AGENT SKILL

rust-cli-builder

Plan and build production-ready Rust CLI tools using clap for argument parsing, with subcommands, config file support, colored output, and proper error handling. Uses interview-driven planning to clarify commands, input/output formats, and distribution strategy before writing any code.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-15
Stars
★ 3.4w
Forks
4.0k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
rust-cli-builder
metadata
{ "tags": [ "rust", "cli", "clap", "terminal", "command-line", "devtools" ] }
description
Plan and build production-ready Rust CLI tools using clap for argument parsing, with subcommands, config file support, colored output, and proper error handling. Uses interview-driven planning to clarify commands, input/output formats, and distribution strategy before writing any code.

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

Rust CLI Tool Builder

When to use

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Scaffold a new Rust CLI tool from scratch with clap
  • Add subcommands to an existing CLI application
  • Implement config file loading (TOML/JSON/YAML)
  • Set up proper error handling with anyhow/thiserror
  • Add colored and formatted terminal output
  • Structure a CLI project for distribution via cargo install or GitHub releases

Phase 1: Explore (Plan Mode)

Enter plan mode. Before writing any code, explore the existing project:

If extending an existing project

  • Find Cargo.toml and check current dependencies (clap version, serde, tokio, etc.)
  • Locate the CLI entry point (src/main.rs or src/cli.rs)
  • Check if clap is using derive macros or builder pattern
  • Identify existing subcommand structure
  • Look for existing error types, config structs, and output formatting
  • Check if there's a src/lib.rs separating library logic from CLI

If starting from scratch

  • Check the workspace for any existing Rust projects or workspace Cargo.toml
  • Look for a .cargo/config.toml with custom settings
  • Check for rust-toolchain.toml to know the target Rust edition

Phase 2: Interview (AskUserQuestion)

Use AskUserQuestion to clarify requirements. Ask in rounds.

Round 1: Tool purpose and commands

Question: "What kind of CLI tool are you building?"
Header: "Tool type"
Options:
  - "Single command (like ripgrep, curl)" — One main action with flags and arguments
  - "Multi-command (like git, cargo)" — Multiple subcommands under one binary
  - "Interactive REPL (like psql)" — Persistent session with a prompt loop
  - "Pipeline tool (like jq, sed)" — Reads stdin, transforms, writes stdout

Question: "What will the tool operate on?"
Header: "Input"
Options:
  - "Files/directories" — Read, process, or generate files
  - "Network/API" — HTTP requests, TCP connections, API calls
  - "System resources" — Processes, hardware info, OS config
  - "Data streams (stdin/stdout)" — Pipe-friendly text/binary processing

Round 2: Subcommands (if multi-command)

Question: "Describe the subcommands you need (e.g., 'init', 'build', 'deploy')"
Header: "Commands"
Options:
  - "2-3 subcommands (I'll describe them)" — Small focused tool
  - "4-8 subcommands with groups" — Medium tool, may need command groups
  - "I have a rough list, help me design the API" — Collaborative command design

Round 3: Configuration and output

Question: "How should the tool be configured?"
Header: "Config"
Options:
  - "CLI flags only (Recommended)" — All config via command-line arguments
  - "Config file (TOML)" — Load defaults from ~/.config/toolname/config.toml
  - "Config file + CLI overrides" — Config file for defaults, flags override specific values
  - "Environment variables + flags" — Env vars for secrets, flags for everything else

Question: "What output format does the tool need?"
Header: "Output"
Options:
  - "Human-readable (colored text)" — Pretty terminal output with colors and formatting
  - "Machine-readable (JSON)" — Structured output for piping to other tools
  - "Both (--format flag)" — Default human, --json or --format=json for machines
  - "Minimal (exit codes only)" — Success/failure via exit code, errors to stderr

Round 4: Async and error handling

Question: "Does the tool need async operations?"
Header: "Async"
Options:
  - "No — synchronous is fine (Recommended)" — File I/O, computation, simple operations
  - "Yes — tokio (network I/O)" — HTTP requests, concurrent connections, async file I/O
  - "Yes — tokio multi-threaded" — Heavy parallelism, multiple concurrent tasks

Question: "How should errors be presented to users?"
Header: "Errors"
Options:
  - "Simple messages (anyhow) (Recommended)" — Human-readable error chains, good for most CLIs
  - "Typed errors (thiserror)" — Custom error enum with specific variants for each failure
  - "Both (thiserror for lib, anyhow for bin)" — Library code is typed, CLI wraps with anyhow

Phase 3: Plan (ExitPlanMode)

Write a concrete implementation plan covering:

  1. Project structure — Cargo.toml dependencies, src/ file layout
  2. CLI definition — clap derive structs for all commands, args, and flags
  3. Config loading — config file format and merge strategy with CLI args
  4. Core logic — main functions for each subcommand, separated from CLI layer
  5. Error types — error enum or anyhow usage, user-facing error messages
  6. Output formatting — colored output, JSON mode, progress indicators
  7. Tests — unit tests for core logic, integration tests for CLI behavior

Present via ExitPlanMode for user approval.

