python-patterns
Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-15
- Stars
- ★ 3.4w
- Forks
- 4.0k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- python-patterns
- description
- Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.
- allowed-tools
- Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
03 SKILL.md 正文
Python Patterns
Python development principles and decision-making for 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize patterns.
⚠️ How to Use This Skill
This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.
- ASK user for framework preference when unclear
- Choose async vs sync based on CONTEXT
- Don't default to same framework every time
1. Framework Selection (2025)
Decision Tree
What are you building?
│
├── API-first / Microservices
│ └── FastAPI (async, modern, fast)
│
├── Full-stack web / CMS / Admin
│ └── Django (batteries-included)
│
├── Simple / Script / Learning
│ └── Flask (minimal, flexible)
│
├── AI/ML API serving
│ └── FastAPI (Pydantic, async, uvicorn)
│
└── Background workers
└── Celery + any framework
Comparison Principles
| Factor | FastAPI | Django | Flask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | APIs, microservices | Full-stack, CMS | Simple, learning |
| Async | Native | Django 5.0+ | Via extensions |
| Admin | Manual | Built-in | Via extensions |
| ORM | Choose your own | Django ORM | Choose your own |
| Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |
Selection Questions to Ask:
- Is this API-only or full-stack?
- Need admin interface?
- Team familiar with async?
- Existing infrastructure?
2. Async vs Sync Decision
When to Use Async
async def is better when:
├── I/O-bound operations (database, HTTP, file)
├── Many concurrent connections
├── Real-time features
├── Microservices communication
└── FastAPI/Starlette/Django ASGI
def (sync) is better when:
├── CPU-bound operations
├── Simple scripts
├── Legacy codebase
├── Team unfamiliar with async
└── Blocking libraries (no async version)
The Golden Rule
I/O-bound → async (waiting for external)
CPU-bound → sync + multiprocessing (computing)
Don't:
├── Mix sync and async carelessly
├── Use sync libraries in async code
└── Force async for CPU work
Async Library Selection
| Need | Async Library |
|---|---|
| HTTP client | httpx |
| PostgreSQL | asyncpg |
| Redis | aioredis / redis-py async |
| File I/O | aiofiles |
| Database ORM | SQLAlchemy 2.0 async, Tortoise |
3. Type Hints Strategy
When to Type
Always type:
├── Function parameters
├── Return types
├── Class attributes
├── Public APIs
Can skip:
├── Local variables (let inference work)
├── One-off scripts
├── Tests (usually)
Common Type Patterns
# These are patterns, understand them:
# Optional → might be None
from typing import Optional
def find_user(id: int) -> Optional[User]: ...
# Union → one of multiple types
def process(data: str | dict) -> None: ...
# Generic collections
def get_items() -> list[Item]: ...
def get_mapping() -> dict[str, int]: ...
# Callable
from typing import Callable
def apply(fn: Callable[[int], str]) -> str: ...
Pydantic for Validation
When to use Pydantic:
├── API request/response models
├── Configuration/settings
├── Data validation
├── Serialization
Benefits:
├── Runtime validation
├── Auto-generated JSON schema
├── Works with FastAPI natively
└── Clear error messages
4. Project Structure Principles
Structure Selection
Small project / Script:
├── main.py
├── utils.py
└── requirements.txt
Medium API:
├── app/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── main.py
│ ├── models/
│ ├── routes/
│ ├── services/
│ └── schemas/
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml
Large application:
├── src/
│ └── myapp/
│ ├── core/
│ ├── api/
│ ├── services/
│ ├── models/
│ └── ...
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml
FastAPI Structure Principles
Organize by feature or layer:
By layer:
├── routes/ (API endpoints)
├── services/ (business logic)
├── models/ (database models)
├── schemas/ (Pydantic models)
└── dependencies/ (shared deps)
By feature:
├── users/
│ ├── routes.py
│ ├── service.py
│ └── schemas.py
└── products/
└── ...
