, CIS benchmarks, GPO security baselines, or endpoint configuration compliance.\n",[63,64,65,66],"T1055","T1547","T1059","T1036","main","54a798831d2266a3ca61ce68a7acb80b81160d57","skills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark",4395,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills","https:\u002F\u002Fmahipal.engineer\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975","Mahipal.engineer","🔐 Cybersecurity | 💻 Dev | 📷 Street Photographer\r\n🎓 MSc | 📚 Research & AI Security","2026-08-31 12:32:44",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":78,"prompt":88,"zipAvailable":89},[79,82,85],{"tool":80,"command":81},"npx","npx skills add mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill hardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark",{"tool":83,"command":84},"bunx","bunx skills add mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill hardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark",{"tool":86,"command":87},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add mukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill hardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002FSKILL.md",true,[91,97,102,108,112,116,120,124,128,132,136,140,146],{"path":92,"resourceType":93,"resourceTypeDesc":94,"sizeBytes":95,"sourceHtmlUrl":96},"assets\u002Ftemplate.md","ASSET","资产文件",2018,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002Fassets\u002Ftemplate.md",{"path":98,"resourceType":98,"resourceTypeDesc":99,"sizeBytes":100,"sourceHtmlUrl":101},"LICENSE","许可证",11255,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002FLICENSE",{"path":103,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":106,"sourceHtmlUrl":107},"references\u002Fanalytical-equipment.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",11935,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpylabrobot\u002Freferences\u002Fanalytical-equipment.md",{"path":109,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":110,"sourceHtmlUrl":111},"references\u002Fapi-reference.md",2330,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002Freferences\u002Fapi-reference.md",{"path":113,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":114,"sourceHtmlUrl":115},"references\u002Fhardware-backends.md",12944,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpylabrobot\u002Freferences\u002Fhardware-backends.md",{"path":117,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":118,"sourceHtmlUrl":119},"references\u002Fliquid-handling.md",10206,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpylabrobot\u002Freferences\u002Fliquid-handling.md",{"path":121,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":122,"sourceHtmlUrl":123},"references\u002Fmaterial-handling.md",13997,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpylabrobot\u002Freferences\u002Fmaterial-handling.md",{"path":125,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":126,"sourceHtmlUrl":127},"references\u002Fresources.md",12263,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpylabrobot\u002Freferences\u002Fresources.md",{"path":129,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":130,"sourceHtmlUrl":131},"references\u002Fstandards.md",2749,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002Freferences\u002Fstandards.md",{"path":133,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":134,"sourceHtmlUrl":135},"references\u002Fvisualization.md",13560,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpylabrobot\u002Freferences\u002Fvisualization.md",{"path":137,"resourceType":104,"resourceTypeDesc":105,"sizeBytes":138,"sourceHtmlUrl":139},"references\u002Fworkflows.md",3601,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002Freferences\u002Fworkflows.md",{"path":141,"resourceType":142,"resourceTypeDesc":143,"sizeBytes":144,"sourceHtmlUrl":145},"scripts\u002Fagent.py","SCRIPT","脚本",5789,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002Fscripts\u002Fagent.py",{"path":147,"resourceType":142,"resourceTypeDesc":143,"sizeBytes":148,"sourceHtmlUrl":149},"scripts\u002Fprocess.py",8403,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fhardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark\u002Fscripts\u002Fprocess.py",[151,176,200,227,252,279],{"skillNo":152,"name":153,"nameZh":6,"description":154,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":155,"categories":156,"keywords":158,"publishedAt":46},"01M6AGDM3HJXTKXX15ZZ0ZVCJ3","verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore","Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI\u002FCD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fverifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore\u002FSKILL.md",[157],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[159,160,161,162,40,45,163,164,44,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175],"sigstore","provenance","slsa","verifying build provenance with slsa sigstore","incident response","identity","code","artifacts","ci","supply-chain","pipeline","supply-chain-security","t1195","attestation","code-signing","cosign","keyless",{"skillNo":177,"name":178,"nameZh":6,"description":179,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":180,"categories":181,"keywords":183,"publishedAt":46},"01M6AGDGBPWYVZ2F11GFKJ4HZ9","validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation","Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote\u002Ftpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware\u002Fkernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation\u002FSKILL.md",[182],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[184,172,185,186,40,187,45,44,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199],"boot","TPM","validating tpm measured boot attestation","policy","verification","ZeRO","firmware","Tools","measured-boot","PCR","integrity","secrets","remote-attestation","tpm2-tools","integrity-verification","trusted-computing",{"skillNo":201,"name":202,"nameZh":6,"description":203,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":204,"categories":205,"keywords":210,"publishedAt":46},"01M6AGDCW0Y4FXZ3362GT1941M","validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery","Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable\u002Fair-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fvalidating-backup-integrity-for-recovery\u002FSKILL.md",[206,209],{"categoryNo":207,"categoryName":208,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[194,211,212,213,214,45,215,216,188,42,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226],"backup","recovery","validating backup integrity for recovery","testing","infrastructure","validation","hash-verification","incident-response","ransomware","cryptocurrency","detection","t1078","t1490","immutable","disaster-recovery","restore-testing",{"skillNo":228,"name":229,"nameZh":6,"description":230,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":231,"categories":232,"keywords":234,"publishedAt":46},"01M6AGD9GBG2KZ336AE763J3WH","triaging-windows-with-kape","Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment\u002Ftriage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftriaging-windows-with-kape\u002FSKILL.md",[233],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[30,235,236,45,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,191,249,250,251],"kape","triaging windows with kape","registry","browser","logs","windows-forensics","dfir","mft","mftecmd","data","prefetch","eric-zimmerman","digital-forensics","SET","collection","pecmd","artifact-collection",{"skillNo":253,"name":254,"nameZh":6,"description":255,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":256,"categories":257,"keywords":259,"publishedAt":46},"01M6AGD5PW5J4EVZM958WD74ZQ","triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework","Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track\u002FTrack*\u002FAttend\u002FAct decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftriaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework\u002FSKILL.md",[258],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[260,261,262,45,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278],"vulnerabilities","framework","triaging vulnerabilities with ssvc framework","status","planning","CISA","vulnerability-management","risk-management","nessus","qualys","openvas","cvss","remediation","risk","vulnerability","api","prioritization","ssvc","decision-tree",{"skillNo":280,"name":281,"nameZh":6,"description":282,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":283,"categories":284,"keywords":286,"publishedAt":46},"01M6AGD24TTQQM4CXG69E3B9TJ","triaging-security-incident","Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM\u002FEDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmukul975\u002FAnthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftriaging-security-incident\u002FSKILL.md",[285],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[40,287,45,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,222,296,223,297,298,299,300,301,302],"triaging security incident","siem","file","ioc","soc","NIST-800-61","NIST","severity","edr","execution","analysis","classification","severity-classification","incident-triage","SANS-PICERL","SOC-operations"]