Phase 4: Execute

After approval, implement following this order:

Step 1: Project setup (Cargo.toml)

[package]
name = "toolname"
version = "0.1.0"
edition = "2021"
description = "Short description of the tool"

[dependencies]
clap = { version = "4", features = ["derive", "env"] }
serde = { version = "1", features = ["derive"] }
anyhow = "1"
# Add based on interview:
# thiserror = "2"              # if typed errors
# tokio = { version = "1", features = ["full"] }  # if async
# serde_json = "1"             # if JSON output
# toml = "0.8"                 # if TOML config
# colored = "2"                # if colored output
# indicatif = "0.17"           # if progress bars
# dirs = "5"                   # if config file (~/.config/)

Step 2: CLI definition with clap derive

use clap::{Parser, Subcommand};

/// Short one-line description of the tool
#[derive(Parser, Debug)]
#[command(name = "toolname", version, about, long_about = None)]
pub struct Cli {
    /// Increase verbosity (-v, -vv, -vvv)
    #[arg(short, long, action = clap::ArgAction::Count, global = true)]
    pub verbose: u8,

    /// Output format
    #[arg(long, default_value = "text", global = true)]
    pub format: OutputFormat,

    /// Path to config file
    #[arg(long, global = true)]
    pub config: Option<std::path::PathBuf>,

    #[command(subcommand)]
    pub command: Commands,
}

#[derive(Subcommand, Debug)]
pub enum Commands {
    /// Initialize a new project
    Init {
        /// Project name
        name: String,

        /// Template to use
        #[arg(short, long, default_value = "default")]
        template: String,
    },

    /// Build the project
    Build {
        /// Build in release mode
        #[arg(short, long)]
        release: bool,

        /// Target directory
        #[arg(short, long)]
        output: Option<std::path::PathBuf>,
    },

    /// Show project status
    Status,
}

#[derive(clap::ValueEnum, Clone, Debug)]
pub enum OutputFormat {
    Text,
    Json,
}

Step 3: Error handling

// With anyhow (simple approach):
use anyhow::{Context, Result};

fn load_config(path: &Path) -> Result<Config> {
    let content = std::fs::read_to_string(path)
        .with_context(|| format!("Failed to read config file: {}", path.display()))?;
    let config: Config = toml::from_str(&content)
        .context("Invalid TOML in config file")?;
    Ok(config)
}

// With thiserror (typed approach):
use thiserror::Error;

#[derive(Error, Debug)]
pub enum AppError {
    #[error("Config file not found: {path}")]
    ConfigNotFound { path: std::path::PathBuf },

    #[error("Invalid config: {0}")]
    InvalidConfig(#[from] toml::de::Error),

    #[error("Network error: {0}")]
    Network(#[from] reqwest::Error),

    #[error("{0}")]
    Custom(String),
}

Step 4: Config file loading

use serde::Deserialize;
use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};

#[derive(Deserialize, Debug, Default)]
pub struct Config {
    pub default_template: Option<String>,
    pub output_dir: Option<PathBuf>,
    // ... fields from interview
}

impl Config {
    pub fn load(explicit_path: Option<&Path>) -> anyhow::Result<Self> {
        let path = match explicit_path {
            Some(p) => p.to_path_buf(),
            None => Self::default_path(),
        };

        if !path.exists() {
            return Ok(Config::default());
        }

        let content = std::fs::read_to_string(&path)?;
        let config: Config = toml::from_str(&content)?;
        Ok(config)
    }

    fn default_path() -> PathBuf {
        dirs::config_dir()
            .unwrap_or_else(|| PathBuf::from("."))
            .join("toolname")
            .join("config.toml")
    }
}

Step 5: Colored output and formatting

use colored::Colorize;

pub struct Output {
    format: OutputFormat,
    verbose: u8,
}

impl Output {
    pub fn new(format: OutputFormat, verbose: u8) -> Self {
        Self { format, verbose }
    }

    pub fn success(&self, msg: &str) {
        match self.format {
            OutputFormat::Text => eprintln!("{} {}", "✓".green().bold(), msg),
            OutputFormat::Json => {} // JSON output goes to stdout only
        }
    }

    pub fn error(&self, msg: &str) {
        match self.format {
            OutputFormat::Text => eprintln!("{} {}", "✗".red().bold(), msg),
            OutputFormat::Json => {
                let err = serde_json::json!({"error": msg});
                println!("{}", serde_json::to_string(&err).unwrap());
            }
        }
    }

    pub fn info(&self, msg: &str) {
        if self.verbose >= 1 {
            match self.format {
                OutputFormat::Text => eprintln!("{} {}", "ℹ".blue(), msg),
                OutputFormat::Json => {}
            }
        }
    }

    pub fn data<T: serde::Serialize>(&self, data: &T) {
        match self.format {
            OutputFormat::Text => {
                // Pretty print for humans — customize per subcommand
                println!("{:#?}", data);
            }
            OutputFormat::Json => {
                println!("{}", serde_json::to_string_pretty(data).unwrap());
            }
        }
    }
}