5. Django Principles (2025)
Django Async (Django 5.0+)
Django supports async:
├── Async views
├── Async middleware
├── Async ORM (limited)
└── ASGI deployment
When to use async in Django:
├── External API calls
├── WebSocket (Channels)
├── High-concurrency views
└── Background task triggering
Django Best Practices
Model design:
├── Fat models, thin views
├── Use managers for common queries
├── Abstract base classes for shared fields
Views:
├── Class-based for complex CRUD
├── Function-based for simple endpoints
├── Use viewsets with DRF
Queries:
├── select_related() for FKs
├── prefetch_related() for M2M
├── Avoid N+1 queries
└── Use .only() for specific fields
6. FastAPI Principles
async def vs def in FastAPI
Use async def when:
├── Using async database drivers
├── Making async HTTP calls
├── I/O-bound operations
└── Want to handle concurrency
Use def when:
├── Blocking operations
├── Sync database drivers
├── CPU-bound work
└── FastAPI runs in threadpool automatically
Dependency Injection
Use dependencies for:
├── Database sessions
├── Current user / Auth
├── Configuration
├── Shared resources
Benefits:
├── Testability (mock dependencies)
├── Clean separation
├── Automatic cleanup (yield)
Pydantic v2 Integration
# FastAPI + Pydantic are tightly integrated:
# Request validation
@app.post("/users")
async def create(user: UserCreate) -> UserResponse:
# user is already validated
...
# Response serialization
# Return type becomes response schema
7. Background Tasks
Selection Guide
| Solution | Best For |
|---|---|
| BackgroundTasks | Simple, in-process tasks |
| Celery | Distributed, complex workflows |
| ARQ | Async, Redis-based |
| RQ | Simple Redis queue |
| Dramatiq | Actor-based, simpler than Celery |
When to Use Each
FastAPI BackgroundTasks:
├── Quick operations
├── No persistence needed
├── Fire-and-forget
└── Same process
Celery/ARQ:
├── Long-running tasks
├── Need retry logic
├── Distributed workers
├── Persistent queue
└── Complex workflows
8. Error Handling Principles
Exception Strategy
In FastAPI:
├── Create custom exception classes
├── Register exception handlers
├── Return consistent error format
└── Log without exposing internals
Pattern:
├── Raise domain exceptions in services
├── Catch and transform in handlers
└── Client gets clean error response
Error Response Philosophy
Include:
├── Error code (programmatic)
├── Message (human readable)
├── Details (field-level when applicable)
└── NOT stack traces (security)
9. Testing Principles
Testing Strategy
| Type | Purpose | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | Business logic | pytest |
| Integration | API endpoints | pytest + httpx/TestClient |
| E2E | Full workflows | pytest + DB |
Async Testing
# Use pytest-asyncio for async tests
import pytest
from httpx import AsyncClient
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_endpoint():
async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client:
response = await client.get("/users")
assert response.status_code == 200
Fixtures Strategy
Common fixtures:
├── db_session → Database connection
├── client → Test client
├── authenticated_user → User with token
└── sample_data → Test data setup
10. Decision Checklist
Before implementing:
- [ ] Asked user about framework preference?
- [ ] Chosen framework for THIS context? (not just default)
- [ ] Decided async vs sync?
- [ ] Planned type hint strategy?
- [ ] Defined project structure?
- [ ] Planned error handling?
- [ ] Considered background tasks?
11. Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ DON'T:
- Default to Django for simple APIs (FastAPI may be better)
- Use sync libraries in async code
- Skip type hints for public APIs
- Put business logic in routes/views
- Ignore N+1 queries
- Mix async and sync carelessly
✅ DO:
- Choose framework based on context
- Ask about async requirements
- Use Pydantic for validation
- Separate concerns (routes → services → repos)
- Test critical paths
Remember: Python patterns are about decision-making for YOUR specific context. Don't copy code—think about what serves your application best.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.