Step 6: Main entry point

use clap::Parser;

fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
    let cli = Cli::parse();
    let config = Config::load(cli.config.as_deref())?;
    let output = Output::new(cli.format.clone(), cli.verbose);

    match cli.command {
        Commands::Init { name, template } => {
            cmd_init(&name, &template, &config, &output)?;
        }
        Commands::Build { release, output_dir } => {
            let dir = output_dir
                .or(config.output_dir.clone())
                .unwrap_or_else(|| PathBuf::from("./dist"));
            cmd_build(release, &dir, &output)?;
        }
        Commands::Status => {
            cmd_status(&config, &output)?;
        }
    }

    Ok(())
}

// If async (tokio):
// #[tokio::main]
// async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> { ... }

Step 7: Subcommand implementations

fn cmd_init(name: &str, template: &str, config: &Config, out: &Output) -> anyhow::Result<()> {
    let template = if template == "default" {
        config.default_template.as_deref().unwrap_or("default")
    } else {
        template
    };

    out.info(&format!("Using template: {}", template));

    let project_dir = Path::new(name);
    if project_dir.exists() {
        anyhow::bail!("Directory '{}' already exists", name);
    }

    std::fs::create_dir_all(project_dir)?;
    // ... scaffold project files based on template

    out.success(&format!("Created project '{}' with template '{}'", name, template));
    Ok(())
}

Step 8: Tests

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_config_default() {
        let config = Config::default();
        assert!(config.default_template.is_none());
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_config_parse_toml() {
        let toml_str = r#"
            default_template = "react"
            output_dir = "./build"
        "#;
        let config: Config = toml::from_str(toml_str).unwrap();
        assert_eq!(config.default_template.unwrap(), "react");
    }
}

// Integration tests (tests/cli.rs):
use assert_cmd::Command;
use predicates::prelude::*;

#[test]
fn test_help_flag() {
    Command::cargo_bin("toolname")
        .unwrap()
        .arg("--help")
        .assert()
        .success()
        .stdout(predicate::str::contains("Usage:"));
}

#[test]
fn test_version_flag() {
    Command::cargo_bin("toolname")
        .unwrap()
        .arg("--version")
        .assert()
        .success();
}

#[test]
fn test_init_creates_directory() {
    let dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap();
    let project_name = dir.path().join("test-project");

    Command::cargo_bin("toolname")
        .unwrap()
        .args(["init", project_name.to_str().unwrap()])
        .assert()
        .success();

    assert!(project_name.exists());
}

#[test]
fn test_init_existing_directory_fails() {
    let dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap();

    Command::cargo_bin("toolname")
        .unwrap()
        .args(["init", dir.path().to_str().unwrap()])
        .assert()
        .failure()
        .stderr(predicate::str::contains("already exists"));
}

#[test]
fn test_json_output_format() {
    Command::cargo_bin("toolname")
        .unwrap()
        .args(["--format", "json", "status"])
        .assert()
        .success()
        .stdout(predicate::str::starts_with("{"));
}

Project structure reference

toolname/
├── Cargo.toml
├── src/
│   ├── main.rs          # Entry point, CLI parsing, command dispatch
│   ├── cli.rs           # Clap derive structs (Cli, Commands, Args)
│   ├── config.rs        # Config file loading and merging
│   ├── output.rs        # Output formatting (text/JSON/colored)
│   ├── error.rs         # Error types (if using thiserror)
│   └── commands/
│       ├── mod.rs
│       ├── init.rs      # Init subcommand logic
│       ├── build.rs     # Build subcommand logic
│       └── status.rs    # Status subcommand logic
└── tests/
    └── cli.rs           # Integration tests with assert_cmd

Best practices

Separate CLI from logic

Keep clap structs and argument parsing in cli.rs. Put business logic in commands/. This makes the core logic testable without invoking the CLI.

Use stderr for status, stdout for data

Human-readable messages (progress, success, errors) go to stderr. Machine-readable data goes to stdout. This lets users pipe output cleanly: toolname status --format json | jq '.items'.

Respect NO_COLOR

Check the NO_COLOR environment variable and disable colors when set:

if std::env::var("NO_COLOR").is_ok() {
    colored::control::set_override(false);
}

Exit codes

Use meaningful exit codes: 0 for success, 1 for general errors, 2 for usage errors (clap handles this automatically).

Dev dependencies for testing

[dev-dependencies]
assert_cmd = "2"
predicates = "3"
tempfile = "3"

Checklist before finishing

  • [ ] clap derive structs have doc comments (they become --help text)
  • [ ] All subcommands have short and long descriptions
  • [ ] Config file has sensible defaults and doesn't error when missing
  • [ ] --format json outputs valid, parseable JSON to stdout
  • [ ] Errors show context (file paths, what went wrong, how to fix it)
  • [ ] Integration tests verify CLI behavior end-to-end
  • [ ] cargo clippy passes with no warnings
  • [ ] cargo fmt has been run

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w